Disability, Race and Ex-Offender Status: The Tri-vector Challenge to Employment

2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 25-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja Feist-Price ◽  
Lisa Lavergne ◽  
Michelle Davis

Racial minority populations consistently make up the largest percentage of individuals incarcerated in the criminal justice system. A significant number of inmates have one or more mental and physical disabilities. To fully understand the intersection between race, disability and incarceration, we must explore the genesis of criminal behavior, which often begins during secondary school years and continue into adulthood. Researchers have begun a discourse on this issue called the school to prison pipeline. Thus, resources to minimize recidivism are of utmost importance. Obtaining education and job skills while incarcerated positively impact ex-offenders' ability to obtain and maintain employment following their release from prison. Additionally, securing employment significantly diminishes the rate of recidivism. However, proper attention and resources are required for persons with disabling conditions. This article will address the rate of incarceration among persons with disabilities by giving particular attention to race, recidivism, education, and resources.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 451-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry T. Greely ◽  
Nita A. Farahany

The criminal justice system acts directly on bodies, but fundamentally it cares about minds. As neuroscience progresses, it will increasingly be able to probe the objective, physical organ of the brain and reveal secrets from the subjective mind. This is already beginning to affect the criminal justice system, a trend that will only increase. This review article cannot begin even to sketch the full scope of the new field of law and neuroscience. The first workshop on the subject was held in 2003 ( Garland 2004 ), but the field already has its own casebook ( Jones et al. 2014 ) and the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience (2018) shows more than 1,700 publications in the area between 1984 and 2017. Greely (2009) divided the implications of law into five different categories: prediction, mind-reading, responsibility, treatment, and enhancement. This article examines only three points: the current use of neuroscience to understand and explain criminal behavior, the possibilities of relevant neuroscience-based prediction, and plausible future applications of neuroscience to the treatment of criminals. But first, we discuss the human brain and how it works.


Author(s):  
Kevin A. Wright

Nearly everyone sent to prison will one day return to the community. This means that understanding recidivism is of critical importance to members of that community. At the most basic level, recidivism can be defined as “the reversion of an individual to criminal behavior after he or she has been convicted of a prior offense, sentenced, and (presumably) corrected.” Recidivism therefore requires that some sort of involvement with the criminal justice system has taken place, and that then the individual again comes into contact with the system after additional transgressions. Recidivism, in other words, is officially detected, repeat unlawful behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document