scholarly journals Evaluation of skin irritation and skin sensitization potential of Venusia max lotion (paraben-free, alcohol-free, mineral oil-free, animal origin free) using human repeat insult patch test

Author(s):  
Monil Y. N. Gala ◽  
Snehal S. Muchhala ◽  
Sujeet N. Charugulla ◽  
Rahul Rathod ◽  
Amey Mane ◽  
...  

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Topical exposure to chemicals from cosmetics can lead to adverse skin effects or skin irritation. This study aimed to investigate the skin irritation and sensitizing potential of a moisturizer Venusia max lotion (paraben-free, alcohol-free, mineral oil-free, animal origin free (PAMA) free).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> In this single-center, non-randomized, observational study, skin irritation, and skin sensitization potential of a test product was assessed using the human repeat insult patch test (HRIPT) technique. Approximately 0.04 g of the test product and filter papers dipped in 0.9% isotonic saline solution (~0.04 ml of solution) were filled in different wells of patch chambers and applied occlusively, on the back of each participant. Scoring of the skin reactions in the induction phase and challenge phase was done using Draize and international contact dermatitis research group (ICDRG) scales respectively. Scores were compared to the baseline and the negative control (isotonic saline).<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> In total 234 participants (50 with sensitive skin), 224 and 221 participants completed the induction phase and challenge phase respectively. Scores for the induction phase for Venusia max lotion (PAMA free) and isotonic saline were 0.46 and 0.06 respectively. The mean cumulative score of erythema and oedema for Venusia max lotion (PAMA free) was below 2. For the challenge phase, none of the participants showed any positive reactions at any time point for test product and isotonic saline.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Test product Venusia max lotion (PAMA free) found to be non-irritant and hypoallergenic. Thus, it can be used without fear of skin irritation or sensitization.</p>

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (SupplementII) ◽  
pp. 475-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiro SUZUKI ◽  
Toshihiro KATO ◽  
Tadahatu KITAGAKI ◽  
Masahiro ONO ◽  
Kiyomi SHIRAKAWA ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 70S-83S
Author(s):  
Wilbur Johnson ◽  
Bart Heldreth ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
...  

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed the safety of alkyl polyethylene glycol (PEG) sulfosuccinates, which function in cosmetics mostly as surfactants/cleansing agents. Although these ingredients may cause ocular and skin irritation, dermal penetration is unlikely because of the substantial polarity and molecular size of these ingredients. The Panel considered the negative oral carcinogenicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity data on chemically related laureths (PEG lauryl ethers) and negative repeated dose toxicity and skin sensitization data on disodium laureth sulfosuccinate supported the safety of these alkyl PEG sulfosuccinates in cosmetic products, but. The CIR Expert Panel concluded that the alkyl PEG sulfosuccinates are safe in the present practices of use and concentration when formulated to be nonirritating.


1996 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 204-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. York ◽  
H. A. Griffiths ◽  
E. Whittle ◽  
D. A. Basketter
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dagmar Jírová ◽  
David Basketter ◽  
Manfred Liebsch ◽  
Hana Bendová ◽  
Kristina Kejlová ◽  
...  

Dermatitis ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 188-194
Author(s):  
Rebecca J. Dearman ◽  
Ian Kimber

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document