Carceral Biocitizenship

2018 ◽  
pp. 51-69
Author(s):  
Sarah Burgess ◽  
Stuart J. Murray

On October 19, 2007, nineteen-year-old Ashley Smith died of self-inflicted strangulation while on suicide watch at the Grand Valley Institution for Women in Kitchener, Ontario, Canada. As she tied a ligature around her neck, correctional officers, who had been instructed not to enter into her cell if she was still breathing, watched—and in compliance with Canadian regulations—video-recorded her death. The three correctional officers who stood by and watched Smith’s suicide were charged, along with one of their supervisors, with criminal negligence causing death. This essay explores how various institutions constituted Smith as a carceral biocitizen—a subject caught between biopolitical practices and scenes of legal sovereignty. More specifically, the chapter posits that Smith’s death was produced by a diffuse agency that cannot be definitively located or prosecuted—a neoliberal administration of law that presumed that Smith was already “socially dead,” and was, thus, no citizen at all. This form of biocitzenship radically diverges from accounts that find in biocitizenship a form of agency through which one might lay claim to life in an affirmative biopolitics.

Crisis ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 122-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc S. Daigle ◽  
Anasseril E. Daniel ◽  
Greg E. Dear ◽  
Patrick Frottier ◽  
Lindsay M. Hayes ◽  
...  

Abstract. The International Association for Suicide Prevention created a Task Force on Suicide in Prisons to better disseminate the information in this domain. One of its objectives was to summarize suicide-prevention activities in the prison systems. This study of the Task Force uncovered many differences between countries, although mental health professionals remain central in all suicide prevention activities. Inmate peer-support and correctional officers also play critical roles in suicide prevention but there is great variation in the involvement of outside community workers. These differences could be explained by the availability of resources, by the structure of the correctional and community services, but mainly by the different paradigms about suicide prevention. While there is a common and traditional paradigm that suicide prevention services are mainly offered to individuals by mental health services, correctional systems differ in the way they include (or not) other partners of suicide prevention: correctional officers, other employees, peer inmates, chaplains/priests, and community workers. Circumstances, history, and national cultures may explain such diversity but they might also depend on the basic way we think about suicide prevention at both individual and environmental levels.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail S. Tucker ◽  
Vincent B. Van Hasselt ◽  
Elizabeth A. Palmer ◽  
Tiffany Maple

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Candace Veitas ◽  
Agata Freedle ◽  
Lauren Eyman ◽  
Amanda D. Zelechoski

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley L. Langeliers ◽  
Shiva Amin ◽  
Siobhan K. O'Toole

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document