scholarly journals The Material and Procedural Aspects of Non Bis In Idem Principle in Proceedings on Administrative Offenses

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 39-42
Author(s):  
Artem R. Nobel ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The essence of the principle of one-time administrative responsibility is considered, its concept and proposals for improving the provisions of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation are formulated. The conclusions are based on the provisions of the legislation on administrative offenses, the legal positions of the highest courts of the Russian Federation, the European Court of Human Rights, a comparative analysis of the current criminal and criminal procedure legislation. The operation of the principle non bis in idem in proceedings on the cases of administrative offenses is revealed by highlighting the material and procedural elements that make up its content.

scholarly journals Ответственность за административные правонарушения: стандарты ЕСПЧ и российская практика

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (52) ◽  
pp. 135-141
Author(s):  
О.Е. Шишкина
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Systemic Problems ◽  
Judicial Procedure ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

Статья посвящена анализу проблем законодательства Российской Федерации об административных правонарушениях и практики его применения сквозь призму вынесенных против России решений Европейского Суда по правам человека. Автор выделяет стандарты, которые используются Европейским Судом по правам человека. Автор также приводит конкретные дела, рассмотренные Европейским Судом, и формулирует ряд системных проблем российского административно-деликтного права, главную из которых можно обозначить как «материальная расточительность при процессуальной экономии». Автор считает методологической ошибкой российского законодательства объединение в одном Кодексе (КоАП РФ) регулирования судебной процедуры привлечения к административной ответственности, которая должна быть состязательной, и внесудебного инквизиционного порядка рассмотрения дел об административных правонарушениях. . This article is devoted to the analysis of the problems of the legislation of the Russian Federation on administrative offenses and the practice of its application through the prism of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights against Russia. The author highlights the standards that are used by the European Court of Human Rights. The author also cites specific cases considered by the European Court and formulates a number of systemic problems of Russian administrative law, the main of which can be described as “material waste in procedural economy”. The author considers a methodological mistake of the Russian legislation to unite in one Code (CAO RF) the regulation of the judicial procedure for administrative responsibility, which should be adversarial, and not the judicial inquisitorial procedure for the consideration of cases of administrative offenses.

scholarly journals Comparative analysis of the approaches of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the European Court of Human Rights to the protection of property rights

2021 ◽  
pp. 168-175
Author(s):  
A. A. Drozdov
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Private Property ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Leading Role ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The article substantiates the leading role of the right of private property in the economic system of a state with a market economy, and therefore points to the need to comply with increased guarantees of its protection. It also states that there are problems with the protection of property rights. Then the author substantiates the obligation for all Russian authorities of the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the European Court of Human Rights. A comparative analysis of these positions and approaches to the protection of property rights leads the author to the conclusion that the goal of their harmonization has been partially achieved. In order to increase the effectiveness of the protection of rights, it is necessary to further implement the approaches of the European Court, which increase the guarantees of protection, into the Russian legal system, and it is also necessary to consider the issue of introducing point changes into Russian legislation taking into account these approaches.

scholarly journals IDENTIFICATION OF DATA EVIDING A NON-FULFILLMENT OF THE PERSONS ''OBLIGATIONS OF AN INSTRUMENT COOPERATION AGREEMENT AS A BASIS FOR CANCELLATION OR CHANGING THE DECISION IN THE COURT OF THE APPEAL INSTANCE

2018 ◽  
pp. 35-37
Author(s):  
R. M. Shageeva ◽  
Z. M. Magadieva
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Cooperation Agreement ◽  
European Court ◽  
Usual Manner ◽  
The Russian Federation

Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, after the amendments introduced by the Federal Law of 03.07.2016 No. 322, provides for such an unfavorable consequence for a person who has entered into a pre-trial cooperation agreement in the event that he fails to fulfill its conditions, such as cancellation or amendment of a court decision on appeal. This consequence, along with the possibility of termination of the agreement, trial of the case in the usual manner, review of the court decision regarding the imposed punishment, is considered as the procedural responsibility of the said person. At the same time, the issue of the obligation of the person who entered into the pre-trial cooperation agreement to give truthful testimony regarding the accomplices of the crime, as well as his procedural status during the interrogation of the main case while fulfilling the conditions of the pre-trial cooperation agreement, remains debatable. The position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation expressed in Resolution No. 17-P of 20.07.2016, as well as the position of the European Court of Human Rights of 04.12.2014 in the case of Alexander Valeryevich Kazakov v. Russia, which is discussed in this article.

scholarly journals REASONABLE TIME OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: CRIMINALISTIC CHARACTER

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 101-111
Author(s):  
K. A. Korsakov ◽  
V. V. Konin ◽  
E. V. Sidorenko
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Reasonable Time ◽  
European Court ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

In the Russian legal system, the understanding that justice should be not only timely, but also fast enough has matured for a long time. The delay in the investigation of a criminal case and its consideration by the court allows the guilty to avoid the deserved punishment in some cases, which calls into question the principle of inevitability of punishment on the one hand, and hinders the right to access justice, on the other hand. The term reasonable time for legal proceedings has emerged as a requirement of international law to be tried without undue delay. The right to a reasonable period of criminal proceedings is regulated by Article 6.1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, but this norm is not fully implemented to date, as evidenced by the decisions of the European court of human rights issued on complaints of violation by the Russian Federation of the provisions of the European Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. At the same time, the available research considers the requirement of reasonable terms in criminal proceedings from the standpoint of criminal procedure law, which is not fully justified. The article attempts to consider the problematic issues of reasonable terms of criminal proceedings from the perspective of criminology, as a science that has incorporated theoretical and practical issues of fighting crime, as well as the problems of criminalistic criteria in criminal proceedings.

Presumption of Innocence as a Principle of Administrative Offense Proceedings

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Artem R. Nobel ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Presumption Of Innocence ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Russian Federation

The presumption of innocence is defined as one of the key principles of proceedings on the cases of administrative offenses. Using the current legislation, the legal positions of the highest courts of the Russian Federation and the European Court of Human Rights, judicial practice, the author reveals the essence of the presumption of innocence by highlighting the elements of this principle and characterizing their content.

scholarly journals Search in Criminal Procedure of Russia and Germany: Comparative Legal Characteristics

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 01159
Author(s):  
Anton Shamne
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Federal Republic ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Federal Republic Of Germany ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Similarities And Differences

The article compares the Criminal Procedural Codes provisions of the Russian Federation and the Federal Republic of Germany that regulate conducting a search as an investigative act. It also provides and compares the definitions of the concept “search” and “dwelling” given in Russian and German criminal procedural legislation. The reasons for conducting the search in general and the search of dwelling are considered, similarities and differences are revealed in relation to the status of the subject who is under the search. The author characterizes the search of dwelling and gives a comparative analysis of this investigative action as well as the notion of “urgent cases” in both countries. The authors also proposed some brief recommendations for improving the norms of the Russian Federation Criminal Procedure Code.

7 International Treaties in Russian Judicial and Arbitral Practice

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Butler William E
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
European Convention ◽  
International Treaties ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
European Court ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
Russian Constitution ◽  
The Russian Federation

This chapter explores the role of Soviet and post-Soviet Russian courts in interpreting and applying international treaties. It is clear that Soviet courts dealt more frequently with treaties than the scanty published judicial practice of that period suggests. This early body of treaties may also have contributed to the emergence in the early 1960s of priority being accorded to Soviet treaties insofar as they contained rules providing otherwise than Soviet legislation. Whatever the volume of cases involving treaties that were considered by Soviet courts prior to 1991, the inclusion of Article 15(4) in the 1993 Russian Constitution transformed the situation. A further transformation occurred when the Russian Federation acceded to the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and began to participate in the deliberations of the European Court for Human Rights in Strasbourg.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document