scholarly journals Spectrum of adverse drug reactions and implicated drugs in a tertiary care centre: a prospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 1345
Author(s):  
Kabilan K. ◽  
Sathyanarayanan V. ◽  
R. Jammuna Rani
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Spontaneous Reporting ◽  
Causality Assessment ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Type A ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Male Predominance ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
A Prospective Study

Background: Adverse Drug Reaction(ADR) is the major limitation in providing health care to patients at a global level. It affects patient’s recovery and is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in both hospitalized and ambulatory patients. ADR can occur with any class of drugs. Early detection and evaluation of ADR is essential to reduce harm to the patients. Thus, the present study was aimed to estimate the number of ADR’s reported, analyze its spectrum and the drugs attributed to it.Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital for a period of 3 months from March 2016 to May 2016 in SRM Medical College and Hospital, Potheri. Adverse drug reactions were collected by spontaneous reporting by active and passive methods. The causality assessment of the reported ADR’s was done using Naranjo causality assessment scale.Results: A total of 38 ADR’s were reported during the study period with male predominance (58%). Most of the ADR’s (42%) were common in patients in the age group 19-39 years. More number of ADR’s were from Medicine (29%) followed by Surgery (16%) and OG (16%) departments. Most commonly affected organ systems were skin (45%) followed by GIT (24%). The drugs mostly accounted were antibiotics (55%) especially Cephalosporins (33%). Most of the reactions were type A (68%) rather than type B (32%) and thus predictable. According to Naranjo’s causality assessment, 63% of reactions were probable, 26% were possible and 11% were definite. No reactions were unlikely. Severity assessment by Modified Hartwig and Seigel scale revealed 45% ADRs to be moderate, 42% were mild and 13% were severe and life threatening.Conclusions: The study concluded that Adverse Drug Reactions are common and some of them resulted in increased healthcare cost due to need of some interventions and increased length of hospital stay. As majority of ADR is predictable (Type A), so preventable. The health system should promote the spontaneous reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions (May be done mandatory). The proper documentation and periodic reporting to regional pharmacovigilance centres to ensure drug safety.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS SPONTANEOUSLY REPORTED TO ADVERSE DRUG MONITORING CENTRE OF A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL–PROSPECTIVE STUDY

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Gajanan P. Kulkarni ◽  
Lokesh V. Patil
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Causality Assessment ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Monitoring Centre ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
A Prospective Study

Objective: To assess ADRs with reference to causative drugs, organ systems involved and seriousness of reactions.Methods: A prospective study conducted over a period of 1 y. The spontaneous adverse drug reactions reported between July 2016 and July 2017 at AMC centre BRIMS, Bidar were analyzed using Naranjo’s scale. Causality assessment of suspected drugs involved, system affected, and seriousness of reactions was assessed.Results: GIT system was most commonly involved, followed by generalized features, skin and appendages, CNS i. e, extrapyramidal system and dizziness, hearing and vestibular systems.Conclusion: Majority of the ADRs reported were mild to moderate severity and 20% can be categorized as severe reactions, which needed to treat under hospitalization

scholarly journals Adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients in a tertiary care teaching hospital: analysis of the reported cases

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 1377
Author(s):  
Althab Begum M. ◽  
Satyajit Mohapatra ◽  
R. Jamuna Rani
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Spontaneous Reporting ◽  
Causality Assessment ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
General Medicine ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital ◽  
Care Teaching ◽  
Organ Systems

Background: Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR’s) contributes to the burden of drug-related morbidity and mortality. ADRs are seen frequently in hospitals due to a variety of factors like complexity of diseases, drug interactions, polypharmacy, and possible negligence. The purpose of the study was to identify and assess ADR in various departments of a tertiary care teaching hospital.Methods: A prospective spontaneous reporting was carried out in a tertiary care teaching hospital during a period of four months from November 2016 to February 2017. All suspected spontaneous ADRs were assessed and the information was collected and analyzed by the pharmacologists for causality assessment using the Naranjo’s causality assessment scale.Results: A total of 30 ADRs were reported with female preponderance (70%). Majority of ADRs were from General Medicine and Oncology departments. The most affected organ systems were skin (80%) followed by the gastrointestinal system (13.3%). The most frequent drugs causing ADRs were antibiotics (56.3%) in which type B reactions were more compared to type A and followed by anticancer drugs (10%). The severity assessment showed that most of them were mild reactions (76.6%). Causality assessment revealed that 90% of the reactions were probable, 10% were possible and no reactions were unlikely.Conclusions: The study accomplished that ADRs are widespread and a few of them raised the healthcare expenditure due to increased hospital stay. The reporting of the ADRs to regional Pharmacovigilance centers should be encouraged to ensure drug safety.

scholarly journals Pharmacovigilance study in geriatric patients of a tertiary care hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
Rajalakshmi Rukmangathen ◽  
Vasundara Devi Brahmanapalli
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Geriatric Patients ◽  
Causality Assessment ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Organ Systems

Introduction: The aim was to assess, categorize and analyze the adverse drug reactions among geriatric patients in a tertiary care hospital.  Methods: All adverse drug reactions of geriatric patients reported at the Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Center, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, under the Pharmacovigilance programme of India, during September 2016 and January 2018 were identified and evaluated. A retrospective analysis was carried out for ADR pattern, drug groups, organ systems implicated in suspect ADR, demographic profile, causality (as per the WHO–UMC scale), severity (Hartwig and Seigel scale), and preventability (Schumock and Thornton criteria) of a said drug. Results: A total of 120 ADRs were received among geriatric patients. Most of the ADRs occurred in male geriatrics (55.83 %) and (34.2 %) occurred in the age group of 60- 64 years. Antibiotics comprised the major group of drugs causing ADRs (18.3 %). ADRs related to gastrointestinal systems were most common with 31.7 % followed by skin disorders (15 %) and central nervous system disorders (13.3 %). As per the causality assessment scale, the majority of adverse drug reactions were found to be possible (51.7 %). Conclusions: There were 60.8 % of reactions being mild and 39.2 % were moderate reactions as per severity scale. The majority of the adverse drug reactions were non-serious (33 %) and in the serious category, 27.5 % of ADRs required intervention to prevent permanent damage.

scholarly journals Adverse drug reactions in the department of dermatology at a tertiary care hospital: a prospective study

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Sujatha Sowmyanarayan ◽  
Rajeshwari K. A. ◽  
Swati Banerjee
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Acne Vulgaris ◽  
Diclofenac Sodium ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Topical Steroids ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
A Prospective Study

Background: To study cutaneous adverse drug reactions with regard to their clinical pattern. etiology, causality and severity.Methods: It was a prospective study undertaken in a 300 bedded tertiary care hospital. Patients with cutaneous ADRs presenting in Dermatology OPD were studied. Causality and severity of the adverse drug reactions were analysed and other parameters such as gender wise distribution of the ADRs and types of ADR were studied.Results: 35 cases of ADRs were enrolled for the study in the duration of Sept.2016 to May 2017. The majority of the patients were in the age group of 21-30 years (37.14%). The most common CADRs were Acne vulgaris (22.86%), followed by Fixed Drug eruption (11.43%) and Tinea cruris (8.57%). The most common class of drugs causing ADRs were topical steroids (64%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (14.29%).Conclusions: Female preponderance was seen. Topical steroids were the most offending drug followed by Diclofenac Sodium, the analgesic. Causality assessment showed a high score of Certain category. These variations may be explained by variations in drug usage patterns. The knowledge of the adverse drug reactions and the drugs causing them is essential for the clinician so that the choice of drug therapy can be made keeping these adverse drug reactions in mind.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document