Orthopaedic Trauma Research Priorities in Latin America

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather J. Roberts ◽  
Madeline C. MacKechnie ◽  
David W. Shearer ◽  
Julio Segovia Altieri ◽  
Fernando de la Huerta ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Juan I. Rojas ◽  
Edgar Carnero Contentti ◽  
Patricio Abad ◽  
Adriana Aguayo ◽  
Ricardo Alonso ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1195-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Helena De Bortoli Cassiani ◽  
Alessandra Bassalobre-Garcia ◽  
Ludovic Reveiz

Objective: To estabilish a regional list for nursing research priorities in health systems and services in the Region of the Americas based on the concepts of Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage. Method: five-stage consensus process: systematic review of literature; appraisal of resulting questions and topics; ranking of the items by graduate program coordinators; discussion and ranking amongst a forum of researchers and public health leaders; and consultation with the Ministries of Health of the Pan American Health Organization's member states. Results: the resulting list of nursing research priorities consists of 276 study questions/ topics, which are sorted into 14 subcategories distributed into six major categories: 1. Policies and education of nursing human resources; 2. Structure, organization and dynamics of health systems and services; 3. Science, technology, innovation, and information systems in public health; 4. Financing of health systems and services; 5. Health policies, governance, and social control; and 6. Social studies in the health field. Conclusion: the list of nursing research priorities is expected to serve as guidance and support for nursing research on health systems and services across Latin America. Not only researchers, but also Ministries of Health, leaders in public health, and research funding agencies are encouraged to use the results of this list to help inform research-funding decisions.


2022 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. S33-S39
Author(s):  
Anthony R. Carlini ◽  
Susan C. Collins ◽  
Elena D. Staguhn ◽  
Katherine P. Frey ◽  
Robert V. O'Toole ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. e0201803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arega D. Alene ◽  
Tahirou Abdoulaye ◽  
Joseph Rusike ◽  
Ricardo Labarta ◽  
Bernardo Creamer ◽  
...  

SICOT-J ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Colin P. Sperring ◽  
Nicholas C. Danford ◽  
Bryan M. Saltzman ◽  
Michael Constant ◽  
Nicholas J. Dantzker ◽  
...  

This review describes the development, advantages and disadvantages, and applications of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in orthopaedic trauma. PROMIS is a useful tool for quantifying outcomes in orthopedic trauma. It allows measurement of outcomes across multiple domains while minimizing administration time. PROMIS also reliably identifies clinical, social, and psychological risk factors for poor outcomes across a variety of orthopaedic injuries and disease states. However, PROMIS lacks specificity for certain anatomic regions and validation for mental health outcomes. It also is limited by ceiling effects in certain active patient populations. Orthopaedic traumatologists should be familiar with PROMIS, as its use is increasing and it is a valuable tool that can aid in clinical decision making.


2009 ◽  
Vol 195 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Sharan ◽  
C. Gallo ◽  
O. Gureje ◽  
E. Lamberte ◽  
J. J. Mari ◽  
...  

BackgroundStudies suggest a paucity of and lack of prioritisation in mental health research from low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries.AimsTo investigate research priorities in mental health among researchers and other stakeholders in LAMI countries.MethodWe used a two-stage design that included identification, through literature searches and snowball technique, of researchers and stakeholders in 114 countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean; and a mail survey on priorities in research.ResultsThe study identified broad agreement between researchers and stakeholders and across regions regarding research priorities. Epidemiology (burden and risk factors), health systems and social science ranked highest for type of research. Depression/anxiety, substance use disorders and psychoses; and children and adolescents, women, and people exposed to violence/trauma were prioritised among the disorders and population groups respectively. Important criteria for prioritising research were burden of disease, social justice, and availability of funds. Stakeholder groups differed in the importance they gave to the personal interest of researchers as a criterion for prioritising research. Researchers' and stakeholders' priorities were consistent with burden of disease estimates, however suicide was underprioritised compared with its burden. Researchers' and stakeholders' priorities were also largely congruent with the researchers' projects.ConclusionsThe results of this first ever conducted survey of researchers and stakeholders regarding research priorities in mental health suggest that it should be possible to develop consensus at regional and international levels regarding the research agenda that is necessary to support health system objectives in LAMI countries.


2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thiago Botelho Azeredo ◽  
Vera Lucia Luiza ◽  
Maria Auxiliadora Oliveira ◽  
Isabel Cristina Martins Emmerick ◽  
Maryam Bigdeli

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 801-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Held ◽  
E. Engelmann ◽  
R. Dunn ◽  
S.S. Ahmad ◽  
M. Laubscher ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document