scholarly journals Editorial

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
R. Jagadeesh
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Management Development ◽  
Finance Management ◽  
Academic Standing ◽  
Emerging Trends ◽  
Foreign Author

Welcome to the second issue of volume 3 of SDMIMD Journal of Management. In this issue we have presented six papers out of which five are from the area of finance management. This concentration is due to choosing some of the best submissions received for the conference on emerging trends in Finance and Accounting organized by SDM Institute for Management Development in the month of July 2012. These papers were subjected to the typical peer review process and revised to suit the journal's requirements. The journal maintains its record of having at least one article from foreign author(s), indicating the journal's slowly growing presence out side the country . This has also raised the academic standing of the journal.

scholarly journals Editorial

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Mousumi Sengupta
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Present Issue ◽  
International Conference ◽  
Emerging Trends

Welcome to the present issue of SDMIMD Journal of Management. There are total nine articles, and one book review, which have been published in this volume. Among them, six articles are the revised and modified version of the papers, presented in the 5th International Conference on Emerging Trends in Finance, Accounting and Banking; and two papers are revised and modified version of the papers, presented in the 2nd International Conference on Inclusive Economic Growth and Sustainable Development. All the articles and the book review, including the above, have been selected for publication following the journal’s guidelines, and after undergoing ‘double blind’ peer review process.

scholarly journals Emerging Trends and Future Directions of Enabling Education

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. i-iv
Author(s):  
Thomas Roche ◽  
Suzi Syme
Keyword(s):  
Student Success ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Gold Coast ◽  
University Education ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Emerging Trends

In December 2017, the 6th Biennial National Association of Enabling Educators of Australia (NAEEA) Conference was hosted by Southern Cross University at the Gold Coast, Australia. The Biennial NAEEA Conference brings together educators and practitioners to collaborate on issues of relevance to enabling pathway programs leading to undergraduate university education.  In this special issue of the Student Success Journal, the  NAEEA conference’s top ranked research papers, as selected via a blind peer review process, have been included for publication.

Getting Involved in the Peer Review Process

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenya Malcolm ◽  
Allison Groenendyk ◽  
Mary Cwik ◽  
Alisa Beyer
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process

Reference Conundrum: The Broad Definition of Peer-Review

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cody Fullerton
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Academic Publishing ◽  
Inaccurate Information ◽  
The Core ◽  
Literature Reviews ◽  
Reference Interactions ◽  
Definition Of

For years, the gold-standard in academic publishing has been the peer-review process, and for the most part, peer-review remains a safeguard to authors publishing intentionally biased, misleading, and inaccurate information. Its purpose is to hold researchers accountable to the publishing standards of that field, including proper methodology, accurate literature reviews, etc. This presentation will establish the core tenants of peer-review, discuss if certain types of publications should be able to qualify as such, offer possible solutions, and discuss how this affects a librarian's reference interactions.

Judges and defendants

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianfranco Pacchioni
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Social Cost ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Scientific Journals ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Contemporary Science ◽  
The Social ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Scientific Publishers

This chapter explores how validation of new results works in science. It also looks at the peer-review process, both pros and cons, as well as scientific communication, scientific journals, and scientific publishers. We give an assessment of the total number of existing journals with peer review. Other topics discussed include the phenomenon of open access, predatory journals and their impact on contemporary science, and the market of scientific publications. Finally, we touch on degenerative phenomena, such as the market of co-authors, bogus papers, and irrelevant and wrong studies, as well as the problem and the social cost of irreproducible results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document