scholarly journals Predatory potential of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant on mealybugs and aphids

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-311
Author(s):  
S R. SURWASE ◽  
S S. SHETGAR ◽  
S H. TIMKE ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cryptolaemus Montrouzieri ◽  
Predatory Potential

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY AND PREDATORY POTENTIAL OF Cryptolaemus montrouzieri ON MEALYBUGS

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 106-113
Author(s):  
L. Allwin ◽  
V. Radhakrishnan
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Period ◽  
Comparative Biology ◽  
Life Stages ◽  
Growth Indices ◽  
Cryptolaemus Montrouzieri ◽  
High Fecundity ◽  
Maconellicoccus Hirsutus ◽  
Suitability Index ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Predatory Potential

Comparative biology of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri on Maconellicoccus hirsutus and Pseudococcus citri revealed that it had completed its life cycle successfully on both species. The mean total developmental period (egg to pupa) was 18.1 days, when reared on P. citri and it was 20.9 days in M. hirsutus. The adults developed on P. citri had high fecundity 284.2 eggs / female and longevity 47.0 days than those developed on M. hirsutus. Analysis on the growth indices of C. montrouzieri showed more preference on P. citri with high suitability index of 2.51 than M. hirsutus (1.78). Among two life stages, adults of C. montrouzieri was more voracious and each adult consumed an average 258.7, 352.1 and 217.3 numbers on M. hirsutus while, it was 323.8, 715.6 and 328.6 number of eggs, nymphs and adults for P. citri, respectively. The grubs required 221.1, 55.1 and 36.6 numbers of M. hirsutus and 1079.0, 341.3 and 41.0 number of eggs, nymphs and adults of P. citri, respectively to complete life stages. Out of different instars of C. montrouzieri, third and fourth instars required around 92.1, 78.5 and 85.9 per cent and 88.9, 93.5 and 79.0 per cent of total eggs, nymphs and adults of P. citri and M. hirsutus consumed, respectively.

Potential displacement of the native Tenuisvalvae notata by the invasive Cryptolaemus montrouzieri in South America suggested by differences in climate suitability

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Larissa F. Ferreira ◽  
Christian S. A. Silva-Torres ◽  
Jorge B. Torres ◽  
Robert C. Venette
Keyword(s):  
Biological Control ◽  
South America ◽  
Prey Availability ◽  
Ecological Factors ◽  
Growth Conditions ◽  
Cryptolaemus Montrouzieri ◽  
Seasonal Differences ◽  
Ladybird Beetle ◽  
Ecoclimatic Index ◽  
Climate Suitability

Abstract Tenuisvalvae notata (Mulsant) (Coccinellidae) is a predatory ladybird beetle native to South America. It specializes in mealybugs prey (Pseudococcidae), but relatively little is known about its ecology. In contrast, the ladybird beetle Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant (Coccinellidae) is indigenous to Australia and has been introduced to many countries worldwide including Brazil for biological control of mealybugs. The potential impacts of these introductions to native coccinellids have rarely been considered. The software CLIMEX estimated the climate suitability for both species as reflected in the Ecoclimatic Index (EI). Much of South America, Africa, and Australia can be considered climatically suitable for both species, but in most cases, the climate is considerably more favorable for C. montrouzieri than T. notata, especially in South America. The CLIMEX model also suggests seasonal differences in growth conditions (e.g. rainfall and temperature) that could affect the phenology of both species. These models suggest that few locations in South America would be expected to provide T. notata climatic refugia from C. montrouzieri. Although other ecological factors will also be important, such as prey availability, this analysis suggests a strong potential for displacement of a native coccinellid throughout most of its range as a consequence of the invasion by an alien competitor.

scholarly journals Observations on the predatory potential of Lutzia fuscana on Aedes aegypti larvae: implications for biological control (Diptera: Culicidae)

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Soujita Pramanik ◽  
Sampa Banerjee ◽  
Soumyajit Banerjee ◽  
Goutam K. Saha ◽  
Gautam Aditya
Keyword(s):  
Biological Control ◽  
Aedes Aegypti ◽  
Biological Control Agent ◽  
Instar Larva ◽  
Control Agent ◽  
The Body ◽  
Larval Habitats ◽  
Larval Stages ◽  
Augmentative Release ◽  
Predatory Potential

Among the natural predators, larval stages of the mosquito <em>Lutzia fuscana (</em>Wiedemann, 1820) (Diptera: Culicidae) bear potential as a biological control agent of mosquitoes. An estimation of the predatory potential of the larva of <em>L. fuscana</em> against the larva of the dengue vector <em>Aedes aegypti</em> (Linnaeus, 1762) (Diptera: Culicidae) was made to highlight its use in vector management. Laboratory experiments revealed that the larva of<em> L</em>. <em>fuscana</em> consumes 19 to 24 <em>A. aegypti</em> larvae per day, during its tenure as IV instar larva. The consumption of <em>A. aegypti</em> larvae was proportionate to the body length (BL) and body weight (BW) of the predatory larva<em> L. fuscana</em> as depicted through the logistic regressions: y = 1 / (1 + exp(-(-2.09 + 0.35*BL))) and y = 1 / (1 + exp(-(0.4+ 0.06*BW))). While the prey consumption remained comparable among the days, the net weight gained by the <em>L</em>. <em>fuscana</em> larva showed a decreasing trend with the age. On the basis of the results, it is apparent that the larva of the mosquito <em>L. fuscana</em> can be used in the regulation of the mosquito <em>A. aegypti</em> through augmentative release, particularly, in the smaller mosquito larval habitats.

scholarly journals Toxicidad de Chenopodium ambrosioides (Amaranthaceae) e Imidacloprid sobre Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Coleoptera:Coccinellidae)

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Víctor Santiago ◽  
Emilio Bonifaz ◽  
Alfonzo Alegre ◽  
José Iannacone
Keyword(s):  
Chenopodium Ambrosioides ◽  
Cryptolaemus Montrouzieri

scholarly journals Quantitative Analysis of Lysobacter Predation

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (20) ◽  
pp. 7098-7105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Seccareccia ◽  
Christian Kost ◽  
Markus Nett
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Feeding Strategy ◽  
Predatory Behavior ◽  
Bacterial Group ◽  
Potential Prey ◽  
Bacterial Populations ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Predator Prey ◽  
Prey Killing ◽  
Predatory Potential

ABSTRACTBacteria of the genusLysobacterare considered to be facultative predators that use a feeding strategy similar to that of myxobacteria. Experimental data supporting this assumption, however, are scarce. Therefore, the predatory activities of threeLysobacterspecies were tested in the prey spot plate assay and in the lawn predation assay, which are commonly used to analyze myxobacterial predation. Surprisingly, only one of the testedLysobacterspecies showed predatory behavior in the two assays. This result suggested that not allLysobacterstrains are predatory or, alternatively, that the assays were not appropriate for determining the predatory potential of this bacterial group. To differentiate between the two scenarios, predation was tested in a CFU-based bioassay. For this purpose, defined numbers ofLysobactercells were mixed together with potential prey bacteria featuring phenotypic markers, such as distinctive pigmentation or antibiotic resistance. After 24 h, cocultivated cells were streaked out on agar plates and sizes of bacterial populations were individually determined by counting the respective colonies. Using the CFU-based predation assay, we observed thatLysobacterspp. strongly antagonized other bacteria under nutrient-deficient conditions. Simultaneously, theLysobacterpopulation was increasing, which together with the killing of the cocultured bacteria indicated predation. Variation of the predator/prey ratio revealed that all threeLysobacterspecies tested needed to outnumber their prey for efficient predation, suggesting that they exclusively practiced group predation. In summary, the CFU-based predation assay not only enabled the quantification of prey killing and consumption byLysobacterspp. but also provided insights into their mode of predation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document