Association of Myofascial Pain in Patients with Thoracolumbar Scoliosis, Kyphoscoliosis or Spinal Deformity Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in Uttar Pradesh, India

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (27) ◽  
pp. 2392-2398
Author(s):  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Sandeep Khuba ◽  
Sujeet Gautam ◽  
Anil Agarwal ◽  
Muralidharan Vittobaraju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Myofascial Pain ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Quadratus Lumborum ◽  
Cobb’S Angle

BACKGROUND Scoliotic spine puts undue strain on the back musculature which may lead to the production of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). The purpose of this study was to find out the association of myofascial pain of iliopsoas and quadratus lumborum in scoliotic patients and to look for any correlation between the degree of deformity (Cobb’s angle) and severity of myofascial pain. METHODS A total of 60 patients of low back pain with spinal deformity were enrolled in the study. The severity of the spinal deformity and pain was calculated with Cobb’s angle and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scale (0 - 100) respectively. Patients with iliopsoas and quadratus myofascial pain underwent trigger point therapy along with regimen of stretching exercises. VAS scores were recorded at 0 - hour, 2 - hour, 2 - weeks, 1 month and 3 months after the procedure. RESULTS Forty-four patients out of 60 had myofascial pain of iliopsoas or quadratus lumborum or both. 15, 31 and 12 patients had Cobb’s angle of 10 - 20, 21 - 30 and 31 - 40 degree, respectively. Trigger point injections were performed in 38 patients. The pre-procedure median VAS score was 70, at 0 hour 45, at 2 hour 40, at 2 weeks 30, at 1 month 30 and at 3 months 30. A significant reduction (P < 0.001) in VAS score was observed till 3 months. CONCLUSIONS The myofascial pain of iliopsoas and quadratus lumborum is an important source of low back pain in patients with scoliosis. There is no correlation between the degree of scoliosis and severity of low back pain. KEYWORDS Scoliosis, Kyphoscoliosis, Thoraco-Lumbar Spinal Deformity, Myofascial Pain, Iliopsoas, Psoas Major, Quadratus Lumborum, Low Back Pain

scholarly journals LOW BACK PAIN;

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bilal Khan ◽  
Khalid Khanzada ◽  
Sajjad Ullah ◽  
Usman Haqqani
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Myofascial Pain ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Myofascial Pain Syndrome ◽  
Radiological Examination ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Female Ratio

Objectives: To know about the efficacy of trigger point injections in low back pain. Study Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Out-patient Department of Naseer Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, and private clinic of the author. Period: March 2016 to January 2017. Materials and Methods: All patients with low back pain were evaluated. Inclusion criteria was; all patients with low back pain greater than 3 months duration whether operated or not, patients with non-radiating symptoms, patients with acceptable radiology (no listhesis, obvious stenosis/disk, albeit some degree of degeneration was acceptable), further helping points were morning exacerbations and elicitation of tender spot by the patient. The exclusion criteria was Low back pain with less than 3 months duration, obvious pathology on radiological examination, radiating symptoms, generalized low back pain without any point tenderness elicitation. The patients were sent home on medications and asked to avoid strenuous activity for a couple of weeks, they were followed after one month and asked about their pain satisfaction. Results: Approximately 2800 patients were evaluated for low back pain and of them 237 (8.46%) patients were upto the inclusion criteria, only 112 patients had agreed to have a TPI, which showed an acceptance rate of 47.25%. There were 65 males and 58 females, with a male to female ratio approaching almost 1:1. The age range was from 18 to 48 years, and the mean age was 32 years. The minimum duration of pain was 3 months and the maximum duration was 4 years, 4 patients had undergone back surgery. Almost all patients pointed out the pain spot, but a typical trigger point was elicited in 58(51.78%) patients, while morning exacerbation was present in 43(38.38%). Radiological examination was performed on all patients in the form of simple xrays and Magnetic resonance imaging scans, it was acceptable in 67%, as patients with radiating symptoms were already excluded. 10.71% (n=12) patients had some problems. Conclusion: In patients with chronic low back pain due to Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) eliciting the trigger points by either elaboration through history or physical examination and treating them with a TP injection with lignocaine and a steroids has good short term results.

scholarly journals The Automatization of a New Thermography Method Using Invasive Nociceptive Stimulation to Confirm an Autonomic Phenomenon within a Trigger Point Referred Pain Zone

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 893
Author(s):  
Elżbieta Skorupska ◽  
Tomasz Dybek ◽  
Michał Rychlik ◽  
Marta Jokiel ◽  
Paweł Dobrakowski
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Trigger Points ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Referred Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Software Utility

The trigger points (TrPs) related to chronic low back pain that mimic sciatica have been lately recognized and included in the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision. This study examined the MATLAB software utility for the objective stratification of low back pain patients using the Minimally Invasive Procedure (MIP). The two diagnostic MIP parameters were: average temperature (ΔTavr) and autonomic referred pain (AURP). Chronic sciatica patients with TrPs (n = 20) and without TrPs (n = 20) were examined using the MIP. A significant increase in both parameters was confirmed for the thigh ROI of the TrP-positive patients, with ΔTavr being the leading parameter (p = 0.016, Exp(β) = 2.603). A continued significance of both parameters was confirmed from 6′00″ to 15′30″ (p < 0.05). The maximum AURP value was confirmed at 13′30″ (p < 0.05) (TrPs(+) 20.4 ± 19.9% vs. TrPs(-) 3.77 ± 9.14%; p = 0.000; CI (0.347,0.348)).

scholarly journals Assessment of Vitamin D Levels in Patients Presenting With Chronic Low Back Pain at a Tertiary Care Hospital

Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mukesh Kumar ◽  
Masroor Ahmed ◽  
Ghulam Hussain ◽  
Muhammad Bux ◽  
Naveed Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Vitamin D Levels

Comparison of intravenous NSAIDs and trigger point injection for low back pain in ED: A prospective randomized study

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 1927-1931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Osman Kocak ◽  
Ali Ahiskalioglu ◽  
Emre Sengun ◽  
Sultan Tuna Akgol Gur ◽  
Ilker Akbas
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Prospective Randomized Study ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Point Injection

scholarly journals Electromyographic Studies on Motor Unit Activity of the Trigger Point in Low Back Pain

1982 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-262
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Goto ◽  
Kazumasa Hiraoka ◽  
Yutaka Kagoshima ◽  
Ryuhei Takeuchi ◽  
Kiyokazu Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Motor Unit ◽  
Unit Activity ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Motor Unit Activity

Change in Regional Activity of the Quadratus Lumborum During Bridge Exercises

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Tomoki Oshikawa ◽  
Gen Adachi ◽  
Hiroshi Akuzawa ◽  
Yu Okubo ◽  
Koji Kaneoka
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Trunk Muscles ◽  
Electromyographic Activity ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction ◽  
Quadratus Lumborum ◽  
Activity Measurements ◽  
Measurement Design

Context: The quadratus lumborum (QL) is expected to contribute to segmental motor control of the lumbar spine to prevent low back pain. It has different layers (anterior [QL-a] and posterior [QL-p] layers), whose functional differences are becoming apparent. However, the difference between the QL-a and QL-p activities during bridge exercises utilized in rehabilitation is unclear. Objective: To compare QL-a and QL-p activities during bridge exercises. Design: Repeated-measurement design was used to assess electromyographic activity of trunk muscles recorded during 14 types of bridge exercises. Setting: University laboratory. Participants: A total of 13 healthy men with no history of lumbar spine disorders participated. Intervention: The participants performed 14 types of bridge exercises (3, 3, and 8 types of side bridge, back bridge, and front bridge [FB], respectively). Main Outcome Measures: Fine-wire electromyography was used for QL-a and QL-p activity measurements during bridge exercises. Results: Both QL-a and QL-p showed the highest activity during the side bridge with hip abduction  (47.3% [29.5%] and 43.0% [32.9%] maximal voluntary isometric contraction, respectively). The activity of the QL-a was significantly higher than that of the QL-p during back bridge with ipsilateral leg lift and FB elbow–toe with ipsilateral arm and contralateral leg lift (P < .05). With regard to the QL-p, the activity of the FB hand–knee with contralateral arm and ipsilateral leg lift, the FB elbow–knee with contralateral arm and ipsilateral leg lift, and the FB elbow–toe with contralateral arm and ipsilateral leg lift were significantly higher than that of the FB elbow–knee and FB elbow–toe (P < .05). Conclusion: This study indicates different regional activities; the QL-a activated during the back bridge with ipsilateral leg lift and FB with ipsilateral arm lift, and the QL-p activated during the FB with ipsilateral leg lift. These results have implications for the rehabilitation of low back pain or lumbar scoliosis patients based on QL recruitment.

scholarly journals EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF FLUPIRTINE VERSUS TRAMADOL IN THE TREATMENT OF MODERATE CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN

2019 ◽  
pp. 84-87
Author(s):  
VINEELA KARTHIK NAGURI ◽  
RAVI BABU KOMARAM ◽  
TAMILISETTI VIDYA SAGAR
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: The objective of the study was to assess and compare the efficacy and tolerability of flupirtine versus tramadol in patients with chronic moderate low back pain (LBP). Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the outpatient department of orthopaedics at tertiary care hospital, Rajamahendravarm. After meeting the inclusion criteria, a total of 60 patients were randomly allocated to tablet flupirtine 100 mg in Group A and tablet tramadol 50 mg in Group B. The efficacy of the study drugs was assessed at baseline and the end of treatment by numerical rating scale11, visual analog scale-100 mm, physician’s, and patient’s global assessment. Statistical analysis was done using paired and unpaired t-test and data were presented as mean±standard deviation. Adverse drug reactions were monitored during the treatment. Results: The study results showed that 90% of the patients in Group A and 78% of the patients in Group B had shown a good response to their respective drugs. 30% of flupirtine group patients reported adverse drug reactions which were mild. Conclusion: Both the drugs are effective in the treatment of moderate chronic LBP, but the advantage of flupirtine was, the incidence of adverse drug reactions was less when compared to tramadol group.

scholarly journals Completion Rates and Clinical Changes of Patients Seeking Non-Invasive Treatment for Low Back Pain in 13 Centres of a Sports Medicine Institute in India

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-96
Author(s):  
Priyadarshini Rajamani ◽  
Hemant Deepak Shewade ◽  
Debashish Kundu ◽  
Kishore Kumar Sekaran ◽  
Santhanam Daniel Amalan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Functional Disability ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Completion Rates ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Non Invasive

Background/Aim: Low back pain (LBP) is the major cause of disability worldwide. The existing treatments are expensive and associated with complications. The present study aimed to determine the proportion of patients completing therapy and rehabilitation phases and describe the changes in self-reported symptoms and functional disability among LBP patients enrolled in a private sports medicine institute. Methods: This is a cohort study involving review of case records. We studied 2 phases out of 3 of non-invasive treatment of LBP: therapy of around 10 days (myofascial trigger point release therapy, cryotherapy, aqua therapy and acupuncture) and rehabilitation of around 3 weeks (muscle strengthening exercises). Results: A total of 443 patients were enrolled; their mean (SD) age was 46 (15) years, 46% were male, and 193 (44%) presented with chronic (>6 months) pain. The numbers of patients who completed the therapy and rehabilitation phases were 327 (74%) and 115 (26%), respectively. The median (IQR) visual analogue scale pain scores were 7 (6–9) at entry, 2 (1–3) at completion of therapy and 1 (0–2) at completion of rehabilitation (p < 0.001). The median (IQR) functional disability scores were 32 (22–53) at entry, 15 (6–26) at completion of therapy and 4 (0–14) at completion of rehabilitation (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Low completion rates were observed. Patients who completed therapy reported reduction in pain and improved functionalities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document