scholarly journals Physician use in Ontario and the United States: The impact of socioeconomic status and health status.

1996 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 520-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
S J Katz ◽  
T P Hofer ◽  
W G Manning
Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011892
Author(s):  
Yeonwoo Kim ◽  
Erica Twardzik ◽  
Suzanne E. Judd ◽  
Natalie Colabianchi

ObjectiveTo summarize overall patterns of the impact of neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) on incidence stroke and uncover potential gaps in the literature, we conducted a systematic review of studies examining the association between nSES and incident stroke, independent of individual socioeconomic status (SES).MethodsFour electronic databases and reference lists of included articles were searched, and corresponding authors were contacted to locate additional studies. A keyword search strategy included the three broad domains of neighborhood, SES, and stroke. Eight studies met our inclusion criteria (e.g., nSES as an exposure, individual SES as a covariate, and incident stroke as an outcome). We coded study methodology and findings across the eight studies.ResultsThe results provide evidence for the overall nSES and incident stroke association in Sweden and Japan, but not within the United States. Findings were inconclusive when examining the nSES-incident stroke association stratified by race. We found evidence for the mediating role of biological factors in the nSES-incident stroke association.ConclusionsHigher neighborhood disadvantage was found to be associated with higher stroke risk, but it was not significant in all the studies. The relationship between nSES and stroke risk within different racial groups in the United States was inconclusive. Inconsistencies may be driven by differences in covariate adjustment (e.g., individual-level sociodemographic characteristics, neighborhood-level racial composition). Additional research is needed to investigate potential intermediate and modifiable factors of the nSES and incident stroke association, which could serve as intervention points.


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1604-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Joynt ◽  
Meghan K. Train ◽  
Brett W. Robbins ◽  
Jill S. Halterman ◽  
Enrico Caiola ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 582-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim E. Byers ◽  
Holly J. Wolf ◽  
Katrina R. Bauer ◽  
Susan Bolick-Aldrich ◽  
Vivien W. Chen ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 13-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty M. Kennedy ◽  
Sahasporn Paeratakul ◽  
Donna H. Ryan ◽  
George A. Bray

1985 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Arden Miller ◽  
Elizabeth J. Coulter ◽  
Amy Fine ◽  
Sharon Adams-Taylor ◽  
Lisbeth B. Schorr

A previously published report by these authors on the impact in the United States of recession on children's health emphasized four points: 1) available monitoring systems are not adequate for reporting on the health of children in a timely fashion; 2) the monitoring of maternal and child health must emphasize data on population subgroups, i.e., minorities, the poor and those hardest hit by recession; 3) the health of poor children is adversely affected and their numbers dramatically increased during the recession of 1981–82; and 4) comparisons between the recession of 1974–75 and that of 1981–82 suggest that expansion of health services and social support systems during the recession of 1974–75 had a cushioning effect that protected the health of children, while the curtailment of many of these programs during the 1981–82 recession is associated with adverse health trends, especially among the most vulnerable population subgroups. Data on these issues are appreciably better now than they were nine months ago, thus further validating the points made above. As with the previous report, officially released current data are abundant for economic indicators (even for early 1984), but are sparse for health status indicators. The previous report also observed that the health status of children is influenced by interdependent and interlocking factors that include economic well-being and access to health services and social supports. A new analysis attempts to unlock those relationships and measure the impact of lost welfare benefits, implemented as a result of the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1981 (OBRA), and the separate impact of the serious recession of 1981–82. That analysis shows the poverty rate for children increased by 7.6 percentage points between 1981 and 1982. Approximately 60 percent of the increase is attributable to the recession and 40 percent to social policy changes effected after 1981.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document