scholarly journals Quality of life and related risk factors after breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients

Gland Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 767-774
Author(s):  
Xiaoqing Wang ◽  
Kepeng Zhu ◽  
Liang Ren ◽  
Hanbing Li ◽  
Shuai Lin ◽  
...  
The Breast ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Edström Elder ◽  
Yvonne Brandberg ◽  
Tina Björklund ◽  
Richard Rylander ◽  
Jakob Lagergren ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 89-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Chang ◽  
J.S. Lee ◽  
S.H. Ann ◽  
K.S. Park ◽  
B.K. Gu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Canhua Xiao ◽  
Andrew H. Miller ◽  
Mylin A. Torres

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of radiation therapy on quality of life (QOL) of breast cancer patients during and until 1 year after radiation therapy treatment. Methods and materials: Thirty-nine breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery were enrolled in a prospective study before whole breast radiation therapy (50 Gy plus a 10-Gy boost). No patient received chemotherapy. Data were collected before, at week 6 of radiation therapy, and 6 weeks and 1 year after radiation therapy. The primary outcome variable was quality of life (QOL), measured by Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Version 2 (SF-36). Risk factors potentially associated with total SF-36 scores and its physical and mental health component summary scores were also examined, including age, race, marital status, smoking history, menopausal status, endocrine treatment, cancer stage, sleep abnormalities (assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), and perceived stress levels (assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale). Mixed effect modeling was used to observe QOL changes during and after radiation therapy. Results: Total SF-36 scores did not change significantly during and up to 1 year after radiation therapy compared with baseline measures. Nevertheless, increased body mass index (BMI) and increased perceived stress were predictive of reduced total SF-36 scores over time (P Z .0064, and P < .0001, respectively). In addition, increased BMI was predictive of reduced physical component summary scores of the SF-36 (P Z .0011), whereas increased perceived stress was predictive of worse mental component summary scores (P < .0001). Other proposed potential risk factors including skin toxicity from radiation therapy were not significant. Conclusions: Radiation therapy did not worsen QOL in breast cancer patients. However, preradiation therapy patient characteristics including BMI and perceived stress may be used to identify women who may experience decreased physical and mental function during and up to 1 year after radiation therapy. Copyright 2016 the Authors. Published by EJCS on behalf of Uptodate In Medicine LLC Health Sciences Publishing. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12546-e12546
Author(s):  
Fang Chen ◽  
Hao Yu ◽  
Caining Zhao ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Yaqing Nong ◽  
...  

e12546 Background: The purpose of this study is to study depression and its risk factors at baseline and explore the changes of depression status during the course of radiation therapy in breast patients. Methods: This is part of a prospective study of treatment toxicity and quality of life. Breast cancer patients, aged 18-year old and above requiring adjuvant radiation therapy were eligible. The primary endpoint depression was assessed by a self-addressed “depression” questionnaires according to NCI “PROMIS”. The Questionnaires were completed one day prior to, during and at the end of treatment. Patient, tumor and prior treatment factors were collected. Cancer specific symptoms were collected by treating physicians and graded according to NIH/NCI CTCAE v4.0. The variables of our interest included age, menopausal status, N-stage,pathology stage, immunohistochemisty, surgical approaches,margin,prior treatments and radiation models. Data are presented as mean (95% confidence interval) unless otherwise specified. Statistical significances were tested using generalized linear model, pearson correlation and t-text. Ps less than 0.05 were considered to be significant. Results: Between July 2019 and January 2020, a total of 185 patients enrolled and completed the PROMIS questionaires. Before RT commencement, 50/185 (27.0%) had some levels of depressive feeling including 40/185 (21.6%), 10/185 (5.4%), and 0/185 (0%) patients for “rarely” (score = 5-8), “sometimes” (score = 9-12), “often” (score = 13-16), and “always” (score 17-20), respectively. Interestingly, N stage and pathology staging group were significantly associated with the depression at baseline while age, menopausal status, immunohistochemistry, previous chemo cycles, chemo regimens and anti-Her2 taget therapy were not. At the end of RT, 51/149 (34.2%) patients had depression level changed, though the absolute lumped scores of depression did not change significantly (p = 0.437). Changes in depression during were significantly associated with menopausal status (p = 0.015) while grade 2 and above toxicities were not (p = 0.421). Conclusions: Depression feeling is not uncommon in breast patients receiving adjuvant radiation. Future study may identify patients with depression and associated risk factors so that proper intervention may be applied to improve long-term survival and quality of life in patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document