The Effect of Positive Image Properties on the Reduction of Interpretation Bias and Social Anxiety

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-313
Author(s):  
Min-Hye Kim ◽  
Hyae-Young Yoon
2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nader Amir ◽  
Courtney Beard ◽  
Emily Bower

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Kanai ◽  
Satoko Sasagawa ◽  
Junwen Chen ◽  
Hironori Shimada ◽  
Yuji Sakano

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1234-1242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Badra ◽  
Lars Schulze ◽  
Eni S. Becker ◽  
Janna Nonja Vrijsen ◽  
Babette Renneberg ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0255224
Author(s):  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Chenwei Huang ◽  
Xiaofei Mao ◽  
Tianya Hou ◽  
Luna Sun ◽  
...  

Training individuals to interpret ambiguous information in positive ways might be an effective method of reducing social anxiety. However, little research had been carried out in Chinese samples, and the effect of interpretation training on other processes such as attentional bias also remained unclear. This study examined the effect of interpretation bias modification program (IMP) on interpretation bias, social anxiety and attentional bias, and the possible mediation effects. 51 healthy adults were randomly assigned to either a 5-session IMP training that guided them to endorse benign interpretation in ambiguous scenarios or an interpretation control condition (ICC). Self-reported measures of social anxiety symptoms, attentional bias and interpretation bias were evaluated before and after training. Results showed that compared to control group, IMP group generated more positive interpretations and less negative interpretations after training (F(1,49) = 7.65, p<0.01, ηp2 = 0.14; F(1,49) = 14.60, p<0.01, ηp2 = 0.23respectively). IMP yielded greater interpretation bias reduction (F(1,49) = 12.84, p<0.01, ηp2 = 0.21) and social anxiety reduction (F(1,49) = 21.39, p<0.01, ηp2 = 0.30) than ICC, but change in attentional bias was not significant between IMP and the control group. Change in interpretation bias did not show a significant mediation effect in the relationship between training condition and social anxiety reduction. This study provided preliminary evidence for the efficacy of the Chinese version of IMP training. Possible methodological issues and interpretations underlying the findings were discussed. This study was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chitr.org.cn), a WHO approved registry. The title of registration trial was “A Study on the efficiency of cognitive bias and attentional bias training on fear and phobia” and the registration number was ChiCTR2100045670.


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1213-1224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick H. F. Chan ◽  
Keisuke Takano ◽  
Jennifer Y. F. Lau ◽  
Tom J. Barry

Abstract Background Theories suggest that interpretation biases play a role in the aetiology of a range of psychopathology including depression, anxiety and psychosis. We evaluate the psychometric properties of an adapted version of an ambiguous scenario task (i.e., Interpretation Bias Task [IBT]) that assesses benign and negative interpretations in four domains: immediate bodily injury; long-term illness; social rejection; and, performance failure. Methods The factor structure of the IBT was evaluated in a student sample (N = 237) in Study 1, and subsequently confirmed in a community sample with a wider age range (N = 1103) in Study 2. Correlations between interpretation biases and health and social anxiety symptoms were tested in both studies. Results The four IBT domains were differentiable and each was represented by two factors (i.e., benign vs. negative). In Study 1, higher health anxiety was characterised by fewer benign interpretations for injury- and illness-related scenarios, whereas higher social anxiety was associated with more negative and fewer benign interpretations for social rejection and performance failure scenarios. Correlational results were replicated in Study 2 for social anxiety, but not health anxiety. Conclusions The IBT is suitable for measuring interpretation biases in Asian adults. The content specificity of interpretation biases was partially supported.


2020 ◽  
Vol 276 ◽  
pp. 1119-1130
Author(s):  
Junwen Chen ◽  
Michelle Short ◽  
Eva Kemps

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 517-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Everaert ◽  
Michael V. Bronstein ◽  
Tyrone D. Cannon ◽  
Jutta Joormann

Interpretation bias is often theorized to play a critical role in depression and social anxiety. To date, it remains unknown how interpretation bias exerts its toxic effects. Interpretation inflexibility may be an important determinant of how distorted interpretations affect emotional well-being. This study investigated interpretation bias and inflexibility in relation to depression severity and social anxiety. Participants ( N = 212) completed a novel cognitive task that simultaneously measured bias and inflexibility in the interpretation of unfolding ambiguous situations. Depression severity was associated with increased negative and decreased positive interpretation biases. Social anxiety was associated with increased negative interpretation bias. Critically, both symptom types were related to reduced revision of negative interpretations by disconfirmatory positive information. These findings suggest that individuals with more severe depression or social anxiety make more biased and inflexible interpretations. Future work examining cognitive risk for depression and anxiety could benefit from examining both these factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document