scholarly journals A comparative study of various techniques of incisional hernia repair in a tertiary care center at Bikaner (North-West Rajasthan)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 2909
Author(s):  
Bhal Singh ◽  
Mahender Kumar Jalthania ◽  
Santosh Kumari
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Abdominal Wall Defect ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Suture Repair ◽  
Onlay Mesh ◽  
Sublay Mesh ◽  
Repair Group

Background: Incisional hernia can be defined as an internal abdominal wall defect that develops after a previously closed laparotomy. Aim of present study was to compare open suture repair and mesh repair (onlay and sublay), various factors predisposing to incisional hernia and evaluate complications following surgery for incisional hernias.Methods: A prospective study was conducted in 60 cases of incisional hernia admitted in Department of General Surgery, PBM Hospital Bikaner between October 2017 to September 2018. 20 cases were selected in each group (open anatomical repair, onlay mesh repair and sublay mesh repair). All cases were followed up for 6 months postoperatively.Results: Incisional hernia was found to occur more often in 41-60 years age group (61.67%) and in females. Wound infection (46.67%) after index surgery was most important risk factor followed by obesity. LSCS (30%) was found to be most common index surgery followed by hysterectomy (28.33%). Seroma was most common postoperative complication (5% patient in anatomical repair group, 30% patients in onlay group and 10% patients in sublay group).Only one recurrence (5%) was observed in anatomical repair group over a period of 6 months follow up.Conclusions: Sublay mesh repair is superior to onlay mesh repair and Anatomical suture repair regarding recurrence rate. Local postoperative complications like seroma formation or wound infection were more common in mesh repair surgery than anatomical repair. Among mesh repair these complications were higher in onlay group than sublay repair.

scholarly journals A prospective study on incisional hernia, its incidence, etiology and management in a tertiary care hospital of Odisha

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1280
Author(s):  
S. K. Pattanaik ◽  
Afroza Firodous ◽  
Ajax John ◽  
Harsha Pattnaik ◽  
Biplab Mishra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Wound Management ◽  
Anatomical Reconstruction ◽  
Suture Repair ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Open Mesh Repair

Background: Incisional hernia (IH) is defined as the hernia protruding through incompletely healed abdominal surgical wound. Management of IH can be preventive (avoidance of infection and suture line tension, proper abdominal wound closure) or operative (anatomical reconstruction or repair with synthetic non-absorbable mesh either by open or laparoscopy method).Methods: A descriptive prospective observational study on 51 patients with age >15 yrs was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack from August 2015 to August 2017. Diagnosis was made with clinical history, physical examination, X-ray abdomen and USG abdomen. The patients underwent different surgical procedures depending on size of defect, patient’s consent and expertise available. Post-operative complications were noted and patients were followed up to 1 year for any recurrence.Results: 28 males and 23 females were included. The mean age was 42.3 years. Most common cause of IH was post-operative wound infection (47.1%). Maximum cases were following emergency surgery (88.2%). Midline incision contributes maximum number (52.9%) followed by Pfannenstiel incision (25.4%). Open hernioplasty was the most common procedure (58.8%) followed by anatomical repair (19.6%) and laparoscopic hernioplasty (15.6%). Recurrence with suture repair was 10%, open mesh repair 3.3% and no recurrence was observed following laparoscopic repair.Conclusions: Prevention of IH is to be taken care of, by avoiding infection during index operation with thorough peritoneal toileting, proper surgical techniques and appropriate antibiotics. Although laparoscopic mesh repair needs more operating time and skill, it has lesser blood loss, hospital stay and recurrence rate when compared to other procedures.

scholarly journals HERNIOPLASTY

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (02) ◽  
pp. 224-227
Author(s):  
MUHAMMAD FAISAL BILALL ◽  
MUHAMMAD AKRAM ◽  
SUMERA KANWAL ◽  
Jawaid Iqbal
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Enterocutaneous Fistula ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Fistula Formation ◽  
Open Mesh Repair ◽  
Sublay Technique ◽  
Open Mesh

Incisional hernia is a common complication of abdominal surgery and an important source of morbidity. It may be repairedusing open suture, open mesh or laparoscopic mesh techniques. O b j e c t i v e s : To examine the results of open mesh repair using "sublaytechnique" of hernioplasty. Setting: Surgical Unit-I, Department of Surgery at Allied Hospital, a tertiary care teaching hospital affiliated withPunjab Medical College, Faisalabad. Patient & M e t h o d s : Sixty patients (male:16, female:44) were operated for incisional hernia. Openmesh repair was done. Polypropylene mesh was placed over closed posterior rectus sheath layer and over the rectus abdominis, wereavailable. Anterior rectus sheath was closed in front of the implanted mesh. All the patients received injectable third generation cephalosporinfor 48hrs postoperatively. Postoperative recovery in terms of seroma formation, wound infection, intraabdominal adhesions leading tointestinal obstruction, enterocutaneous fistula formation and recurrence were the main factors noted and analyzed statistically. Results:Mean postoperative hospital stay was 03 days. Only one patient developed wound infection. None of the patients developed seromaformation, intestinal obstruction or enterocutaneous fistula. Maximum follow up till this study is 14 months. No recurrence has been reportedso far. C o n c l u s i o n s : Open mesh repair using "sublay technique" does not carry risk of enterocutaneous fistula, carries low risk of seromaformation and wound infection. Proper technique is not associated with recurrence.

scholarly journals MESH REPAIR

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (07) ◽  
pp. 840-843
Author(s):  
Muhammad Paryal Tagar ◽  
Khawar Saeed Jamali ◽  
Muhammad Jawed ◽  
Sarang Tagar
Keyword(s):  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Surgical Department ◽  
Hospital Patients ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Sublay Mesh ◽  
Repair Group

Objectives: Compare the complications of inlay versus sublay mesh repairin epigastric hernia. Study Design: Observational study. Setting: Surgical department ofmultiple hospitals and compares the results, JPMC, Civil Hospital Karachi and NaushahroFeroze. Period: March 2015 to February 2016. Methodology: 94 patients presenting withupper abdomen midline swellings aged between 25 to 60 years attended as outdoor patientat a tertiary care hospital. Patients associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease likeasthma, abdominal malignancies and cirrhosis with end stage liver disease, multiple hernia,patients with prior hernia repair with mesh and defects < 4cm were excluded. Results: Outof the 94 patients, the majority was found to be male. 61 (64.89%) males and 33 (35.10%)females. Mean age was found to be 41.57+4.54 years. Inlay mesh repair group observed highcomplications as compared to sublay mesh repair group. Wound Infection observed 4(8.5%) cases inlay mesh repair group and 2(4.25%) cases in sublay mesh repair group. SeromaInfection observed 3(6.38 %) cases inlay mesh repair group and 1(2.12 %) cases in sublay meshrepair group. Recurrence occurred inlay mesh repair group was observed in 2(4.25%) cases.Short Hospital stay was observed in sublay mesh repair group. Conclusion: We concludethat sublay mesh repair is a better alternative to only mesh repair for all forms of ventral herniacases.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN ONLAY AND RETRORECTUS MESH REPAIR IN THE TREATMENT OF INCISIONAL HERNIAS

2021 ◽  
pp. 65-69
Author(s):  
S. Yashwanth ◽  
S. Dayakar
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Onlay Mesh ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

INTRODUCTION: Over the years, surgeons tried the placement of mesh at different locations like On-lay, Under-lay, Sub-lay and pre-peritoneal, retroperitoneal intraperitoneal, Inter-muscular, etc. with each procedure having its advantages and disadvantages. Commonly Onlay and sub lay mesh repairs are done. Though the literature says, sub lay procedures have fewer complications and a high success rate. However, in a few studies, the ideal position for mesh repair appears to be retro muscular, where the force of abdominal pressure holds the mesh against deep surfaces of muscles. In this study, a comparison of both Onlay and retro rectus procedures with regards to the duration of surgery, postoperative complications like seroma, wound infection, wound dehiscence, and also the period of postoperative stay in the hospital. The aim of the study is To compare 'Onlay' versus 'retro rectus' mesh repair in inuencing the outcome in incisional hernia with regards to Duration of surgery, Postoperative complications like seroma formation, wound infection, Postoperative stay, Recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODOLOGY: Type of Study: A Prospective comparative study Study Setting: Department of general surgery, Narayana Medical College & Hospital, Nellore.Study Period: November 2018 to September 2020 Study Sample: 50 cases, divided into two groups by random allocation technique. Groups A and B with 25 patients in each group. RESULTS: The mean age of cases in Group A is 40.48 years. The mean age of patients in Group B is 44.08 years. Youngest was 31 years and 36 years in group A and group B, respectively, and the eldest was 51 years and 53 years in group A and group B, respectively. In Group A, 11 were male, and 14 were female, and in Group B, 11 were male, and 14 were female. The male to female ratio in the study was 1:1.27. The mean Operative Time in Group A was 1.93 Hrs, and that in Group B was 2.98Hrs. Nine patients (36%) in group A and one patient (4%) in group B had seroma formation. Eight patients (32%) in group A and one patient (4%) in group B had a wound infection. The mean Hospital Stay in Group A was 5.44 Days, and Group B was 4.88 days. No short-term recurrences were noted in either of the two groups when followed for six months. CONCLUSION : Retrorectus mesh repair is an excellent alternative to Onlay mesh repair that may apply to incisional hernia. The mesh-related overall complication rate like seroma wound infections and hospital stay is less than Onlay mesh repair.

scholarly journals Incidence of seroma in sublay versus onlay mesh repair of incisional hernia

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 155-157
Author(s):  
Rashid Ibrahim ◽  
Sabry Abounozha ◽  
Adel Kheder ◽  
Talal Alshahri
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Onlay Mesh

scholarly journals A Study of Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair Using Barbed Sutures for Abdominal Incisional Hernia

2021 ◽  
Vol 105 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 585-590
Author(s):  
Junpei Takashima ◽  
Keizo Taniguchi ◽  
Toshiaki Yasui ◽  
Masahiro Yamane ◽  
Yutaka Hattori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Barbed Suture ◽  
Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh ◽  
Barbed Sutures ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Onlay Mesh ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Hernial Orifice

Objective We investigated the validity of our intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) Plus technique with barbed sutures. Background Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair has become a proven method for treating abdominal incisional hernias in recent years. There have been a few reports on the utility of IPOM Plus, which is IPOM + celiorrhaphy, although this method has not been widely discussed. We adopted the IPOM Plus technique with barbed sutures at our hospital and investigated the validity of this technique. Methods We included 7 patients who underwent IPOM Plus repair from 2015 to 2017 at our hospital. We excluded patients with a hernia hilum &lt;2 cm or ≥10 cm, age &lt; 20 years old, PS3 or more, and uncontrolled comorbidity. The hernial orifice was closed laparoscopically using barbed sutures and subsequently secured by tacking on an onlay mesh. Results The median hernial orifice size of the 7 patients was 45 mm (25 to 55 mm). Hernia onset occurred after laparotomy in all cases. In one case, an abdominal incisional hernia recurred after IPOM used to treat the condition 15 years earlier. The mean duration of surgery was 80.5 minutes (53 to 126 minutes), and the median pain scale score was 3 points (0 to 3 points), indicating little pain. None of the patients reported persistent postoperative pain. The mean duration of the postoperative hospital stay was a median of 3.5 days (2 to 5 days). Both short- and long-term outcomes indicated that no recurrence or complications, such as bulging or seroma, occurred. Conclusions IPOM Plus with intracavitary abdominal suturing using barbed suture for abdominal scar hernia repair may be a valid surgical procedure.

scholarly journals Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair – Experience in A Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-109
Author(s):  
Md Ezharul Haque Ratan ◽  
Hasina Alam
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh ◽  
Diabetes Status ◽  
Onlay Mesh

Background: Ventral hernias are common problem in surgical practice. Repair of hernia by a prosthetic mesh is a well recognized procedure. But whether the procedure is to be done by open or laparoscopic technique is still a topic of discussion. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) hernioplasty is a newer technique in managing ventral hernia in our country. We are evaluating the usefulness of this procedure as routine operation for ventral hernias.Methods: All patients attending at Bangladesh Institute of Research & Rehabilitation of Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic disorders (BIRDEM) outpatient department (OPD) with ventral hernia were approached and counseled for laparoscopic IPOM, but only those who agreed were included in this study. Fifty consecutive patients underwent IPOM by a single surgeon. Preoperative evaluation was done rationally and surgery performed by standard laparoscopic method. Age, sex, diabetes status and additional procedures done were evaluated. Post- operative follow up period was from 3 months to 75 months and any complication or recurrence were noted.Results: We are reporting 50 cases of laparoscopic IPOM, over a time period of 78 months (April 2010- September 2016). Eleven cases were male, 39 female (M: F=1:3.5). 35 (70%) cases were diabetic, 15 (30%) were non-diabetic. Mean age of the patients were 47.7yrs (male 47.7+9.5 yrs, female 47.7- 2.6 yrs, diabetic patients 47.7+ 2.5yrs, non-diabetic patients 47.7-5.9yrs). Indication for IPOM was paraumbilical hernia 29 cases (58%), incisional hernia 14 cases(28%), multiple incisional hernia 2 cases ( 2 large defect in one case, 5 defects of varying size in another patient), umbilical port hernia 2 cases, paraumbilical along with incisional hernia 1 case, epigastric hernia 1 case, lumber hernia 1 case. In 48 cases (96%) polypropylene mesh and only in 2 cases (4%) dual mesh were used. In addition to IPOM procedure, in same sitting laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done in 8 cases, Dilatation & Curettage in 1 case and adhesiolysis in 7 cases. None of the case required conversion to open, neither was there any intra-operative complication. In one case there was recurrence . In another case there was false recurrence due to development of ascites. Four patients developed seroma which were managed conservatively.Conclusion: Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) hernioplasty has proved to be an effective surgical procedure for ventral hernia repair. It provides much benefits with low complications and conversion in experienced hands.Birdem Med J 2017; 7(2): 106-109

scholarly journals The clinical study of the incisional hernia and its management

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 2281
Author(s):  
Navdeep Garg ◽  
Pooja Batra ◽  
Sharadendu Bali
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Previous History ◽  
Exploratory Laparotomy ◽  
Suture Repair ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Response Sets ◽  
History Of ◽  
Sublay Mesh ◽  
Mesh Hernioplasty

Background: Hernia is defined as abnormal protrusion of viscus through a normal or abnormal weakness in the wall of its containing cavity. Incidence of Incisional hernias is 60%. It is the most common complication after exploratory laparotomy followed by LSCS.Methods: Data was collected for 30 cases of incisional hernia according to the proforma which included detailed history, clinical examination and investigation. Data was tabulated, analyzed and results interpreted.Results: Incisional hernia was more common in females with the ratio 1.5:1. The incidence of incisional hernia was highest in the age group ranging from 30-50 years. Most of the patients presented with chief complaint of swelling (100%) followed by pain and swelling (24%). Incisional hernia was more common in patients of previous history of abdominal procedures (explorative laparotomy 53%) followed by gynaecological operations (23%). Out of 30 patients studied, 20 underwent only mesh hernioplasty (67%), 10 underwent sublay mesh hernioplasty (23%).Conclusions: With prosthetic mesh, defects of any size can be repaired without tension. The polypropylene mesh, by inducing inflammatory response sets up scaffolding that in turn induces the synthesis of collagen. Thus, the superiority of mesh repair over suture repair can be accounted for. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document