scholarly journals Teacher Experiences of Prereferral Intervention Teams from a Self-Determination Perspective

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn Gewirtz
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan S. Bennett ◽  
William P. Erchul ◽  
Hannah L. Young ◽  
Chelsea M. Bartel

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan S. Bennett ◽  
William P. Erchul ◽  
Hannah L. Young ◽  
Chelsea M. Bartel

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 130-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen D. Truscott ◽  
Celina E. Cohen ◽  
Deanna P. Sams ◽  
Kathryn J. Sanborn ◽  
Alicia J. Frank

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen D. Truscott ◽  
Gina Cosgrove ◽  
Joel Meyers ◽  
Kirsten A. Eidle-Barkman

1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Meyers ◽  
Carole T. Valentino ◽  
Joel Meyers ◽  
Michele Boretti ◽  
Donna Brent

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-70
Author(s):  
Petr Květon ◽  
Martin Jelínek

Abstract. This study tests two competing hypotheses, one based on the general aggression model (GAM), the other on the self-determination theory (SDT). GAM suggests that the crucial factor in video games leading to increased aggressiveness is their violent content; SDT contends that gaming is associated with aggression because of the frustration of basic psychological needs. We used a 2×2 between-subject experimental design with a sample of 128 undergraduates. We assigned each participant randomly to one experimental condition defined by a particular video game, using four mobile video games differing in the degree of violence and in the level of their frustration-invoking gameplay. Aggressiveness was measured using the implicit association test (IAT), administered before and after the playing of a video game. We found no evidence of an association between implicit aggressiveness and violent content or frustrating gameplay.


Crisis ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrée Fortin ◽  
Sylvie Lapierre ◽  
Jacques Baillargeon ◽  
Réal Labelle ◽  
Micheline Dubé ◽  
...  

The right to self-determination is central to the current debate on rational suicide in old age. The goal of this exploratory study was to assess the presence of self-determination in suicidal institutionalized elderly persons. Eleven elderly persons with serious suicidal ideations were matched according to age, sex, and civil status with 11 nonsuicidal persons. The results indicated that suicidal persons did not differ from nonsuicidal persons in level of self-determination. There was, however, a significant difference between groups on the social subscale. Suicidal elderly persons did not seem to take others into account when making a decision or taking action. The results are discussed from a suicide-prevention perspective.


Author(s):  
Philipp A. Freund ◽  
Annette Lohbeck

Abstract. Self-determination theory (SDT) suggests that the degree of autonomous behavior regulation is a characteristic of distinct motivation types which thus can be ordered on the so-called Autonomy-Control Continuum (ACC). The present study employs an item response theory (IRT) model under the ideal point response/unfolding paradigm in order to model the response process to SDT motivation items in theoretical accordance with the ACC. Using data from two independent student samples (measuring SDT motivation for the academic subjects of Mathematics and German as a native language), it was found that an unfolding model exhibited a relatively better fit compared to a dominance model. The item location parameters under the unfolding paradigm showed clusters of items representing the different regulation types on the ACC to be (almost perfectly) empirically separable, as suggested by SDT. Besides theoretical implications, perspectives for the application of ideal point response/unfolding models in the development of measures for non-cognitive constructs are addressed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document