Integrating the WPIM Process Model with OAIS Information Packages for Data Management Planning Support for Research Data

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heike Görzig ◽  
◽  
Holger Brocks ◽  
Felix Engel ◽  
Tobias Vogel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Management Planning ◽  
Planning Support

Data management planning and repository demands for qualitative research

KWALON ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
René van Horik
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Digital Data ◽  
Data Repository ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Data Repositories ◽  
Management Planning ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Trusted Data ◽  
New Research

Summary Nowadays, research without a role for digital data and data analysis tools is barely possible. As a result, we see an increasing interest in research data management, as this enables the replication of research outcomes and the reuse of research data for new research activities. Data management planning outlines how to handle data, both during research and after the research is completed. Trusted data repositories are places were research data are archived and made available for the long term. This article covers the state of the art concerning data management and data repository demands with a focus on qualitative data sets.

scholarly journals Automating Research Data Management Using Machine-Actionable Data Management Plans

2022 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Tomasz Miksa ◽  
Simon Oblasser ◽  
Andreas Rauber
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Use Cases ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Institutional Research ◽  
Reference Architecture ◽  
Management Planning ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
Management Plans ◽  
New Generation

Many research funders mandate researchers to create and maintain data management plans (DMPs) for research projects that describe how research data is managed to ensure its reusability. A DMP, being a static textual document, is difficult to act upon and can quickly become obsolete and impractical to maintain. A new generation of machine-actionable DMPs (maDMPs) was therefore proposed by the Research Data Alliance to enable automated integration of information and updates. maDMPs open up a variety of use cases enabling interoperability of research systems and automation of data management tasks. In this article, we describe a system for machine-actionable data management planning in an institutional context. We identify common use cases within research that can be automated to benefit from machine-actionability of DMPs. We propose a reference architecture of an maDMP support system that can be embedded into an institutional research data management infrastructure. The system semi-automates creation and maintenance of DMPs, and thus eases the burden for the stakeholders responsible for various DMP elements. We evaluate the proposed system in a case study conducted at the largest technical university in Austria and quantify to what extent the DMP templates provided by the European Commission and a national funding body can be pre-filled. The proof-of-concept implementation shows that maDMP workflows can be semi-automated, thus workload on involved parties can be reduced and quality of information increased. The results are especially relevant to decision makers and infrastructure operators who want to design information systems in a systematic way that can utilize the full potential of maDMPs.

scholarly journals PROVIDING RESEARCH DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND PRACTICES AT PDDI-LIPI: PREPAREDNESS, ROLES, CHALLENGES, AND TRAINING

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
Hermin Triasih ◽  
Rahmi Rahmi ◽  
Katrin Setio Devi
Keyword(s):  
Human Resources ◽  
Data Management ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Training Needs ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Management Planning ◽  
Data Archiving ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
And Training ◽  
Management Services

This study aims to analyse the implementation of RDM at PDDI-LIPI and to assess its staff’s understanding about RDM services. This article also discusses the challenges and obstacles PDDI faces in providing RDM services. The data was collected via an online survey from 28 July to 7 August 2020. The survey consisted of 35 questions and was shared with 36 respondents via social media. The results identified categories such as research data management services, data management planning services, data archiving services, funding, and staff competency and training needs. In addition, this article also discusses the approach and assessment of RDM services, challenges in providing RDM services, and plans for further developing RDM services at PDDI-LIPI. The results showed that the PDDI staff's understanding of RDM services is adequate. As a new service, the implementation of RDM at PDDI-LIPI continues to develop toward optimisation. RIN is a platform used by PDDI to support this goal. The three biggest obstacles faced by PDDI-LIPI in developing RDM services are limited human resources, competence and budget.  Various trainings related to RDM, both sending staff off campus and inviting trainers to campus, were carried out by PDDI to overcome these obstacles. It is recommended to conduct further research on the mapping and upskilling of staff in charge of RDM services.

scholarly journals Incorporating Software Curation into Research Data Management Services: Lessons Learned

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-247
Author(s):  
Fernando Rios
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Research University ◽  
Service Level ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Related Services ◽  
Management Planning ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
Management Context ◽  
Large Research

Many large research universities provide research data management (RDM) support services for researchers. These may include support for data management planning, best practices (e.g., organization, support, and storage), archiving, sharing, and publication. However, these data-focused services may under-emphasize the importance of the software that is created to analyse said data. This is problematic for several reasons. First, because software is an integral part of research across all disciplines, it undermines the ability of said research to be understood, verified, and reused by others (and perhaps even the researcher themselves). Second, it may result in less visibility and credit for those involved in creating the software. A third reason is related to stewardship: if there is no clear process for how, when, and where the software associated with research can be accessed and who will be responsible for maintaining such access, important details of the research may be lost over time. This article presents the process by which the RDM services unit of a large research university addressed the lack of emphasis on software and source code in their existing service offerings. The greatest challenges were related to the need to incorporate software into existing data-oriented service workflows while minimizing additional resources required, and the nascent state of software curation and archiving in a data management context. The problem was addressed from four directions: building an understanding of software curation and preservation from various viewpoints (e.g., video games, software engineering), building a conceptual model of software preservation to guide service decisions, implementing software-related services, and documenting and evaluating the work to build expertise and establish a standard service level.

scholarly journals Doctoral Students' Educational Needs in Research Data Management: Perceived Importance and Current Competencies

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Jukka Rantasaari
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
High Quality Research ◽  
Management Planning ◽  
Data Preservation ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
Data Lifecycle

Sound research data management (RDM) competencies are elementary tools used by researchers to ensure integrated, reliable, and re-usable data, and to produce high quality research results. In this study, 35 doctoral students and faculty members were asked to self-rate or rate doctoral students’ current RDM competencies and rate the importance of these competencies. Structured interviews were conducted, using close-ended and open-ended questions, covering research data lifecycle phases such as collection, storing, organization, documentation, processing, analysis, preservation, and data sharing. The quantitative analysis of the respondents’ answers indicated a wide gap between doctoral students’ rated/self-rated current competencies and the rated importance of these competencies. In conclusion, two major educational needs were identified in the qualitative analysis of the interviews: to improve and standardize data management planning, including awareness of the intellectual property and agreements issues affecting data processing and sharing; and to improve and standardize data documenting and describing, not only for the researcher themself but especially for data preservation, sharing, and re-using. Hence the study informs the development of RDM education for doctoral students.

scholarly journals Exploring research data management planning challenges in practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37
Author(s):  
Armel Lefebvre ◽  
Baharak Bakhtiari ◽  
Marco Spruit
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Public Funding ◽  
Research Data ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Management Planning ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
Barriers To Access ◽  
Funding Agencies ◽  
Management Plans

AbstractResearch data management planning (RDMP) is the process through which researchers first get acquainted with research data management (RDM) matters. In recent years, public funding agencies have implemented governmental policies for removing barriers to access to scientific information. Researchers applying for funding at public funding agencies need to define a strategy for guaranteeing that the acquired funds also yield high-quality and reusable research data. To achieve that, funding bodies ask researchers to elaborate on data management needs in documents called data management plans (DMP). In this study, we explore several organizational and technological challenges occurring during the planning phase of research data management, more precisely during the grant submission process. By doing so, we deepen our understanding of a crucial process within research data management and broaden our understanding of the current stakeholders, practices, and challenges in RDMP.

scholarly journals Tuuli project: accelerating data management planning in Finnish research organisations

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minna Ahokas ◽  
Mari Elisa Kuusniemi ◽  
Jari Friman
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Data Management ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Planning Tool ◽  
Management Planning ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
Management Plans ◽  
Research Organisations ◽  
And Training

Many research funders have requirements for data sharing and data management plans (DMP). DMP tools are services built to help researchers to create data management plans fitting their needs and based on funder and/or organisation guidelines. Project Tuuli (2015–2017) has provided DMPTuuli, a data management planning tool for Finnish researchers and research organisations offering DMP templates and guidance. In this paper we describe how project has helped both Finnish researchers and research organisations adopt research data management best practices. As a result of the project we have also created a national Tuuli network. With growing competence and collaboration of the network, the project has reached most of its goals. The project has also actively promoted DMP support and training in Finnish research organisations.

scholarly journals The on-premise data sharing infrastructure e!DAL: Foster FAIR data for faster data acquisition

GigaScience ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Arend ◽  
Patrick König ◽  
Astrid Junker ◽  
Uwe Scholz ◽  
Matthias Lange
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Data Storage ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Data Repository ◽  
Plant Genomics ◽  
Quality Of Data

Abstract Background The FAIR data principle as a commitment to support long-term research data management is widely accepted in the scientific community. Although the ELIXIR Core Data Resources and other established infrastructures provide comprehensive and long-term stable services and platforms for FAIR data management, a large quantity of research data is still hidden or at risk of getting lost. Currently, high-throughput plant genomics and phenomics technologies are producing research data in abundance, the storage of which is not covered by established core databases. This concerns the data volume, e.g., time series of images or high-resolution hyper-spectral data; the quality of data formatting and annotation, e.g., with regard to structure and annotation specifications of core databases; uncovered data domains; or organizational constraints prohibiting primary data storage outside institional boundaries. Results To share these potentially dark data in a FAIR way and master these challenges the ELIXIR Germany/de.NBI service Plant Genomic and Phenomics Research Data Repository (PGP) implements a “bring the infrastructure to the data” approach, which allows research data to be kept in place and wrapped in a FAIR-aware software infrastructure. This article presents new features of the e!DAL infrastructure software and the PGP repository as a best practice on how to easily set up FAIR-compliant and intuitive research data services. Furthermore, the integration of the ELIXIR Authentication and Authorization Infrastructure (AAI) and data discovery services are introduced as means to lower technical barriers and to increase the visibility of research data. Conclusion The e!DAL software matured to a powerful and FAIR-compliant infrastructure, while keeping the focus on flexible setup and integration into existing infrastructures and into the daily research process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document