scholarly journals Board 59: Work in Progress: Industry-based Team Program Reviews for Capstone Design Teams

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachana Gupta ◽  
Greg Dunko
Author(s):  
Clinton Lanier ◽  
William S. Janna ◽  
John I. Hochstein

An innovative capstone design course titled “Design of Fluid Thermal Systems,” involves groups of seniors working on various semester-long design projects. Groups are composed of 3 or 4 members that bid competitively on various projects. Once projects are awarded, freshmen enrolled in the “Introduction to Mechanical Engineering” course are assigned to work with the senior design teams. The senior teams (Engineering Consulting Companies) function like small consulting companies that employ co-operative education students; e.g., the freshmen. In Fall 2006, the Engineering Consulting Companies also worked with students enrolled in a Technical Editing (TE) course—“Writing and Editing in the Professions”—within the English Department. The TE students would be given reports or instructional manuals that the Mechanical Engineering (ME) students had to write as part of their capstone project, and the resulting editing of their documents would be done by these TE students. Subsequently, the ME students were given a survey and asked to comment on this experience. In addition, the TE students were also surveyed and asked to comment as well. It was concluded that the collaboration should continue for at least one more cycle, and that the TE students were more favorably inclined toward this collaboration than were the engineering students.


Author(s):  
Mario Milicevic ◽  
Narges Balouchestani Asli ◽  
Deborah Tihanyi ◽  
Kamran Behdinan

Multidisciplinary capstone design projectsoffer students the opportunity to solve complexengineering problems that span multiple disciplinesthrough collaborative, team-based learning. Using amixed quantitative and qualitative approach, this studyexamines student experience in a multidisciplinarycapstone design course by analyzing how disciplinaryknowledge is applied, taught, and learned among teammembers. Our preliminary findings suggest correlationsbetween open communication, sharing of disciplinaryknowledge, and the likelihood of taking design risks.Future work will further explore the reasons behind thesecorrelations.


Author(s):  
D. D. Mann ◽  
D. S. Petkau ◽  
K. J. Dick ◽  
S. Ingram

Design teams in industry are composed of individuals with diverse backgrounds at various stages of their careers. A unique set of group dynamics will be created with one member, likely someone with sufficient experience, assuming the responsibility of being the team leader. Design teams formed in engineering classes within the university setting typically consist of individuals at the same stage of their academic training, thus students do not experience the same group dynamics as they will find in industry. In an attempt to give undergraduate engineering students this experience, inter-year design teams were formed from engineering students registered in courses representing different stages of completion of the engineering degree. Students registered in the final-year design course were expected to assume the roles of team leaders or coleaders. This paper will discuss a number of issues that were observed with inter-year capstone design teams. It has been concluded that the disadvantages of inter-year design teams outweigh the advantages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document