scholarly journals Brachial artery perforator propeller flap reconstruction of post electrical burn defect axilla

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 3211
Author(s):  
Surya Rao Venkata Mahipathy ◽  
Alagar Raja Durairaj ◽  
Narayanamurthy Sundaramurthy ◽  
Anand Prasath Jayachandiran ◽  
Suresh Rajendran
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Artery ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Vascular Pedicle ◽  
Propeller Flap ◽  
Current Scenario ◽  
The Right ◽  
Artery Perforator

In the current scenario, propeller flaps are an attractive choice for single stage coverage of a large number of defects. They have a more reliable vascular pedicle than traditional flap and allow for greater freedom in design and wide mobilization and minimal donor-site morbidity. Harvesting of a propeller flap requires appropriate patient selection, preoperative planning, and meticulous dissection and these techniques greatly reduce the complication rates. Here, we present a case of a post burn raw area of the right axilla which was debrided and covered with a brachial artery perforator propeller flap.

Use of Indocyanine Green Imaging for Perforator Identification in Preexpanded Brachial Artery Perforator Flaps

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (05) ◽  
pp. 650-658
Author(s):  
Tinglu Han ◽  
Nima Khavanin ◽  
Mengqing Zang ◽  
Shan Zhu ◽  
Bo Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Indocyanine Green ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Brachial Artery ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Icg Angiography ◽  
Flap Design ◽  
Flap Elevation ◽  
Artery Perforator

AbstractThe tissues of the medial arm as a donor site for perforator flap design have several advantages. However, they are relatively underused with limited reports, partly due to unreliable perforator anatomy. Therefore, we aimed to review our preliminary experience using indocyanine green (ICG) angiography to design and elevate preexpanded pedicled brachial artery perforator (BAP) flaps for regional reconstruction. All patients underwent soft tissue reconstructions using a preexpanded BAP flap in two or three stages. ICG angiography was used to localize perforators during both expander insertion and flap elevation. The pedicle was divided at the third stage 3 weeks following flap elevation for head and neck cases. Sixteen patients underwent reconstructions of the head and neck (n = 13) or shoulder/trunk (n = 3) using 14 perforator-plus and 2 propeller BAP flaps. In total, 50 perforators were identified using ICG imaging, all of which were appreciable during both expander placement and flap elevation. Thirty-five perforators were directly visualized during flap elevation, and an additional 15 perforators were not explored but incorporated into the flap. All flaps survived without necrosis, and the donor sites healed uneventfully without complications. The medial arm provides thin and pliable skin for the resurfacing of regional defects with relatively minimal donor-site morbidity. With the assistance of ICG angiography, perforators of the brachial artery can be reliably identified, facilitating the preexpansion and elevation of pedicled BAP flaps for use in head–neck and trunk reconstruction.

Time and Speed of Vascular Pedicle Dissection in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Elevation

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (08) ◽  
pp. 557-562
Author(s):  
Ji Yim ◽  
Yeon Lee ◽  
Young Kim ◽  
Eun Kim ◽  
Taik Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Free Flap ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Vascular Pedicle ◽  
Inferior Epigastric Artery ◽  
Epigastric Artery ◽  
Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery ◽  
Time Required ◽  
Artery Perforator

Background Breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) free flap is widely used because of the advantages of minimizing donor-site morbidity, but it requires technical competency in vascular dissection. This study evaluated the influence of patient factors and vascular status on the time and speed of dissection of the vascular pedicle. Methods DIEP free flap procedures were performed in 49 patients assigned to immediate or delayed reconstruction groups. Factors that significantly influenced the time required and the speed of dissection were evaluated. Results The average total dissection time was 55.9 minutes (34.5 minutes for the intramuscular dissection and 21.4 minutes for the submuscular dissection). The dissection speed for the total vascular pedicle was 2.65 cm/10 minutes (1.71 cm/10 minutes for the intramuscular dissection and 4.30 cm/10 minutes for the submuscular dissection). The presence of a Pfannenstiel scar, length of the vascular pedicle in the intramuscular area, and the number of microclips used significantly correlated with the total dissection time. Conclusion The length of the intramuscular pedicle, number of microclips used, and presence of a Pfannenstiel scar significantly correlated with the total dissection time of the vascular pedicle. An assessment prior to the surgery can reduce the time of operation and make it easier to elevate the flap.

scholarly journals Suprafascial Free Flaps: Classification and Comprehensive Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 247275122110205
Author(s):  
Sebastian Rios ◽  
María Isabel Falguera-Uceda ◽  
Alicia Dean ◽  
Susana Heredero
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Anterolateral Thigh Flap ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Comprehensive Review ◽  
Search Terms

Study Design: Suprafascial free flaps have become common place in reconstructive surgery units. Nomenclature related to these flaps has not been uniform throughout the scientific literature, especially in regard to planes of dissection. This study is designed as a comprehensive review of the literature. Objectives: Our study highlights which flaps are used most frequently, their main indications, their survival rate, and how they have evolved in the last few decades as innovations have been introduced. Methods: A review of the literature was performed using keywords and Medical Subject Headings search terms. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched using the appropriate search terms. Data collected from each study included flap type, dissection plane, preoperative planning, area of reconstruction, as well as complications, donor-site morbidity and survival rate. Results: Seven hundred and fifty-five studies were found based on the search criteria. After full-text screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria 34 studies were included. A total of 1332 patients were comprised in these studies. The most common types of flaps used were superficial circumflex iliac perforator flap (SCIP), anterolateral thigh flap (ALT), and radial forearm flap. The most common areas of reconstruction were head & neck and limbs. There was no significant difference in survival rates between flaps that were raised in different planes of dissection. Conclusions: Based on the author’s review of the literature, suprafascial flaps are reliable, they have low donor site morbidity, and there is a wide selection available for harvest. The use of new technologies for preoperative planning, such as CT-Angiography and UHF ultrasound, have contributed to have more predictable results. We propose a standardized classification for these flaps, in order to create a uniform nomenclature for future reference.

Application of Proximal Lateral Leg Perforator Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstructions

2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (5) ◽  
pp. 791-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Honda Hsu ◽  
Peir-Rong Chen ◽  
Sou-Hsin Chien ◽  
Jiunn-Tat Lee
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Head And Neck Reconstruction ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Recipient Site ◽  
The Mean

Objective Analyze the reliability, complications, and donor site morbidity of the proximal lateral leg flap when applied to head and neck reconstruction. Study Design Case series and chart review. Setting Tertiary care teaching hospital. Subjects and Methods Nineteen patients who underwent reconstruction of various head and neck defects with this flap were analyzed. The patient demographics, flap characteristics, method of donor site closure, scars of the donor area, complication rates, as well as functional results at the recipient site were assessed. Results The flap size ranged from 4 × 4 cm to 11 × 8 cm. Vascular pedicle length ranged from 5 to 9 cm. The mean distance of the perforator from the fibula head was 9.2 cm. The mean thickness of this flap was 5.5 mm. All the donor wounds were closed primarily. The flap survival rate was 100%. Conclusion This flap has the advantages of thinness, short harvesting time, minimal donor site morbidity, and primary closure at the donor site when the flap width is less than 6 cm. This flap may be useful for reconstruction in selected patients with small and thin heads and neck defects.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Harvesting of Omental Flaps for Breast Reconstruction—A Review of the Literature and Outcome Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hani Shash ◽  
Becher Al-halabi ◽  
Salah Aldekhayel ◽  
Tassos Dionisopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pedicle Flaps

Background: Evidence on the use of omental flaps for breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer is lacking, and no published reviews report an outcome-based assessment of such flap. This review explores available data and evidence for change in complication rates following the shift toward laparoscopic harvesting. Methods: We searched the databases Excerpta Medica database, MEDLINE, and PubMed from inception until December 2015 using search terms “omental flaps“ and “breast reconstruction.” Data extracted were patient characteristics, technique used, and outcome measures reported and were then analyzed based on the technique of harvesting. Results: Twenty-two articles reporting 651 patients who underwent mastectomies and breast-conserving surgeries were included in this review. Most flaps, 537 (82.5%), were harvested by laparoscopy, and 626 (96.2%) of the flaps were pedicle flaps. The mean age was 47.7 years (standard deviation: 4.29), and mean follow-up was 38.1 months. There were 88 reported complications among 562 patients in 16 reports. The rate of any complication was calculated to be 15.0%, with a higher rate (29.1%) occurring with the open technique in comparison to laparoscopy (12.6%). The commonest complications were postoperative infection and breast firmness each reported in 2.22%. Most authors reported advantages of malleability and excellent aesthetic outcomes and disadvantages in terms of inability to estimate the volume of the flap and variability in size. Conclusion: Omentum use is safe and has advantages in breast reconstruction where other options are limited including a natural feeling and minimal donor site morbidity if harvested laparoscopically.

scholarly journals Propeller Flaps: A Review of Indications, Technique, and Results

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore D'Arpa ◽  
Francesca Toia ◽  
Roberto Pirrello ◽  
Francesco Moschella ◽  
Adriana Cordova
Keyword(s):  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Large Range ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Body Regions ◽  
Potential Problems ◽  
One Stage Reconstruction ◽  
Dissection Technique

In the last years, propeller flaps have become an appealing option for coverage of a large range of defects. Besides having a more reliable vascular pedicle than traditional flap, propeller flaps allow for great freedom in design and for wide mobilization that extend the possibility of reconstructing difficult wounds with local tissues and minimal donor-site morbidity. They also allow one-stage reconstruction of defects that usually require multiple procedures. Harvesting of a propeller flap requires accurate patient selection, preoperative planning, and dissection technique. Complication rate can be kept low, provided that potential problems are prevented, promptly recognized, and adequately treated. This paper reviews current knowledge on propeller flaps. Definition, classification, and indications in the different body regions are discussed based on a review of the literature and on the authors’ experience. Details about surgical technique are provided, together with tips to avoid and manage complications.

scholarly journals Hinged multiperforator-based extended dorsalis pedis adipofascial flap for dorsal foot defects

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 340-346
Author(s):  
Magdy A. Abd Al Moktader
Keyword(s):  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
Plantar Fascia ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Adipofascial Flap ◽  
Dorsalis Pedis Artery ◽  
Flap Viability ◽  
Cutaneous Flap ◽  
The Right

Background Adipofascial flaps covered with a skin graft address the challenges involved in reconstructing dorsal foot defects. The purpose of this study was to describe a large adipofascial flap based on the perforators of the dorsalis pedis artery for large foot defects.Methods Twelve patients aged 5–18 years with large soft tissue defects of the dorsal foot due to trauma were treated with an extended dorsalis pedis adipofascial flap from May 2016 to December 2018. The flap was elevated from the non-injured half of the dorsum of the foot. Its length was increased by fascial extension from the medial or lateral foot fascia to the plantar fascia to cover the defect. All perforators of the dorsalis pedis artery were preserved to increase flap viability. The dorsalis pedis artery and its branches were kept intact.Results The right foot was affected in 10 patients, and the left foot in two patients. All flaps survived, providing an adequate contour and durable coverage with a thin flap. Follow-up lasted up to 2 years, and patients were satisfied with the results. They were able to wear shoes. Donor-site morbidity was negligible. Two cases each of partial skin graft loss and superficial necrosis at the tip of the donor cutaneous flap occurred and were healed by a dressing.Conclusions The hinged multiperforator-based extended dorsalis pedis adipofascial flap described herein is a suitable method for reconstructing dorsal foot defects, as it provides optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes with minimal donor site morbidity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document