A New Generalized Model for Predicting the Drag Coefficient and the Settling Velocity of Rigid Spheres in Viscoplastic Fluids

SPE Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (06) ◽  
pp. 3217-3235
Author(s):  
Temitope Okesanya ◽  
Ergun Kuru ◽  
Yanxin Sun
2017 ◽  
Vol 321 ◽  
pp. 242-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianzhi Song ◽  
Zhengming Xu ◽  
Gensheng Li ◽  
Zhaoyu Pang ◽  
Zhaopeng Zhu

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silin Jing ◽  
Xianzhi Song ◽  
Zhaopeng Zhu ◽  
Buwen Yu ◽  
Shiming Duan

Abstract Accurate description of cuttings slippage in the gas-liquid phase is of great significance for wellbore cleaning and the control accuracy of bottom hole pressure during MPD. In this study, the wellbore bubble flow environment was simulated by a constant pressure air pump and the transparent wellbore, and the settling characteristics of spherical particles under different gas volume concentrations were recorded and analyzed by highspeed photography. A total of 225 tests were conducted to analyze the influence of particle diameter (1–12mm), particle density (2700–7860kg/m^3), liquid viscosity and bubble volume concentration on particle settling velocity. Gas drag force is defined to quantitatively evaluate the bubble’s resistance to particle slippage. The relationship between bubble drag coefficient and particle Reynolds number is obtained by fitting the experimental results. An explicit settling velocity equation is established by introducing Archimedes number. This explicit equation with an average relative error of only 8.09% can directly predict the terminal settling velocity of the sphere in bubble containing Newtonian fluids. The models for predicting bubble drag coefficient and the terminal settling velocity are valid with particle Reynolds number ranging from 0.05 to 167 and bubble volume concentration ranging from 3.0% to 20.0%. Besides, a trial-and-error procedure and an illustrative example are presented to show how to calculate bubble drag coefficient and settling velocity in bubble containing fluids. The results of this study will provide the theoretical basis for wellbore cleaning and accurate downhole pressure to further improve the performance of MPD in treating gas influx.


2017 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 409-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengming Xu ◽  
Xianzhi Song ◽  
Gensheng Li ◽  
Qingling Liu ◽  
Zhaoyu Pang ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 658 ◽  
pp. 438-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES Q. FENG

The steady axisymmetric flow internal and external to a deformable viscous liquid drop falling through a quiescent gas under the action of gravity is computed by solving the nonlinear Navier–Stokes equations using a Galerkin finite-element method with a boundary-fitted quadrilateral mesh. Considering typical values of the density and viscosity for common liquids and gases, numerical solutions are first computed for the liquid-to-gas density ratio ρ = 1000 and viscosity ratio μ from 50 to 1000. Visually noticeable drop deformation is shown to occur when the Weber number We ~ 5. For μ ≥ 100, drops of Reynolds number Re < 200 tend to have a rounded front and flattened or even dimpled rear, whereas those at Re > 200 a flattened front and somewhat rounded rear, with that at Re = 200 exhibiting an almost fore–aft symmetric shape. As an indicator of drop deformation, the axis ratio (defined as drop width versus height) increases with increasing We and μ, but decreases with increasing Re. By tracking the solution branches around turning points using an arclength continuation algorithm, critical values of We for the ‘shape instability’ are determined typically within the range of 10 to 20, depending on the value of Re (for Re ≥ 100). The drop shape can change drastically from prolate- to oblate-like when μ < 80 (for 100 ≤ Re ≤ 500). For example, for μ = 50 a drop at Re ≥ 200 exhibits a prolate shape when We < 10 and an upside-down button mushroom shape when We > 10. The various solutions computed at ρ = 1000 with the associated values of drag coefficient and drop shapes are found to be almost invariant at other values of ρ (e.g. from 500 to 1500) as long as the value of ρ/μ2 is fixed, despite the fact that the internal circulation intensity changes according to the value of μ. The computed values of drag coefficient are shown to agree quite well with an empirical formula for rigid spheres with the radius of the sphere replaced by the radius of the cross-sectional area.


1987 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Y. Dedegil

Drag forces on bodies in non-Newtonian fluids which are to be described by using the Reynolds number should only contain forces which are associated with the fluid velocity or particle velocity. Forces due to the yield stress τ0 must be considered separately. According to its physical composition, the Reynolds number must be calculated by means of the fully representative shear stress including the yield stress τ0. Then the drag coefficient cD as a function of the Reynolds number can be traced back to that of Newtonian fluids.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document