scholarly journals Comparison of outcome of interrupted versus continuous closure technique of rectus sheath in emergency laparotomies patients in terms of wound dehiscence.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (04) ◽  
pp. 455-458
Author(s):  
Kaleem Ullah ◽  
Shams Uddin ◽  
Azam Shoib ◽  
Muhmmad Danish Yaseen
Keyword(s):  
Total Duration ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trail ◽  
Group B ◽  
Continuous Closure

Objective: To compare outcome of interrupted versus continuous closure of rectus sheath in emergency laparotomy patients, in terms of wound dehiscence. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trail. Setting: Department of Casualty Surgical Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat. Period: 1st January to 30th June 2020. Material & Methods: Total duration of study was 6 months. Total of 150 patients (75 in each group) were studied. Interrupted closure of rectus sheath was done in group “A” patients while continuous closure was done in group “B” patients, and efficacy in terms of wound dehiscence was compared in both groups. Results: Overall male to female ratio was1.29:1. The average age of the patients was 39.41 years +13.02SD.   Wound dehiscence in Group “A” was found in 2.6% cases while 6.6% in Group “B” patients. Conclusion: Interrupted closure of Rectus sheath in emergency laparotomy is more effective than continuous closure in preventing wound dehiscence.

scholarly journals Comparison of interrupted-X technique closure versus conventional continuous closure of rectus sheath: a randomized control study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 3233
Author(s):  
Balaji C. ◽  
Sushanto Neogi ◽  
Sadasivam Ramasamy ◽  
Manu Vats
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Suture Material ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Patient Data ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Continuous Closure ◽  
Preoperative Patient

Background: A major surgical complication after emergency midline laparotomy is abdominal fascial dehiscence. Dehiscence is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates up to 30%, prolonged hospital stay, and a long-term risk of developing incisional hernia. The risk factors of Wound dehiscence can surgeon factors or patient factors. This study was aimed at comparing effectiveness of interrupted-X technique versus conventional continuous closure of rectus sheath in midline laparotomy in emergency setting.Methods: This study was conducted in a total of 100 patients underwent midline laparotomy for perforation peritonitis in emergency setting. Out of which 50 patients underwent rectus sheath closure by interrupted-X technique (group A) and 50 patients by conventional continuous closure (group B) using non-absorbable, monofilament, no.1 polypropylene suture. Necessary preoperative patient data, wound length, the time taken for rectus closure, length of the suture material used, post-operative complications like wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, period of hospital stay were recorded for analysis.Results: Preoperative patient data among both the groups were comparable. Group A was found to have less wound dehiscence (p=0.001 for partial and p=0.008 for complete) and less period of hospital stay (p=0.054), which were statistically significant. Surgical site infections were similar in both groups. Group B was found to have less time taken for closure (p=0.003) and less length of suture material used (p=0.003), which were statistically significant.Conclusions: Interrupted-X technique of rectus sheath closure reduces the rate of wound dehiscence and period of hospital stay, although it consumes more length of suture material and more time for suturing as compared to conventional continuous closure.

scholarly journals Comparative study of abdominal wound dehiscence in continuous versus interrupted fascial closure after emergency midline laparotomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 886
Author(s):  
Rajesh Kumar Bansiwal ◽  
Tarun Mittal ◽  
Rajeev Sharma ◽  
Sanjay Gupta ◽  
Simrandeep Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Abdominal Wound ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Group A ◽  
Abdominal Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Group B

Background: Laparotomy wound dehiscence is still a puzzle for most of the surgeons. Mortality associated with dehiscence has been estimated at 10-30%. Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy suffer from one of these comorbid conditions which are detrimental to healing. In this scenario interrupted suturing has been found to give good strength and have less incidence of wound dehiscence. The objective of the study was to compare the incidence of abdominal wound dehiscence in emergency midline laparotomy.Methods: This study was conducted on 300 consecutive patients undergoing emergency midline laparotomy in the Department of Surgery, Government Medical College and Hospital. Methods group-A: closed by suturing the rectus sheath using polydioxanone suture 1-0 (PDS) in continuous layer suturing method. group-B: closed by suturing the rectus sheath using polydioxanone suture 1-0 in interrupted layer suturing method.Results: The mean age in group A was 40.47 years and 37.47 in group B. In Group A 20.1% patients had burst abdomen and 5.4% in group B.Conclusions: Interrupted closure of abdominal wall fascia is better in emergency laparotomy as compared to continuous closure.

scholarly journals Outcome of abdominal binder in midline abdominal wound Dehiscence in terms of pain, psychological satisfaction and need for reclosure

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Siddique Ammar ◽  
Syed Asghar Naqi ◽  
Shehrbano Khattak ◽  
Ahmed Raza Noumani
Keyword(s):  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
P Value ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Abdominal Wound ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Surgical Ward ◽  
Group A ◽  
Abdominal Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Group B

Objective: To assess the role of abdominal binder in patients with midline wound dehiscence after elective or emergency laparotomy in terms of pain, psychological satisfaction and need for reclosure. Methods: It was a comparative study done at EAST Surgical Ward of Mayo Hospital, Lahore from 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2019. One hundred and sixty-two (162) patients were included in this study with post-operative midline abdominal wound dehiscence and after informed consent by consecutive non probability sampling technique. Patients were divided into two groups by lottery method into eighty-one patients each. Group-A included patients where abdominal binder was applied and Group-B included patients without abdominal binder. In both groups pain score, psychological satisfaction and need for reclosure was assessed and compared. Results: Patients with abdominal binder shows significantly less pain (P value =0.000) and more psychological satisfaction (P value = 0.000) as compared to the patients where abdominal binder was not used. However, there was no difference in reducing the need for reclosure in patients who use abdominal binder (P value = 0.063). Conclusion: Although abdominal binder helps in reducing the pain and improving the psychological satisfaction in patients with midline abdominal wound dehiscence yet it doesn’t help in healing of wound and reclosure of the dehisced abdominal wound is needed. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.4.3671 How to cite this:Ammar AS, Naqi SA, Khattak S, Noumani AR. Outcome of abdominal binder in midline abdominal wound Dehiscence in terms of pain, psychological satisfaction and need for reclosure. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(4):1118-1121.  doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.4.3671 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

scholarly journals Prospective comparative study of modified Smead Jones versus conventional continuous method of fascial closure in emergency midline laparotomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 3713
Author(s):  
Chirag B. Aghara ◽  
Ajay M. Rajyaguru ◽  
Jatin G. Bhatt
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Closure Technique ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Linea Alba ◽  
Hernia Prevention ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Continuous Closure

Background: A midline incision is simple, quick, bloodless and provides excellent exposure. So it is most commonly used access route for emergency laparotomy. But compare to other incision it increases incidence of postoperative wound dehiscence and an incisional hernia. Prevention of this complication is important in reducing post-operative morbidity and mortality. Present study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of modified Smead Jones versus conventional continuous closure technique in terms of wound infection and wound dehiscence.Methods: A total of 100 patients from July 2017 to November 2019 were randomized in two groups of 50 each. Group A in which linea alba closure was done by modified Smead Jones technique and group B in which linea alba closure was done by conventional continuous closure technique.Results: 12 patients in group A and 28 patients in group B developed wound infection and 1 patient in group A and 7 patients in group B developed wound dehiscence.Conclusions: Modified Smead Jones technique is better than conventional continuous closure technique in management of closure of emergency midline laparotomy. 

scholarly journals A comparative study between continuous and x-interrupted sutures in emergency midline laparotomies

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 1753
Author(s):  
Shashikala V. ◽  
Abhilash S. B. ◽  
Abhishek G. ◽  
Prajwal S. Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Suture Material ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Common Technique ◽  
Laparotomy Wound ◽  
Group B ◽  
Time Required

Background: Midline laparotomy is the most common technique of abdominal incisions in both emergency and elective settings. Wound dehiscence is related to several factors pertaining to patient besides suture material and method of closure. This study tries to compare continuous sutures with x-interrupted sutures in mass closure of midline laparotomy wound in patients undergoing emergency midline laparotomy for acute peritonitis.Methods: A total of 60 patients undergoing emergency midline laparotomy for secondary peritonitis were considered for the study, 30 of whom underwent closure of abdominal wall with continuous sutures (Group A) and the other 30 with x-interrupted sutures (Group B) using non-absorbable, monofilament, polypropylene suture. Necessary preoperative data, the time required for rectus closure, length of the suture material required, post-operative complications like surgical site infection, wound dehiscence were analyzed.Results: The groups were comparable in means of age and sex distribution. Group A was found to have lesser time for closure of rectus, lesser suture length and lesser suture to wound length ratio when compared with Group B. Surgical site infections were similar in both groups. Patients with rectus sheath sutured in x-interrupted sutures (n=2) had significantly less wound dehiscence as compared with continuous sutures (n=8) (p<0.05).Conclusions: Interrupted -X suture method of suturing reduces post-operative wound dehiscence, although requires more suture and consumes more time than the continuous method of suturing.

SP1.2.5Robot-assisted Colorectal Surgery: Short-term Outcome of First 70 cases at Different Time-intervals along the Learning Curve

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Singh ◽  
William Rea ◽  
Shaun Nai ◽  
Tamas Sollei ◽  
Neil Kukreja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Aim To analyse the evolution of robot-assisted colorectal surgery (RACS). Methods All the patients who underwent RACS between June 2018 and December 2020 were selected. Study period was divided into 3 intervals along the learning curve; group A represents the 1st 10 months, group B 2nd 10 and group C last 11. Results Over the 31-month study period, 70 RACS were performed. Male to female ratio was 4:3, with mean age of 66 years and BMI 28.7. ASA score was reported as 1-2 in 65% patients and 35% as 3. Indication was malignancy for 89% patients and the remainder benign pathology. High or low anterior resection performed were 72%, right hemicolectomies 21%, Hartmann’s 3%, abdominoperineal resections 3%, and left hemicolectomy 1%. RACS performed in group A was 20 compared to 19 in B and 31 C. Type of RACS performed, BMI, ASA, complications, anastomotic leaks, R0 resections and harvested lymph nodes were unrelated to selected time-intervals along learning curve. Mean total duration of procedure dropped down to 247 minutes in group C from 375 in group A (p = &lt;0.001). No significant difference in mean length of stay and readmission rate was observed in 3 groups (p = 0.7, p = 0.59). Conclusion The study demonstrates that introduction of this new surgical technique is safe even in the early phase of adoption with no significant difference in pre-and post-operative morbidities. Significant difference in time taken for surgery was observed with reduction of 88 minutes in average operating time between the start and end of the study.

scholarly journals Comparison of suture technique (interrupted vs. continuous) with respect to wound dehiscence

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 191-194
Author(s):  
Gopal Sharma ◽  
Nivedita Prashar ◽  
Nikita Gandotra
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Suture Technique ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Continuous Suture ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Objectives: Post-operative complete wound dehiscence, being an unfortunate and also a very serious complication, is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate despite the most sophisticated intensive care these patients receive today. The quest for the best closure technique for abdominal incisions continues. To achieve this goal, several modifications in opening the abdomen and closing the wound have been tried. There are many studies in the literature comparing various methods of wound closure, with conflicting results. The aim of the present study was to assess the proportion of wound infection and wound dehiscence in the post-midline laparotomy patients, using interrupted X suture versus continuous suture technique in sheath closure. Material and Methods: A total of 80 patients undergoing vertical midline emergency laparotomy at one of the gynecology units were recruited randomly after taking written informed consent and were equally divided into 40 cases each group (interrupted X suture) and (continuous suture) they were randomized into two groups depending on whether the patient registration number was odd or even. Results: The age of the patients varied from 16 years to 82 years. In Group A, the mean age was 36.75 ± 13.78 years, and in Group B, the mean age of the patients was 38.37 ± 12.56 years. In Group A, 8 (20%) patients had comorbidity, whereas, in Group B, 10 (25%) patients had comorbidity. In Group A, 12 patients had wound infection, while in Group B, ten patients had wound infection (P = 0.001 [statistically significant]). In Group A, two patients had wound dehiscence, while none of the patients in Group B had wound dehiscence (P = 0.001 [statistically significant]). There was no incisional hernia in both the groups. Conclusion: Emergency laparotomy is associated with a higher rate of burst abdomen as compared to elective laparotomy, but using interrupted X suture technique in sheath closure, wound dehiscence can be prevented up to some extent.

scholarly journals Role of subcutaneous vacuum suction drain in prevention of abdominal wound complication in emergency laparotomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1873
Author(s):  
Vinod Kumar Pandey ◽  
Dhruv Chandra ◽  
Raj Kumar ◽  
Anil Singh ◽  
Tej Pratap ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Wound Complication ◽  
P Value ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Burst Abdomen ◽  
Vacuum Suction ◽  
Suction Drain ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Some of the most common wound complications following laparotomy include hematoma formation, seroma formation, wound infection, burst abdomen and wound dehiscence. Closed-suction drains (CSDs) help to drain any wound collection and also reduce any dead space in the wound thereby promoting healing and preventing complication.Methods: We conducted a prospective study and included patients presenting with acute abdomen in emergency department. Patients were selected as per inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two groups (group A and B) with equal number of patients were created based on closed envelope technique. CSD was placed in the wound of patients in group A. Wound healing and complications were compared between the two groups.Results: 50 patients were included in the study with 25 in each group. Hematoma formation was found to be significantly more among group B (24.0%) compared to group A (4.0%). Seroma formation (p value =0.03917), SSI rate (p value =0.039) and wound dehiscence/burst abdomen (p value =0.0415) was more in group B than group A. The mean wound healing time (days) and mean hospital stay (days) was significantly more in group B.Conclusions: Placing a subcutaneous vacuum suction drain at the time of abdominal wall closure during emergency laparotomy results in better wound healing and reduces postoperative wound complication, hospital stay time, morbidity and also decreases overall healthcare cost.

scholarly journals 439 Conservative Versus Surgical Management of Complicated Diverticulitis - A Retrospective Study of Long-Term Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Durity ◽  
G Elliott ◽  
T Gana
Keyword(s):  
Complicated Diverticulitis ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Stoma Reversal ◽  
Group A ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Group B

Abstract Introduction Management of complicated diverticulitis has shifted towards a conservative approach over time. This study evaluates the feasibility and long-term outcomes of conservative management. Method We retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of patients managed with perforated colonic diverticulitis from 2013-2017. Results Seventy-three (73) patients were included with a male to female ratio of 1:2. Thirty-one (31) underwent Hartmann’s procedure (Group A) and 42 patients were managed with antibiotics +/- radiological drainage (Group B). Mean follow-up was 64.9 months (range 3-7 years). CT Grade 3 and 4 disease was observed in 64.5% and 40.4% of Group A and Group B patients, respectively. During follow-up, 9 (21.4%) Group B patients required Hartmann’s. Group A had longer median length of stay compared to Group B (25.1 vs 9.2 days). Post-operative complications occurred in 80.6% with 40% being Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher in group A. Stoma reversal was performed in 8 patients (25.8%). Conclusions In carefully selected cases, complicated diverticulitis including CT grade 3 and 4 disease, can be managed conservatively with acceptable recurrence rates (16.7% at 30 days, 4.8% at 90 days, 19.0% at 5 years). Surgical intervention on the other hand, carries high post-operative complication rates and low stoma reversal rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document