scholarly journals Tobacco Use and Cessation Among a Household-Based Sample of US Urban Men Who Have Sex With Men

2005 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory L. Greenwood ◽  
Jay P. Paul ◽  
Lance M. Pollack ◽  
Diane Binson ◽  
Joseph A. Catania ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 1197-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. McKirnan ◽  
Marina Tolou-Shams ◽  
Lindsey Turner ◽  
Kellie Dyslin ◽  
Brent Hope

2005 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 929-929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rex Archer ◽  
Gerald L. Hoff ◽  
William D. Snook
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 155798831989979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Hu ◽  
Yetao Luo ◽  
Xiaoni Zhong ◽  
Rongrong Lu ◽  
Yang Wang ◽  
...  

This study aimed to determine the differences in condom use and related factors among rural–urban men who have sex with men (MSM) in Western China. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Chongqing, Sichuan, and Guangxi, which recruited MSM by non-probability sampling. Data were collected through an anonymous, standardized, and self-reported questionnaire guided by an information–motivation–behavioral skills model. Structural equation model was applied to analyze the related factors. Out of the 1141 MSM included in this analysis, 856 (75%) and 285 (25%) were from urban and rural areas, respectively. The median age was 27 years for both groups. Self-reported consistent condom use for anal sex in the past 6 months was 57.58%. The rate of consistent condom use was lower in rural MSM than in urban MSM (50.88% vs. 59.81%, p = .008). Behavioral skills, HIV/AIDS intervention services, and response costs had direct positive and negative influences on condom use, respectively. By contrast, motivation and information exhibited indirect influence. All the factors were mediated by behavioral skills in rural and urban MSM, except for the information that had no effect among urban MSM but had an indirect effect among rural MSM. These findings suggest that service providers should pay attention to substantial rural–urban differences and design different AIDS prevention and intervention strategies targeting rural and urban MSM.


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1201-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Monina Klevens ◽  
Brett M. Martin ◽  
Rose Doherty ◽  
H. Dawn Fukuda ◽  
Kevin Cranston ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 939-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ron Stall ◽  
Thomas C. Mills ◽  
John Williamson ◽  
Trevor Hart ◽  
Greg Greenwood ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 33-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Catania ◽  
Jesse Canchola ◽  
Lance Pollack ◽  
Jason Chang

Sexual Health ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie G. Middleton ◽  
Andrew E. Grulich ◽  
Ann M. McDonald ◽  
Basil Donovan ◽  
Jane S. Hocking ◽  
...  

Background: To review existing data on sexually transmissible infections (STI) in men who have sex with men in Australia in order to determine the possible contribution of STI to diverging trends in HIV notifications in different states. Methods: We reviewed data from multiple sources, including routine national surveillance data, laboratory surveillance data, self-reported information on STI testing in men who have sex with men and ad hoc reports of STI prevalence. Results: We found increasing rates of gonorrhoea and infectious syphilis notifications in urban men in Australia between 1997 and 2006, and increasing rates of chlamydia notifications in men aged 30–49 years. There was little difference in these trends by state. Differences in the population groups sampled meant we were unable to gain further information on trends in men who have sex with men from these studies. Data on STI testing showed an increase in anal STI testing between 2003 and 2006, which may have increased the number of diagnoses of chlamydia and gonorrhoea for men who have sex with men during this period. Conclusions: Over the past 10 years, there has been a substantial increase in diagnoses of gonorrhoea and infectious syphilis, and probably chlamydia, in men who have sex with men in Australia. However, it is unlikely that changes in the pattern of STI transmission are responsible for the recent divergence in HIV rates between Australian states because there is little evidence that trends in STI also differ by state.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document