scholarly journals Optimization of Pharmacotherapy with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: the Need to Choose the Right Dosage Regimen

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 593-603
Author(s):  
A. I. Kochetkov ◽  
O. D. Ostroumova
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
High Efficacy ◽  
Drug Label ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Number Of Patients

In recent years, there has been a persistent trend towards the more frequent prescription of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists due to the extensive body of evidence showing their high safety and efficacy, which in some cases exceed those of warfarin, and also by reason of there is no necessity for regular monitoring of international normalized ratio. However, the question of the reasonable and rational prescription of DOACs becomes relevant, including issues of their dosing, especially as a result of increasing in the number of patients with a complex cardiovascular risk profile and multimorbidity. In these terms, apixaban stands high among the DOAC class, and its high efficacy and safety both in full dose and reasonably reduced dosage has been proved, including older patients, patients with chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, with history of acute coronary syndrome and individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. This DOAC has strict indications to reduce the dose, they are specified in the drug label, and in such cases a reduced dose should be prescribed, in these clinical conditions the effectiveness and safety of apixaban is also proven. The favorable apixaban pharmacokinetic properties, consisting in low renal clearance, lack of clinically relevant interaction with food and the linear smooth effect on the blood coagulation components without episodes of hypo- and hypercoagulation, are the most important components of high efficacy and safety of this DOAC. The optimal efficacy and safety coupling of apixaban is reflected in the exclusively high patients’ adherence to the treatment confirmed by evidence-based medicine data, and therefore there is no necessity for additional procedures to maintain adherence. All the aforementioned facts allow us to recommend apixaban for widespread use in patients requiring anticoagulant therapy for optimal prevention of systemic thromboembolism and minimizing the associated risk of bleeding.

scholarly journals Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Valerio Mariani ◽  
Michele Magnocavallo ◽  
Martina Straito ◽  
Agostino Piro ◽  
Paolo Severino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

Abstract Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended as first-line anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in patients with cancer and AF the efficacy and safety of DOACs are not well established. Objective We performed a meta-analysis comparing available data regarding the efficacy and safety of DOACs vs vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in cancer patients with non-valvular AF. Methods An online search of Pubmed and EMBASE libraries (from inception to May, 1 2020) was performed, in addition to manual screening. Nine studies were considered eligible for the meta-analysis involving 46,424 DOACs users and 182,797 VKA users. Results The use of DOACs was associated with reduced risks of systemic embolism or any stroke (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.52–0.81; p 0.001), ischemic stroke (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74–0.95; p 0.007) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.52–0.71; p 0.00001) as compared to VKA group. DOAC use was associated with significantly reduced risks of major bleeding (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.50–0.92; p 0.01) and intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.47–0.88; p 0.006). Compared to VKA, DOACs provided a non-statistically significant risk reduction of the outcomes major bleeding or non-major clinically relevant bleeding (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.78–1.13; p 0.50) and any bleeding (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.78–1.06; p 0.24). Conclusions In comparison to VKA, DOACs were associated with a significant reduction of the rates of thromboembolic events and major bleeding complications in patients with AF and cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy in In-Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-53
Author(s):  
V. I. Petrov ◽  
O. V. Shatalova ◽  
A. S. Gerasimenko ◽  
V. S. Gorbatenko
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Thromboembolic Complications ◽  
Antithrombotic Agents ◽  
Cardiology Department ◽  
Number Of Patients

Aim. To study the frequency of prescribing antithrombotic agents in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who were hospitalized in the cardiology department of a multidisciplinary hospital.Material and methods. A retrospective one-time study of medical records of 765 patients with non-valvular AF treated in the cardiology department of a multidisciplinary hospital in 2012 and 2016 was performed.Results. All patients were stratified in three groups depending on the CHA2DS2-VASc score. The frequency of prescribing antithrombotic agents was evaluated in each group. A low risk of thromboembolic complications was found in 1% (n=3) of patients in 2012 and 0.6% (n=3) in 2016. All these patients received antithrombotic agents. CHA2DS2-VASc=1 was found in 6% (n=15) of patients with AF in 2012 and in 3.4% (n=17) in 2016. A significant number of patients in this group received anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists (warfarin) or with direct oral anticoagulants. A high risk of thromboembolic complications (CHA2DS2-VASc≥2) was found in 93% of patient (n=245) in 2012 and in 96% (n=482) in 2016. Anticoagulant therapy was prescribed in 70.2% (n=172) patients with high risk in 2012 and 80% (n=387) in 2016. However, some patients with high risk of thromboembolic complications did not have the necessary therapy.Conclusion. Positive changes in the structure and frequency of prescribing anticoagulant drugs in patients with AF and a high risk of thromboembolic complications were found during the years studied. 

Antithrombotische Therapie bei akutem Koronarsyndrom und Vorhofflimmern

2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (14) ◽  
pp. 978-986
Author(s):  
Harald Darius
Keyword(s):  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Antiplatelet Agent ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Coronary Stent Implantation ◽  
Number Of Patients

AbstractThe number of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing due to the aging of the population. In addition, the number of patients with AF and an indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC) for the prevention of strokes increases, who are in need for a dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) plus a P2Y12-Inhibitor because of an acute coronary syndrome and/or coronary stent implantation. These patients did receive a triple therapy (TT) for 3–12 months in the past. Triple therapy never has been studied for efficacy or safety, however, the rate of bleeding complications in comparison to OAC or DAPT is significantly higher.Registries and smaller trials showed that dual therapy with an OAC plus a single platelet inhibitor may be sufficient to prevent strokes and stent thromboses/myocardial infarctions. Four prospective randomized trials involving all four NOACs (Non-Vitamin K oral anticoagulants) approved for stroke prevention in AF have been undertaken. The NOACs plus one antiplatelet agent were tested versus vitamin K-antagonists plus DAPT. In the meantime, the trials involving rivaroxaban (PIONEER AF-PCI), dabigatran (RE-DUAL PCI), apixaban (AUGUSTUS), and edoxaban (ENTRUST-AF-PCI) have been published. The current status is that a NOAC plus a single antiplatelet agent, mostly clopidogrel, is superior to TT with respect to the bleeding complications, without any obvious and statistically significant disadvantage for stroke rates or cardiac ischemic events. The international guidelines already recommend to treat with a NOAC and one antiplatelet agent instead of TT in case the patients bleeding risk is prevailing. Thus, TT seems not to be indicated anymore for most patients with AF and ACS or PCI.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Vs. Traditional Anticoagulants in Patients with Cirrhosis

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5015-5015
Author(s):  
Justin Hum ◽  
Janice Jou ◽  
Thomas G. Deloughery ◽  
Joseph Shatzel
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Recurrent Thrombosis ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Abstract Introduction: The coagulopathy associated with cirrhosis is complex and places patients at risk for both bleeding and thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been shown to have superior efficacy and safety compared to vitamin K antagonists; however their efficacy and safety in cirrhotic patients is not clear. The aim of this study is to retrospectively compare the effectiveness and bleeding complications of DOACs as compared to traditional anticoagulants in cirrhotic patients. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of patients treated at a single academic center between 2012-2015 who were prescribed a DOAC (apixaban or rivaroxaban), or a traditional anticoagulant (warfarin or low molecular weight heparin), with an ICD-9 code for the diagnosis of cirrhosis. The primary outcomes of interest are recurrent thrombosis or stroke (efficacy failure), or bleeding events (safety failure). Major bleeds were characterized as fatal bleeding, symptomatic bleeding in critical organ area, or bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin level >2 or leading to transfusion of 2+ units of packed red blood cells. Results: During the study period, 27 cirrhotic patients were prescribed a DOAC and 18 were prescribed a traditional anticoagulant (either LMWH or warfarin). Both groups had similar total bleeding events (8 DOAC vs. 10 traditional anticoagulation, p = 0.12). There were significantly less major bleeding episodes in the DOAC group, (1 (4%) vs. 5 (28%), p = 0.03) and less intracranial bleeding (3 (17% ) vs. 0 (0%) p=0.06). Recurrent thrombosis or stroke occurred in 1 (4%) patient in the DOAC group and 1 (6%) patient in the traditional group (p = 1.0). Conclusions: Anticoagulation with DOACs in cirrhotic patients may be as safe as traditional anticoagulants with respect to bleeding events. Patients with cirrhosis at our center prescribed DOACs had less major bleeding events, while maintaining efficacy at preventing stroke or recurrent thrombosis. Table Table. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals A prospective multicenter observational study evaluating the risk of periendoscopic events in patients using anticoagulants: the Osaka GIANT Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. E104-E114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Inoue ◽  
Hideki Iijima ◽  
Takuya Yamada ◽  
Yuji Okuyama ◽  
Kanae Takahashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Endoscopic Biopsy ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Endoscopic Procedures ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Duration Of Hospitalization

Abstract Background and study aims An increasing number of patients have been using anticoagulants including anti-vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs); however, in patients using anticoagulants, limited data are available with regard to the risks of gastrointestinal bleeding and thromboembolic events during the peri-endoscopic period. We aimed to evaluate the peri-endoscopic bleeding and thrombotic risks in patients administered VKAs or DOACs. Patients and methods Consecutive patients using anticoagulants who underwent endoscopic biopsy, mucosal resection, or submucosal dissection were prospectively enrolled across 11 hospitals. The primary outcome assessed was difference in incidence of post-procedural gastrointestinal bleeding in patients using VKAs and DOACs. Duration of hospitalization and peri-procedural thromboembolic events were also compared. Results We enrolled 174 patients using VKAs and 37 using DOACs. In total, 16 patients using VKA were excluded from the analysis because of cancellation of endoscopic procedures and contraindications to the use of DOACs; 128 (81 %) patients using VKAs and 17 (46 %) using DOACs received heparin-bridging therapy (HB). The rate of post-procedural gastrointestinal bleeding in DOAC users was similar to that in VKA users (16.2 % vs. 16.4 %, P = 1.000). Duration of hospitalization was significantly longer in patients using VKAs than in those using DOACs (median 15 vs. 7 days, P < 0.0001). Myocardial infarction occurred during pre-endoscopic HB in one patient using VKAs. Conclusion DOAC administration showed similar post-procedural gastrointestinal bleeding risk to VKA administration in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures, but it shortened the hospital stay.

scholarly journals Impact of Patient Characteristics on Treatment Outcomes in Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism: Results of HOKUSAI-VTE Randomized Trial Analysis

TH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. e245-e254
Author(s):  
Ben van Hout ◽  
Emma Hawe ◽  
Alexander T. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Creatinine Clearance ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Effect Modifier ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Introduction In patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) such as edoxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban are more convenient, safer, and just as effective as vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Limited information is known about the effects of patient characteristics on VTE efficacy and safety of DOACs compared with VKAs, without appropriate effect modifier adjustment comparisons of DOACs may be biased. This study considers the effect of variables that can modify the efficacy and safety of edoxaban and warfarin, using patient-level data. Materials and Methods The primary efficacy and safety outcomes in the HOKUSAI-VTE study were VTE recurrence and clinically relevant bleeding, respectively. Potential effect modifiers were age, creatinine clearance, and weight. The relationship between the percentage of time in international normalized ratio (INR) control and outcomes were considered for the warfarin arm. Univariate and multivariate regression were performed for each patient characteristic. Results The relationship between treatment and VTE recurrence differed by age (interaction p = 0.007) and by creatinine clearance (p = 0.05). VTE recurrence differed by age for patients in the warfarin arm but not for those in the edoxaban arm and differed by INR control in the warfarin arm (p < 0.005). A stronger relationship between creatinine clearance and clinically relevant bleeding was found in the warfarin arm than in the edoxaban arm (p = 0.04). Clinically relevant bleeding differed by the percentage of time in INR control in the warfarin arm (p < 0.005). Age appeared to be a more important effect modifier than creatinine clearance in patients with VTE. Discussion The finding that efficacy in older patients was greater for those taking edoxaban than for those taking warfarin in the HOKUSAI-VTE study needs further investigation. Modification of the treatment effect by age for those taking warfarin might bias estimates of comparative effectiveness among DOACs if VKAs are the reference treatment.

scholarly journals Direct oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin K antagonists for acute venous thromboembolism: evidence from phase 3 trials

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (12) ◽  
pp. 1968-1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick van Es ◽  
Michiel Coppens ◽  
Sam Schulman ◽  
Saskia Middeldorp ◽  
Harry R. Büller
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Key Points DOACs have similar efficacy as VKAs in the treatment of acute symptomatic VTE, but significantly reduce the risk of major bleeding. The efficacy and safety of DOACs in the treatment of acute VTE are consistent in clinically important subgroups.

Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin regarding time within the therapeutic range

2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (5) ◽  
pp. 177-181
Author(s):  
Kálmán Havasi
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Therapeutic Range ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Drawback ◽  
Routine Monitoring

Prevention of thromboembolism by lifelong anticoagulation is an important therapeutic goal in patients with atrial fibrillation according to recent guidelines. Major drawback of vitamin K antagonists are their narrow therapeutic range and interactions with other drugs and food. These have significant impact on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics requiring regular measurements of the international normalized ratio. Efficiency of the anticoagulant therapy depends considerably on time within the therapeutic range of prothrombin international normalized ratio. Time within the therapeutic range represents the percentage of time within the required range of prothrombin international normalized ratio. Prothrombin international normalized ratio outside the therapeutic range increases the risk of thromboembolism or bleeding according to whether it falls below or above the range. New oral anticoagulants do not require routine monitoring of anticoagulation. Their efficacy and safety are shown to be at least as good as or better than those of warfarin. In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation ARISTOTLE study revealed that antithrombotic effect of apixaban compared with warfarin is better and with lower bleeding risk irrespective of the quality of prothrombin international normalized ratio control. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(5), 177–181.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document