scholarly journals Eliminating The Double Standard For The Bachelor Of Science Degree In Engineering

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Burger
1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 45-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Bosselman ◽  
Peter B. Manning ◽  
Martin Kisseleff ◽  
Frank W Mieczkowski

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger W. Moni ◽  
Deanne H. Hryciw ◽  
Philip Poronnik ◽  
Lesley J. Lluka ◽  
Karen B. Moni

Responding to the concern from our faculty that undergraduate students do not have robust laboratory skills, we designed and implemented a strategy to individually teach and assess the manipulative skills of students in first-year laboratories. Five core laboratory skills were selected for the course entitled Human Biology, a large, first-year class of students, most of whom were enrolled in Bachelor of Pharmacy and Human Movement Studies. Here, we report details for the 365 students enrolled primarily in Pharmacy and Human Movement Studies bachelor degree programs in semester 1 of 2006. We designed a specific strategy to assess five core laboratory skills: 1) accurate and precise use of a micropipette, 2) calculation of dilutions and preparation of diluted samples of saline, 3) accurate representation of data using a graph, 4) use of a light microscope, and 5) acquisition of digital data by measuring the latent period for the Achilles reflex. Graduate tutors were trained to teach and assess each student on each skill. The development of competency was tracked for all students across all five skills. Most students demonstrated proficiency on their first attempt. The development of proficiency across the core skills depended on both the skill and degree program. In semester 2 of 2006, 854 students mostly enrolled in the Bachelor of Science degree program and were similarly taught and assessed on the same five core skills. This approach was an effective teaching and assessment strategy that, when applied beyond first year, should increase the level of laboratory skills across undergraduate programs in physiology.


The Lancet ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 362 (9386) ◽  
pp. 822-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S Yudkin ◽  
Olivia Bayley ◽  
Shaima Elnour ◽  
Chris Willott ◽  
J Jaime Miranda

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Daniel Unger ◽  
Sarah Schwab ◽  
Ryan Jacques ◽  
Yanli Zhang ◽  
I-Kuai Hung ◽  
...  

<p>Undergraduate students pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Spatial Science degree at Stephen F. Austin State University (SFASU) receive instruction in the spatial sciences with a focus on hands-on applications. All undergraduate students take the course Introduction to Spatial Science which includes a comprehensive overview of spatial science incorporating a comparison of standard inexpensive area assessment techniques with high-end computer based area assessment methodologies. Students within this course were instructed how to assess the area of a surface feature on an aerial image with a ruler applying the transect method. Student’s average Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) between a student’s transect derived area and surveyed area was 0.45, 0.13, 0.07, and 0.02 acres for 5, 10, 15, and 20 transect lines, respectfully. An ANOVA analysis of area assessment and area error assessment indicated that mean area and mean absolute area error were statistically different between transect line groups. In addition, the accuracy of area measured increased significantly as the number of transect lines increased which: (1) indicates students receiving hands-on instruction in estimating area using the transect method can record accurate area measurements after only a limited 2 hour introduction; (2) reveals the accuracy of the transect method is not user dependent; (3) shows area accuracy increases as the number of transects increases; and, (4) validates the interactive hands-on instruction methodology employed at SFASU.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. ar18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Drinkwater ◽  
Kelly E. Matthews ◽  
Jacob Seiler

While there is a wealth of research evidencing the benefits of active-learning approaches, the extent to which these teaching practices are adopted in the sciences is not well known. The aim of this study is to establish an evidential baseline of teaching practices across a bachelor of science degree program at a large research-intensive Australian university. Our purpose is to contribute to knowledge on the adoption levels of evidence-based teaching practices by faculty within a science degree program and inform our science curriculum review in practical terms. We used the Teaching Practices Inventory (TPI) to measure the use of evidence-based teaching approaches in 129 courses (units of study) across 13 departments. We compared the results with those from a Canadian institution to identify areas in need of improvement at our institution. We applied a regression analysis to the data and found that the adoption of evidence-based teaching practices differs by discipline and is higher in first-year classes at our institution. The study demonstrates that the TPI can be used in different institutional contexts and provides data that can inform practice and policy.


1952 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-190
Author(s):  
E. A. Murphy

Abstract Among the celebrated names of those who have contributed so much in the last thirty years to rubber technology is that of Douglas Frank Twiss. Born in Birmingham, England, in 1883, he graduated at Birmingham University and received the Doctor of Science degree in 1910. Among other academic qualifications, he was a Bachelor of Science of London University and became a Fellow of the Royal Institute of Chemistry in 1908, on whose Council he served for nine years. He was also one of the pioneer members of the Institution of the Rubber Industry at its inception in 1921, and in 1934 he received the highest honor the Institution awards—the Colwyn Gold Medal—for his outstanding scientific work in rubber technology. During the long and active part he played in the British rubber industry, he served on various committees of the Research Association of British Rubber Manufacturers and the Institution of the Rubber Industry. Dr. Twiss's first appointment was as a lecturer in chemistry at the Birmingham College of Technology until 1914, when he joined the Dunlop Rubber Company to form a Chemical Research Department. Within a year he was appointed Chief Chemist, a position he held until his retirement in 1946. Some idea of his wide and varied interests can be obtained from over seventy scientific publications and two hundred patent specifications bearing his name and sometimes those of his fellow workers. He was also part author of a text book on practical organic chemistry and two volumes on inorganic chemistry dealing with oxygen and sulfur, and he served for many years as Special Editor in rubber and elastomers for British Abstracts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document