scholarly journals Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimal invasive superpath approach and conventional posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 431
Author(s):  
Carlos B. Branco ◽  
Rita M. Sousa ◽  
Diogo Sousa ◽  
Joao Reis ◽  
Andre Guimaraes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
The Third ◽  
Posterior Group ◽  
Approach Group

<p><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of current study was to compare the short-term outcomes between a cohort of patients that undergone total hip replacement by a superpath technique at the beginning of the surgeon's learning curve, and a cohort of patients that undergone a total hip replacement by a conventional posterior approach.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> A cohort of 22 patients was prospectively and randomly selected for being part of a superpath approach group or a conventional posterior approach group. Clinical evaluation was performed in two primary end-points - the third post-operative day and the first month after surgery - using physical exams as the “20 meter walking test” and the “30 seconds sit to stand test”, the Harris hip score, the visual analogue scale for pain. Radiological evaluation was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> 11 patients underwent the superpath approach and 11 patients underwent the conventional posterior approach. The surgery time was 78.2 min in the superpath group and 59.4 min in the posterior group. The average hospital stay was 3.4 days in the superpath group and 5.3 days in the posterior group. When assessing pain improvement through VAS, it was found that both on the third postoperative day and on the first postoperative month, patients in the superpath group showed greater improvement. There were no differences in functional results with statistical significance. No complications were seen in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Despite the longer surgical time seen with the superpath approach, it managed to significantly decrease the length of hospital stay and obtained better results in improving pain in the short term.</p>

SHALL IT BE BETTER, AS AN APPROACH FOR THR, POSTERIORLY OR LATERALLY; A CLINICO-FUNCTIONAL AND GAIT ANALYTICAL OUTCOME ANALYSIS, IN A PROSPECTIVE STUDY, IN THE SOUTH-INDIAN POPULATION.

2021 ◽  
pp. 71-75
Author(s):  
Arun Kumar C ◽  
Ganashree S ◽  
Arivoli S ◽  
Aswath C A ◽  
Rakesh Kumar B ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
South Indian Population ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
South Indian

Introduction: Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) or Total hip replacement (THR), as it is popularly called, attempts to mollify these basic clinical problems, in patients with a hip arthritic problem, which may be of a sequela to age-related degeneration, osteonecrosis, systemic disorder like Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or Ankylosing spondylosis (AS) or as a result of trauma and or an old infection. The basic pathology, is an unfavourable and abrading hip diarthrodial joint. The endeavour of the study was, to establish the efcacy of the Posterior vs Lateral approach for THA/THR, by studying their outcomes in primary THR. This prospective study was undertaken at Che Materials And Methods: ttinad Hospital and Research Institute (CARE), Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu district, Tamilnadu, In the Department of Orthopaedics from Jan 2017 to Dec 2020 (48 months). The Functional outcome of hip surgery was measured using the Harris Hip Score, Oxford hip score and the WOMAC. Rivermead visual gait analysis (RVGA) method was used post-operatively to assess the gait. The Biomechanical outcomes of Abductor Gait Component, were individually assessed by EMG studies. The Harris Hip Score, The Oxford Hip S Results: core and WOMAC score, when the lateral approach was compared to the posterior approach pre-op and post-op in the 12 months minimum follow-up period, the laterally approached group faired better. The VAS score was equivocal. The comprehensive RVGA assessment also showed marginally better results for the laterally approached group as was the case with the Trendelenburg test score. The EMG studies for the Gluteus Maximus, Medius and the lateral rotators of hip also favoured the outcomes for the laterally approach hips. The supremacy of the Lateral Approach, ove Conclusion: r Posterior Approach, cannot be adjudged in a short-term follow-up study. It is thus opined that the Lateral Approach may be statistically and data wise superior, but the patient satisfaction, which is a major factor, is almost the same in both the approach groups. The follow-up needs to be atleast for a decade for us to be able to come to any meaningful conclusion. With regards to surgery like the Total hip replacement, which have a longevity factor exceeding 10 years, studies have to be followed up for periods in excess of 10 years.

scholarly journals Uncemented versus cemented arthroplasty after metal-on-metal total hip replacement in patients with femoral neck fractures: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 030006052110122
Author(s):  
Wenlu Liu ◽  
Huanyi Lin ◽  
Xianshang Zeng ◽  
Meiji Chen ◽  
Weiwei Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Metal On Metal

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of primary metal-on-metal total hip replacement (MoM-TR) converted to uncemented total hip replacement (UTR) or cemented total hip replacement (CTR) in patients with femoral neck fractures (AO/OTA: 31B/C). Methods Patient data of 234 UTR or CTR revisions after primary MoM-TR failure from March 2007 to January 2018 were retrospectively identified. Clinical outcomes, including the Harris hip score (HHS) and key orthopaedic complications, were collected at 3, 6, and 12 months following conversion and every 12 months thereafter. Results The mean follow-up was 84.12 (67–100) months for UTR and 84.23 (66–101) months for CTR. At the last follow-up, the HHS was better in the CTR- than UTR-treated patients. Noteworthy dissimilarities were correspondingly detected in the key orthopaedic complication rates (16.1% for CTR vs. 47.4% for UTR). Statistically significant differences in specific orthopaedic complications were also detected in the re-revision rate (10.3% for UTR vs. 2.5% for CTR), prosthesis loosening rate (16.3% for UTR vs. 5.9% for CTR), and periprosthetic fracture rate (12.0% for UTR vs. 4.2% for CTR). Conclusion In the setting of revision of failed primary MoM-TR, CTR may demonstrate advantages over UTR in improving functional outcomes and reducing key orthopaedic complications.

scholarly journals Changes in Invasiveness and Latent Infection Rate Associated with Switching the Approach in Total Hip Replacement

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 117954412110313
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Kijima ◽  
Kenji Tateda ◽  
Shin Yamada ◽  
Satoshi Nagoya ◽  
Masashi Fujii ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Latent Infection ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Bleeding Volume ◽  
Muscle Sparing

Purpose: Muscle-sparing approaches for total hip replacement (THR) involve learning curves. This study aimed to clarify changes in invasiveness and infection rate with changes in approach. Methods: One surgeon changed the approach of THR from Dall’s approach (Dall) to anterolateral modified Watson-Jones approach (OCM). Another changed from Dall to a direct anterior approach (DAA). Another 3 surgeons changed from posterolateral approach (PL) to OCM. Subjects were 150 cases, comprising the last 25 cases with conventional approaches and the first 25 cases with new approaches (Dall to OCM: 25 + 25; Dall to DAA: 25 + 25; PL to OCM: 25 + 25 cases). Differences in operative time, bleeding volume, hospital stay, haemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, creatine kinase (CK) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were investigated. Results: In the change from Dall to OCM, only hospital stay decreased. In the change from Dall to DAA, hospital stay and CRP decreased, but bleeding volume increased. In the change from PL to OCM, operative time, CRP and CK decreased, but Hb also decreased. Cases with lymphocyte count <1000/μL or lymphocytes comprising <10% of total white blood cells at around day 4 after surgery were defined as latent infection cases. In these cases, operative time was longer, Hb was lower and CK was higher. Conclusion: Introducing muscle-sparing approaches improved many markers of invasiveness, but some items deteriorated. In the early stages of introducing a new approach, choosing cases without obesity and without high muscle volume may reduce the risk of infection.

scholarly journals A study to assess functional outcome of cemented and uncemented total hip replacement in a tertiary care center

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 828
Author(s):  
Kunal Ajitkumar Shah ◽  
Mohan Madhav Desai
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Total hip replacement (THR) is the most successful and cost effective treatment with aim of pain relief and functional rehabilitation for hip disorders. As the implant designs of THR have evolved over time, the functional outcome and survivorship has improved. Even after so many advancements, it remains unclear that which implants are better, uncemented or cemented. Hence, we took up this study to analyze which of the uncemented or cemented THR have better functional outcome.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This was a longitudinal study conducted during 2014 to 2018. Hundred cases were randomized into groups of 50 each. All patients with age between 55-80 years in whom THR was indicated were included in the study. Uncemented THR was done in Group A and cemented THR was done in Group B. Patients were followed up at 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 3 years. At follow-up, functional examination in terms of visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Harris hip score (HHS) was done.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The mean age of patients in Group A (uncemented) and Group B (cemented) was 62.5 years and 60 years respectively. We found that the difference of VAS score and HHS between Group A and B was statistically significant at 12 weeks and 6 months. The difference of VAS and HHS scores between Group A and B at 12 months and 3 years was not significant.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> We conclude that cemented THR has better functional outcome at short term. They are cost effective option at age ≥55-60 years.</p>

scholarly journals Gait Analysis after Unilateral Total Hip Replacement Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-466
Author(s):  
Sadiq J. Hamandi ◽  
Marwa Azzawi ◽  
Waleed Abdulwahed
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Gait Dynamics ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Normal Ranges ◽  
Gait Parameters

Total hip replacement (THR) is an elective surgical procedure with the primary indication being pain relief. The aim of this study is to analyze gait dynamics for patients after they underwent a unilateral THR surgery and compare it with normal parameters. To investigate the gait dynamics a gait analysis was performed on five patients after they underwent a unilateral THR surgery; only two of them were examined before the surgery. The gait analysis was performed using a digital video camera with two force plates. Kinematics data were obtained from 2D trajectories of seven passive markers using SkillSpector software. MATLAB software has been used for inverse dynamics computation. General gait parameters, Harris Hip Score, joints’ angles, forces, moments and powers were obtained during gait cycle. It was found that the average of improvement in Harris Hip Score (for four patients who were examined 1.5, 2.5, 3 and 9 months after surgery) is 61.8 points, which is an indication of pain relief. In the other hand, the general gait parameters were found slightly lower than normal after THR surgery. The average hip reaction force was found to be 2.988 N/BW, which is within normal range. Also, the average of maximum hip extension and maximum hip flexion angles were found to be 25.69 and -13.524 degree respectively, which both are within normal ranges. Furthermore, hip, knee and ankle moments and powers results showed some abnormality. Therefore as a conclusion, patient satisfaction and functional improvement are not related to general gait parameter. And it is not unusual that gait mechanics improvement would not reach normal after months of recovery. Also, the results of gait dynamics which are from the engineer’s perspective are compatible with Harris Hip Score, which is from the physician’s perspective, in quantifying surgical results and subsequent recovery progress.

Complications and radiographic findings following cemented total hip replacement

2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 172-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. S. Gilley ◽  
F. S. Shofer ◽  
A. S. Kapatkin ◽  
M. S. Bergh
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Radiographic Appearance ◽  
Radiographic Findings ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Technical Errors ◽  
Radiographic Changes

SummaryCemented total hip replacement (cTHR) is commonly performed to treat intractable coxofemoral pain in dogs. While owners generally perceive a good outcome after the procedure, the longevity of the implant may be limited by complications such as infection and aseptic loosening. The objective of this retrospective study was to identify the prevalence of complications and radiographic changes following cTHR, and to identify factors that may predispose to a need for revision surgery. Medical records and radiographs from 97 dogs that underwent cTHR were evaluated for signalment, preoperative degree of osteoarthritis, technical errors, intra-operative culture results, and the post-operative radiographic appearance of the implant. The complications occurring in the intra-operative and short-term (<eight week) periods, and the radiographic appearance of the implant in the long-term (>eight week) time period were recorded. Mean (±SD) follow-up time was 1.1 ± 1.6 years (range: 0–7.7 years). Seven dogs had a short-term complication and a revision surgery was performed in eleven dogs. Osseous or cement changes were radiographically detectable in the majority of cTHR. Eccentric positioning of the femoral stem and the presence of radiolucent lines at the femoral cement-bone interface were positively associated with the occurrence of revision surgery. The clinical significance of the periprosthetic radiographic changes is unclear and further investigation is warranted.

Short-Term Clinical Assessment of Hip Hemi-Arthroplasty in 11 Dogs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renée Huggard ◽  
Grace Wicks ◽  
Gordon Corfield
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Salvage Procedure ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Pelvic Radiography ◽  
Hemi Arthroplasty

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to assess the short-term clinical outcome in dogs following a hip hemi-arthroplasty for the treatment of primary pathological disorders of the hip and as a salvage procedure following failure of the cup component of a total hip replacement. Materials and Methods Medical records of dogs that had a unilateral hip hemi-arthroplasty performed between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed. Data collected included follow-up orthopaedic examinations performed at 0, 2, 8 and 52 weeks postoperatively, pelvic radiography at 0, 8 and 52 weeks postoperatively and an owner questionnaire (Helsinki chronic pain index [HCPI]). Results Eleven unilateral hip hemi-arthroplasty procedures were identified. The median age at time of surgery was 3.6 years (8 months–10 years) and the median follow-up time was 13 months (range: 2 months–3 years). The HCPI for all dogs at follow-up was median 8 ± 7.30 (range: 5–25). Total HCPI was < 12 for 7/10 dogs and ≥ 12 for 3 dogs. Pelvic radiographs at 1 year confirmed osteointergration of the femoral stem implant and no evidence of implant subsidence or progression of osteoarthritis. However, there was some evidence of mild lucency of the acetabular bed around the prosthetic femoral head and mild peri-acetabular sclerosis in four cases. Conclusion Hip hemi-arthroplasty provides a clinically acceptable treatment for disabling disease of the coxofemoral joint with 10/11 patients achieving acceptable short-term clinical function. Long-term assessment of the hip hemi-arthroplasty and comparison with total hip replacement is indicated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document