Comparison between the results of bipolar hemiarthroplasty with lateral approach and posterior approach in Sanglah General Hospital in 2018: a case series

The purpose of this study was to compare the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative parameters of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty procedure using lateral approach and posterior approach in Sanglah General Hospital in 2018. Thirty-five patients diagnosed with femoral neck fracture or intertrochanter fracture underwent Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty using either lateral approach or posterior approach at our institution between January 2018 and December 2018. The primary outcome measures were postoperative complication and hip function. The secondary outcome measures were surgical time, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative haemoglobin. There were 14 patients in Lateral Approach group and 21 patients Posterior Approach group included for analysis. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding to the Harris Hip Score at 6 months follow up. Significant differences were found between Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty with Lateral Approach and Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty with Posterior Approach group in comparison of intraoperative blood loss (p<0.05) and length of stay (p<0.05). The present study concluded that both lateral and posterior approaches are comparable in terms of functional outcomes and complications. However, there is a tendency of longer hospital of length of stay and more of intraoperative blood loss using posterior approach which should be kept in mind when orthopaedic surgeon is performing a bipolar hemiarthroplasty.

Download Full-text

A comparative study between anterior and posterior approach for bipolar hemiarthroplasty in intracapsular fracture neck of femur

International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics ◽

10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20214964 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. 68

Author(s):

Johney Juneja ◽

Mohzin Asiger ◽

Ishan Sharma ◽

Vinay Joshi ◽

Ramesh Sen

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Anterior Approach ◽

Posterior Approach ◽

Femur Fracture ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Neck Of Femur ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

<ul><li>Background: The present study was undertaken to to compare the efficacy of treatment of intracapsular neck of femur fracture operated by anterior and posterior approaches.Methods: A total 100 patients of either sex, aged >65 years with intracapsular neck femur fracture were operated with hemiarthroplasty. The patients were divided into two equal groups and patients were operated alternatively one with anterior approach and the second with posterior approach. Functional outcomes were compared using Harris hip score and range of movements assessed clinically. Hip function and final outcome measures were noted and compared between two groups.Results: The mean age of patients was 63.1±5.3 years in group A and 65.8±5.4 years in group B with female to male ratio was 1.7:1 for group A and 1.8:1 for group B. Operating time for group A and for group B was 65 and 78 minutes respectively. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 120 ml in group A and 150 ml in group B. The most common complication in both the groups were infection and rate in group A was 9.70% and in group B was 13.50%. Posterior approach carried an increased risk of prosthetic dislocation as compared to anterior approach. There was no intraoperative mortality seen in follow up period.Conclusions: Anterior approach for hip hemiarthroplasty in elderly population with intracapsular femoral neck fractures provided significant benefit in early postoperative period when compared to the posterior approach in terms of duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, time of recovery, hip dislocation rate.</li></ul>

Download Full-text

Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy (LSPDP) with Preservation of Splenic Vessels: An Inferior-Posterior Approach

Gastroenterology Research and Practice ◽

10.1155/2018/1683719 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2018 ◽

pp. 1-7 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Yong Fei Hua ◽

Dipesh Kumar Yadav ◽

Xueli Bai ◽

Tingbo Liang

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Distal Pancreatectomy ◽

Splenic Artery ◽

Posterior Approach ◽

Operative Time ◽

The Other ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Spleen Preserving ◽

Splenic Vessels ◽

Approach Group

Objective. To summarize the operation experience of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) with preservation of splenic vessels by an inferior-posterior dissection of the pancreatic body and evaluate its feasibility. Methods. Patients undergoing LSPDS at Ningbo Li Huili Hospital and Ningbo Li Huili Eastern Hospital from January 2014 to April 2017 were recruited in this study and were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: the inferior-posterior approach group and the other approach group. We sought to compare outcomes of the two groups. Results. The LSPDP procedure was completed successfully in 49 cases, and 48 patients had their splenic artery and vein preserved, including 26 cases in the inferior-posterior approach group and 22 cases in the other approach group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to age (p=0.18), sex (p=0.56), preoperative diabetes (p=1.00), ASA grading (p=1.00), tumor size (p=0.91), intraoperative blood loss (t=−0.01, p=0.99), hospital stay (t=−0.02, p=0.98), and pancreatic fistula rates (p=1.00). Patients undergoing LSPDP by the inferior-posterior approach had a shorter operative time (t=−4.13, p<0.001) than the other approach group. Conclusions. LSPDS by the inferior-posterior approach associated with shorter operative time is safe and feasible.

Download Full-text

Comparison between the results of proximal femur nail anti-rotation and cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in Sanglah Hospital in 2016

International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences ◽

10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20193931 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 (9) ◽

pp. 3475

Author(s):

Wayan Suryanto Dusak ◽

Herryanto Agustriadi Simanjuntak ◽

I Gusti Ngurah Paramartha Wijaya Putra

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Postoperative Complication ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Surgical Trauma ◽

Transfusion Rate ◽

Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Surgical Time

Background: Hemiarthroplasty is now being considered as a primary treatment for comminuted unstable type of IT fracture in elderly on the grounds that it allows early mobilization and full weight bearing. Recently popular modality is fourth generation of intramedullary nails like the Proximal Femoral Nails. The goal of treatment is restoring mobility safely and efficiently, while minimizing the risk of medical complications and technical failure.Methods: A Forty patients, having Intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA or cemented BH at our institution between April 2016 and April 2017. The primary outcomes measures were postoperative complication and hip function. The secondary outcome measures were intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, surgical time, postoperative haemoglobin and hospital stay.Results: Seventeen patients in PFNA group and 23 patients in BH group were included for analysis. There were no significant differences between the two group regarding to the Harris Hip Score at 6 months follow up. Significant differences were found between PFNA and BH group in comparison of intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001), length of stay (p = 0.006), surgical time (p < 0.001), postoperative transfusion (p < 0.001), and decrease of hemoglobin (p=0.001).Conclusions: These findings indicate that PFNA has obvious advantages over the BH in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in case of surgical trauma and postoperative complication.

Download Full-text

Benefit of lag screw placement by a single- or two-screw nailing system in elderly patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures

Journal of International Medical Research ◽

10.1177/03000605211003766 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 49 (3) ◽

pp. 030006052110037

Author(s):

Fulong Zhao ◽

Lijuan Guo ◽

Xuefei Wang ◽

Yakui Zhang

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Fracture Healing ◽

Healing Time ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Trochanteric Fractures ◽

Surgical Time ◽

Gamma3 Nail ◽

Intertan Nail

Objective To retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes of two intramedullary fixation devices, the INTERTAN nail and Gamma3 nail, for treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Methods In total, 165 elderly patients underwent treatment for AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures in our hospital from June 2017 to June 2018 (INTERTAN group, n = 79; Gamma3 group, n = 86). All patients underwent radiological and clinical investigations and were followed up for an average of 12 months. Age, sex, fracture type, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The surgical time was significantly shorter and the intraoperative blood loss volume was significantly lower in the Gamma3 than INTERTAN group (58.2 ± 2.5 vs. 81.7 ± 14.2 minutes and 170 ± 29 vs. 220 ± 16 mL, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in the reduction quality, hospital stay, fracture healing time, Harris hip score, postoperative complications, or 1-year postoperative mortality. Conclusion Both INTERTAN and Gamma3 nails may be effective for surgical treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures in elderly patients. However, the Gamma3 nail was superior to the INTERTAN nail in terms of surgical time and intraoperative blood loss.

Download Full-text

SHALL IT BE BETTER, AS AN APPROACH FOR THR, POSTERIORLY OR LATERALLY; A CLINICO-FUNCTIONAL AND GAIT ANALYTICAL OUTCOME ANALYSIS, IN A PROSPECTIVE STUDY, IN THE SOUTH-INDIAN POPULATION.

10.36106/7014294 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 71-75

Author(s):

Arun Kumar C ◽

Ganashree S ◽

Arivoli S ◽

Aswath C A ◽

Rakesh Kumar B ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prospective Study ◽

Total Hip Replacement ◽

Hip Replacement ◽

Posterior Approach ◽

Lateral Approach ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

South Indian Population ◽

Total Hip ◽

South Indian

Introduction: Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) or Total hip replacement (THR), as it is popularly called, attempts to mollify these basic clinical problems, in patients with a hip arthritic problem, which may be of a sequela to age-related degeneration, osteonecrosis, systemic disorder like Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or Ankylosing spondylosis (AS) or as a result of trauma and or an old infection. The basic pathology, is an unfavourable and abrading hip diarthrodial joint. The endeavour of the study was, to establish the efcacy of the Posterior vs Lateral approach for THA/THR, by studying their outcomes in primary THR. This prospective study was undertaken at Che Materials And Methods: ttinad Hospital and Research Institute (CARE), Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu district, Tamilnadu, In the Department of Orthopaedics from Jan 2017 to Dec 2020 (48 months). The Functional outcome of hip surgery was measured using the Harris Hip Score, Oxford hip score and the WOMAC. Rivermead visual gait analysis (RVGA) method was used post-operatively to assess the gait. The Biomechanical outcomes of Abductor Gait Component, were individually assessed by EMG studies. The Harris Hip Score, The Oxford Hip S Results: core and WOMAC score, when the lateral approach was compared to the posterior approach pre-op and post-op in the 12 months minimum follow-up period, the laterally approached group faired better. The VAS score was equivocal. The comprehensive RVGA assessment also showed marginally better results for the laterally approached group as was the case with the Trendelenburg test score. The EMG studies for the Gluteus Maximus, Medius and the lateral rotators of hip also favoured the outcomes for the laterally approach hips. The supremacy of the Lateral Approach, ove Conclusion: r Posterior Approach, cannot be adjudged in a short-term follow-up study. It is thus opined that the Lateral Approach may be statistically and data wise superior, but the patient satisfaction, which is a major factor, is almost the same in both the approach groups. The follow-up needs to be atleast for a decade for us to be able to come to any meaningful conclusion. With regards to surgery like the Total hip replacement, which have a longevity factor exceeding 10 years, studies have to be followed up for periods in excess of 10 years.

Download Full-text

Surgery for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis a multicentre, retrospective study

10.21203/rs.2.13914/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Yanping Zeng ◽

Peng Cheng ◽

Jiulin Tan ◽

Zhilin Li ◽

Yuan Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Posterior Approach ◽

Spinal Tuberculosis ◽

Surgical Techniques ◽

Operation Time ◽

Thoracolumbar Junction ◽

Group A ◽

The Mean ◽

Group B ◽

Approach Group

Abstract Purpose A multicentre, retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different surgical techniques for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis. Methods The medical records of thoracolumbar junction tuberculosis patients (n = 257) from January 2005 to January 2015 were collected and reviewed. A total of 45 patients were operated on by an anterior approach (Group A), 52 by a combined anterior and posterior approach (Group B) and 160 by a posterior approach (Group C). Anti-tuberculosis therapy was performed both before and after surgery. Clinical outcomes, laboratory indexes and radiological results of the three groups were compared. Results All three surgical approaches achieved bone fusion, pain relief and neurological recovery. The mean loss of correction in group A at last follow-up was higher than in groups B and C (P < 0.05), and the difference between groups B and C was not significant (P > 0.05). The mean operation time and blood loss in group B were greater than in groups A and C. Conclusions For patients with thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis, the posterior-only approach is superior to the anterior-only approach in the correction of kyphosis and maintenance of spinal stability. The posterior-only approach is recommended because it achieves the same efficacy as the anterior-only or combined approach but with shorter operation times, less trauma and less blood loss. Keywords Spinal tuberculosis; Thoracolumbar junction; Three approaches.

Download Full-text

Genitofemoral Nerve Protection During the Lateral Retroperitoneal Transpsoas Approach

Operative Neurosurgery ◽

10.1227/01.neu.0000431473.49042.95 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 73 (2) ◽

pp. ons192-ons197 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Gabriel C. Tender ◽

Daniel Serban

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Operative Time ◽

Femoral Nerve ◽

Psoas Muscle ◽

Lateral Approach ◽

Direct Visualization ◽

Genitofemoral Nerve ◽

Estimated Blood Loss

Abstract BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal approach for lumbar fusions is a novel technique with good results, but also with significant sensory and motor complications. OBJECTIVE: To present the early results of a modified surgical technique, in which the psoas muscle is dissected under direct visualization. METHODS: Thirteen consecutive patients with L4-5 or L3-4 pathology were prospectively followed after being treated using a minimally invasive lateral approach with direct exposure of the psoas muscle before dissection. There were 7 woman and 6 men with a mean age of 52.3 years. Perioperative parameters like operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay, were noted. Pain, paresthesia, and motor weakness, as well as any other complications, were evaluated at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay were 163 minutes, 126 mL, and 3 days, respectively. One patient exhibited anterior thigh pain and paresthesia at 2 weeks, both of which resolved by 3 months. Two patients experienced superficial wound infections that healed with antibiotics. The genitofemoral nerve was identified and protected in 7 patients; in 4 patients, it had a more posterior anatomic location than expected. The femoral nerve was not exposed or detected in the operative field by neuromonitoring, nor were there any symptoms related to a femoral nerve injury in any patient. CONCLUSION: Dissection of the psoas muscle under direct visualization during the minimally invasive lateral approach may provide increased safety to the genitofemoral and femoral nerves.

Download Full-text

Patient-reported results of simultaneous direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasties performed in the same patients

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology ◽

10.1186/s10195-021-00611-w ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Zhi Yang ◽

Shuo Feng ◽

Kai-Jin Guo ◽

Guo-Chun Zha

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Anterior Approach ◽

Operative Time ◽

Direct Anterior Approach ◽

Hip Pain ◽

Posterolateral Approach ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Total Hip ◽

Patient Reported

Abstract Background Several studies have compared clinical results of the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the posterolateral approach (PLA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, the effect of the surgical approach on outcome of THA remains controversial. Most of these studies used two distinct groups of patients, and THAs were performed by different surgeons, using different designs of prosthesis. These confounding factors may limit the strength of the conclusions. The purpose of this prospective, simultaneous bilateral randomized study was to investigate whether patients would perceive the difference between the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the posterolateral approach (PLA) after THA. Materials and methods Among 20 patients scheduled to undergo same-day bilateral THA between October 2017 and August 2019, one hip was randomly assigned to DAA and the other to PLA. Patient-reported outcome measures [Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), patients’ hip pain on mobilization] and physician-assessed measures [Harris Hip Score (HHS), operative time, intraoperative blood loss, cup abduction, cup anteversion, stem orientation, and incidence of complications (intraoperative fracture, nerve damage, incisional problem, or postoperative dislocation)] were compared. Results All patients were followed up for 12 months. Hip pain was significantly less with DAA-THA compared with PLA-THA at postoperative 1, 3, and 7 days (p < 0.05). There was no clinical difference between DAA-THA and PLA-THA in terms of the VAS, HOOS, or HSS at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (p > 0.05). DAA-THA had a longer operative time and shorter length of incision compared with PLA-THA. There was no statistical difference between DAA-THA and PLA-THA in terms of intraoperative blood loss, cup abduction, cup anteversion, stem orientation, and perioperative complications (p > 0.05). Conclusions This study demonstrates that DAA-THA and PLA-THA could provide comparable HHS and HOOS at all follow-ups. Compared with PLA-THA, DAA-THA is associated with less hip pain within postoperative 7 days and shorter incision length, but longer operative time. Level of evidence Level I, therapeutic study. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trail Registry, ChiCTR1800019816. Registered 30 November 2018—retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=30863

Download Full-text

Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimal invasive superpath approach and conventional posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics ◽

10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20211598 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (3) ◽

pp. 431

Author(s):

Carlos B. Branco ◽

Rita M. Sousa ◽

Diogo Sousa ◽

Joao Reis ◽

Andre Guimaraes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Total Hip Replacement ◽

Hip Replacement ◽

Posterior Approach ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Short Term ◽

Total Hip ◽

The Third ◽

Posterior Group ◽

Approach Group

Background: The objective of current study was to compare the short-term outcomes between a cohort of patients that undergone total hip replacement by a superpath technique at the beginning of the surgeon's learning curve, and a cohort of patients that undergone a total hip replacement by a conventional posterior approach.Methods: A cohort of 22 patients was prospectively and randomly selected for being part of a superpath approach group or a conventional posterior approach group. Clinical evaluation was performed in two primary end-points - the third post-operative day and the first month after surgery - using physical exams as the “20 meter walking test” and the “30 seconds sit to stand test”, the Harris hip score, the visual analogue scale for pain. Radiological evaluation was also performed.Results: 11 patients underwent the superpath approach and 11 patients underwent the conventional posterior approach. The surgery time was 78.2 min in the superpath group and 59.4 min in the posterior group. The average hospital stay was 3.4 days in the superpath group and 5.3 days in the posterior group. When assessing pain improvement through VAS, it was found that both on the third postoperative day and on the first postoperative month, patients in the superpath group showed greater improvement. There were no differences in functional results with statistical significance. No complications were seen in both groups.Conclusions: Despite the longer surgical time seen with the superpath approach, it managed to significantly decrease the length of hospital stay and obtained better results in improving pain in the short term.

Download Full-text

LONG VERSUS SHORT PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL IN THE MANAGEMENT OF UNSTABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES IN ELDERLY POPULATION

10.36106/ijsr/6804321 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 45-47

Author(s):

Ravindra Prasad ◽

L B Manjhi

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Postoperative Complication ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Failure Rate ◽

Elderly Population ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Surgical Duration ◽

Cephalomedullary Nails

INTRODUCTION: Intertrochanteric fractures constitute a vast majority of geriatric orthopedic trauma having highest postoperative morbidity and mortality of surgically treated fractures. Use of cephalomedullary nails for treatment of highly unstable intertrochanteric fractures is now more common as plate xation is associated with higher risk of implant breakage and screw cutout. However, choice of length of these nails remains surgeon dependent. AIM: to compare the functional outcome and complications associated with the use of Long and Short PFN for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTAtype 31A1 and 31A2) in elderly population. METHOD: A prospective interventional study comprising of 58 patients distributed in two groups in which one group (n=25) was treated with long PFN while other group (n=33) was operated with short PFN. Parameters compared between these two groups included demographic data, intraoperative blood loss and surgical duration as well as analysis of radiological and clinical progression of union and postoperative complications in the form of hip pain, anterior thigh pain and failure rate. Functional assessment was done using Harris hip score. RESULT:This study included only AO/OTAtype 31A1 and 31A2 fracture types in elderly patients above 60 years of age. We found no statistically signicant difference with regard to age, sex as well as fracture type among two groups. Long PFN group had a shorter union time (11.4 weeks) and was associated with lesser postoperative complication and failure rate as compared to short PFN. Also, functional outcome evaluated using Harris hip score shown better scores in long PFN group. However, intraoperative blood loss and surgical duration was found to be signicantly lesser in short PFN group. CONCLUSION: use of cephalomedullary nails either short or long for xation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures particularly AO/OTA type 31A1 and 31A2 provides good results. However, longer nails should be preferred over short nails as these are associated with less postoperative complication such as hip pain or anterior thigh pain owing to excessive curvature of femur in Indian population with lesser union time and better functional outcome as compared to short PFN. Shorter nails may be used in cases of sick and polytrauma patients where shorter operative time with minimal blood loss is desirable

Download Full-text