scholarly journals Study of blunt trauma abdomen involving liver injuries based on grade of injury, management: a single centre study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Kumar Jyothiprakasan ◽  
Chinthakindhi Madhusudhan ◽  
Challa Sravya Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Operative Management ◽  
Liver Trauma ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Initial Management ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Injury Management ◽  
Operative Repair ◽  
Liver Injuries ◽  
Single Centre Study ◽  
Non Operative Management

Background: Modern treatment of liver trauma is increasingly non-operative. Advantages of non-operative management include avoidance of non-therapeutic celiotomies and the associated cost and morbidity, fewer intra-abdominal complications compared to operative repair and reduced transfusion risks. It is associated with a low overall morbidity and mortality and does not result in increase in length of the hospital stay. The objectives was to study efficacy of non-operative management of blunt liver injury.Methods: Seventy patients were studied, out of which 59 were initially given a trial of non-operative management and 11 patients were immediately shifted to the operating room. Of the 59 patients initially considered for non-operative management, 5 of them became unstable hemodynamically and were operated. Any complications arising in patients in non-operative group were managed with the help of interventional radiological procedures.Results: Total 54 patients were managed successfully without operative intervention which included patients with higher grade of injuries. 11 patients were shifted to surgery on arrival as they did not respond to resuscitation measures. Mortality and morbidity were found to be higher in patients undergoing surgery. Also, number of transfusions required, ICU stay and total number of days in hospital were higher in operated group. High ISS, low BP at admission, higher grade of injury in this study were seen in patients who failed non-operative management.Conclusions: Non-operative management is the initial management of choice in hemodynamically stable patients, irrespective of the grade of injury and is associated with less mortality and morbidity.

scholarly journals Evolution of non-operative management of liver trauma

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000551
Author(s):  
Adam Brooks ◽  
John-Joe Reilly ◽  
Carla Hope ◽  
Alex Navarro ◽  
Paal Aksel Naess ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Liver Injury ◽  
Patient Selection ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Liver Trauma ◽  
Severe Liver ◽  
Injury Management ◽  
Non Operative Management ◽  
Rate Of Failure

The management of complex liver injury has changed during the last 30 years. Operative management has evolved into a non-operative management (NOM) approach, with surgery reserved for those who present in extremis or become hemodynamically unstable despite resuscitation. This NOM approach has been associated with improved survival rates in severe liver injury and has been the mainstay of treatment for the last 20 years. Patients that fail NOM and require emergency surgery are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Better patient selection may have an impact not only on the rate of failure of NOM, but the mortality rate associated with it. The aim of this article is to review the evidence that helped shape the evolution of liver injury management during the last 30 years.

scholarly journals Predictors of failure in non-operative management of blunt liver trauma

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 2913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andika A. Winata ◽  
Reno Rudiman
Keyword(s):  
Demographic Data ◽  
Fluid Collection ◽  
Transaminase Level ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Liver Trauma ◽  
Group I ◽  
Liver Injuries ◽  
Non Operative Management ◽  
Blunt Liver Trauma

Background: Liver is the most injured organ in abdominal trauma. Nonoperative treatment (NOM) is increasingly being adopted as the initial management strategy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of operative and conservative management of patients with blunt liver injury treated in a single institution.Methods: A retrospective study, analyzing patients admitted from 2011-2015 with the diagnosis of liver trauma, was performed. The patients were classified according to the intention to treatment: Group I, NOM; Group II, operative management and Group III, fail in NOM management. We analyzed demographic data, injury classification, associated injuries, transfusions, shock, liver function test, lactate level, and mortality rates.Results: Over the five years period, 68 patients were recorded, 45 were successful (S-NOM) and 18 were failed (F-NOM). No differences in age, sex or initial hemodynamics were found between S-NOM and F-NOM. The F-NOM patients were more seriously injured, more acidotic, required transfusion, had more fluid collection at FAST, had worse transaminase level and higher mortality rate. Grade of liver injuries was the independent risk factor of failure in nonoperating management of blunt liver trauma with the cut-off point is 3.66.Conclusions: Non-operative management of blunt liver injuries is successful in some cases. Patients with more severe injury tend to have an operation. High-grade blunt liver injuries always present with a worse condition and require an operation.

scholarly journals Damage Control in Penetrating Liver Trauma: Fear of the Unknown

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Alberto Ordoñez ◽  
Michael Parra ◽  
Mauricio Millan ◽  
Yaset Caicedo ◽  
Monica Guzman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Damage Control ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Hemodynamic Instability ◽  
Liver Trauma ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Severely Injured ◽  
Management Algorithm ◽  
Liver Injuries ◽  
Non Operative Management

The liver is the most commonly affected solid organ in cases of abdominal trauma. Management of penetrating liver trauma is a challenge for surgeons but with the introduction of the concept of damage control surgery accompanied by significant technological advancements in radiologic imaging and endovascular techniques, the focus on treatment has changed significantly. The use of immediately accessible computed tomography as an integral tool for trauma evaluations for the precise staging of liver trauma has significantly increased the incidence of conservative non-operative management in hemodynamically stable trauma victims with liver injuries. However, complex liver injuries accompanied by hemodynamic instability are still associated with high mortality rates due to ongoing hemorrhage. The aim of this article is to perform an extensive review of the literature and to propose a management algorithm for hemodynamically unstable patients with penetrating liver injury, via an expert consensus. It is important to establish a multidisciplinary approach towards the management of patients with penetrating liver trauma and hemodynamic instability. The appropriate triage of these patients, the early activation of an institutional massive transfusion protocol, and the early control of hemorrhage are essential landmarks in lowering the overall mortality of these severely injured patients. To fear is to fear the unknown, and with the management algorithm proposed in this manuscript, we aim to shed light on the unknown regarding the management of the patient with a severely injured liver.

The Role of Angioembolization in Hepatic Trauma

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482097372
Author(s):  
Ali Cadili ◽  
Jonathan Gates
Keyword(s):  
Gold Standard ◽  
Management Strategy ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Hepatic Trauma ◽  
Anatomy And Physiology ◽  
Liver Injuries ◽  
Hepatic Injuries ◽  
Non Operative Management ◽  
Type Of Injury

The liver is one of the most commonly injured solid organs in blunt abdominal trauma. Non-operative management is considered to be the gold standard for the care of most blunt liver injuries. Angioembolization has emerged as an important adjunct that is vital to the success of the non-operative management strategy for blunt hepatic injuries. This procedure, however, is fraught with some possible serious complications. The success, as well as rate of complications of this procedure, is determined by degree and type of injury, hepatic anatomy and physiology, and embolization strategy among other factors. In this review, we discuss these important considerations to help shed further light on the contribution and impact of angioembolization with regards to complex hepatic injuries.

Non-operative management of blunt liver injuries

1991 ◽  
Vol 78 (8) ◽  
pp. 968-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Hollands ◽  
J. M. Little
Keyword(s):  
Operative Management ◽  
Liver Injuries ◽  
Non Operative Management

scholarly journals P7 A review of the understanding and use of the Regional Liver Trauma Guidelines

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Thakkar ◽  
Khaled Ammar ◽  
Ellen Meredith ◽  
Michael Jones ◽  
Ellen Meredith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regional Distribution ◽  
Bile Leak ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Liver Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
North East ◽  
The North ◽  
Close Observation ◽  
Patient’S Outcome ◽  
Non Operative Management

Abstract Introduction The liver is the most commonly injured intra-abdominal organ and occurs in 30% of patients undergoing laparotomy for penetrating injuries and in 15–20% of laparotomies for blunt injuries. CT scan is the investigation of choice for accurate diagnosis and categorization of hepatic injury. Management of isolated liver trauma can be by operative or non-operative management, guided mainly by haemodynamic stability of the patient irrespective to category of injury. Close observation of patients undergoing non-operative management is important; they may develop early complications that require operative intervention, including bleeding, bile leak and peritonitis. Methods A questionnaire will be sent to the General Surgery consultants and registrars within the North East of England, a region with eleven hospitals taking General Surgical admissions, two of which are regional trauma centres. This is to assess the understanding of liver trauma classification and management and their familiarity with and adherence to the regional liver trauma guidelines. Following this, the guidelines will be distributed throughout the region with accompanying teaching sessions. A follow up questionnaire will determine the improvement of regional knowledge and use of the guidelines. In parallel, the outcome of liver trauma patients within the region will be sought to look for correlation between the education and the patient’s outcome. Results Regional distribution of the results will demonstrate the change in the education of liver trauma management and the subsequent change in patient’s outcome. Results will be recorded using Excel and analysed using SPSS statistical software.

Long-Term Follow-Up After Non-operative Management of Blunt Splenic and Liver Injuries: A Questionnaire-Based Survey

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 1358-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Moreno ◽  
Matthias Von Allmen ◽  
Tobias Haltmeier ◽  
Daniel Candinas ◽  
Beat Schnüriger
Keyword(s):  
Operative Management ◽  
Liver Injuries ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Non Operative Management

scholarly journals An Unusual Recurrent Bile Leak Following High Grade Liver Trauma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-140
Author(s):  
Morgan E Jones ◽  
Ee Jun Ban ◽  
Charles H. C. Pilgrim
Keyword(s):  
Liver Injury ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Bile Leak ◽  
Biliary Tree ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Liver Trauma ◽  
Post Injury ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Non Operative Management

Non-operative management of blunt liver injury has been demonstrated as a safe and effective treatment for most grades of injury. As the severity of liver injury increases, so does the risk of complications. A 21-year-old male was brought to the trauma center following a high speed motorbike accident. He underwent a laparotomy and angioembolization for a Grade 4 liver injury. A biloma was diagnosed on Day 18 post injury, and he underwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and biliary stenting which were unsuccessful. There were 2 re-admissions for infected perihepatic collections. In this case, an Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography was not a helpful procedure due to a disconnected liver segment, and morbidity occurred due to instrumentation of the biliary tree (the likely cause of infected biloma). Hepatic resection should be considered for patients who fail non-operative management. Further assessment of efficacy using a larger dataset for analysis is required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document