Benefit of lag screw placement by a single- or two-screw nailing system in elderly patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures

Objective To retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes of two intramedullary fixation devices, the INTERTAN nail and Gamma3 nail, for treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Methods In total, 165 elderly patients underwent treatment for AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures in our hospital from June 2017 to June 2018 (INTERTAN group, n = 79; Gamma3 group, n = 86). All patients underwent radiological and clinical investigations and were followed up for an average of 12 months. Age, sex, fracture type, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The surgical time was significantly shorter and the intraoperative blood loss volume was significantly lower in the Gamma3 than INTERTAN group (58.2 ± 2.5 vs. 81.7 ± 14.2 minutes and 170 ± 29 vs. 220 ± 16 mL, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in the reduction quality, hospital stay, fracture healing time, Harris hip score, postoperative complications, or 1-year postoperative mortality. Conclusion Both INTERTAN and Gamma3 nails may be effective for surgical treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures in elderly patients. However, the Gamma3 nail was superior to the INTERTAN nail in terms of surgical time and intraoperative blood loss.

Download Full-text

Comparison of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches of intramedullary nailing for distal tibia fractures

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-020-01960-8 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Yao Lu ◽

Gen Wang ◽

Bin Hu ◽

Cheng Ren ◽

Liang Sun ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Fracture Healing ◽

Closed Reduction ◽

Distal Tibia ◽

Reduction Rate ◽

Healing Time ◽

Reduction Technique ◽

Surgical Time ◽

Tibia Fractures ◽

Distal Tibia Fractures

Abstract Background This study aimed to analyze and compare the clinical and functional outcomes of distal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN) using the suprapatellar (SP) and infrapatellar (IP) surgical approaches. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in 63 patients with distal fractures that were treated with IMN between August 2014 and August 2018. A total of 27 and 36 patients underwent IMN using the SP and IP techniques, respectively. The surgical time, blood loss, closed reduction rate, rate of adjuvant reduction technique, fracture healing time, and complications were reviewed in this study. Anterior knee pain was assessed using the visual analog scale. The Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale were used as clinical measurements. Results A total of 63 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, were evaluated. The average surgical time, blood loss, rate of adjuvant reduction technique, closed reduction rate, fracture healing time, and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale score were insignificantly different (P > 0.05) between the two groups. However, the SP approach was superior to the IP approach in terms of pain score, AOFAS score, and fracture deformity rate (P < 0.05). Conclusions In the treatment of distal tibia fractures, the SP IMN technique is associated with a significantly higher functional outcome, lower knee pain, and lower rate of fracture deformity than the IP IMN technique.

Download Full-text

Comparison between the results of proximal femur nail anti-rotation and cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in Sanglah Hospital in 2016

International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences ◽

10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20193931 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 (9) ◽

pp. 3475

Author(s):

Wayan Suryanto Dusak ◽

Herryanto Agustriadi Simanjuntak ◽

I Gusti Ngurah Paramartha Wijaya Putra

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Postoperative Complication ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Surgical Trauma ◽

Transfusion Rate ◽

Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Surgical Time

Background: Hemiarthroplasty is now being considered as a primary treatment for comminuted unstable type of IT fracture in elderly on the grounds that it allows early mobilization and full weight bearing. Recently popular modality is fourth generation of intramedullary nails like the Proximal Femoral Nails. The goal of treatment is restoring mobility safely and efficiently, while minimizing the risk of medical complications and technical failure.Methods: A Forty patients, having Intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA or cemented BH at our institution between April 2016 and April 2017. The primary outcomes measures were postoperative complication and hip function. The secondary outcome measures were intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, surgical time, postoperative haemoglobin and hospital stay.Results: Seventeen patients in PFNA group and 23 patients in BH group were included for analysis. There were no significant differences between the two group regarding to the Harris Hip Score at 6 months follow up. Significant differences were found between PFNA and BH group in comparison of intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001), length of stay (p = 0.006), surgical time (p < 0.001), postoperative transfusion (p < 0.001), and decrease of hemoglobin (p=0.001).Conclusions: These findings indicate that PFNA has obvious advantages over the BH in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in case of surgical trauma and postoperative complication.

Download Full-text

A comparative study between dynamic hip screw and intramedullary nail fixation in trochanteric fractures

International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics ◽

10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20212424 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (4) ◽

pp. 794

Author(s):

Krishan Kumar ◽

Anurag Chhabra ◽

Ashok Kumar ◽

Sourabh Jain ◽

Ankush Berwal

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Traffic Accidents ◽

Road Traffic ◽

Common Type ◽

Dynamic Hip Screw ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Trochanteric Fractures ◽

Surgical Time ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Hip Screw

Background: The trochanteric fractures are one of the commonest fractures in elderly population. Incidence of these fractures is increasing due to better life expectancy, growing number of population, industrialization and the road traffic accidents. Variety of implants are available but still there is no consensus for single implant.Methods: A prospective randomized control study was conducted on total 60 patients of intertrochanteric fractures which were randomized into 2 groups of 30 each, treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN). All the patients were followed up for a maximum of 6 months. Outcomes were reviewed and compared such as mode of injury, complications, functional and radiological outcomes.Results: There was no significant difference between two groups of patients as regards to mean age and sex. The mode of injury by slip and fall was main cause. The most common type of fracture as per AO-orthopaedic trauma association (OTA) classification was 31-A2 (65%) and 31-A3 (5%) being the least common type. Mean surgical time of DHS group and PFN group was 125.17 minutes and 89.93 minutes respectively. Mean blood loss in DHS group and PFN group was 251.67 ml and 158.67 ml respectively. Mean radiological union time of fracture in DHS group and PFN group was 12.3 and 9.5weeks respectively. Mean Harris hip score at six month in DHS group and PFN group was 80.77 and 85.47 respectively.Conclusions: We conclude that though both the implants can achieve comparable union rates but PFN are better than DHS as of better Harris hip score, shorter surgical time and less intra operative blood loss.

Download Full-text

Comparison of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches of intramedullary nailing for distal tibia fractures

10.21203/rs.3.rs-19065/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Yao Lu ◽

Gen Wang ◽

Bin Hu ◽

Cheng Ren ◽

Liang Sun ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Fracture Healing ◽

Closed Reduction ◽

Distal Tibia ◽

Reduction Rate ◽

Healing Time ◽

Reduction Technique ◽

Surgical Time ◽

Tibia Fractures ◽

Distal Tibia Fractures

Abstract Background: This study aimed to analyze and compare the clinical and functional outcomes of distal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN) using the suprapatellar (SP) and infrapatellar (IP) surgical approaches. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 63 patients with distal fractures that were treated with IMN between August 2014 and August 2018. A total of 27 and 36 patients underwent IMN using the SP and IP techniques, respectively. The surgical time, blood loss, closed reduction rate, rate of adjuvant reduction technique, fracture healing time, and complications were reviewed in this study. Anterior knee pain was assessed using the visual analog scale. The Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale were used as clinical measurements. Results: A total of 63 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, were evaluated. The average surgical time, blood loss, rate of adjuvant reduction technique, closed reduction rate, fracture healing time, and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale score were insignificantly different (P>0.05) between the two groups. However, the SP approach was superior to the IP approach in terms of pain score, AOFAS score, and fracture deformity rate (P<0.05). Conclusions: In the treatment of distal tibia fractures, the SP IMN technique is associated with a significantly higher functional outcome, lower knee pain, and lower rate of fracture deformity than the IP IMN technique.

Download Full-text

Comparison of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches of intramedullary nailing for distal tibia fractures

10.21203/rs.3.rs-17814/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Yao Lu ◽

Gen Wang ◽

Bin Hu ◽

Cheng Ren ◽

Liang Sun ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Fracture Healing ◽

Closed Reduction ◽

Distal Tibia ◽

Reduction Rate ◽

Healing Time ◽

Reduction Technique ◽

Surgical Time ◽

Tibia Fractures ◽

Distal Tibia Fractures

Abstract Background: This study aimed to analyze and compare the clinical and functional outcomes of distal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN) using the suprapatellar (SP) and infrapatellar (IP) surgical approaches.Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 63 patients with distal fractures that were treated with IMN between August 2014 and August 2018. A total of 27 and 36 patients underwent IMN using the SP and IP techniques, respectively. The surgical time, blood loss, closed reduction rate, rate of adjuvant reduction technique, fracture healing time, and complications were reviewed in this study. Anterior knee pain was assessed using the visual analog scale. The Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale were used as clinical measurements.Results: A total of 63 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, were evaluated. The average surgical time, blood loss, rate of adjuvant reduction technique, closed reduction rate, fracture healing time, and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale score were insignificantly different (P>0.05) between the two groups. However, the SP approach was superior to the IP approach in terms of pain score, AOFAS score, and fracture deformity rate (P<0.05).Conclusions: In the treatment of distal tibia fractures, the SP IMN technique is associated with a significantly higher functional outcome, lower knee pain, and lower rate of fracture deformity than the IP IMN technique.

Download Full-text

Comparison of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches of intramedullary nailing for distal tibia fractures

10.21203/rs.3.rs-19065/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Yao Lu ◽

Gen Wang ◽

Bin Hu ◽

Cheng Ren ◽

Liang Sun ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Fracture Healing ◽

Closed Reduction ◽

Distal Tibia ◽

Reduction Rate ◽

Healing Time ◽

Reduction Technique ◽

Surgical Time ◽

Tibia Fractures ◽

Distal Tibia Fractures

Abstract Background: This study aimed to analyze and compare the clinical and functional outcomes of distal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN) using the suprapatellar (SP) and infrapatellar (IP) surgical approaches.Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 63 patients with distal fractures that were treated with IMN between August 2014 and August 2018. A total of 27 and 36 patients underwent IMN using the SP and IP techniques, respectively. The surgical time, blood loss, closed reduction rate, rate of adjuvant reduction technique, fracture healing time, and complications were reviewed in this study. Anterior knee pain was assessed using the visual analog scale. The Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale were used as clinical measurements.Results: A total of 63 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, were evaluated. The average surgical time, blood loss, rate of adjuvant reduction technique, closed reduction rate, fracture healing time, and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale score were insignificantly different (P>0.05) between the two groups. However, the SP approach was superior to the IP approach in terms of pain score, AOFAS score, and fracture deformity rate (P<0.05).Conclusions: In the treatment of distal tibia fractures, the SP IMN technique is associated with a significantly higher functional outcome, lower knee pain, and lower rate of fracture deformity than the IP IMN technique.

Download Full-text

THE FEASIBILITY OF FAST TRACK PROTOCOL FOR ELDERELY PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL CANCER

Koloproktologia ◽

10.33878/2073-7556-2016-0-1-26-29 ◽

2016 ◽

pp. 26-29

Author(s):

D. . Zitta ◽

V. . Subbotin ◽

Y. . Busirev

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Colorectal Surgery ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Fast Track ◽

Randomized Study ◽

Conventional Group ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽

Complications Rate

Fast track protocol is widely used in major colorectal surgery. It decreases operative stress, shortens hospital stay and reduces complications rate. However feasibility and safety of this approach is still controversial in patients older than 70 years. The AIM of the study was to estimate the safety and effectiveness of fast track protocol in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Prospective randomized study included 138 elective colorectal resectionfor cancer during period from 1.01.10 till 1.06.15. The main criteria for the patients selection were age over 70 years and diagnosis of colorectal cancer. 82 of these patients received perioperative treatment according to fast track protocol, other 56 had conventional perioperative care. Patients underwent following procedures: right hemicolectomy (n=7), left hemicolectomy (n=12), transverse colectomy (n=1), sigmoidectomy (n=23), abdomeno-perineal excision (n=19) and low anterior resection of rectum (n=76). Following data were analized: duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, time offirst flatus and defecation, complications rates. RESULTS. Mean age was 77,4 ± 8 years. There were no differences in gender, co morbidities, body mass index, types of operations between groups. Duration of operations didn't differ significantly between 2 groups. Intraoperative blood loss was higher in conventional group. The time of first flatus and defecation were better in FT-group. There was no mortality in FT-group vs 1,8 %o mortality in conventional group. Complications rate was lower in FT-group: wound infections 3,6% vs 9 %, anastomotic leakage 4,8 %o vs 9 %o, ileus 1,2 vs 5,4 %o, peritonitis 2,4 %o vs 3,6%o, bowel obstruction caused by the adhesions 6 % vs 5,3 %. Reoperation rate was similar 4,8 % vs 3,6 %. CONCLUSION. Fast track protocol in major elective colorectal surgery can be safely applied in elderly patients. The application of fast track protocol in elderly patients improves the restoration of bowel function and reduces the risk of postoperative complication.

Download Full-text

Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty for the treatment of neurologically intact osteoporotic Kümmell’s disease

BMC Surgery ◽

10.1186/s12893-021-01057-x ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Shou-qian Dai ◽

Rong-qing Qin ◽

Xiu Shi ◽

Hui-lin Yang

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Bone Cement ◽

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty ◽

Cement Leakage ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Surgical Time ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Neurologically Intact ◽

Operation Cost

Abstract Background Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and kyphoplasty (PKP) have been widely used to treat neurologically intact osteoporotic Kümmell’s disease (KD), but it is still unclear which treatment is more advantageous. Our study aimed to compare and investigate the safety and clinical efficacy of PVP and PKP in the treatment of KD. Methods The relevant data that 64 patients of neurologically intact osteoporotic KD receiving PVP (30 patients) or PKP (34 patients) were analyzed. Surgical time, operation costs, intraoperative blood loss, volume of bone cement injection, and fluoroscopy times were compared. Occurrence of cement leakage, transient fever and re-fracture were recorded. Universal indicators of visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were evaluated separately before surgery and at 1 day, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and the final follow-up after operation. The height of anterior edge of the affected vertebra and the Cobb’s angle were assessed by imaging. Results All patients were followed up for at least 24 months. The volume of bone cement injection, intraoperative blood loss, occurrence of bone cement leakage, transient fever and re-fracture between two groups showed no significant difference. The surgical time, the operation cost and fluoroscopy times of the PKP group was significantly higher than that of the PVP group. The post-operative VAS, ODI scores, the height of the anterior edge of the injured vertebrae and kyphosis deformity were significantly improved in both groups compared with the pre-operation. The improvement of vertebral height and kyphosis deformity in PKP group was significantly better than that in the PVP group at every same time point during the follow-up periods, but the VAS and ODI scores between the two groups showed no significant difference. Conclusion PVP and PKP can both significantly alleviate the pain of patients with KD and obtain good clinical efficacy and safety. By contrast, PKP can achieve better imaging height and kyphosis correction, while PVP has the advantages of shorter operation time, less radiation volume and operation cost.

Download Full-text

Risk factors for postoperative systemic complications in elderly patients with brain tumors

Journal of Neurosurgery ◽

10.3171/2008.10.17669 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 111 (2) ◽

pp. 258-264 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Kenichiro Asano ◽

Takahiro Nakano ◽

Tetsuji Takeda ◽

Hiroki Ohkuma

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Postoperative Complications ◽

Brain Tumors ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Systemic Complications ◽

Level Difference ◽

Cutoff Values

Object In elderly patients with brain tumors, the prevention of postoperative systemic complications is extremely important, and identification of the risk factors would be useful for planning therapy. The authors investigated ways to avoid postoperative complications by identifying risk factors. Methods The study population included 84 patients, 70 years of age or older, who underwent surgical brain tumor removal. The following independent factors were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses: sex, age, preoperative underlying diseases and complications, histopathological findings, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score, preoperative whole blood hemoglobin (Hb) level, preoperative serum total protein (TP) level, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, change in Hb level (difference between pre- and postoperative values), and change in TP level (difference between pre- and postoperative values). The cutoff values for significant independent factors were also determined. Results Overall, 35 (41.7%) of the 84 patients had a total of 56 postoperative systemic complications. Univariate analysis identified the preoperative KPS score, intraoperative blood loss, change in Hb level, and change in TP level as risk factors for postoperative complications, and multivariate analysis extracted the following risk factors: the preoperative KPS score (p = 0.0450, OR 4.020), intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.0104, OR 6.571), and change in Hb levels (p = 0.0023, OR 9.301). The cutoff values were: KPS score < 80%, intraoperative blood loss ≥ 350 ml, and change in Hb level ≥ 2.0 g/dl. Conclusions In elderly patients with brain tumors, low preoperative KPS score, high intraoperative blood loss, and a large difference between pre- and postoperative Hb levels are significant risk factors for postoperative systemic complications.

Download Full-text