scholarly journals Lessons Learned: Improving the New Faculty Orientation Program

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Grimes ◽  
Sharon Bommer ◽  
Adedeji Badiru
1989 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 241-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald M. Meredith

This study established topic priorities for planning a workshop for new faculty members at the university level.


2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerri F. Luke ◽  
Anthony Fabrizio

In recent years, adult educators have seen the surge of cohort-based programs.  This phenomenon has created many challenges for faculty. This paper will provide an overview of the development of a faculty orientation program and discuss the challenges of facilitating within a cohort-based program. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 273-276
Author(s):  
Catherine Wilson Cox ◽  
Elizabeth T. Jordan ◽  
Theresa M. Valiga ◽  
Qiuping Zhou

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e395-e404
Author(s):  
John J. Cuaron ◽  
Erin F. Gillespie ◽  
Daniel R. Gomez ◽  
Atif J. Khan ◽  
Borys Mychalczak ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To evaluate physician-reported assessments of an established faculty orientation program for new radiation oncology physicians at a large academic center and to prospectively analyze the effects of an onboarding improvement program based on those assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous survey was designed and distributed to physicians new to the department who received onboarding orientation between 2013 and 2017. Survey questions addressed the comprehensiveness, effectiveness, and utility of various orientation activities. On the basis of the survey results, an improved onboarding program was designed and implemented for nine new faculty members between May 2018 and November 2018. A post-intervention survey querying topics similar to those in the pre-intervention survey was distributed to the new faculty members. Descriptive statistics were generated to compare the pre-intervention and post-intervention groups. RESULTS: The overall rate of survey completion was 85% (17 of 20). The intervention program markedly improved physician assessment of comprehensiveness and effectiveness of the onboarding process. Physicians strongly and consistently identified mentor shadowing, on-the-job training, and other faculty mentorship activities as the most important components of an effective onboarding experience. CONCLUSION: An enhanced, tailored, person-oriented, formal onboarding improvement program significantly increased physician assessment scores of comprehensiveness and effectiveness of the faculty onboarding process. This model can serve as a framework for increasing physician preparedness, encouraging early physician mentorship, and ensuring a universal standard of quality across large practices.


Author(s):  
T. Michael Gallagher ◽  
Mei-Yan Lu ◽  
J. Francisco Hidalgo

Author(s):  
Vincent Prior ◽  
Drake Hankins ◽  
Miranda Gillilan

The COVID-19 pandemic forced our institution to question how we deliver information to new students.  Prior to the pandemic, our students attended an in-person, day-and-a-half orientation program in the summer before their first semester. With the transition to a virtual program format, our institution identified the most critical information delivered in our single-event model and converted that one event to a more purposeful process, complete with pre-orientation modules, a live virtual event, and post-orientation modules. This article shares specific details about the steps taken in the transition to a three-phased orientation experience, outlines the final product of each phase, and discusses future implications for our practice. Specific emphasis is placed on individualized program elements for students, new family and guest programming, and the work of student leaders in a virtual format. Finally, we share advice for professionals and lessons learned that will impact how we approach orientation in the future as we establish a philosophy of orientation as a process, not a program.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document