scholarly journals iRobot Corporations Intellectual Property: Accounting For Research And Development Under U.S. GAAP Versus IFRS

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Bowen ◽  
Jane Jollineau ◽  
Loren Margheim

Founded by MIT scientists in 1990, iRobot Corporation designed, developed, and sold consumer and military robots to help people complete dull, dirty or dangerous tasks in real-world situations. The purpose of this case study is to stimulate discussion about intellectual property and how it should be measured and reported. Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), iRobot reported no asset related to their internally generated intellectual property despite over 20 years of intensive research in robotics. In contrast, international financial reporting standards (IFRS) permitted firms to treat certain research and development (R&D) activities as an asset. By comparing U.S. GAAP and IFRS treatments of R&D, we provide an interesting example of the range of potential financial reporting effects across alternative accounting methods. Further, the case requires that students wrestle with the implications of moving from more rule-based accounting (U.S. GAAP) to more principles-based accounting (IFRS). How might U.S. managers, auditors, and investors likely respond? A teaching note is available.

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 101-102
Author(s):  
Dolores Rinke

This case examines the differences in format and terminology in financial statements between US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Students download the financial statements of two different companies in the same industry; i.e., Nokia (reporting under IFRS) and Motorola (reporting under US GAAP). Questions related to the differences in format and terminology are addressed.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Sylwia Gornik-Tomaszewski ◽  
Victoria Shoaf

The milestone outcomes of over a decade of close cooperation between the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on the convergence of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) have been highly publicized in the professional media. Great attention has been paid to such joint FASB and IASB projects as accounting for business combinations, fair value measurement, and revenue recognition. The impact of U.S. GAAP on IFRS has also been discussed and highlighted in many professional and academic resources. It should come as no surprise since FASB is considered a world leader in creating high-quality standards through an exemplary standard-setting process. In this paper, we look at the least noticed outcome of the convergence process: the impact of IFRS on U.S. GAAP. We reviewed all of the Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs) to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification®, from the first issued in June 2009 to 2016, and listed instances where U.S. GAAP was significantly modified to reflect international solutions. These examples of U.S. GAAP modifications indicate that the impact of IFRS on U.S. GAAP continued well after the bilateral cooperation between FASB and IASB effectively ended in 2014. Furthermore, look at the most recent FASB pronouncement let us conclude that the FASB continues to be engaged in seeking comparable global accounting solutions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 120-121
Author(s):  
Ralph ter Hoeven

Het is inmiddels 20 jaar geleden dat de Europese Unie een beslissende keuze maakte in het ontwikkelen van een eigen GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles; dus stelsel van accountingregels). De keuze luidde: no, non, nein, não, nej, nee: er zou geen eigen EUGAAP worden ontwikkeld. Wel werd er voorzichtig gewezen op de toenmalige International Accounting Standards (IAS); inmiddels omgedoopt tot International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Kortom Lidstaten werden vrijgelaten in de keuze van een GAAP voor beursgenoteerde ondernemingen en een beetje aangemoedigd om daarbij aan IAS te denken. Vijf jaar later, rond de millenniumwisseling dus, volgde er een update van de Europese accountingstrategie waarin niet geheel verrassend werd geconstateerd dat jaarrekeningen op de EU-kapitaalmarkt niet vergelijkbaar waren.


2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (12) ◽  
pp. 565-573
Author(s):  
Ruud Vergoossen ◽  
Frans Van Der Wel

De roep om een wereldstandaard voor de financiële verslaggeving is groot. De Europese Unie heeft gekozen voor de International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) die in 2005 worden ingevoerd, terwijl de Verenigde Staten blijven vasthouden aan de United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP). Dit artikel gaat in op de implementatie van de IFRS in de Europese Unie en de obstakels die een consistente interpretatie en toepassing van de IFRS in de weg kunnen staan. Daarna worden de IFRS vergeleken met de US GAAP en komt de positie van de IFRS in de Verenigde Staten aan de orde. In een korte slotbeschouwing wordt een drietal scenario’s geschetst om te komen tot een wereldstandaard. Het scenario waarbij de IFRS en de US GAAP naar elkaar toegroeien, lijkt, gegeven de omstandigheden, het meest realistisch en wenselijk (convergentiestrategie).


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 619-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henning Zülch ◽  
Dominic Detzen

ABSTRACT This instructional resource is based on an actual case of financial reporting enforcement and invites students to reflect on two main themes: the treatment of research and development costs and the enforcement of financial reporting standards. First, students are to analyze a cooperation agreement under which German company White Pharmaceuticals AG receives access to the research and development results of their U.S.-based partner. While applying managerial judgment in interpreting the transaction, students review the treatment of internally generated and separately acquired intangible assets under IFRS and U.S. GAAP. In addition, they are asked to discuss the convergence of the two major accounting regimes. Second, the case study fosters students' understanding of how financial reporting standards are enforced when the German Financial Reporting Enforcement Panel (FREP) starts an investigation into how White Pharmaceuticals AG accounted for payments that the company conducted in the course of the cooperation. Students become aware of the consequences such an investigation may have as the FREP finally adjudges that White Pharmaceuticals AG should restate their financial statements.


Author(s):  
Sérgio de Iudícibus ◽  
Ana Paula Correia Lacanna ◽  
José Everardo Alves Pereira ◽  
Ilse Maria Beuren

Em 2008 foi anunciada a revisão do International Accounting Standard (IAS 39), segmentada em três etapas principais, a classificação e mensuração dos instrumentos financeiros, a introdução de uma nova metodologia para o cálculo de perda incorrida (impairment) e hedge accounting. Esse projeto resultou na publicação, em julho de 2014, na nova norma dos Instrumentos Financeiros, a IFRS 9. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar os principais impactos trazidos pela IFRS 9, frente aos normativos contábeis do Plano Contábil das Instituições do Sistema Financeiro Nacional (COSIF), no que tange à contabilização de hedge accounting. Realizou-se a análise dos normativos locais e internacionais, e de modo complementar um estudo de caso, por meio da análise das demonstrações contábeis brasileiras no Generally Accepted Accounting Principles do Banco Société Générale do Brasil, com data-base de 30 de junho de 2017. Os resultados da pesquisa mostram que, com as alterações trazidas pelo IFRS 9, maior detalhamento das informações sobre o hedge accounting passou a ser exigido, o que impacta consideravelmente o conteúdo e o formato atual das notas explicativas. Este estudo tem como principal contribuição a demonstração de que os requerimentos locais das divulgações dos instrumentos financeiros precisam de adequações.


2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-132
Author(s):  
Steve L. Gill ◽  
Damon M. Fleming ◽  
G. E. Whittenburg

ABSTRACT: Multiple revisions in recent years to IRC §6694, IRC §6662, U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) have created conflicting recognition and disclosure requirements for uncertain tax positions. This paper reviews the existing recognition thresholds under these various standards—“reasonable basis,” “substantial authority,” and “more-likely-than-not”—and discusses scenarios in which the standards may cause reporting conflicts between tax and financial reporting. This paper also reviews the extant disclosure guidance for uncertain tax positions included in tax and financial reporting, with a particular emphasis on the newly issued proposed IRS regulations regarding general and specific-item disclosures for tax return preparers.


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 721-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Henry ◽  
Ya-Wen Yang

This case introduces the concept of convergence between International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The scenario involves a securities analyst's evaluation of Novartis AG's financial performance under IFRS and U.S. GAAP, and provides an opportunity to examine the issues giving rise to differences under the two sets of standards. Based on the company's 20-F disclosure, the case uses the reconciliation footnotes to recast the company's IFRS financial statements to U.S. GAAP. The analytical skill of adjusting financial statements is useful beyond the IFRS-to-U.S. GAAP context.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document