An Analysis of Mark Design for Domestic and Foreign Military to Organize the Brand of the Republic of Korea Army - Focusing on the Military-related Marks of Korea, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan -

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 435-446
Author(s):  
Eunryung Hyun ◽  
Youjeong Kim
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
The United States ◽  
Republic Of Korea ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Military

Missions by the President

1992 ◽  
Vol 32 (291) ◽  
pp. 582-588
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
The United States ◽  
Republic Of Korea ◽  
People’S Republic Of China ◽  
People's Republic Of China ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Republic

From September to November 1992 ICRC President Cornelio Sommaruga went on several missions, visiting successively the Republic of Korea, the People's Republic of China, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, the United Kingdom, Tunisia and the United States.

Baghdad Pact

1957 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 546-547 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Annual Meeting ◽  
Prime Minister ◽  
Foreign Minister ◽  
The United States ◽  
United States Military ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Military ◽  
Opening Session

The Council of the Baghdad Pact held its annual meeting in Karachi from June 3 through 6, 1957. Representatives were present from the five member countries—Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and the United Kingdom—and the United States was represented by an observer delegation. The Council had been scheduled to meet months earlier, but Iraq originally refused to meet with the United Kingdom. At the opening session, presided over by Mr. Suhrawardy, Prime Minister of Pakistan, the Prime Minister of Iraq, Nuri es Said, was reported to have spoken forcefully about the dangers implicit in the problems of Israel, Algeria, Kashmir and Cyprus. Mr. Lloyd, Foreign Minister of the United Kingdom, was reported to have followed Mr. Nuri es Said's remarks with a speech in which he announced his government's offer of a contribution of £500,000 a year in cash and in kind for building up the minimum military infra-structure in member countries. The speeches of other delegates were reported to be noteworthy for their frank recognition of past weaknesses in the Baghdad Pact organization and the need to give it new effectiveness. In the course of the first session the United States formally accepted an invitation to join the Pact's Military Committee; and a United States military delegation headed by General Nathan F. Twining started participating in a separate concurrent meeting of the Military Committee. The United States thus became a member of the Pact's three main committees, but had still not become a formal member of the Pact.

scholarly journals Outbreaks of infectious intestinal disease among coach tour passengers, Ireland

2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (38) ◽  
Author(s):  
P McKeown
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Elderly People ◽  
The United States ◽  
Intestinal Disease ◽  
Infectious Intestinal Disease ◽  
Republic Of Ireland ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Microbiological Confirmation

Several outbreaks of infectious intestinal disease (IID) among passengers on board tour coaches have been reported in the Republic of Ireland in September 2002. Most of the affected passengers have been elderly people from the United States and the United Kingdom. Microbiological confirmation is awaited, but clinically and epidemiologically the illness is consistent with Norwalk-like virus (NLV) infection (1). Similar outbreaks were described in Scotland earlier this summer (2).

The world court lawsuits by the Republic of Iraq against the United States and the United Kingdom

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-216
Author(s):  
Francis A. Boyle
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
New York ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
The United States ◽  
International Court Of Justice ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The People ◽  
International Court ◽  
The Icj ◽  
The Republic

The article explores the author’s experience of crafting legal actions meant to bring a case against the governments of the United States and the United Kingdom for the genocidal conditions that arose from their actions against the people of Iraq from 1991 to 2003. Based on a similar effort, successfully brought to the International Court of Justice on behalf of the people and Republic of Bosnia in 1993, the strong potential for a legal and peaceful remedy to bring an end to Iraqi civilian suffering ‐ as well as the potential to avert a future war ‐ existed and drove the author to implore Iraqi legal action before the ICJ. Iraqi state officials, from the President’s Office to that of Deputy PM Tariq Aziz, through Iraqi diplomats in New York, were canvassed and engaged in an effort for the author to receive their support to act on Iraq’s behalf at the ICJ. Published here is the author’s recollection of this effort to prosecute international crimes against the Iraqi people as well as an overview of the ICJ case that while never brought forward, could have prevented the 2003 invasion and its aftermath.

Baghdad Pact

1958 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-232 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
The United States ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Building Project ◽  
The Military ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Communications System ◽  
Fourth Session

The fourth session of the Council of the Baghdad Pact was held in Ankara, Turkey, January 27–30, 1958, under the chairmanship of Mr. Adnan Menderes, Prime Minister of Turkey, and was attended by delegations from Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, as well as by an observer delegation from the United States. It was reported that at the opening meeting the delegates from Iran, Iraq, Turkey, and Pakistan stressed the need for more economic aid to the pact area, while the United Kingdom and United States speakers expressed the belief that member nations should concentrate on completing economic projects already under way. Mr. Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States, in his opening address pointed out that Congress had authorized the President to use armed forces to assist any nation or group of nations in the Middle East, including the Baghdad Pact nations, that requested assistance against armed aggression by any communist-controlled country. On the second day of the session the Council approved reports of the military, liaison, and countersubversion committees. The report of the military committee recommended a longterm defense building project, which would include a communications system from west Turkey to Pakistan with trunk and lateral highways, harbor and storage facilities at seaports on the Mediterranean, Persian Gulf, and the Arabian Sea, and civil airports that could be readily converted for military use. In the meeting on January 29 Mr. Dulles announced that, subject to funds being made available by Congress, $10 million would be provided by the United States for the improvement of telephone and radiotelephone links between the capitals of Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, and Turkey, in addition to $8 million already provided for surveys being carried out.

scholarly journals THE SYSTEMS APPROACH TO TRAINING IN THE MILITARY EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM – AGGREGATION OF INTEGRATION PROCESSES

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1457-1462
Author(s):  
Daniel Berchev ◽  
Milko Stefanov
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Educational System ◽  
Systems Approach ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
The United States ◽  
Military Education ◽  
Education Systems ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Military

This report looks into the Systems Approach to Training, in the context of educational institutions in the armed forces, as a logical and systematic process. Documents regulating the implementation of the Systems Approach to Training in the US Army, United Kingdom and Bulgaria are analyzed. The first part of the report outlines the requirements of the military educational system based on the made analysis. It is reasonably stated that these requirements apply to all military education systems and constitute a valid framework for all models. This framework sufficiently allows those who make the training to do so in a flexible way, in accordance to the learners’ educational needs. From the standpoint of the management of each education system, the Systems Approach to Training is the most appropriate way to identify learning and development needs. It is reasonably stated that this is an adaptive, continuous training model focused on providing quality, appropriate and effective learning practices. The main features of the Systems Approach to Training applied in the military education systems of the United States, the United Kingdom and the Republic of Bulgaria are examined in the second part of the report. Different definitions are used to describe the Systems Approach to Training. From the analysis of the definitions given, the authors justify the assertion, that inherently, the Systems Approach to Training to a certain extent approaches the architectural approach. It is established that for the needs of the armed forces of all three countries the Systems Approach to Training is presented as an aggregation of interrelated and interdependent processes (or stages) aimed at designing the modern military education process in a highly dynamic and external environment. A comparative analysis of the stages (phases) of the Systems Approach to Training applied in the military education systems of the United States, United Kingdom and the Republic of Bulgaria is made. In conclusion of this report the authors justify the opinion that the Systems Approach to Training in the context of the armed forces is an aggregation of integration processes not only aimed at the end result, but also in the learning process itself.

Part 3 The Post 9/11-Era (2001–), 62 Threats of and Actual Military Strikes Against Syria—2013 and 2017

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lagerwall Anne
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Final Section ◽  
The United States ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Chemical Weapons ◽  
Sovereign State ◽  
Syrian Crisis ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Military

This chapter examines the threats of military intervention expressed by the United States, the United Kingdom and France in reaction to the use of chemical weapons during an attack in the Ghouta area of Damascus in 2013 as well as the military strikes launched by the United States following the use of chemical weapons during an attack in the Khan Sheikhun area of Southern Idlib in 2017. After recalling the facts and context of the Syrian crisis, it studies the legal positions of the main protagonists (the United States, the United Kingdom and France) and the reactions of third States and international organisations. The final section analyses the envisaged and actual intervention’s precedential value and its impact on the jus ad bellum. It argues that targeting the military assets of a sovereign State as a reaction to violations of international law that this State has supposedly committed is far from being unanimously accepted from a legal point of view.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document