Stapler versus handswen in small intestinal anastomosis

Background: Intestinal anastomosis dates back to 1000, B.C but it accompanied with high rates of failure, sepsis, wound infection and mortality until the development of suture materials. Lembert described his seromuscular suture technique in 1826. Surgical Stapler was first introduced by Hultl in 1908. The development of modern devices over the past 30 years changes the surgical practice dramatically. The objective of present study is to compare the outcome between Stapler and handswen anastomosis in the small intestine.Methods: This study is a randome controlled study carried on 40 patients divided into two equal groups, 20 patients were treated by handswen suture method (group A) and the other 20 patients operated by stapling technique (group B).Results: In both elective and emergent cases as regard patient operative time, postoperative passing flatus, begin of oral intake, hospital stay duration and postoperative complications it was lower in Stapler (group B) comparing to handswen (group A) and P-value was statistically significant (P<0.05). In emergent cases postoperative leakage is equal in both handswen (group A) and Stapler (group B) and P-value was non-significant (P>0.05).Conclusions: In both elective and emergent cases the duration of operation, postoperative passing flatus, return of bowel sound, hospitalization days and postoperative complications including (intraoperative bleeding, prolonged ileus >4 days, patient stenosis and wound infection) in Stapler anastomosis it was lower comparing to handswen anastomosis and P-value was statistically significant (P<0.05). No significant difference in postoperative leakage between handswen anastomosis and Stapler anastomosis in emergency cases (P>0.05).

Download Full-text

Comparison between scalpel incision and electrocautery incision in midline abdominal surgery: a comparative study

International Surgery Journal ◽

10.18203/2349-2902.isj20211817 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (5) ◽

pp. 1507

Author(s):

Amit Yadav ◽

Lakshman Agarwal ◽

Sumit A. Jain ◽

Sanjay Kumawat ◽

Sandeep Sharma

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Pain ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Abdominal Surgery ◽

Wound Infection ◽

Skin Incision ◽

P Value ◽

Wound Area ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Background: Fear of poor wound healing have curtailed the use of diathermy for making skin incision. Scalpel produces little damage to surrounding tissue but causing more blood loss. Our aim of study was to compare electrocautery incision with scalpel incision in terms of incision time, blood loss, postoperative pain and wound infection.Methods: Total of 104 patients were included in the study undergoing midline abdominal surgery. Patients were randomized into electrocautery (group A) and scalpel (group B). The incision dimension, incision time and blood loss were noted intraoperatively. Postoperative pain was noted on postoperative day 2 using visual analog scale. Wound complications were recorded on every postoperative day till the patient was discharged.Results: 52 patients in each of the two groups were analyzed. There was significant difference found between group A and group B in terms of mean incision time per unit wound area, 8.16±1.59 s\cm2 and 11.02±1.72 s\cm2 respectively (p value=0.0001). The mean blood loss per unit wound area was found to be significantly lower in group A (0.31±0.04 ml\cm2) as compared to group B (1.21±0.21), p value=0.0001. There was no significant difference noted in terms of postoperative pain and wound infection between both groups.Conclusions: Electrocautery can be considered safe in making skin incision in midline laparotomy compared to scalpel incision with comparable postoperative pain and wound infection with less intraoperative blood loss and less time consuming.

Download Full-text

A Comparative Study of 5.5mm Temporal Sclerocorneal Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery Versus 5.5mm Temporal Clear Corneal Extended-incision Phacoemulsification with Implantation of a 5.25mm Rigid pmma Intraocular lens in the Bag

Journal of Ophthalmology & Clinical Research ◽

10.33140/jocr.03.02.01 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 3 (2) ◽

Keyword(s):

Cataract Surgery ◽

Controlled Study ◽

P Value ◽

Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽

Corneal Incision ◽

Small Incision ◽

Clear Corneal Incision ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Objective: Aim of the study is to Compare the astigmatism induced by a reduced temporal sclerocorneal tunnel incision manual small incision cataract surgery with an extended temporal clear corneal Phacoemulsification of similar width . Methods: A Prospective, randomised controlled study was carried out in 224 selected patients who were again divided into two groups - Group A (112 patients) and Group B (112 patients). Group A patients underwent temporal manual small incision cataract surgery with a 5.5 mm sclerocorneal incision and Group B underwent phacoemulsification by a 2.8 mm clear corneal temporal incision which was extended to 5.5 mm before IOL implantation. In both groups, a 5.25 mm rigid PMMA IOL was implanted in the bag. UCVA and BCVA of both group of patients was quantified and analyzed at 1 week and at 6 weeks Observation: It was seen that the mean surgically Induced astigmatism in group A (N=112) was 0.5625D , which was slightly lesser than that in Group B (N=112) which was 0.65D, although the p-value of 0.26 indicated that there was statistically no significant difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of patients. Here, a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Conclusion: In Skilled and Safe hands, refractive outcomes following performing a 5.5mm temporal sclerocorneal frown-incision manual small incision cataract surgery and a phacoemulsification procedure by a 2.8mm temporal clear corneal incision extended to 5.5mm for implanting a 5.25mm rigid PMMA IOL , are comparable.

Download Full-text

Role of Aminophylline Intravesical Instillation on Enhancing Ureteral Dilatation prior to Ureteroscopy

QJM ◽

10.1093/qjmed/hcab110.011 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Ahmed Mohamed Saafan ◽

Mohamed Ismail Shabayek ◽

Marwa Mamdouh Mohamed ◽

Mostafa Mabrouk Bayomi Ali

Keyword(s):

Intravesical Instillation ◽

Controlled Study ◽

P Value ◽

Pressure Monitor ◽

Post Operative Pain ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Before And After ◽

Group A ◽

Ureteral Dilatation ◽

Group B

Abstract Background Semi-rigid uretroscopy (URS) is a common intervention approach for lower ureteric stones. Ureteral dilatation is frequently needed before URS to enable ureter accessing. Aminophylline is known by its muscle relaxant effect and has been suggested to be effective in ureteral dilation. Objectives To evaluate the effect of intravesical administration of aminophylline on ureteroscopy and to measure intraureteral pressure Methods This prospective randomized controlled study included 50 before and after aminophylline injection. patients with lower ureteral calculi. In group A, the ureter was dilated by intravesical aminophylline whereas in group B balloon dilator was used. Intraureteral pressure was measured using pressure transducer connected to invasive pressure monitor. Results No statistically significant difference was noticed between both groups in operative time, intra operative complication, need for ureteral stenting or stone free rate. However, post-operative pain and haematuria were statistically significantly higher among balloon group compared to aminophylline group. In group A, there was statistically significant decrease in intraureteral pressure after injection of aminophylline (7.80 ± 1.71) compared to before injection (12.2 ± 1.85) with p-value < 0.001. Conclusion Aminophylline is effective in ureteral dilatation when intravesically injected with less frequent post-operative pain and hematuria.

Download Full-text

Outcome of thyroid lobectomies undergone with and without drains

International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences ◽

10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20203438 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (8) ◽

pp. 2919

Author(s):

Sahrish Bachani ◽

Shahid N. Memon ◽

Muhammad R. Pathan ◽

Rehmat Sehrish Shah ◽

Aneeta Kumari ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Wound Infection ◽

Pain Score ◽

Thyroid Nodules ◽

University Hospital ◽

P Value ◽

Thyroid Lobectomy ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Background: Thyroid lobectomy is a common operative technique of management of benign solitary thyroid nodules in which drains are used routinely. Objective of this study to compare the outcome of thyroid lobectomies undergone with and without drains in patients of benign solitary thyroid nodules.Methods: A comparative cross-sectional research was completed on 98 patients of benign solitary thyroid nodules at surgery department of Liaquat University Hospital Jamshoro. Patients having age of 18-60 years underwent thyroid lobectomies were included and distributed in two groups A and B. Group A includes thyroid lobectomies with drain and Group B without drain. Postoperative outcomes including pain score assessed via visual analog score (VAS), hospital stay and complications including wound infection, seroma and hematoma.Results: Out of 98 cases, 49 underwent thyroid lobectomy with drain and 49 without a drain. Females patients were in majority in group A 42 (85.7%) and also in group B 47 (95.9%). No significant difference (p-value=0.674) was in mean age of group A 30.8±10.2 years and group B 31.8±12.2 years. Higher mean with significant difference (p-value=0.001) was in pain score of group A 5.61±1.25 as compared to group B 3.55±0.70. No significant difference was in complications; seroma 1 (2.04%) vs 5 (10.20%), hematoma 1 (2.04%) vs 1 (2.04%) and infection 3 (6.12%) vs 0 (0.0%) in group A and B respectively. Higher mean with significant difference (p-value=0.001) was in hospital stay of group A 2.40±1.57 days as compared to group B 1.42±0.54 days. No significant difference (p-value=0.748) was in overall rate of complications in group A 5 (10.20%) and B 6 (12.24%).Conclusions: Thyroid lobectomy with drain is not effective in lowering the postoperative complications whereas enhanced the risk of postoperative pain, wound infection and duration of hospital stay as compared to thyroid lobectomy without a drain.

Download Full-text

Does the early removal of urethral stent can reduce postoperative complications of Snodgrass urethroplasty for hypospadias repair? A prospective randomized trial

International Surgery Journal ◽

10.18203/2349-2902.isj20175095 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 4 (12) ◽

pp. 3839 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Hussein Lafta Hashim ◽

Ahmed Al Adhami ◽

Ali Hussain Abid

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Complications ◽

Wound Infection ◽

Hypospadias Repair ◽

Urethrocutaneous Fistula ◽

Meatal Stenosis ◽

Early Removal ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Urethral Stent ◽

Group B

Background: Hypospadias is a relatively common congenital defect of the male external genitalia. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the early removal of urethral stent following TIP Snodgrass repair of hypospadias can reduces postoperative complications of this procedure.Methods: In Al-Yarmouk teaching hospital, the surgical procedure included 61 tabularized incised plate (TIP) repairs for penile hypospadias. The patients were prospectively observed over 36 months and randomized into 2 groups, group (A) was 30 patients where the urethral stent was removed after 24 hours of operation, and group (B) was 31 cases where the stent removed in the 6th postoperative day. Suprapubic urinary diversion was done for all patients. All of the operations were performed by the same surgeon. Complications and cosmetic appearance were documented at last follow-up.Results: The average age of the patients was 3.9 years, urethrocutaneous fistula was observed in 2 cases in group A (6.6 %), while 11 patients had fistula in group B (35.4 %) with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). meatal stenosis was reported in 4 patients in (group A) (13.3%), while 12 patients had such complication in group B (38.7%) with a statistically Significant difference as (P< 0.05). 6.6 % of group A developed wound infection, while 32.2 % had wound infection postoperatively in group B with a statistically significant difference (P< 0.05). Complete surgical failure when wound dehiscence occurs, it was found that no significant difference between the 2 groups (P value=0.1).Conclusions: TIP repair is a versatile operation that can be performed in almost all cases of penile hypospadias. We believe that early stent removal after 1 day of surgery for hypospadias repair simplifies postoperative care, highly reduces risk of development of urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal stenosis and wound infection, so obviates the need for antibiotics.

Download Full-text

465 No Role for Postoperative Antibiotics in Uncomplicated Appendicitis

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab134.283 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

N Ayoub ◽

Y Tryliskyy ◽

M K Baig

Keyword(s):

Wound Infection ◽

P Value ◽

Nice Guidelines ◽

Uncomplicated Appendicitis ◽

Perforated Appendix ◽

Group A ◽

Preoperative Antibiotics ◽

Group B ◽

Variable Practice

Abstract Introduction Several studies have shown benefit from use of preoperative antibiotics in reducing postoperative infection after appendectomy as well as efficacy of postoperative antibiotics in complicated appendicitis (defined as perforated appendix or presence of pus in peritoneum). While for uncomplicated appendicitis, several studies showed no benefit from antibiotics postoperatively but there are no clear NICE guidelines till now and so surgeons have different practice based on their preferences. Method This study included patients who had appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis in Worthing hospital from 1st July 2019 till 30th June 2020. The end point was 30-day follow up postoperatively for wound infection or collection. Results 90 patients were admitted with uncomplicated appendicitis with age 6-80 years (mean of 31.3). 46 patients (51%) did not receive postoperative antibiotics (group A) and 44 (49%) received postoperative antibiotics (group B) with a variable practice from one dose to 8-day course. postoperatively, only 1 patient (2.1%) in group A developed wound infection requiring drainage while none in group B developed complications (p-value=1). Conclusions Administration of postoperative antibiotics in uncomplicated appendicitis showed no superiority over non-administration. in addition, they add extra cost on NHS. So, their routine use postoperatively is not recommended, however, larger studies are required to confirm this.

Download Full-text

ELECTIVE MIDLINE LAPAROTOMY

The Professional Medical Journal ◽

10.29309/tpmj/2011.18.01.1869 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 18 (01) ◽

pp. 106-111

Author(s):

ARSALAN SIRAJ ◽

ATHAR ABBAS SHAH GILANI ◽

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ DAR ◽

Sohail Raziq

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Pain ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Wound Infection ◽

Visual Analogue Score ◽

P Value ◽

Midline Laparotomy ◽

Pain Scores ◽

Group A ◽

Insignificant Difference ◽

Group B

Objectives: To compare the diathermy incision with scalpel incision in patients undergoing midline elective laparotomy. Design of Study: A prospective, experimental comparative study. Place and Duration: Department of surgery, PNS Shifa Karachi, from March 2007 to June 2008. Patients and Methods: A total of 100 patients were included in the study, and equally divided into 2 groups. Group A received scalpel incision while in group B diathermy was employed to incise all layers. Peroperative parameters including, incision time and blood loss were calculated. Postoperatively, pain was assessed by visual analogue score and wound infection documented. Results: Both groups included fifty patients each out of the total 44 females and 56 were males, with similar gender preposition in both the groups. Mean age of patients in scalpel group was 48.78 (±14.47) while it was 44.92 (±15.87) in diathermy group. The mean incision related blood loss in Scalpel group was 1.53 (±0.20) ml/cm2 and in Diathermy group was 1.43 (±0.20) ml/cm2, showing significantly less bleeding in diathermy group (p-value= 0.014). Diathermy group, with incision related time of 6.20 sec/cm2 (±0.97 sec/cm2), was significantly quicker (p-value= 0.003) than scalpel incision, with incision time of 6.76 sec/cm2 (±0.84 sec/cm2). Postoperative pain scores, recorded daily over five days, showed insignificant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: Diathermy, employed for midline laparotomy, is quicker and hemostatic, compared to the scalpel. The two are, however, similar in terms of wound infection and postoperative pain.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Recovery Time of Propofol and Midazolam with Propofol Alone for Sedation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

10.53350/pjmhs211551024 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 15 (5) ◽

pp. 1024-1027

Author(s):

Asma Samreen ◽

Aamir Waseem ◽

Muhammad Azam ◽

Itrat Hussain Kazmi ◽

Aamir Bashir ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography ◽

Recovery Time ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

P Value ◽

Time Data ◽

Endoscopic Retrograde ◽

Intravenous Anesthetic ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Background: Procedural sedation is required for multiple short duration procedures outside of the operating rooms especially in radiology and endoscopy suites. Intravenous anesthetic agent with rapid recovery profile is desirable in such circumstances. This study aims to compare two regimens of intravenous anesthetic agents. Aim: To compare the mean recovery time of propofol and midazolam with propofol alone for sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Settings: Department of Anesthesia, Shalamar Hospital, Lahore. Study Duration: June 2017 to December 2017. Methods: A total of 70 adult patients aged 20-60 years undergoing ERCP under sedation were included. Patients were given a combination of propofol and midazolam in group A while propofol alone was given in group B. After procedure, pts were transferred to recovery room and were followed for assessment of recovery time. Data were analyzed in SPSS vr 21, Independent t-test was applied & p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Significant difference was found in mean recovery time amongst both the groups. Mean recovery time in Group A (propofol and midazolam) was 19.29±4.50 minutes while in Group B (propofol alone) was 26.66±3.70 minutes showing statistically significant result with p-value = 0.0001. Conclusion: We conclude that mean recovery time with propofol plus midazolam is shorter as compared to propofol alone for sedation in ERCP. Keywords: Propofol, midazolam, sedation outside operation theatre.

Download Full-text

Combination Therapy Of Tadalafil And Pentoxifylline In Severe Erectile Dysfunction; A Prospective Randomized Trial

Polish Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1515/pjs-2015-0075 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 87 (8) ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Santosh Kumar ◽

Rajesh Roat ◽

Swati Agrawal ◽

Kumar Jayant ◽

Ravimohan S. Mavuduru ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Erectile Dysfunction ◽

Combination Therapy ◽

Erectile Function ◽

T Test ◽

P Value ◽

Chi Square ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Chi Square Test ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Abstractwas to assess efficacy of Tadalafil alone versus Tadalafil plus Pentoxifylline in the treatment of erectile dysfunction by using self administered IIEF-5 questionnaire.Two hundred and thirty seven patients presenting with ED at andrology OPD were evaluated for ED by a self administered IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire. Patients were systematically randomized by computer generated random table into two groups groups namely, group A: Tadalafil only group, group B: combination of Tadalafil + Pentoxifyl-line. All the patients were re-assessed by IIEF-5 questionnaire after 8 weeks of medical therapy. Statistical analysis was performed using student’s unpaired t-test, paired t-test, chi square test. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Two hundred and thirty seven patients were included in the present study, in group A: 92 patients (78.6%) showed improvement in their IIEF score after 8 weeks of tadalafil treatment. While in group B, overall 104 patients(86.6%) showed improvement after combination of Tadalafil and Pentoxifylline. There was a statistically significant difference of percentage change in IIEF score was seen in group B (group A 90.7±15.2%, group B 95.6±13.4%; p value – 0.014). We found this difference even more statistically significant in patients with severe ED (group A 72.7±47.2%, group B 132.3±54.3%; p value – 0.000). There was no significant difference in between the two groups with regards to occur-rence of side effects.Both tadalafil and combination of Tadalafil + Pentoxifylline improve erectile function in patients of ED. Patients with severe ED showed much significant improvement in erectile function with combination therapy.

Download Full-text

Comparative Study of Efficiency between Povidone Iodine and Normal Saline Lavage in the Treatment of Acute Peritonitis

Bangladesh Journal of Infectious Diseases ◽

10.3329/bjid.v4i1.37675 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

pp. 15-20

Author(s):

Haridas Saha ◽

Mohammad Ibrahim Khalil ◽

Aminul Islam ◽

Abdullah Al Mamun ◽

Md Margub Hossain

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Wound Infection ◽

Normal Saline ◽

Povidone Iodine ◽

Medical College ◽

Acute Peritonitis ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Group B ◽

Saline Lavage

Background: Control of the primary site of sepsis is the main determinant of good surgical outcome. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficiency between povidone iodine and normal saline lavage in the treatment of acute peritonitis. Methodology: This was a randomized clinical trial conducted in the Department of Surgery at Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Patients with acute peritonitis due to gastrointestinal causes who were admitted in the different units of Dhaka Medical College Hospital during the study period were selected as study population. Among them patients who were treated with povidone iodine were enrolled in the present study in group A and patients who were treated with conventional normal saline were in group B. Results: A total number of 1050 patients were recruited for this study. Among them 100 patients were enrolled in the present study of which group A (50 patients) for povidone iodine and group B (50 patients) for conventional normal saline. On 7th POD wound infection was found in Group A and Group B were 11(22.4%) and 21(44.7%) respectively. Statistically significant difference in post operative complication of wound infection was observed on 7th POD between the groups (p<0.05). Post operative hospital stay in Group A and Group B were 11.50 ± 4.48 and 13.46 ± 5.13 days respectively. There is statistically significant difference in post operative hospital stay between the groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Statistically significant difference observed in post operative complication of wound infection and burst abdomen on 7th POD between the groups. The present study there is statistically significant difference in post operative hospital stay between the groups also observed. Bangladesh Journal of Infectious Diseases 2017;4(1):15-20

Download Full-text