scholarly journals Prospective comparative study of modified Smead Jones versus conventional continuous method of fascial closure in emergency midline laparotomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 3713
Author(s):  
Chirag B. Aghara ◽  
Ajay M. Rajyaguru ◽  
Jatin G. Bhatt
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Closure Technique ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Linea Alba ◽  
Hernia Prevention ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Continuous Closure

Background: A midline incision is simple, quick, bloodless and provides excellent exposure. So it is most commonly used access route for emergency laparotomy. But compare to other incision it increases incidence of postoperative wound dehiscence and an incisional hernia. Prevention of this complication is important in reducing post-operative morbidity and mortality. Present study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of modified Smead Jones versus conventional continuous closure technique in terms of wound infection and wound dehiscence.Methods: A total of 100 patients from July 2017 to November 2019 were randomized in two groups of 50 each. Group A in which linea alba closure was done by modified Smead Jones technique and group B in which linea alba closure was done by conventional continuous closure technique.Results: 12 patients in group A and 28 patients in group B developed wound infection and 1 patient in group A and 7 patients in group B developed wound dehiscence.Conclusions: Modified Smead Jones technique is better than conventional continuous closure technique in management of closure of emergency midline laparotomy. 

scholarly journals A clinical study of continuous and interrupted fascial closure in emergency midline laparotomy at a tertiary care centre

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 2014
Author(s):  
Rahul D. Kunju ◽  
Vinayak Thakkannavar ◽  
Shrivathsa Merta K. ◽  
Sachin H. G. ◽  
Allen Netto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Closure Technique ◽  
Burst Abdomen ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Laparotomy Wound

Background: Commonest approach in emergency open abdominal surgeries remains to be midline laparotomy because it is simple, saves time and causes minimal blood loss. Optimal technique for laparotomy wound closure has been a topic of debate since long. Risk factors for development of incisional hernia and burst abdomen are wound infection, systemic illnesses of patient and closure technique. Factors related to patients like age, gender, body mass index (BMI), systemic illnesses are not modifiable when an emergency laparotomy is the only option. Hence closure technique is one factor where surgeon has total control, which can bring down the incidence of burst abdomen and incisional hernias.Methods: Prospective study conducted in 150 patients who underwent emergency midline laparotomy from December 2014 to February 2016 in Krishna Rajendra Hospital attached to Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India with 6 months’ follow-up after surgery.Results: Most of patients in the study belonged to 30-40-year group and were males (78%). Gastrointestinal perforation peritonitis (52%) was the single most common indication for emergency midline laparotomy. In the continuous and interrupted groups, post-operative wound infection was found in 54.6% and 34.6%, wound dehiscence was found in 16% and 6.6% and incisional hernia in 14.4% and 4% respectively.Conclusions: Interrupted suturing is superior to continuous technique in emergency midline laparotomy wound closure in terms of complications and post-operative morbidity.

scholarly journals Comparison of suture technique (interrupted vs. continuous) with respect to wound dehiscence

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 191-194
Author(s):  
Gopal Sharma ◽  
Nivedita Prashar ◽  
Nikita Gandotra
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Suture Technique ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Continuous Suture ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Objectives: Post-operative complete wound dehiscence, being an unfortunate and also a very serious complication, is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate despite the most sophisticated intensive care these patients receive today. The quest for the best closure technique for abdominal incisions continues. To achieve this goal, several modifications in opening the abdomen and closing the wound have been tried. There are many studies in the literature comparing various methods of wound closure, with conflicting results. The aim of the present study was to assess the proportion of wound infection and wound dehiscence in the post-midline laparotomy patients, using interrupted X suture versus continuous suture technique in sheath closure. Material and Methods: A total of 80 patients undergoing vertical midline emergency laparotomy at one of the gynecology units were recruited randomly after taking written informed consent and were equally divided into 40 cases each group (interrupted X suture) and (continuous suture) they were randomized into two groups depending on whether the patient registration number was odd or even. Results: The age of the patients varied from 16 years to 82 years. In Group A, the mean age was 36.75 ± 13.78 years, and in Group B, the mean age of the patients was 38.37 ± 12.56 years. In Group A, 8 (20%) patients had comorbidity, whereas, in Group B, 10 (25%) patients had comorbidity. In Group A, 12 patients had wound infection, while in Group B, ten patients had wound infection (P = 0.001 [statistically significant]). In Group A, two patients had wound dehiscence, while none of the patients in Group B had wound dehiscence (P = 0.001 [statistically significant]). There was no incisional hernia in both the groups. Conclusion: Emergency laparotomy is associated with a higher rate of burst abdomen as compared to elective laparotomy, but using interrupted X suture technique in sheath closure, wound dehiscence can be prevented up to some extent.

scholarly journals Comparative study of abdominal wound dehiscence in continuous versus interrupted fascial closure after emergency midline laparotomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 886
Author(s):  
Rajesh Kumar Bansiwal ◽  
Tarun Mittal ◽  
Rajeev Sharma ◽  
Sanjay Gupta ◽  
Simrandeep Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Abdominal Wound ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Group A ◽  
Abdominal Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Group B

Background: Laparotomy wound dehiscence is still a puzzle for most of the surgeons. Mortality associated with dehiscence has been estimated at 10-30%. Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy suffer from one of these comorbid conditions which are detrimental to healing. In this scenario interrupted suturing has been found to give good strength and have less incidence of wound dehiscence. The objective of the study was to compare the incidence of abdominal wound dehiscence in emergency midline laparotomy.Methods: This study was conducted on 300 consecutive patients undergoing emergency midline laparotomy in the Department of Surgery, Government Medical College and Hospital. Methods group-A: closed by suturing the rectus sheath using polydioxanone suture 1-0 (PDS) in continuous layer suturing method. group-B: closed by suturing the rectus sheath using polydioxanone suture 1-0 in interrupted layer suturing method.Results: The mean age in group A was 40.47 years and 37.47 in group B. In Group A 20.1% patients had burst abdomen and 5.4% in group B.Conclusions: Interrupted closure of abdominal wall fascia is better in emergency laparotomy as compared to continuous closure.

scholarly journals ELECTIVE MIDLINE LAPAROTOMY

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (01) ◽  
pp. 106-111
Author(s):  
ARSALAN SIRAJ ◽  
ATHAR ABBAS SHAH GILANI ◽  
MUHAMMAD FAROOQ DAR ◽  
Sohail Raziq
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
P Value ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Group A ◽  
Insignificant Difference ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To compare the diathermy incision with scalpel incision in patients undergoing midline elective laparotomy. Design of Study: A prospective, experimental comparative study. Place and Duration: Department of surgery, PNS Shifa Karachi, from March 2007 to June 2008. Patients and Methods: A total of 100 patients were included in the study, and equally divided into 2 groups. Group A received scalpel incision while in group B diathermy was employed to incise all layers. Peroperative parameters including, incision time and blood loss were calculated. Postoperatively, pain was assessed by visual analogue score and wound infection documented. Results: Both groups included fifty patients each out of the total 44 females and 56 were males, with similar gender preposition in both the groups. Mean age of patients in scalpel group was 48.78 (±14.47) while it was 44.92 (±15.87) in diathermy group. The mean incision related blood loss in Scalpel group was 1.53 (±0.20) ml/cm2 and in Diathermy group was 1.43 (±0.20) ml/cm2, showing significantly less bleeding in diathermy group (p-value= 0.014). Diathermy group, with incision related time of 6.20 sec/cm2 (±0.97 sec/cm2), was significantly quicker (p-value= 0.003) than scalpel incision, with incision time of 6.76 sec/cm2 (±0.84 sec/cm2). Postoperative pain scores, recorded daily over five days, showed insignificant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: Diathermy, employed for midline laparotomy, is quicker and hemostatic, compared to the scalpel. The two are, however, similar in terms of wound infection and postoperative pain.

scholarly journals Comparison of outcome of interrupted versus continuous closure technique of rectus sheath in emergency laparotomies patients in terms of wound dehiscence.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (04) ◽  
pp. 455-458
Author(s):  
Kaleem Ullah ◽  
Shams Uddin ◽  
Azam Shoib ◽  
Muhmmad Danish Yaseen
Keyword(s):  
Total Duration ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trail ◽  
Group B ◽  
Continuous Closure

Objective: To compare outcome of interrupted versus continuous closure of rectus sheath in emergency laparotomy patients, in terms of wound dehiscence. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trail. Setting: Department of Casualty Surgical Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat. Period: 1st January to 30th June 2020. Material & Methods: Total duration of study was 6 months. Total of 150 patients (75 in each group) were studied. Interrupted closure of rectus sheath was done in group “A” patients while continuous closure was done in group “B” patients, and efficacy in terms of wound dehiscence was compared in both groups. Results: Overall male to female ratio was1.29:1. The average age of the patients was 39.41 years +13.02SD.   Wound dehiscence in Group “A” was found in 2.6% cases while 6.6% in Group “B” patients. Conclusion: Interrupted closure of Rectus sheath in emergency laparotomy is more effective than continuous closure in preventing wound dehiscence.

scholarly journals A Prospective Study Comparing Continuous Versus Interrupted Suture Techniques in Midline Abdominal Wound Closure

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-66
Author(s):  
Shiv Vansh Bharti ◽  
Anup Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
College Teaching ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Burst Abdomen ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Abdominal Closure ◽  
Group A ◽  
Laparotomy Wound ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Wound closure after midline laparotomy is an essential part of surgery to produce a healthy and a strong scar. There is an alternative interrupted method of closure as compared to conventional continuous method of closure. Many comparative studies have shown different outcomes. So, we wanted to evaluate the outcome of different techniques in our setting. Aims: To compare the outcome of Interrupted abdominal closure and continuous abdominal closure in midline laparotomy wound. Methods: This was a prospective comparative study conducted in the Department of Surgery of Nepalgunj Medical College Teaching Hospital, Kohalpur, Banke, Nepal for a duration of 1 year. A total of 60 patients were selected randomly to receive either continuous or interrupted abdominal closure in midline laparotomy wound. Wound was evaluated in terms of wound discharge, infection and wound dehiscence. Results: The mean age of the patients was 38.38 years. Most commonly, the patients presented with duodenal ulcer perforation with peritonitis. The average time taken for abdomen closure in group A (16.77 minutes) was significantly less as compared to group B (27.77 minutes). The average cost of sutures for group B (Rs 1322.97) was higher than that of sutures for group A (Rs 1118) with p value of <0.01. Wound infection and incidence of burst abdomen were similar in both groups after one month, suture sinus was seen in three patients of group A and four patients of group B (p = 1.0). Incisional hernia was seen in one patient of group A and in none of the patients of group B at three month’s follow-up (p = 1.0). Conclusion: Continuous technique of midline laparotomy wound closure is better in terms of time required for wound closure and costing of suture materials, while showing no difference in terms of wound infection, burst abdomen and late wound complications

scholarly journals Comparison of interrupted-X technique closure versus conventional continuous closure of rectus sheath: a randomized control study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 3233
Author(s):  
Balaji C. ◽  
Sushanto Neogi ◽  
Sadasivam Ramasamy ◽  
Manu Vats
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Suture Material ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Patient Data ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Continuous Closure ◽  
Preoperative Patient

Background: A major surgical complication after emergency midline laparotomy is abdominal fascial dehiscence. Dehiscence is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates up to 30%, prolonged hospital stay, and a long-term risk of developing incisional hernia. The risk factors of Wound dehiscence can surgeon factors or patient factors. This study was aimed at comparing effectiveness of interrupted-X technique versus conventional continuous closure of rectus sheath in midline laparotomy in emergency setting.Methods: This study was conducted in a total of 100 patients underwent midline laparotomy for perforation peritonitis in emergency setting. Out of which 50 patients underwent rectus sheath closure by interrupted-X technique (group A) and 50 patients by conventional continuous closure (group B) using non-absorbable, monofilament, no.1 polypropylene suture. Necessary preoperative patient data, wound length, the time taken for rectus closure, length of the suture material used, post-operative complications like wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, period of hospital stay were recorded for analysis.Results: Preoperative patient data among both the groups were comparable. Group A was found to have less wound dehiscence (p=0.001 for partial and p=0.008 for complete) and less period of hospital stay (p=0.054), which were statistically significant. Surgical site infections were similar in both groups. Group B was found to have less time taken for closure (p=0.003) and less length of suture material used (p=0.003), which were statistically significant.Conclusions: Interrupted-X technique of rectus sheath closure reduces the rate of wound dehiscence and period of hospital stay, although it consumes more length of suture material and more time for suturing as compared to conventional continuous closure.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Wound Infection in Patients Undergoing Elective or Emergency Abdominal Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1697-1699
Author(s):  
Arshid Mahmood ◽  
Aqeel Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Hammad Muzaffar ◽  
Sarfraz Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Surgical Wound Infection ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Surgical Wound ◽  
Surgical Infection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Intra Abdominal Infection

Objective: To compare the surgical wound infection in patients undergoing elective or emergency abdominal surgeries. Study Design: Comparative study Place & Duration of Study: Study was conducted at surgery department of Divisional Headquarter Teaching hospital Mirpur Azad Kashmir for eighteen months duration from June 2019 to November 2020. Materials and Methods: 150 patients of both genders with ages 15 to 65 years who received laparotomy treatment due to intra-abdominal infection or complicated appendicitis were included in this study. Patient’s medical history, age, sex and residency were recorded after taking informed consent. All the patients were divided into two groups, Group A contained 75 patients (Elective) and Group B contains 75 patients (emergency) received laparotomy. Deep surgical wound infection was examined at the 7th day after surgery and compared between both groups. Results: Ninety eight (65.3%) patients 49 in each group were males and 52 (34.7%) patients 26 in each group were females. In Group A and B 27 and 29 patients were ages 15 to 30 years, 33 and 31 patients had ages 36 to 45 years, 15 and 15 patients were ages between 46 to 60 years. 10 (13.3%) patients in Group A and 12 (16%) patients in group B had deep surgical infection within 1 week after surgery. Statistically there is no significant difference between the both groups (p>0.356) Conclusion: It is concluded that the frequency of wound infection was high in emergency abdominal surgeries as compared to patients undergoing elective surgery, but the difference was not statistically significant. Keywords: Emergency laparotomy, Deep surgical site infection, PO Drain placement

scholarly journals 465 No Role for Postoperative Antibiotics in Uncomplicated Appendicitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Ayoub ◽  
Y Tryliskyy ◽  
M K Baig
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
P Value ◽  
Nice Guidelines ◽  
Uncomplicated Appendicitis ◽  
Perforated Appendix ◽  
Group A ◽  
Preoperative Antibiotics ◽  
Group B ◽  
Variable Practice

Abstract Introduction Several studies have shown benefit from use of preoperative antibiotics in reducing postoperative infection after appendectomy as well as efficacy of postoperative antibiotics in complicated appendicitis (defined as perforated appendix or presence of pus in peritoneum). While for uncomplicated appendicitis, several studies showed no benefit from antibiotics postoperatively but there are no clear NICE guidelines till now and so surgeons have different practice based on their preferences. Method This study included patients who had appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis in Worthing hospital from 1st July 2019 till 30th June 2020. The end point was 30-day follow up postoperatively for wound infection or collection. Results 90 patients were admitted with uncomplicated appendicitis with age 6-80 years (mean of 31.3). 46 patients (51%) did not receive postoperative antibiotics (group A) and 44 (49%) received postoperative antibiotics (group B) with a variable practice from one dose to 8-day course. postoperatively, only 1 patient (2.1%) in group A developed wound infection requiring drainage while none in group B developed complications (p-value=1). Conclusions Administration of postoperative antibiotics in uncomplicated appendicitis showed no superiority over non-administration. in addition, they add extra cost on NHS. So, their routine use postoperatively is not recommended, however, larger studies are required to confirm this.

Frequency of port site infection following gall bladder removal through Epigastric vs Umbilical port.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (03) ◽  
pp. 277-281
Author(s):  
Bushra Shaikh ◽  
Imamuddin Baloch ◽  
Azhar Ali Shah ◽  
Abdul Sami Mirani ◽  
Parkash Lal Lund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gall Bladder ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the frequency of port site wound infection following gall bladder removal through umbilical and epigastric port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Study Design: Randomized Control Trial. Setting: Surgical Unit 2, Ghulam Muhammad Mahar Medical College, hospital Sukkur. Period: 1st November 2019 to 30th October 2020. Material & Methods: All cases who underwent four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in two groups. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. As the last event of surgery gall bladder was retrieved in a glove bag through umbilical port in group A and through epigastric port in group B, both under direct camera vision. Wound infection was considered if there was 3 to 5 grade of wound according to Southampton wound grading system (Figure-1) on 5th postoperative day. All demographics and outcome variables were recorded. Results: Age ranged from 20 to 60 years with mean age of 38.875±8.11 years, BMI 29.973±5.12 Kg/m2, duration of surgery 50.656±8.41 mins and Southampton score was 1.044±1.07 in Group A and mean age of 38.560±6.23 years, BMI 27.437±5.04 Kg/m2, duration of surgery 48.920±8.67 mins and Southampton score was 0.856±0.92 in Group B. In group A, 18 (5.7%)patients developed port site wound infection in contrast to 5 (1.6%) patients in group B (P= 0.006). Conclusion: We conclude that epigastric port retrieval of gall bladder following laparoscopic cholecystectomy results in less port site infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document