The Challenge of Comprehensive Care

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-86
Author(s):  
Dawn Bucher

Adults are living longer with multiple chronic conditions. There are many challenges to providing comprehensive care to patients around the country in today’s system. This article, although personal, discusses some challenges seen by the writer but witnessed by many. It also looks at some challenges nurse practitioners have when practicing in multiple states across the country. Lastly, I offer my opinion on certification as a Diplomate of Comprehensive Care for all Doctor of Nursing Practice clinicians who provide comprehensive care in independent practice settings. It is time to provide safe, quality, comprehensive care to our patients in a reputable health care system.

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary W. Byrne

Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs have focused on competencies needed to deliver comprehensive patient care across settings and time. Endorsed by professional nursing associations, these competencies are typically evaluated through detailed case narratives written by DNP candidates. Beyond competency metrics, the essence of comprehensive care for advanced nursing practice has not been carefully explicated. In this study, a phenomenological analysis is applied to a purposive sample of 12 DNP case narratives to identify the meaning of comprehensive care as transmitted in practice. Clinical assessment precision, diagnostic acumen, and advocacy emerge consistently but only the more audacious nurse practitioners directly challenge health system fragmentation.


10.2196/13022 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. e13022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese Scott Duncan ◽  
Sara Riggare ◽  
Sabine Koch ◽  
Lena Sharp ◽  
Maria Hägglund

Background Current health care systems are rarely designed to meet the needs of people living with chronic conditions. However, some patients and informal caregivers are not waiting for the health care system to redesign itself. These individuals are sometimes referred to as e-patients. The first generation of e-patients used the internet for finding information and for communicating with peers. Compared with the first generation, the second generation of e-patients collects their own health data and appears to be more innovative. Objective The aim of this study was to describe the second generation of e-patients through exploration of their active engagement in their self-care and health care. Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 patients with chronic conditions and 5 informal caregivers. They were all recruited through a Web-based advertisement. Data were analyzed according to the framework analysis approach, using the 3 concepts of the self-determination theory—autonomy, relatedness, and competence—at the outset. Results Study participants were actively engaged in influencing their self-care and the health care system to improve their own health, as well as the health of others. This occurred at different levels, such as using their own experience when giving presentations and lectures to health care professionals and medical students, working as professional peers in clinical settings, performing self-tracking, contributing with innovations, and being active on social media. When interaction with health care providers was perceived as being insufficient, the participants sought support through their peers, which showed strong relatedness. Competence increased through the use of technology and learning experiences with peers. Their autonomy was important but was sometimes described as involuntary and to give up was not an option for them. Conclusions Like the first generation of e-patients, the participants frequently searched for Web-based information. However, the second generation of e-patients also produce their own health data, which they learn from and share. They also engage in the innovation of digital tools to meet health-related needs. Utilizing technological developments comes naturally to the second generation of e-patients, even if the health care system is not prepared to support them under these new circumstances.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-144
Author(s):  
Kim Kuebler

The ratio of people aged 65 years and older compared to people aged 20–64 years are expected to rise by 80% over the next decade. Currently, 70% of the American population is living with a chronic disease, and 2 out of 3 have multiple chronic conditions (MCC). The purpose of this review is to identify the current Federal Initiatives funded by the Affordable Care Act that are being used to demonstrate and promote the use of self-management practices in patients who are living with MCCs. Patients with MCCs who engage in self-management practices have shown to have a reduction in disease complications and exacerbations, less hospitalization and readmission rates, improved physical functioning, and adherence to their medical plan.


Life ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 329
Author(s):  
Lars Botin ◽  
Pernille S. Bertelsen ◽  
Lars Kayser ◽  
Paul Turner ◽  
Sidsel Villumsen ◽  
...  

Health care systems struggle to consistently deliver integrated high-quality, safe, and patient-centered care to all in an economically sustainable manner. Inequity of access to health care services and variation in diagnostic and treatment outcomes are common. Further, as health care systems become ever more complex, iatrogenesis and counter productivity have emerged as real dangers. In exploring this paradox, this paper considers a subset of those in society living with chronic conditions. Their attributes and circumstances have led to them being marginalized or excluded from ‘end-user’ engagement and/or from their requirements being incorporated into technology supported chronic disease management initiatives. Significantly, these citizens are often the most vulnerable and socially disadvantaged and tend to achieve poorer results and cost more per capita than the ‘average patient’ in their interactions with the health care system. Critically, this paper argues that a truly people-centered technology supported chronic care system can only be designed by understanding and responding to the needs, attributes and capabilities of the most vulnerable in society. This paper suggests innovative ways of supporting interactions with these ‘end-users’ and highlights how reflection on these approaches can contribute to emancipating the health system to move towards more socially inclusive eHealth solutions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 237796082110209
Author(s):  
Melissa Northwood ◽  
Jenny Ploeg ◽  
Maureen Markle-Reid ◽  
Diana Sherifali

Introduction A third of older adults with diabetes receiving home-care services have daily urinary incontinence. Despite this high prevalence of urinary incontinence, the condition is typically not recognized as a complication and thereby not detected or treated. Diabetes and urinary incontinence in older adults are associated with poorer functional status and lower quality of life. Home-care nurses have the potential to play an important role in supporting older adults in the management of these conditions. However, very little is known about home-care nurses’ care of this population. Objective The objective of this study was to explore how nurses care for older home-care clients with diabetes and incontinence. Methods This was an interpretive description study informed by a model of clinical complexity, and part of a convergent, mixed methods research study. Fifteen nurse participants were recruited from home-care programs in southern Ontario, Canada to participate in qualitative interviews. An interpretive description analytical process was used that involved constant comparative analysis and attention to commonalities and variance. Results The experiences of home-care nurses caring for this population is described in three themes and associated subthemes: (a) conducting a comprehensive nursing assessment with client and caregiver, (b) providing holistic treatment for multiple chronic conditions, and (c) collaborating with the interprofessional team. The provision of this care was hampered by a task-focused home-care system, limited opportunities to collaborate and communicate with other health-care providers, and the lack of health-care system integration between home care, primary care, and acute care. Conclusion The results suggest that nursing interventions for older adults with diabetes and incontinence should not only consider disease management of the individual conditions but pay attention to the broader social determinants of health in the context of multiple chronic conditions. Efforts to enhance health-care system integration would facilitate the provision of person-centred home care.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese Scott Duncan ◽  
Sara Riggare ◽  
Sabine Koch ◽  
Lena Sharp ◽  
Maria Hägglund

BACKGROUND Current health care systems are rarely designed to meet the needs of people living with chronic conditions. However, some patients and informal caregivers are not waiting for the health care system to redesign itself. These individuals are sometimes referred to as e-patients. The first generation of e-patients used the internet for finding information and for communicating with peers. Compared with the first generation, the second generation of e-patients collects their own health data and appears to be more innovative. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe the second generation of e-patients through exploration of their active engagement in their self-care and health care. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 patients with chronic conditions and 5 informal caregivers. They were all recruited through a Web-based advertisement. Data were analyzed according to the framework analysis approach, using the 3 concepts of the self-determination theory—autonomy, relatedness, and competence—at the outset. RESULTS Study participants were actively engaged in influencing their self-care and the health care system to improve their own health, as well as the health of others. This occurred at different levels, such as using their own experience when giving presentations and lectures to health care professionals and medical students, working as professional peers in clinical settings, performing self-tracking, contributing with innovations, and being active on social media. When interaction with health care providers was perceived as being insufficient, the participants sought support through their peers, which showed strong relatedness. Competence increased through the use of technology and learning experiences with peers. Their autonomy was important but was sometimes described as involuntary and to give up was not an option for them. CONCLUSIONS Like the first generation of e-patients, the participants frequently searched for Web-based information. However, the second generation of e-patients also produce their own health data, which they learn from and share. They also engage in the innovation of digital tools to meet health-related needs. Utilizing technological developments comes naturally to the second generation of e-patients, even if the health care system is not prepared to support them under these new circumstances.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document