scholarly journals Evaluation Of Periodontal Flap Procedures Done Using Guided Tissue Regeneration (Gtr) Versus Guided Tissue Regeneration (Gtr) With Bone Graft

2021 ◽  
pp. 4065-4069
Author(s):  
Nashra Kareem ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Guided Tissue Regeneration

Guided Tissue Regeneration of the Mixture of Human Tooth-Ash and Plaster of Paris in Dogs

2007 ◽  
Vol 330-332 ◽  
pp. 1327-1330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ha Ra Ku ◽  
Hyun Seon Jang ◽  
S.G. Kim ◽  
Moon Jin Jeong ◽  
Joo Cheol Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Formation ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Guided Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Human Tooth ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Bone Graft Material ◽  
Plaster Of Paris ◽  
Experimental Group

This study evaluated the efficacy of periodontal tissue regeneration using guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with a mixture of tooth ash and plaster as a bone substitute material in the treatment of class II furcation defects in dogs. GTR was performed at the site of a surgically formed mandibular premolar bifurcation area in dogs. Four adult dogs were used in the animal study. The animals were in a good periodontal state without any systemic disease. A resorbable membrane (Bio-Gide®, Swiss) and bone graft material using a mixture of tooth ash and plaster were used to examine the biological activity. The defect in the control group was filled a Bio-Gide® only. For the experimental group, the defects were filled with a mixture of tooth ash and plaster and covered by a Bio-Gide®. Oral rinsing with 0.12% chlorhexidine was performed twice a day for 2 weeks. In control group, new bone formation was observed adjacent to the preexisting bone. Soft tissue ingrowth was also noted. In experimental group, new lamellar type trabecular bone formation as well as centum and PDL regeneration was observed in the base of the infrabony pocket. More bone regeneration would be expected when GTR is performed using a mixture of human tooth-ash and plaster of Paris as a bone graft material.

scholarly journals Guided Tissue Regeneration in Surgical Endodontic Treatment: Case Report and Literature Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Sidiropoulos ◽  
Konstantina Roussou ◽  
Lambros Intzes ◽  
Nikolaos Economides
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Healing Process ◽  
Guided Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Endodontic Surgery ◽  
Root Canal Retreatment ◽  
Added Benefit

Summary Background/Aim: Guided tissue regeneration is widely used in endodontic surgery. The aim is to aid in the healing process and bone regeneration and provide more successful and predictable outcomes. Case report: This case report describes the successful treatment of an endodontic-periodontal lesion (with primary endodontic involvement), including root canal retreatment and endodontic surgery with the use of GTR (collagen absorbable membrane-xenogeneic bone graft). CBCT examination was used to aid in diagnosis and in the follow-up examination after two years to provide additional confirmation of the healing process. An extensive literature review was undertaken focusing on clinical studies that assessing the added benefit of GTR in surgical endodontics. The clinical and radiographic examinations showed uneventful healing and the reconstruction of the buccal plate and periapical area. The patient remained asymptomatic throughout the entire two years period after surgical intervention. A literature review concluded that lesion type, lesion size and the selection of the biomaterial are important factors that influence the outcome of GTR in comparison control groups. A favorable outcome was found in cases of large periapical lesions (>10mm), through-through lesions and with the use of an absorbable membrane, with or without a bone graft. Conclusions: GTR is thought to provide an added benefit in bone regeneration and the healing process in specific cases. The outcomes in the case report are consistent with the conclusions of literature review.

scholarly journals Guided Tissue Regeneration Treatment Yields Better Results in Class II Furcations in the Mandible Than in the Maxilla: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (14) ◽  
pp. 7447
Author(s):  
Odontuya Dorj ◽  
Wei-Fang Lee ◽  
Eisner Salamanca ◽  
Yu-Hwa Pan ◽  
Yi-Fan Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Guided Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Collagen Membrane ◽  
Bovine Bone ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Furcation Defects ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Porcine Collagen

Absorbable porcine collagen membrane with a bovine bone graft can be considered for regenerative treatment in periodontal class II furcation defects. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) treatment with bovine bone xenograft and a porcine collagen membrane in molars with class II furcations. Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and bone level (BL) were recorded at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively. Thirty class II furcation defects from the lower and upper molars were assessed. Significant improvements in PD and CAL were observed from baseline to 9 months in all groups (p < 0.01). BL improved in all groups except group A in the upper molars in radiographic assessment (p < 0.05). The lower and upper molars showed PD reduction of 50.5% ± 7.44% and 46.2% ± 11.2%, respectively, at 9 months (p = 0.044). In furcations of 1–3 mm, the lower and upper molars showed PD reductions of 51.2% ± 4.49% and 36.5% ± 16.14%, respectively (p = 0.035). The lower and upper molars showed a CAL gain of 51.1% ± 4.64% and 33.6% ± 18.8%, respectively (p = 0.037). Thus, GTR with bovine bone graft and porcine collagen membrane yielded good results in class II furcations, with better results in the lower than in the upper molars.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document