A Cervical Collar-Cervical Traction Device

1963 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 1709-1711
Author(s):  
HARRY E. BARNETT
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-133
Author(s):  
MA Shakoor ◽  
Md Ali Emran ◽  
Abul Khair Ahmed Zaman ◽  
Md Moyeenuzzaman

Background: Cervical spondylosis is the results of disc degeneration with associated osteophytosis. Cervical traction is widely used to treat neck disorders. Rehabilitation treatment like cervical traction along with other measures at home may play an important role to reduce symptoms of the patients with cervical spondylosis. Objective: A randomised clinical trial was conducted among 125 patients having cervical spondylosis to find out the effects of manual continuous home cervical traction. Methods: The patients were selected on the basis specific selection criteria. They were subdivided into two groups. In Group-A (manual continuous home cervical traction group), 61 patients were treated with exercise, cervical collar, neck support, manual continuous home cervical traction, NSAID, warm moist compression and instruction in posture. In Group-B (conventional treatment receiving group), 64 patients were treated with exercise, cervical collar, neck support, warm moist compression, NSAID and instruction in posture. Results: Among the subjects there were 68 (54.4 %) male and 57 (45.6 %) female.  The mean age of the subjects was 45.94 ± 11.65 years.  There was marked improvement of symptoms of the patients of Group-A in response to treatment for 6 weeks (p < 0.007). It indicates that manual home cervical traction was found effective to reduce the sign and symptoms of cervical spondylosis. There was improvement after treatment in Group-B also (p < 0.01). It indicates that conventional treatment was also found effective. In comparison, there was no significant difference between two groups (p < 0.36, 95% CI= ‐0.56 to 1.51) found after first week. But there was significant improvement in Group-A than Group-B after six weeks of treatment (p < 0.003, 95% CI= -2.40 to -0.51). Conclusion: It may be concluded that manual continuous home cervical traction is beneficial for the patients with cervical spondylosis. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2020; 46(2): 128-133


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 520
Author(s):  
Deepak Kumar Kolur ◽  
G. Dileep Tejas ◽  
M. V. A. Raju Bahubalendruni

2017 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. 355-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Sadegh Masoudi ◽  
Nima Derakhshan ◽  
Fariborz Ghaffarpasand ◽  
Tayebeh Sadeghpour

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-68
Author(s):  
Abul Khair Ahmad Zaman ◽  
Md Abdus Shakoor ◽  
Md Moyeenuzzaman ◽  
Muhammad Alamgir Mandal ◽  
HN Mashuk Rahman

Background: Patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy is more responding by application of cervical traction with NSAIDs, exercise and ADL than treating with NSAIDs, exercise and ADL.Objectives: Study is to know the effect of home cervical traction on patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.Materials & Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the department of physical medicine and rehabilitation, BSMMU during the period of 3-9-2012 to 2-9-2013 to find out the effect of home cervical traction on patient with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.Results: A total of 120 patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy attended the department. Sixty patients was treated with NSAID, Isometric neck muscle strengthening exercise, Activity of daily living advice (ADL) and soft cervical collar, other 60 patients was treated with NSAID, Isometric neck muscle strengthening exercise, Activity of daily living advice (ADL) and soft cervical collar with home cervical traction. The patients were treated for 6 weeks. There was marked improvement in both groups after treatment. But there was significant difference regarding improvement in treatment with home cervical traction (p=0.432).Conclusion: So, it can be concluded that the home cervical traction is effective in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Male and female ratio was 1.9:.6. In respect of occupation the maximum patient was housewife (27.5%) followed by businessman (25. 8%). Highest number of patients is in the 41-50 years age group.KYAMC Journal Vol. 9, No.-2, July 2018, Page 65-68


Radiology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 225 (3) ◽  
pp. 895-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae-Sub Chung ◽  
Young-Jun Lee ◽  
Seong-Woong Kang ◽  
Chang-Jun Park ◽  
Won-Suk Kang ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Olivero ◽  
Scott C. Dulebohn

Object The percentage of patients responding to conservative treatment for cervical radiculopathy secondary to nerve root compression is not well quantified. To clarify this question, the authors retrospectively reviewed the records obtained over a 4-year period in patients with cervical radiculopathy to determine their response to conservative measures (cervical collar therapy and halter cervical traction). Methods Cervical radiculopathy was diagnosed in patients if they suffered from radiating arm pain made worse by neck movement and at least one of the following: reflex loss, dermatomal numbness, and/or myotomal weakness. Patients with neck pain alone or arm pain without neurological deficit were excluded from analysis. Those patients without excruciating pain, severe weakness, or evidence of myelopathy were offered a course of halter traction before surgery was to be considered. Ninety-six patients met the inclusion criteria; there were 61 males and 35 females, and the mean age was 47 years. Fifty-five patients presented with C-7, 37 with C-6, two with C-5, and two with C-8 radiculopathy. Eighty-one patients underwent a trial of traction that consisted of wearing a cervical collar and home-based halter cervical traction: 8 to 12 pounds, applied for 15 minutes, three times a day for 3 to 6 weeks The mean duration of symptoms prior to neurosurgical evaluation was 43 days ± 8.3 days (standard deviation). Sixty-three (78%) of 81 patients responded to therapeutic traction, experiencing significant or total pain relief, three could not tolerate the traction, and traction failed in 15 patients. Of the 81 patients in whom traction was undertaken, 78 underwent magnetic resonance imaging prior to being seen, which revealed herniated discs at the corresponding levels in 71 and foraminal stenosis in seven. Three of the 63 patients in whom an initial response to traction was noted suffered recurrence of symptoms and required surgery. It would appear that in patients in whom symptoms of cervical radiculopathy were present for approximately 6 weeks that 75% will respond to further conservative treatment (halter traction and cervical collar) over the next 6 weeks.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hélène Legardeur ◽  
Gessica Masiello-Fonjallaz ◽  
Martine Jacot-Guillarmod ◽  
Patrice Mathevet

Introduction: Alignment of the uterine cervix with the vaginal canal is often required during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD). Currently available instruments are traumatic tenacula, which can cause pain and bleeding and represent an obstacle for certain patients to pursue their medical follow-up. A novel investigational cervical vacuum tenaculum, enables atraumatic traction of the cervix using a semi-circular suction pad, designed to conform to the anatomical shape of the external cervical os. Suction is generated by manually pulling out a sliding tube in a vacuum chamber.Methods: We performed a single arm non-comparative pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the cervical vacuum tenaculum in 13 women receiving an IUD. Data on procedural efficacy, safety, patient-reported pain scores at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure and patient satisfaction were collected prospectively.Results: Insertion of IUD was successful with use of the study device in 7 of the 13 enrolled patients (54%). No bleeding or only limited ecchymosis were caused by the device. No adverse events were reported. Participants reported very little pain (mean Visual Analog Scale &lt;10) when applying the device. Participants who achieved IUD insertion with the device reported strong overall satisfaction with the procedure.Conclusions: The suction-based atraumatic tenaculum can be used to manipulate the cervix during IUD insertion with satisfactory efficacy and safety. The results of this pilot study support further studies of this device in larger populations comparing with standard single-tooth tenaculum.Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT 04441333.


2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-22
Author(s):  
T O Odebode ◽  
S B Agaja

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document