Lessons Learned from Extensive Well Testing Operations in Khuff Formations Offshore Abu Dhabi

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Hollaender ◽  
Mahmoud Basioni ◽  
Ahmed Yahya Al Blooshi ◽  
Ahmed Elmahdi ◽  
Sohdy Sayed ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Gerardo Vallejo ◽  
Aciel Olivares ◽  
Pablo Crespo Hdez ◽  
Eduardo R. Roman ◽  
Claudio Rogerio Tigre Maia ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 740
Author(s):  
Malcolm Henderson ◽  
Kevin Hansen

Over the past ten years the region has witnessed the unforeseen presence of mercury during gas production which has affected projects not only in southeast Asia but more recently in Australian waters. This has caused major operational challenges and has often involved costly production impairment, loss of condensate sales value and major brownfield modifications. Today–s awareness of mercury has seen a new vigilance in well testing programmes intended to address the identification of mercury in gas streams during the early appraisal and concept development phases of an asset lifecycle. This paper looks at the ways in which operating companies have resolved the issue of unforeseen mercury production to date, and the operational experience and lessons learned. The paper describes some of the fundamental testing programmes as well as the available technologies for treatment and removal of mercury from production and effluent streams. It also identifies the impact of mercury on the design and operation of specific parts of the process as well as the overall impact on facility topsides. The impact of mercury on a development is shown to be manageable and least costly where identified and addressed during the conceptual stage of a project development. Technical, environmental, safety and regulatory issues associated with mercury can be tackled, minimising risk of production deferment, and the costs incurred can be quantified and incorporated into economic models.


Author(s):  
Anthony Hechanova

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is a developing affluent nation. The leaders of the UAE announced the pursuit of peaceful nuclear power in 2008 and by the end of the following year established its Nuclear Energy Program Implementing Organization (the Emirates Nuclear Energy Corporation (ENEC)), Federal Authority for Nuclear Regulation (FANR), and ordered four APR-1400 pressurized water reactors from the Korean Electric Power Company (KEPCO). Nuclear Engineering programs were initiated soon afterwards at Khalifa University for graduate students and the University of Sharjah for undergraduate students. The technical workforce including nuclear power plant local operators and chemistry and radiation protection personnel was established by ENEC and the Institute of Applied Technology as an inaugural program of Abu Dhabi Polytechnic (AD Poly) in 2011. This paper describes the development of the dual education and training program at AD Poly, the experience of the initial cohorts who conducted their training at the APR-1400 units at the Shin Kori Nuclear Power Plant in Korea, and the current program between the AD Poly Abu Dhabi campus and the new Barakah Nuclear Power Plant based on lessons learned from the earlier years.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Hollaender ◽  
Yakov Shumakov ◽  
Ozgur Karacali ◽  
Bertrand Theuveny

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Hassan Al-basry ◽  
Salma Khalfan Al-Hajeri ◽  
Hisham N.H. Saadawi ◽  
Fatema Mohamed Al Aryani ◽  
Adel Al Obeidi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (07) ◽  
pp. 58-59
Author(s):  
Chris Carpenter

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 202636, “Fishbone Stimulation: A Game Changer for Tight Carbonate Productivity Enhancement—Case Study of First Successful Implementation at ADNOC Onshore Fields,” by R.V. Rachapudi, SPE, S.S. Al-Jaberi, SPE, and M. Al Hashemi, SPE, ADNOC, et al., prepared for the 2020 Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, held virtually 9–12 November. The paper has not been peer reviewed. The operator’s first successful installation of fishbone stimulation technology was aimed at establishing vertical communication between layers in a tight carbonate reservoir and maximizing the reservoir contact. Furthermore, the advanced stimulation technology connects natural fractures within the reservoir, bypasses near-wellbore damage, and allows the thin sublayers to produce. This technology requires running standard lower-completion tubing with fishbone subs preloaded with 40-ft needles and stimulation with the rig on site. Introduction The operator plans to develop tight carbonate reservoirs as part of its production growth strategy. Field Q is a 35×15-km field under development with a phased approach. Phase 1 was planned and production began in 2014. Phase 2 is being developed by drilling wells using the pad concept. Reservoir A, a tight carbonate formation with low permeability ranging from 1 to 3 md and porosity from 15 to 25%, is part of Phase 2 development. The aver-age thickness of Reservoir A is approximately 90 ft across the field, with seven sublayers. The major challenge of Reservoir A development is poor vertical communication and low permeability. Based on appraisal-well data, the average production rate per well is approximately 200 to 400 BOPD with a wellhead pressure of 200 psi. Therefore, appraisal-well testing confirmed the poor productivity of the wells. In addition, the wells are required to produce to the central facilities located in a Phase 1 area 18 km away from Phase 2. In summary, each Phase 2 well is required to be produced against a back-pressure of 500 to 600 psi. Fishbone Stimulation Technology Fishbone stimulation technology is an uncemented-liner rig-deployed completion stimulation system. The liner includes fishbone subs at fixed intervals, and each sub consists of four needles that will connect the sublayers by penetrating into the formation. The typical fishbone completion after installation and jetting the needles in formation is shown in Fig. 1.


2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 438-443
Author(s):  
Hideaki Kuramata ◽  
Manabu Tanaka ◽  
Naohiro Tominaga ◽  
Takeharu Okamoto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document