Couplings and Clutches

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Obsieger

Textbook in machine elements at two universities. *** Published in two languages and several variants. *** Provides students of mechanical engineering, naval architecture and electrical engineering required literature, as well as a suitable problem-solving basis for experts in engineering practice. *** This book is divided into seven chapters which deal with ( 1-st) rigid couplings, (2-nd) compensating couplings, (3-rd) flexible couplings, (4-th) friction clutches, (5-th) electromagnetic friction clutches, (6-th) hydrodynamic couplings and (7-th) special types of couplings. *** A practical application is supported by detailed descriptions of designs variants, principles of operation and calculation methods, as well as through 227 figures, 74 tables and calculation examples of flexible couplings and friction clutches. *** This textbook is the result of continual improvements on the lecture notes Couplings and clutches, starting from 2001. The book has been reviewed by prominent experts from several universities, and upon their recommendations the Croatian edition of this book was adopted as a textbook of the University of Rijeka in 2005 and then translated into English. Both variants are adopted as university textbooks of the Juraj Dobrila University of Pula in 2020/2021.*** Finally, it must be emphasized that the purpose of this textbook, although amply illustrated and comprehensive, is not one of replacing lectures, but of helping students acquire knowledge that will serve them in building their future careers. *** More at "https://university-books.eu/obsieger/couplings".

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Obsieger

Textbook at Juraj Dobrila University of Pula. The color edition is also available at Glasstree Bookstore. It is recommended for students. Couplings and Clutches is a volume in the Machine elements series of text-books. The intended purpose of this series of textbooks is to provide the students of mechanical engineering, naval architecture and electrical engineering with the required literature, and to provide a suitable problem-solving basis for experts in engineering practice. This volume is divided into seven chapters which deal with 1. rigid, 2. compensating, 3. flexible, 4. friction, 5. electromagnetic, 6. hydrodynamic and 7. special types of couplings and clutches. The applicability of the presented material is reflected in detailed descriptions of many designs variants, principles of operation and calculation methods, as well as through 227 figures, 74 tables and calculation examples of flexible couplings and friction clutches.


Author(s):  
Zbigniew M. Bzymek ◽  
Steven S. Hinkle ◽  
Zoila E. Jurado Quiroga

The Design of Machine Elements course is one of the most difficult and complicated courses in the Mechanical Engineering program. It requires inventive concept generation, the knowledge of geometrical design, and basic knowledge of stress and deformation analyses. On those three elements, the machine elements design philosophy is established and further developed. The course material has to be chosen carefully since the time constrains will allow to cover design of only few essential machine elements. The material is covered by lectures, textbook readings, homework problems, and design projects. In addition to the textbook content the course contains five special elements: Idea Generation, Safety Considerations, Design of the Day (DoD), a Designer’s Liability study, and three projects including Final Project – Shaft Design. In the Idea Generation project, students generate an idea of machine or mechanical device. The Safety Consideration project is done by inspection and documentation of unsafe elements on campus. The Shaft Design Project had students design a shaft system under given constrains. In DoD students present existing advanced machines chosen using different sources or their own industrial internship experience. The Liability assignment addresses the designer’s legal responsibility in case of a defective product that caused an injury or accident. The material taught in the course is larger than conventional machine element design course. The elements added that are beyond the structural analysis bring better understanding of engineering problems during the Senior Design course and later during engineering practice. They allow the students to connect the theory with the real world of engineering challenges. This gives students more satisfaction during the learning process and cognitive benefits during engineering practice. The unconventional inventive design approach of the teaching team (course instructor and GTA) to problem solving is based on many years of instructor’s experience in teaching of engineering problem solving and design. The learning pattern in which students work in teams, both in problem solving and in design exercises, also helps to conduct the course. Thanks to all these elements the learning experience of the course is unique and engaging despite the high level of difficulty associated with it.


2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-143
Author(s):  
Robert Keresztes ◽  
Gabor Kalacska

Nowadays parts made of up-to-date engineering plastics are used more and morein mechanical engineering practice. These machine-elements are produced most frequentlyby injection molding or by one cutting process. The injection molding technology are usedgenerally for great number of pieces, in case of serial production while cutting processes arepreferred to piece (unit) or smaller number production.We used lathe and measured the main- and feeding-directional cutting force at differentengineering polymers (cast PA6, POM C and UHMW PE HD 1000). The analysis made canbe well used in practice.


GUY’s forceful personality and abounding energy were a source of continual wonder and inspiration to his staff throughout his time as turbine designer. But he drove himself too hard; these great gifts were beginning to fail in the last phase of his career. In Guy’s boyhood locomotive work was the field most clearly offering scope for talent in mechanical engineering. Guy trained as a pupil under the Chief Mechanical Engineer of the Taff Vale Railway. He received his technical education at the University College of South Wales from 1907 to 1910. He was a hard worker and academically brilliant. He obtained the college diplomas in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering. He did not take a degree as he had not matriculated. In later life the honorary degree of D.Sc. was conferred on him by the University of Wales.


Author(s):  
Michael Turner

It is common for engineers but rare for engineering students to be asked to work on projects with people whose expertise is in other fields. In an effort to address this shortcoming at the University of Dayton, an interdisciplinary mechatronics class was developed. This lab based course with equal numbers of electrical engineering and mechanical engineering seniors focused on designing, building and controlling electromechanical systems. This paper covers the development of the course and the challenges posed in teaching such a course. The course is centered on the concept of building an autonomous system by integrating a well designed mechanism with a well designed electrical controller. Particular emphasis is placed on the challenge of covering material which is basic and familiar to one set of students while being novel and challenging to another set of students. Additional discussion is included on encouraging cross-disciplinary communication, preventing asymmetrical workloads and stimulating innovation.


Author(s):  
Zbigniew M. Bzymek

The Engineering Problem Solving process has two aspects. It relies on the talent of the designer on the one hand and the efficiency of the problem solving tools on the other. Talent is an attribute of a person. It is very difficult to formalize the talent of an individual, and no satisfactory formalization has been achieved successfully. For this reason only the original designer’s talent and his/her knowledge and experience are available for use during the problem solving process. However, there are several choices and decisions that can be made concerning methods, algorithms, and software packages. After those choices are made the next steps in the problem solving process can be outlined. The problem solving method described in this paper is called a Brief Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (BTIPS) and was developed on the basis of TRIZ (Russian: теория решения изобретательских задач, teoriya resheniya izobretatelskikh zadatch) and TIPS (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) and taught at the University of Connecticut (UConn). The application of this method starts with the accurate definition of the problem. The problem has to be properly separated from the environment. Further problem solving choices depend on the knowledge of the designer and include the right sequence of steps, definition of contradictions, choice of solution modules, algorithms, definition of designed systems and subsystems, and choice of elements and objects. There are several further paths to be selected and resulting decisions to be made. Those decisions and the processes following them are described in this paper. The recommendations for the proper path are given and the procedures are discussed. The derivation of the Ideal Solution is described and tests of the solution’s effectiveness and economy are given. The experience gained from teaching one Mechanical Engineering course, three MEM (Management Engineering for Manufacturing) courses at UConn, one graduate course at UConn, one graduate course at the University of Fairfield, and several special non-academic courses for practicing engineers is summarized. Some students’ opinions are analyzed and recommendations for further education and the practice of engineering problem solving are derived. The references to the existing teaching, research, practice, and development studies are quoted. This paper is devoted to the characteristics of BTIPS method. The companion paper [1] is devoted to the characteristics of the software that could be used with the method. TIPS (the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) is a further development of Altshuller’s theory done by Invention Machine under the leadership of Valery Tsourikov [2]. BTIPS (Brief Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) is a simplified version of TIPS developed at the University of Connecticut (UConn) especially for teaching purposes, though it is also powerful when applied to engineering practice problems [3].


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (02) ◽  
pp. 155-163
Author(s):  
Haris Mahmudi ◽  
Ah. Sulhan Fauzi

Most of the students of the Mechanical Engineering Study Program at the University of Nusantara PGRI Kediri assume that basic physics is a course with memorizing many formulas so that they have difficulty understanding the concept of physics. This study aims to develop a Physics practicum module for Mechanical Engineering and to know the feasibility value of the module. This study uses the development research method (RnD) of the Plomp model which consists of 3 stages, namely: The first stage of the initial investigation, the Second Stage of the preparation of the prototype, and the third stage of the assessment. From the results of the validation and analysis of the readability test, the average value of the feasibility of the Basic Physics module based on problem solving is 3.22 with feasible criteria, and the feasibility assessment for presentation is 3.55 with the appropriate criteria. So that overall the feasibility assessment of the Basic Physics module is problem solving based on 3.39 with a decent criteria. While the results of student satisfaction data analysis on the use of the Basic Physics module based on problem solving obtained 83% stated very well and the remaining 17% stated good. The product of the development is in the form of a basic Physics practicum module for Mechanical Engineering. From the data analysis it can be concluded that the feasibility assessment of the overall development module is feasible to develop. Keywords: module, research development, problem solving, satisfaction questionnaire.  Abstrak Sebagian besar mahasiswa Program Studi Tehnik Mesin Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri beranggapan bahwa fisika dasar merupakan mata kuliah dengan hafalan rumus yang banyak sehingga mereka kesulitan untuk memahami konsep fisika tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan modul praktikum Fisika untuk Teknik Mesin dan mengetahui nilai kelayakan modul tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian pengembangan (RnD) model Plomp yang terdiri dari 3 tahap, yaitu: Tahap pertama investigasi awal, Tahap Kedua penyusunan prototipe, dan Tahap ketiga assesment. Dari hasil validasi dan analisis uji keterbacaan diperoleh nilai rata-rata kelayakan isi modul Fisika Dasar berbasis problem solving sebesar 3.22 dengan kriteria layak, dan penilaian kelayakan penyajian sebesar 3,55 dengan kriteria layak. Sehingga secara keseluruhan penilaian kelayakan modul Fisika Dasar berbasis problem solving sebesar 3,39 dengan kriteria layak.  Sedangkan hasil analisis data kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap penggunaan modul Fisika Dasar berbasis problem solving diperoleh 83% menyatakan sangat baik dan sisanya sebesar 17% menyatakan baik. Produk hasil pengembangan adalah berupa modul praktikum Fisika dasar untuk Teknik Mesin. Dari analisis data maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa penilaian kelayakan modul hasil pengembangan secara keseluruhan layak untuk dikembangkan.


2011 ◽  
Vol 367 ◽  
pp. 601-610
Author(s):  
M.T. Oladiran ◽  
Jacek Uziak ◽  
Venkata P. Kommula

Design activity is core to modern engineering practice. Some design experience is demanded by professional bodies that accredit degree engineering programmes (e.g. ABET and ECSA). The purpose of this paper is to track design related topics through the curriculum of the mechanical engineering degree programme at the University of Botswana. A questionnaire was designed and administered to staff teaching on the programme. The responses were used to map design components in the curriculum and assess the design experience of students. The results showed that design topics were delivered in various courses and the knowledge gained by students increased steadily from Year 3 to Year 5. Some observed deficiencies in the teaching of design included lack of industry recommended projects, negligible application of design software, and the use of only single discipline based problems (i.e. no multi disciplinary teaching approach). It was concluded that a programme review is needed to improve the pedagogy of design and enhance programme robustness. It is envisaged that the study will help in designing a new mechanical engineering curriculum to satisfy accreditation requirements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document