scholarly journals RAMUCIRUMAB THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED GASTRIC AND GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION ADENOCARCINOMA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 116-121
Author(s):  
V. A Gorbounova ◽  
N. S Besova ◽  
M. B Bychkov ◽  
S. V Orlov ◽  
L. M Kogoniya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Antiangiogenic Agents ◽  
Gastroesophageal Cancer ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
American Society ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Objective. Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignancy and the third leading cause of the cancer mortality worldwide. It is most often diagnosed at a locally advanced or metastatic stage. Angiogenesis has become an important target in the treatment of solid tumors, and antiangiogenic agents are a promising approach to cancer therapy. In this review, we summarize the current literature on the treatment of gastric and gastroesophageal cancer with ramucirumab, an antiangiogenic agent specifically targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2). Material and methods. We conducted a systematic search in May 2016 of PubMed and relevant congress proceedings including the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology, and the European Cancer Congress. Included studies were aimed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer. Results. Our search yielded 91 publications including 5 manuscripts and 6 congress abstracts meeting the predefined inclusion criteria. Included studies reported outcomes were related to ramucirumab in gastric cancer, published within the past 5 years. Conclusion. Second-line treatment with ramucirumab, either as monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel, significantly improves the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Ramucirumab is well tolerated and has an acceptable safety profile. Furthermore, the patient quality of life is maintained with delayed both symptom worsening and deterioration of the functional status. Studies are required to identify potential predictive biomarkers of ramucirumab efficacy.

scholarly journals Case report of the rapid achievement of sustained and long-term remission resulting from the use of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in the second-line treatment of a patient with disseminated gastric adenocarcinoma

2018 ◽  
pp. 150-153
Author(s):  
T. A. Titova ◽  
N. S. Besova ◽  
V. A. Gorbunova ◽  
Yu. P. Kuvshinov ◽  
A. A. Filatov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Ramucirumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. In two randomised clinical trials Ramucirumab either alone or in combination with paclitaxel has been found to be safe and effective for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. One of the serious adverse events associated with ramucirumab is bleeding.We report the case of a 56-year-old man with advanced gastric cancer located at the gastroesophageal junction with liver, pulmonary and multiple lymph node metastases, plevritis was treated with a paclitaxel plus Ramucirumab regimen. We demonstrate a case of a cardioesophageal junction bleeding due to the high efficiency of treatment. He was successfully treated with by applying only hemostatical therapy, but after stop the bleeding chemotherapy was not reintroduced. The partial response was maintained for approximately 10 months. The patient died on 28 November 2017.Chemotherapy with best supportive care for metastatic gastric cancer shown the improvement the performance status, help keep the cancer under control and help relieve symptoms during the time.

scholarly journals REAL-LIFE CLINICAL UTILITY OF RAMUCIRUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DISSEMINATED GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMA: PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF THE EXPERIENCE OF BLOKHIN RUSSIAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTRE

2017 ◽  
pp. 30-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Besova ◽  
T. A. Titova ◽  
V. A. Gorbunova ◽  
O. O. Gordeeva ◽  
A. A. Tryakin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Preliminary Review ◽  
National Medical ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Angiogenesis   has  become  an  important  target  in  the  treatment  of  solid  tumors  and  anti-angiogenic   agents   are a  promising  approach  to  cancer  therapy.  Ramucirumab, an  anti-angiogenic   agent   specifically  targeting  vascular endothelial  growth factor receptor-2  (VEGFR-2). In April 2014, the FDA approved ramucirumab as a single  agent  or in combination with paclitaxel  for treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC) that has progressed on or after prior fluoropyrimidine – or platinumcontaining chemotherapy based on data of REGARD and RAINBOW trials.We evaluated the progression free (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety of ramucirumab in patients (pts) with advanced GC in routine clinical practice From June 2016  to 20 Sep 2017  40 pts with advanced GC were treated with ramucirumab in the second line treatment as single  agent (8 pts) or in combination with paclitaxel  (26 pts) in N.N.Blokhin National medical research center of oncology.Median PFS (MPFS) and median OS (MOS) was 1,8  and 7,6 mons for monotherapy group. For combination group MPFS was 5,02  mons, MOS was not reached. Ramucirumab had an acceptable safety profile Our data are similar to the data of REGARD and RAINBOW trials.

scholarly journals Results of the use of ramucirumab in combination with paclitaxel or ramucirumab monotherapy as the second line treatment in patients with disseminated HER2-negative gastric or cardioesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: experience of N.N. Blokhin russian cancer research center of the ministry of health of Russia

2018 ◽  
pp. 34-40
Author(s):  
N. S. Besova ◽  
T. A. Titova ◽  
E. V. Trusilova ◽  
V. A. Gorbunova ◽  
A. A. Tryakin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Research Center ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
National Medical ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Background.Working out of the second line chemotherapy of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma is a promising approach to cancer therapy. Ramucirumab, an anti-angiogenic agent specifically targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2). In April 2014, the FDA approved ramucirumab as a single agent or in combination with paclitaxel for treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma that has progressed on or after prior fluoropyrimidineor platinum containing chemotherapy based on data of REGARD and RAINBOW trials.Materials and Methods: From June 2016 to 15Jan 201837 pts with advanced GC were treated with ramucirumabin the second line treatment as single agent (11 pts) or in combination with paclitaxel (26 pts) in N.N.Blokhin National medical research center of oncology.Results: edian PFS (MPFS) and median OS (MOS) was 1,8 and 7,6 mons for monotherapy group. For combination group MPFS was 4,0mons, MOS -10,6 mons. Ramucirumab had an acceptable safety profileConclusions:ur data are similar to the data of international randomized trials.

scholarly journals Hyperprogressive Disease in the Irradiation Field after a Single Dose of Nivolumab for Gastric Cancer: A Case Report

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takatsugu Ogata ◽  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
Misato Ogata ◽  
Yukimasa Hatachi ◽  
Hisateru Yasui
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Rapid Progression ◽  
Gastroesophageal Cancer ◽  
Irradiation Field ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Hyperprogressive Disease

Following the ATTRACTION-2 study, nivolumab was approved for advanced gastric cancer in Japan. However, pseudoprogression and hyperprogressive disease have been reported in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We report a patient with gastric cancer who received nivolumab after radiotherapy only to experience rapid progression within the irradiation field after the first immunotherapy session. A 66-year-old man with dysphagia visited our hospital and was diagnosed with stage IV gastroesophageal cancer (human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 score = 0). He commenced a G-SOX regimen (S-1 80 mg/m2 on days 1–14 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks) in June 2017. The dysphagia worsened despite 3 cycles of G-SOX, and computed tomography (CT) revealed constriction of the gastroesophageal junction. To ameliorate the dysphagia, palliative chemoradiotherapy (S-1 and 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) was performed starting in August 2017. The patient’s dysphagia had not resolved after completing radiotherapy, and pain on swallowing worsened. Nivolumab (3 mg/m2 every 2 weeks) was administered 7 days after the completion of radiotherapy. The patient experienced malaise and worsening dysphagia before the second cycle. CT 15 days after the first nivolumab administration revealed rapid progression in the irradiation field. His general condition rapidly deteriorated, and he died 24 days after the first administration. This episode suggests that administration of nivolumab after radiotherapy may be a risk factor for hyperprogressive disease.

Unanswered Questions in the Management of Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: An Overview from the Medical Oncologist's Perspective

2013 ◽  
pp. e155-e159
Author(s):  
Manish A. Shah
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Multiple Treatment ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Patients with gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma have multiple treatment options; however, are victims of lack of consensus and wide variation in treatment, sometimes within the same hospital. While there is a consensus that surgery alone is inadequate for locally advanced disease, locoregional treatment has become the point for debate. Only in 2010 was the reclassification of GEJ cancers as esophageal cancers. Treatment options remain as varied as the classification of GEJ cancers: preoperative chemoradiotherapy, definitive chemoradiation, perioperative chemotherapy, and resection followed by postoperative chemoradiation. Several studies have examined the varying treatment paradigms; however, many fall short due to methodology or sample size. The MAGIC study determined perioperative chemotherapy to be an acceptable standard treatment option for patients with gastric cancer, althouth a significant portion of enrolled patients had distal esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma. The CROSS study concluded combination chemotherapy and radiation before resection beneficial. Preoperative therapy in cases of GEJ is beneficial for survival, but not as much impact is seen as in esophageal SCC, which exhibits an increased sensitivity to CRT. There is concurrence with two phase III studies from Japan and Korea on the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. However, the applicability of these studies to GEJ adenocarcinoma remains a question, especially with the significantly different epidemiology of increased proximal and GEJ tumors in the West compared to Asia. To move forward with this increasingly prevalent disease, we will need to do more than understand the multiple treatment paradigms—we will need to select a strategy and examine it.

Recent Strategies for Treating Stage IV Gastric Cancer: Roles of Palliative Gastrectomy, Chemotherapy, and Radiotherapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunihiko Izuishi ◽  
Hirohito Mori
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage Iv Gastric Cancer ◽  
Palliative Gastrectomy ◽  
Advanced Tumor ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer ◽  
Previously Treated

Recently, many strategies have been reported for the effective treatment of gastric cancer. However, the strategy for treating stage IV gastric cancer remains controversial. Conducting a prospective phase III study in stage IV cancer patients is difficult because of heterogeneous performance status, age, and degree of cancer metastasis or extension. Due to poor prognosis, the variance in physical status, and severe symptoms, it is important to determine the optimal strategy for treating each individual stage IV patient. In the past decade, many reports have addressed topics related to stage IV gastric cancer: the 7th Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM staging system has altered its stage IV classification; new chemotherapy regimens have been developed through the randomized ECF for advanced and locally advanced esophagogastric cancer (REAL)-II, S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 in RCT in the treatment for stomach cancer (SPIRITS), trastuzumab for gastric cancer (ToGA), ramucirumab monotherapy for previously-treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD), and ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously-treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW) trials; and the survival efficacy of palliative gastrectomy has been denied by the reductive gastrectomy for advanced tumor in three Asian countries (REGATTA) trial. Current strategies for treating stage IV patients can be roughly divided into the following five categories: palliative gastrectomy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, gastric stent, or bypass. In this article, we review recent publications and guidelines along with above categories in the light of individual symptoms and prognosis. Abbreviations: APC: argon plasma coagulation; AVAGAST: anti-angiogenic antibody bevacizumab, the avastin in gastric cancer; BSC: best supportive care; CF: cisplatin and fluorouracil; CRP: C-reactive protein; DCF: docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU; FISH: fluorescent in-situ hybridization; GJ: gastrojejunostomy; GPS: Glasgow Prognostic Score; HER: human epidermal growth factor receptor; HR: hazard ratio; NLR: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; OS: overall survival; PS: performance status; QOL: quality of life; RAINBOW: ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously-treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma; RCTs: randomized controlled trials; REAL: randomized ECF for advanced and locally advanced esophagogastric cancer; REGARD: ramucirumab monotherapy for previously-treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma; REGATTA: reductive gastrectomy for advanced tumor in three Asian countries; SEER: Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results; SEMS: self-expandable metal stents; SPIRITS: S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 in RCT in the treatment for stomach cancer; ToGA: trastuzumab for gastric cancer; TTP: time-to-progression; VEGFR: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor.

Safety and efficacy of apatinib as third or later line treatment for advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A post-marketing phase IV study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16034-e16034
Author(s):  
Jin Li ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Lu Wen ◽  
Junsheng Wang ◽  
Wenying Deng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Phase Iv

e16034 Background: Apatinib, a small molecule multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor with high selectivity for VEGFR-2, has been approved for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma in China by significantly improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Here, we report safety and efficacy data from an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase IV trial of apatinib as a third-line or later line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma; and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2; and adequate haematological and hepatic function; and failure of at least two lines of chemotherapy. Patients received oral apatinib until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints included PFS and OS. Results: The intention-to-treat population (ITT) included 2004 patients. At baseline, the median age was 59 (range, 19-85) years, ECOG performance status of 0/1/2 (%) was 15.4/68.8/15.1, and stage III/IV was 3.5/96.4; 98.8% had metastases, and among which metastatic foci≤2/ > 2 was 64.5/34.2 (%), respectively. 89.6% of the patients were given apatinib 500mg as the initial does and the median treatment duration was 56 days. After a median follow-up of 126.5 days, adverse events (AEs) occurred in 95.1% of the patients and 70.3% were grade ≥3. 87.9% of the patients experienced treatment-related AEs (TRAEs), of which 51% had grade ≥3, 12.3% and 16.8% reduced dose and discontinued the treatment, respectively. 57 (2.9%) TRAEs-related deaths were reported, mainly because of gastrointestinal bleeding (16 cases), upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (7), cerebral haemorrhage (2), and gastric perforation (1). The incidence of TRAEs of special interest was 74.3%; 38.1% of patients developed grade≥3, mainly including hypertension (26.3%), bleeding (5.1%), proteinuria (4.5%), and hand-foot syndrome (3.1%). In an ITT population, median PFS was 2.7 months (95%CI 2.23-2.79) and median OS was 5.8 months (95% CI 5.42-6.11). Conclusions: This study confirms that apatinib has a well-established and manageable safety profile and survival benefit as third or later line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034.

Multicenter Phase II Trial of S-1 Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Untreated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 663-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaffer A. Ajani ◽  
Fa-Chyi Lee ◽  
Deepti A. Singh ◽  
Daniel G. Haller ◽  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Purpose S-1 plus cisplatin is considered highly active in Japanese gastric cancer patients. We conducted a phase II multi-institutional trial, in the West, in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma to evaluate activity and safety of this combination. Methods Patients received cisplatin intravenously at 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and S-1 orally at 25 mg/m2/dose bid (50 mg/m2/d) on days 1 to 21, repeated every 28 days. Patients with histologic proof of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of ≥ 70% and near-normal organ function were eligible. All patients provided a written informed consent. To observe a 45% confirmed overall response rate (ORR), 41 assessable patients were needed. Results All 47 patients were assessed for safety and survival, and 41 patients were assessed for ORR. The median age was 56 years and median KPS was 80%. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was four. The confirmed ORR was 51% (95% CI, 35% to 67%) and it was 49% by an independent review. At the 6-month interval, 71% of patients were alive, with a median survival time of 10.9 months. Frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities included fatigue (26%), neutropenia (26%), vomiting (17%), diarrhea (15%), and nausea (15%); however, stomatitis (2%) and febrile neutropenia (2%) were uncommon. There was one (2%) treatment-related death. Conclusion S-1 plus cisplatin is active against gastric cancer and has a favorable toxicity profile. A global phase III study of S-1 plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin currently is accruing patients.

A phase Ib/II, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study evaluating trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201) monotherapy and combinations in patients with HER2-overexpressing gastric cancer (DESTINY-Gastric03).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS261-TPS261
Author(s):  
Yelena Y. Janjigian ◽  
Natasha Viglianti ◽  
Feng Liu ◽  
Ariadna Mendoza-Naranjo ◽  
Liz Croydon
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1B

TPS261 Background: For patients (pts) with HER2-overexpressing metastatic gastric cancer, trastuzumab + chemotherapy is a standard first-line option but provides only a modest overall survival (OS) benefit vs chemotherapy. T-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an anti-HER2 antibody, cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a membrane-permeable topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. Results from a phase 1 trial showed promising antitumor activity (confirmed objective response rate [ORR], 43.2%) in pts with heavily pretreated HER2+ metastatic gastric cancer who received T-DXd (5.4 or 6.4 mg/kg; Shitara K, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:827-836). Here we describe the phase 1b/2 DESTINY-Gastric03 trial (NCT04379596) evaluating T-DXd monotherapy and combinations in pts with HER2-overexpressing gastric cancer. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, 2-part, phase 1b/2 study in pts with HER2-overexpressing (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization positive) locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. In part 1 (dose escalation), pts who had received prior trastuzumab-containing therapy will be assigned to 1 of 5 arms: (1) T-DXd + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); (2) T-DXd + capecitabine (C); (3) T-DXd + durvalumab; (4) T-DXd + 5-FU or C + oxaliplatin (Ox); or (5) T-DXd + 5-FU or C + durvalumab. In part 2 (dose expansion), pts with no prior treatment for metastatic disease will be randomized across 4 arms: (1) T-DXd; (2) trastuzumab + 5-FU or C + Ox or cisplatin; (3) T-DXd + 5-FU or C ± Ox; or (4) T-DXd + 5-FU or C + durvalumab. In part 2, pts will be stratified by HER2 status. Primary endpoints are safety, determination of recommended phase 2 doses (part 1), and investigator-assessed confirmed ORR per RECIST v1.1 (part 2). Secondary endpoints include confirmed ORR (part 1), disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (all per investigator), OS, safety (part 2), pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Clinical trial information: NCT04379596.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document