Structure-Solubility Correlation for Asphaltene Deposit Removal

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bilel Hamzaoui ◽  
Abdullah M. Moajil ◽  
Abdulaziz Al Ghamdi
Keyword(s):  

TAPPI Journal ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
HONGHI TRAN ◽  
DANNY TANDRA

Sootblowing technology used in recovery boilers originated from that used in coal-fired boilers. It started with manual cleaning with hand lancing and hand blowing, and evolved slowly into online sootblowing using retractable sootblowers. Since 1991, intensive research and development has focused on sootblowing jet fundamentals and deposit removal in recovery boilers. The results have provided much insight into sootblower jet hydrodynamics, how a sootblower jet interacts with tubes and deposits, and factors influencing its deposit removal efficiency, and have led to two important innovations: fully-expanded sootblower nozzles that are used in virtually all recovery boilers today, and the low pressure sootblowing technology that has been implemented in several new recovery boilers. The availability of powerful computing systems, superfast microprocessors and data acquisition systems, and versatile computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling capability in the past two decades has also contributed greatly to the advancement of sootblowing technology. High quality infrared inspection cameras have enabled mills to inspect the deposit buildup conditions in the boiler during operation, and helped identify problems with sootblower lance swinging and superheater platens and boiler bank tube vibrations. As the recovery boiler firing capacity and steam parameters have increased markedly in recent years, sootblowers have become larger and longer, and this can present a challenge in terms of both sootblower design and operation.



1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G. Trbovich ◽  
G.E. King
Keyword(s):  


1954 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. W. Sigworth ◽  
R. K. Stone
Keyword(s):  


Wear ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 356-357 ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boštjan Pečnik ◽  
Marko Hočevar ◽  
Brane Širok ◽  
Benjamin Bizjan


1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Simmons ◽  
Christine M. Sun ◽  
Beverly A. Yamamoto ◽  
Timothy B. Edrington


Author(s):  
Hang Zhang ◽  
Zhicheng Lan ◽  
Shuhai Liu ◽  
Huaping Xiao

Pigging is the most effective and common way to remove the wax deposits in pipelines. The discs, cups, or brushes of a pig are executing components for waxy oil deposit removal. In this study, a homemade experiment setup was built and employed to conduct the waxy oil deposit removal experiments with various wax concentration at different scraping speeds using polymeric bristled brushes. An explanation model was established to analyze the formation of waxy oil deposit chips. The entire removal processes were captured and the resistant friction forces were measured during the experiments. Our results show that there are three stages in the scraping process: (a) brush deforming; (b) steady scraping; (c) brush leaving; In the scraping stage, the frictional resistant force was found to decrease as the scraping speed increases. The frictional resistant force increases as the wax concentration increases. There is obvious stick-slip phenomenon in the steady scraping process. The wax concentration influences the shape of the chips. The shape of the high wax concentration deposit chips is saw-toothed.



2009 ◽  
Vol 386-388 ◽  
pp. 893-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Drenik ◽  
A. Vesel ◽  
M. Mozetič


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document