scholarly journals The trophic role of a forest salamander: impacts on invertebrates, leaf litter retention, and the humification process

Ecosphere ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. art16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Best ◽  
Hartwell H. Welsh, Jr.
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 153-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey A. Prudkovsky

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. e0183108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno M. Carreira ◽  
Pedro Segurado ◽  
Anssi Laurila ◽  
Rui Rebelo

Food Webs ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 20-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Yves Pascal ◽  
Olivier Gros ◽  
Henricus T.S. Boschker

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 520-525
Author(s):  
Jessica E Griffin ◽  
Brian P O’Malley ◽  
Jason D Stockwell

Abstract Freshwater mysids of the Mysis relicta group are omnivorous macroinvertebrates that form an important link between fishes and lower trophic levels in many north temperate to Arctic lakes, where they exhibit diel vertical migration (DVM) to exploit subsurface food-rich layers at night. Benthic food resources have been assumed to be less important for mysid diets than pelagic zooplankton. Studies have nevertheless indicated that mysids consume benthic sedimented detritus, calling this assumption into question. We conducted a food-choice experiment to evaluate the feeding preferences of Mysis diluviana (Audzijonyte & Väinölä, 2005) by presenting field-caught specimens in individual foraging arenas with multiple choices of food. Experimental food treatments included a preferred pelagic prey (Daphnia), a presumed less desirable benthic resource (detritus), and a combination of both. We hypothesized that M. diluviana 1) prefers Daphnia over detritus and consumes only Daphnia in combination treatments, and 2) would not consume detritus except when detritus was the only food source available. Contrary to our hypothesis, M. diluviana readily consumed detritus in the presence of Daphnia. Mysis diluviana unexpectedly consumed more individuals of Daphnia in the presence rather than in the absence of detritus. Our results demonstrate that mysids take advantage of benthic food resources even in the presence of a presumably preferred zooplankton prey, calling to question the long-held assumption that benthic resources are unimportant when considering the trophic role of freshwater mysids of the M. relicta group.


2011 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Luštrik ◽  
Martin Turjak ◽  
Simona Kralj-Fišer ◽  
Cene Fišer

Interspecific interactions between surface and subterranean species may be a key determinant for species distributions. Until now, the existence of competition (including predation) between these groups has not been tested. To assess the coexistence and potential role of interspecific interactions between surface Gammarus fossarum and subterranean Niphargus timavi, and to determine their micro distributions, we conducted a series of field and laboratory observations. We aimed to determine: (1) species substrate preference, (2) whether the presence of G. fossarum influences the habitat choice of N. timavi, and (3) possible predation effects on micro habitat choice of small juveniles. Throughout a small river in SW Slovenia, N. timavi was predominantly found in leaf litter and gravel, but rarely in sand. In the sand however, we exclusively found juveniles. In contrast, surface G. fossarum sheltered mainly in leaf litter. A similar, body size dependent, micro distribution was observed in G. fossarum, where small individuals were generally found in gravel and sand. The presence of G. fossarum affected the micro distribution of juvenile, but not adult, N. timavi. In the laboratory we observed predation and cannibalism in both species. Niphargus timavi, however, appeared to be a more efficient predator than G. fossarum. In particular, juvenile N. timavi were most vulnerable to preying by adults of both species. This probably affected the distribution of juvenile N. timavi that chose finer substrates when placed with adult individuals in an aquarium with granules of different size. To understand the distribution of subterranean species, the summed effect of intraspecific interactions, as well as surface – subterranean species interactions, in particular between individuals of different size, should be taken into account.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 990-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Tomás Schoffer ◽  
Sébastien Sauvé ◽  
Alexander Neaman ◽  
Rosanna Ginocchio
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document