scholarly journals A Comparative Study of 5.5mm Temporal Sclerocorneal Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery Versus 5.5mm Temporal Clear Corneal Extended-incision Phacoemulsification with Implantation of a 5.25mm Rigid pmma Intraocular lens in the Bag

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
P Value ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Corneal Incision ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Clear Corneal Incision ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: Aim of the study is to Compare the astigmatism induced by a reduced temporal sclerocorneal tunnel incision manual small incision cataract surgery with an extended temporal clear corneal Phacoemulsification of similar width . Methods: A Prospective, randomised controlled study was carried out in 224 selected patients who were again divided into two groups - Group A (112 patients) and Group B (112 patients). Group A patients underwent temporal manual small incision cataract surgery with a 5.5 mm sclerocorneal incision and Group B underwent phacoemulsification by a 2.8 mm clear corneal temporal incision which was extended to 5.5 mm before IOL implantation. In both groups, a 5.25 mm rigid PMMA IOL was implanted in the bag. UCVA and BCVA of both group of patients was quantified and analyzed at 1 week and at 6 weeks Observation: It was seen that the mean surgically Induced astigmatism in group A (N=112) was 0.5625D , which was slightly lesser than that in Group B (N=112) which was 0.65D, although the p-value of 0.26 indicated that there was statistically no significant difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of patients. Here, a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Conclusion: In Skilled and Safe hands, refractive outcomes following performing a 5.5mm temporal sclerocorneal frown-incision manual small incision cataract surgery and a phacoemulsification procedure by a 2.8mm temporal clear corneal incision extended to 5.5mm for implanting a 5.25mm rigid PMMA IOL , are comparable.

scholarly journals Small Incision Cataract Surgery (SICS) with Clear Corneal Incision and SICS with Scleral Incision – A Comparative Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
Md Shafiqul Alam ◽  
Khaleda Nazneen Bari
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Corneal Incision ◽  
Clear Corneal Incision ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Postoperative Astigmatism ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Age related cataract is the leading cause of blindness and visual impairment throughout the world. With the advent of microsurgical facilities simple cataract extraction surgery has been replaced by small incision cataract surgery (SICS) with posterior chamber intra ocular lens implant, which can be done either with clear corneal incision or scleral incision. Objective: To compare the post operative visual outcome in these two procedures of cataract surgery. Materials and method: This comparative study was carried out in the department of Ophthalmology, Delta Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh, during the period of January 2010 to December 2012. Total 60 subjects indicated for age related cataract surgery irrespective of sex with the age range of 40-80 years with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Subjects were randomly and equally distributed in 2 groups; Group A for SICS with clear corneal incision and group B for SICS with scleral incision. Post operative visual out come was evaluated by determining visual acuity and astigmatism in different occasions and was compared between groups. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS for windows version12. Results: The highest age incidence (43.3%) was found between 61 to 70 years of age group. Among study subjects 40 were male and 20 were female. Preoperative visual acuity and astigmatism were evenly distributed between groups. Regarding postoperative unaided visual outcome, 6/12 or better visual acuity was found in 19.98% cases in group A and 39.6% cases in group B at 1st week. At 6th week 6/6 vision was found in 36.3% in Group A and 56.1% in Group B and 46.2% in group A and 66% in group B without and with correction respectively. With refractive correction, 6/6 vision was attained in 60% subjects of group A and 86.67% of group B at 8th week. Post operative visual acuity was statistically significant in all occasions. Postoperative astigmatism of >0.50D was in 82.5% subjects of group A and 52.8% subjects of group B at 1st week. At 6th week postoperative astigmatism of less than 1D was in 79.95% subjects of Group A and 83.34% subjects of Group B. About 20% subjects in Group A and only 3.3% in Group B showed astigmatism of more than 1D and these differences on both the occasions were statistically significant. Conclusion: The post operative visual outcome was better in SICS with scleral incision (group B) than in SICS with clear corneal incision (Group-A). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/dmcj.v2i1.17793 Delta Med Col J. Jan 2014; 2(1): 22-27

scholarly journals A comparative study of combined small-incision cataract surgery with sutureless trabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy using W-shaped incision

1970 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
AK Khurana ◽  
U Chawla ◽  
N Passi ◽  
A Jyoti ◽  
A Archana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Posterior Chamber ◽  
Combined Surgery ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Incision Technique ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Manual small-incision cataract surgery with trabeculectomy is now an acceptable option in the surgical management of combined cataract and glaucoma uncontrolled with maximum tolerated medical therapy. Objective: To compare the results and complications of combined manual small-incision cataract surgery (SICS) and posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation with trabeculectomy by sutureless versus W-shaped incision technique. Materials and methods: The study included 30 eyes of 28 patients with senile cataract and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) who were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in Group A (n = 15) underwent SICS with sutureless trabeculectomy and those in Group B (n =15) underwent SICS with trabeculectomy using W-shaped incision with one suture. Post-operative evaluation was done at the first post-operative day and thereafter on follow-ups at 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks. Results: The mean preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) in Group A was 27.33 ± 3.35 mmHg and 16.13 ± 4.30 mmHg respectively and in Group B it was 29.46 ± 6.06 mmHg and 14.66 ± 2.69 mmHg respectively. The mean reduction in IOP after 8 weeks of follow-up in Group A was 12.52 ± 3.59 mmHg and that in Group B was 16.47 ± 3.79 mmHg (p <0.001). Besides this, the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was better in Group B postoperatively with less surgically-induced against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism. Conclusion: Combined SICS with trabeculectomy using W-shaped incision offers better prospective in terms of glaucoma control and visual performance than sutureless combined surgery. Key words: sutureless trabeculectomy; combined surgery; W-shaped trabeculectomyDOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v3i1.4272Nepal J Ophthalmol 2011;3(5):13-18

scholarly journals Phacoemulsification versus small incision cataract surgery (SICS): which one is a better surgical option for immature cataract in developing countries?

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
SK Singh ◽  
I Winter ◽  
L Surin
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
P Value ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Several studies have shown comparable visual outcomes of SICS and phacoemulsification (Gogate et al 2007, Ruit et al 2007). Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of different types of surgical procedures (phacoemulsification versus SICS) for cataract surgery in immature cataract. Material and methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was carried out involving 93 and 89 patients with immature senile cataract selected for phacoemulsification and SICS respectively. Statistics: Mean values with standard deviations were calculated. P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: There was no difference between the groups in terms of gender, age and pre-operative visual acuity (p = 0.09). In phacoemulsification group (n=93) more than two thirds and in SICS group (n=89) more than three quarters of the patients had good visual outcome (6/6-6/18) on first postoperative day (p=0.065). Poor outcome (<6/60) was recorded in 6% (phacoemulsification group) and 1% (small incision cataract surgery group). Mean visual acuity was 0.43 ± 0.27 in phacoemulsification group and 0.47 ± 0.24 in SICS group. Mean surgery time was significantly shorter in SICS group (p=0.0003). Statistics: Data were computed and analyzed using the SPSS software program vs 10. The p value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in visual outcome on first post operative day in between phacoemulsification and SICS technique. However, performing SICS was significantly faster. Small incision cataract surgery with implantation of rigid PMMA lens is a suitable surgical technique to treat immature cataract in developing countries. Keywords: phacoemulsification; small incision cataract surgery (SICS) DOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v1i2.3682 Nep J Oph 2009;1(2):95-100

Role of Aminophylline Intravesical Instillation on Enhancing Ureteral Dilatation prior to Ureteroscopy

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mohamed Saafan ◽  
Mohamed Ismail Shabayek ◽  
Marwa Mamdouh Mohamed ◽  
Mostafa Mabrouk Bayomi Ali
Keyword(s):  
Intravesical Instillation ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
P Value ◽  
Pressure Monitor ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Group A ◽  
Ureteral Dilatation ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Semi-rigid uretroscopy (URS) is a common intervention approach for lower ureteric stones. Ureteral dilatation is frequently needed before URS to enable ureter accessing. Aminophylline is known by its muscle relaxant effect and has been suggested to be effective in ureteral dilation. Objectives To evaluate the effect of intravesical administration of aminophylline on ureteroscopy and to measure intraureteral pressure Methods This prospective randomized controlled study included 50 before and after aminophylline injection. patients with lower ureteral calculi. In group A, the ureter was dilated by intravesical aminophylline whereas in group B balloon dilator was used. Intraureteral pressure was measured using pressure transducer connected to invasive pressure monitor. Results No statistically significant difference was noticed between both groups in operative time, intra operative complication, need for ureteral stenting or stone free rate. However, post-operative pain and haematuria were statistically significantly higher among balloon group compared to aminophylline group. In group A, there was statistically significant decrease in intraureteral pressure after injection of aminophylline (7.80 ± 1.71) compared to before injection (12.2 ± 1.85) with p-value &lt; 0.001. Conclusion Aminophylline is effective in ureteral dilatation when intravesically injected with less frequent post-operative pain and hematuria.

scholarly journals Comparison of surgical and visual outcomes following capsulotomy using the envelope and continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis technique in manual small incision cataract surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-13
Author(s):  
Sanjib Kr Chaudhary ◽  
Shailesh Mani Pokhrel ◽  
Manoj Sharma ◽  
Badri Prasad Badhu ◽  
Bhuwan Govinda Shrestha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Posterior Capsular Opacification ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Uncorrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background & Objectives: Capsulotomy is one of the important step in cataract surgery which can affect the surgical outcomes. The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of envelope and continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis technique in manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS). Materials & Methods: A total of 72 eyes of 72 patients undergoing MSICS were studied. The patients were equally divided into two groups i.e. 36 patients each in envelope capsulotomy (Group A) and continuous curvilinear capsulotomy (CCC) group (Group B).Results: Mean surgical time (±SD) in Group A was 355.83 sec ±37.79 sec and in Group B was 375 sec ±31.214 (p=0.02). Uncorrected visual acuity on postoperative day 1 was 6/9 or better in 50% (18) cases in Group A and in 36% (13) cases in Group B (p=0.28). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) on post-operative week 12 was 6/9 or better in 30.6% (n=11) cases in Group A and in 36% (n=13) cases in Group B (p=0.43). On 12th week postoperatively, Grade 2 posterior capsular opacification (PCO) was seen in 30.6 % (n=11) cases of Group A and in 16.6 % (n=6) cases of Group B (p=0.17). Conclusion: CCC technique can be considered superior to envelope technique for long term visual rehabilitation.JCMS Nepal. 2016;12(1):10-13.

scholarly journals A comparative study of sclero-corneal and clear corneal tunnel incision in manual small-incision cataract surgery

1970 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22
Author(s):  
S Archana ◽  
AK Khurana ◽  
U Chawla
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Posterior Chamber ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Surgically Induced Astigmatism ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Group A ◽  
Induced Astigmatism ◽  
Group B ◽  
Surgically Induced

Background: Cataract surgery techniques have improved a lot over the years from couching to the latest micro-incision cataract surgery. Objectives: To compare the temporal sclero-corneal and clear corneal tunnel incisions in patients undergoing manual small-incision cataract surgery (SICS) with respect to the surgically-induced astigmatism. Materials and methods: The present study included 60 patients who underwent manual SICS with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Group A comprised of 30 patients, selected randomly, who underwent sutureless manual SICS through 6 mm curvilinear clear corneal tunnel incision made temporally and Group B comprised of 30 patients, selected randomly, who underwent sutureless manual SICS through 6 mm straight sclero-corneal tunnel made temporally. The patients were assessed at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month and 2 months post-operatively and visual acuity and keratometry findings were recorded. The amount of surgically induced astigmatism was calculated using Holladay’s formula. Statistics: Numerical data were compared between the two groups using unpaired Student’s t-test. The p value of < 0.50 was considered significant. Results: The mean induced astigmatism in Group A was 2.69 ± 0.84 D at 1 week, 2.31 ± 0.77 D at 2 weeks; 2.03 ± 0.82 D at 4 weeks and 1.98 ± 0.54 D at 8 weeks post-operatively. In group B, it was 1.85 ± 0.62 D, 1.56 ± 0.54 D, 1.35 ± 0.49 D and 1.34 ±0.45 D at 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks postoperatively. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/ 20 was seen in 20 % of patients in group A and in 40 % in group B at 8 weeks postoperatively. Conclusion: Surgically-induced astigmatism is significantly higher in clear corneal manual SICS than in sclero-corneal. Our study confirmed the safety and improvement in visual acuity after small-incision cataract surgery using sclero-corneal tunnel incision. Key words: astigmatism; sclero-corneal; clear corneal tunnel; extra-capsular cataract surgery; small incision cataract surgery DOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v3i1.4273Nepal J Ophthalmol 2011;3(5):19-22

scholarly journals A study on the effect of topical lidocaine gel versus drops on surgeon’s comfort during manual small incision cataract surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 1485
Author(s):  
Prakash Krishnan ◽  
Sancy Mary Sam ◽  
Sanitha Kuriachan ◽  
Nirmala Sethuraman
Keyword(s):  
P Value ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Prospective Comparison ◽  
Topical Lidocaine ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Lidocaine Gel ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Cataract is a frequent surgical procedure performed worldwide. The study compared lidocaine 4% drops with 2% gel on surgeon’s comfort, need for supplemental anaesthesia and duration of surgery in patients who underwent manual small incision cataract surgery.Methods: This was a Prospective, Comparison study conducted at a Single centre by multiple surgeons. Patients enrolled for surgeries were divided into Group A: Lidocaine 4% drops 1ml was instilled in the conjunctival sac 5 minutes before surgery and Group B: Lidocaine 2% gel 2ml was applied. Endpoints evaluated were surgeon’s comfort, need for supplemental anesthesia and duration of surgery.Results: The mean duration of surgery for gel was 20±8 minutes as compared to 29±6 minutes with drops (p*- value<0.001). 26 (87%) patients in gel did not require any supplemental anesthesia as compared to 3 (10%) patients in drops. Peribulbar supplementation was required for 20 (67%) patients in drops as compared to 1 (3%) patient in gel (p*- value<0.001). 26 (87%) patients in gel were operated comfortably by the surgeon as compared to 2 (6%) patients in drops. Mild to Moderate discomfort was experienced by the surgeon in operating 27 (90%) patients in drops as compared to 3(10%) patients in gel (p*- value<0.001).Conclusions: The surgeons were more comfortable using gel with least requirement of supplemental anaesthesia and faster completion compared to drops.

Comparison of Complications between Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery and Phacoemulsification

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Israr Ahmed Bhutto ◽  
Maria Nazish Memon ◽  
Irshad Ali ◽  
Abdul Qadeem Soomro ◽  
Abdul Haleem Mirani
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Senile Cataract ◽  
P Value ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Post Operative Complications

Purpose:  To compare per-operative and early post-operative complications between Manual Small Incision cataract surgery and Phacoemulsification in patients with Senile Cataract. Study Design:  Quasi experimental study. Place and Duration of Study:  Al-Ibrahim Eye Hospital Karachi from December 2018 to October 2019. Methods:  Two hundred and seventy patients with senile Cataract were recruited for this study by convenient sampling technique. They were divided equally into two groups. Group I underwent Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery (MSICS), whereas Group II underwent Phacoemulsification. Per-operative and early post-operative complications were recorded on day 1 in both groups. Data was analyzed using SPSS 24.0. Independent t-test was carried out with P-value of ?0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results:  Mean age group – I was 54.95 ± 11.0 and in Group – II was 57.09 ± 10.59 (p = 0.546). There were 72 (53.3%) males in group – I and 74 (54.8%) in group – II with a non-significant difference (p-value > 0.01). There was significant difference for posterior capsule rupture and striate keratitis between the two groups (p = 0.031 and 0.044 respectively). Rest of the study parameters was not statistically different in the both group. None of the groups had a nucleus drop and vitreous prolapse. No significant difference was seen between the two groups concerning iris trauma (p = 0.56), wound leakage (p = 0.15) and hyphema (p = 0.32). Conclusion:  There is no significant difference between per-operative and early post-operative complications between MSICS and Phacoemulsification in patients with senile cataract except posterior capsular rupture and striate keratopathy which were more common in phacoemulsification group. Key Words:  Cataract, Senile Cataract, Phacoemulsification, Small Incision Cataract Surgery.

scholarly journals Stapler versus handswen in small intestinal anastomosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 2054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Abdelhady Mohamed ◽  
Mohamed Leithy Ahmed ◽  
Mahmoud Gamal Eldin Hagag ◽  
Mohammed Nazeeh Shaker Nassar
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Intestinal Anastomosis ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
P Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Stapler Anastomosis ◽  
Group B ◽  
Postoperative Leakage

Background: Intestinal anastomosis dates back to 1000, B.C but it accompanied with high rates of failure, sepsis, wound infection and mortality until the development of suture materials. Lembert described his seromuscular suture technique in 1826. Surgical Stapler was first introduced by Hultl in 1908. The development of modern devices over the past 30 years changes the surgical practice dramatically. The objective of present study is to compare the outcome between Stapler and handswen anastomosis in the small intestine.Methods: This study is a randome controlled study carried on 40 patients divided into two equal groups, 20 patients were treated by handswen suture method (group A) and the other 20 patients operated by stapling technique (group B).Results: In both elective and emergent cases as regard patient operative time, postoperative passing flatus, begin of oral intake, hospital stay duration and postoperative complications it was lower in Stapler (group B) comparing to handswen (group A) and P-value was statistically significant (P<0.05). In emergent cases postoperative leakage is equal in both handswen (group A) and Stapler (group B) and P-value was non-significant (P>0.05).Conclusions: In both elective and emergent cases the duration of operation, postoperative passing flatus, return of bowel sound, hospitalization days and postoperative complications including (intraoperative bleeding, prolonged ileus >4 days, patient stenosis and wound infection) in Stapler anastomosis it was lower comparing to handswen anastomosis and P-value was statistically significant (P<0.05). No significant difference in postoperative leakage between handswen anastomosis and Stapler anastomosis in emergency cases (P>0.05).

Comparative Evaluation of Tear Film Parameters Following Cataract Surgery in Diabetic Patients.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagarika Dash
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Dry Eye ◽  
Tear Film ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Fluorescein Staining ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Purpose: To compare the propensity of manual small incision and phacoemulsification cataract surgery in causing tear film dysfunction and dry eye syndrome in diabetic patients. Methods: Diabetic patients in group A underwent manual small Incision Cataract surgery whereas in group B underwent phacoemulsification with similar post-operative regimes. The primary outcome measures were the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), a Subjective questionnaire. The secondary outcome measures were the Subjective Dry Eye (DE) questionnaire, Corneal Fluorescein staining, Tear meniscus height, Schirmer’s II test, and Tear film break-up time. All parameters were measured pre and then postoperatively. Result: 126 patients were divided into group A (undergoing small incision cataract surgery) and group B (undergoing phacoemulsification). The OSDI and subjective DE scores continued to be worse for Group A until the first month after which they became similar to group B with no statistically significant difference (p-value of 0.726 and 0.347 respectively). The OSDI and subjective DES at 3 months were better in both groups as compared to baseline (p <0.0001). The objective tear film parameters (Schirmer’s, TBUT, TMH, and fluorescein staining scores) showed statistically significant changes from the baseline in both groups but the scores remained in the normal range clinically. Schirmer’s test scores were different between the two groups at three months (p=0.007) in SICS group being higher. Conclusion: Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery (SICS) causes subjective dry eye symptoms more than phacoemulsification until 1 month of surgery in diabetic patients after which the subjective symptoms become similar to phacoemulsification at 3 months.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document