scholarly journals A case report palatal implant for molar distalization

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 847
Author(s):  
Guilherme Thiesen ◽  
Fabiana Mendes ◽  
Marcus Vinícius Neiva Nunes Do Rego ◽  
Amanda Frizzo Viecilli ◽  
Maria Perpétua Mota Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Oral Appliances ◽  
Molar Distalization ◽  
Osseointegrated Implants ◽  
Palatal Implant ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Maximum Anchorage ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Implants obtained popularity in Orthodontics by to make easy the maximum anchorage with the minimal patient׳s compliance. In this context, osseointegrated implants has been frequently used as auxiliaries of orthodontic treatments, substituting in some cases inter maxillaries elastics and extra oral appliances. These implants show as advantage a independence in opposite the patient׳s compliance, the anchorage possibility in periodontal loss cases, over there an esthetic improvement and the comfort propitiated, showing more expected results. This article approach the orthodontic treatment of a clinic case of Class II, division 1 malocclusion, non-extraction accomplished and with palatal implant to distalization of latter teeth.

scholarly journals Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment using TADs: Case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-164
Author(s):  
Tina Pajevic ◽  
Jovana Juloski ◽  
Marija Zivkovic
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Temporary Anchorage Devices ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Incisor Retraction ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Introduction. Orthodontic treatment of Class II Division 1 (II/1) malocclusions in adults can be challenging since skeletal effects are limited. Possible treatment options are orthodontic camouflage or orthognatic surgery, in severe cases. The aim of this paper was to present a successful management of Class II malocclusion in an adult patient using temporary anchorage devices (TADs). Case report. After detailed clinical examination, study models and cephalometric analysis, a 26 years old patient was diagnosed with Class II malocclusion, an overjet of 12 mm, congenitally missing tooth 41 and midline shifted to the right in upper dental arch. In prior orthodontic treatment, patient had upper premolars extracted. Posterior teeth in upper left quadrant were shifted mesially. The camouflage treatment was considered, using temporary anchorage devices (TADs) to distalize posterior teeth on the left side, and gain space for incisor retraction and midline correction in upper dental arch. Results. Using TADs as additional anchorage in anterior region and coil spring for molar distalization, the space was made for tooth 23, midline correction and incisor retraction. After 40 months, a satisfactory result was achieved, overjet and midline correction, class I canines occlusion and class II molar occlusion. Conclusion. Class II/1 malocclusion in adults can be successfully treated using TADs. The success depends on the severity of malocclusion and patient cooperation.

Lingual orthodontics with customized functional appliance

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 151-156
Author(s):  
Sridhar Premkumar ◽  
Varun Peter
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Synergistic Effect ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Treatment Technique ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Lingual Orthodontics ◽  
Effective Manner ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Every treatment technique in the orthodontic specialty has its own set of advantages. Combining the techniques in an effective manner could result in a synergistic effect. Two such techniques are lingual orthodontics and functional orthopaedic appliances. This case report shows the effective and efficient use of a customized functional appliance, along with lingual orthodontics, in the management of Class II division 1 malocclusion. It emphasizes the importance of combining the benefits of different strategies of orthodontic treatment. CPD/Clinical Relevance: The use of a customized functional appliance along with lingual orthodontics can produce desirable changes in Class II division 1 cases and clinicians should be aware of these advantages.

scholarly journals Orthodontic treatment of Skeletal Class II Division 1 Malocclusion: A case report

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28
Author(s):  
MW Ali ◽  
MZ Hossain ◽  
M Zaki
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Dental Research ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjdre.v2i1.15575 Bangladesh Journal of Dental Research & Education Vol.2(1) 2012: 24-28

Perbedaan Analisis Sefalometri Skeletal Sebelum dan Sesudah Perawatan Alat Myofunctional pada Pasien Maloklusi Dentoskeletal Kelas II Divisi I dalam Masa Pertumbuhan dengan Metode Steiner

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nugroho Ahmad Riyadi
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
T Test ◽  
Analytic Study ◽  
Statistic Analysis ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Normal Occlusion ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

The aim of orthodontics treatment is normalization of teeth position in three planes, using various orthodontics appliance to reach the chepalometric standar and normal occlusion. Orthodontic treatment for dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion in growing patients using myofunctional appliance may correct anteroposterior planes of mandibula. This study was a descriptive retrospective analytic study to look at the success of Orthodontic treatment for dentoskeletal class II division 1 in growing patients with myofunctional appliance using chepalometrics analysis Steiner value. The sample used in this study is chepalogram radiographic from patient with dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion in growing patients before and after using myofunctional appliance in PPDGS orthodontics Clinic of Padjadjaran University. Statistic analysis were performed with pair t-test and Wilcoxon. Based on this study, it is concluded that orthodontic treatment with myofunctional appliance such as activator and twin block in growing patient with dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion shows significant changes and compatibility with the normal criteria.

scholarly journals Comparison of esthetic outcome after extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment in class II division 1 malocclusion patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 206 ◽  
Author(s):  
SnehLata Verma ◽  
VP Sharma ◽  
Pradeep Tandon ◽  
GyanP Singh ◽  
Kiran Sachan
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

scholarly journals Functionally orientated/systemic approach to orthodontic treatment of severe class II division 1 malocclusions: an adapted device, the FABP

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 304
Author(s):  
J.-L. Raymond
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Surgical Correction ◽  
Systemic Approach ◽  
Deep Bite ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Bite Plate ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

The orthodontic treatment of severe class II division 1 malocclusions is often difficult, which leads some specialists to offer a surgical correction of the overjet. Treatment is made complex by the value of the horizontal overlap as much as the « depth » of deep bite that is very often present alongside the malocclusion. This is why we are offering a treatment protocol including a FABP (Fixed Anterior Bite Plate) which will allow, if the patient cooperates, to correct the anatomic anomaly while concurrently establishing new masticatory cycles in order to stabilize and preserve the results obtained. It is this systemic approach of treatment that is the focus of this article.

Orthodontic Treatment Planning by General Dental Practitioners

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Parfitt ◽  
W. P. Rock
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Dental Practitioners ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

A group of 30 general dental practitioners were asked to plan treatment for a series of 10 Class II division 1 malocclusions of graded severity. The results were assessed against a gold standard provided by three consultants. Only 14 per cent of practitioner treatment plans agreed with the gold standard and agreement was worst for those cases requiring the use of headgear. When consultants and General Dental Practitioners (GDPs) were asked whether a case should be referred for advice before the GDP began treatment, 64 per cent of GDP decisions agreed with those of the consultants. On 13 per cent of occasions, however, the GDP would have initiated incorrect treatment without seeking consultant advice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document