Safeguarding CO2 Storage by Restoring Well Integrity Using Leakage Rate Modeling LRM along Wellbore in Depleted Gas Fields Offshore Sarawak

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parimal A. Patil ◽  
Prasanna Chidambaram ◽  
M Syafeeq B. Ebining Amir ◽  
Pankaj K. Tiwari ◽  
Mahesh S. Picha ◽  
...  

Abstract Ensuring long-term integrity of existing plugged and abandoned (P&A) and active wells that penetrated the selected CO2 storage reservoir is the key to reduce leakage risks along the wellpath for long-term containment sustainability. Restoring the well integrity, when required, will safeguard CO2 containment for decades. Well integrity is often defined as the ability to contain fluids with minimum to nil leakage throughout the project lifecycle. With a view to develop depleted gas fields as CO2 storage sites in offshore Sarawak, it is vital to determine the complexity involved in restoring the integrity of these P&A wells as well as the development wells. Leakage Rate Modeling (LRM) was performed to identify and evaluate the associated risks for designing the remedial action plan to safeguard CO2 storage site. The P&A wells in the identified depleted gas fields were drilled 35–45 years ago and were not designed to withstand high CO2 concentration downhole conditions. Corrosive-Resistant Alloy (CRA) tubulars and CO2 resistant cement were not used during well construction and downhole pressure and temperature conditions may have further degraded the material strength and elevated the corrosion susceptibility. As a proof of concept, single well was selected to assess the loss of containment along the wellbore and to determine the complexity in resorting the well integrity, multiple scenarios were considered in LRM and composite structure and barrier parameters were assigned to estimate possible leakage pathways. Detailed numerical models were simulated for estimating leakage from reservoir to the surface through possible leakage pathways. Risks were identified and remedial action plan was designed for restoring well integrity. Post remedial plan covers Marine CO2 dispersion modeling to design comprehensive monitoring and mitigation plan for potential CO2 leakage in the marine environment. This study summarizes the unique challenge associated with estimating well integrity and re-entering existing P&A wells. Leakage rate modeling along these wells involves uncertainties but when carried out with realistic parameters, it can be used as a predicting tool to determine the nature and complexity of leakage. Integrating with site survey results for any indication of gas bubbling, decision can be made to restoring the well integrity. The paper outlines the detail strategic options to safeguard CO2 storage by restoring well integrity using LRM and integrating with marine CO2 dispersion modeling. Assessing well integrity of P&A wells on individual basis, risk is assessed and identified. Proper remedial actions are proposed accordingly. Quantification of all the uncertainties involved needs to be conducted that may affect long-term security of CO2 storage site.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debasis P. Das ◽  
Parimal A. Patil ◽  
Pankaj K. Tiwari ◽  
Renato J Leite ◽  
Raj Deo Tewari

Abstract The emerging global climate change policies have necessitated the strategic need for prudent management of produced contaminants and, with cold flaring being no more the best option, Carbon Capture Utilization & Storage (CCUS) technology provides opportunity for development of high CO2 contaminant fields. A typical CO2 sequestration project comprises capturing CO2 by separating from produced hydrocarbons followed by injection of CO2 into deep geological formations for long term storage. While injection ofCO2 may continue over tens of years, the long-term containment needs to be ascertained for thousands of years. Several geological and geophysical factors along with the existingwells need to be evaluated to assess the potential risks for CO2 leakage that maychallenge the long-term containment. This study considers a depleted carbonate field located offshore Sarawak as a possible long-term CO2 storage site. Elements that may lead to possible leakage of CO2over time are the existing faults or fractures, development of new fractures/faults during injection, caprock failure due to pressures exceeding fracture pressure during/after injection and possible leakage through existing wells. The risk assessment process includes identification and mapping of faults and fracture networks, mapping of seals, evaluation of seismic anomalies and gas while drilling records, pore-pressure analysis, laboratory experiments for analyzing changes in geomechanical & geochemical rock properties and well integrity of existing wells. All these parameters are cross correlated, and qualitative risk categorization is carried out to determine the robustness of the reservoir for long term CO2 storage. The evaluation of available data indicates less frequent faulting occur only towards the flank with no seismic anomalies associated with them. Some seismic anomalies are observed at shallower levels, however their impact on the reservoir and overburden integrity is assessed to be minimum. There are four shale dominated formations mapped in the overburden section, which will act as potential seals. Estimated fracture pressures for the potential seals ranges between 6200-9280 psia for the deepest seal to 2910-4290 psia for the shallowest. Therefore,it is interpreted that if the post injection reservoir pressure is kept below the initial reservoir pressure of 4480 psia, it would not hold any threat to the caprock integrity.Leakage rate riskalong the existing wells was determined based on well log data. Well integrity check of legacywells helped identify two abandoned wells for rigorous remediation to restore their integrity. The subsurface risk analysis is critical to ascertain the long-term containment of injectedCO2. The integrated subsurface characterization and well integrity analysis approach adopted in this work can be applied to any other field/reservoir to validate its robustness for long-term CO2 injection and storage.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parimal A Patil ◽  
Debasis P. Das ◽  
Pankaj K. Tiwari ◽  
Prasanna Chidambaram ◽  
Renato J. Leite ◽  
...  

Abstract CO2 storage in a depleted field comes with the risk that is associated with wells integrity which is often defined as the ability to contain fluids with minimum to nil leakage throughout the project lifecycle. The targeted CO2 storage reservoir in offshore Malaysia has existing abandoned exploration/appraisal, and development wells. With a view of developing such CO2 storage sites, it is vital to maintain the integrity of the abandoned wells. High-risk characterized wells need to be analyzed and remedial action plan to be defined by understanding the complexity involved in restoring the integrity. This will safeguard CO2 containment for decades. Abandoned exploration/appraisal wells in the identified field are >40 years old and were not designed to withstand CO2 corrosion environment. Downhole temperature and pressure conditions may have further degraded the wellbore material strength elevating corrosion susceptibility. The reservoir simulation predicts that the CO2 plume will reach to these abandoned wells during the initial phase of total injection period. Single well was selected to assess the loss of containment through the composite structure along the wellbore and to determine the complexity in resorting the well integrity. CO2 leakage rates through all possible pathways were estimated based on numerical models and the well is characterized for its risk. For unacceptable leakage risk, the abandoned well needs to be re-entered to restore the performance of barriers. Minimum plug setting depth (MPSD) and caprock restoration considers original reservoir pressure(3450psia) anticipating the pressure buildup upon CO2 injection and is derived based on fracture gradient and maximum horizontal stress. This paper elaborates unique challenges associated with locating abandoned wells that are submerged below seabed. Top and side re-entry strategies are discussed to overcome challenges. Based on past abandonment scheme, leakage rate modeling calculates estimated leakage rate of ~460SCFD at higher differential pressure of around 3036psia at shallowest barrier and ~15SCFD for differential pressure of 1518psia at deepest barrier. Sensitivity analysis has been carried out for critical barrier parameters (cement permeability, cracks, fractures) to the containment ability and improving understanding of quality of barriers, uncertainties, and complexities for CO2 leakage risk. The paper proposes two(2) minimum plug setting depths (3550ft & 3750ft) derived based on fracture gradient and maximum horizontal stress. Perforate-wash-cement (PWC) and section milling were compared for operational efficiencies to achieve caprock restoration. for MPSD out strategic options to restore well integrity by remediating casing/cement barriers at by performing best fit abandonment technique to contain CO2 in the reservoir. Well integrity risk is assessed for existing plugged and abandoned (P&A) wells in a carbon storage site. Optimized remedial actions are proposed. Quantification of all the uncertainties are resolved that may affect long-term security of CO2 storage site.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parimal A. Patil ◽  
Prasanna Chidambaram ◽  
M Syafeeq Bin Ebining Amir ◽  
Pankaj K. Tiwari ◽  
Debasis P. Das ◽  
...  

Abstract Underground storage of CO2 in depleted gas reservoirs is a greenhouse gas reduction technique that significantly reduces CO2 released into the atmosphere. Three major depleted gas reservoirs in Central Luconia gas field, located offshore Sarawak, possess good geological characteristics needed to ensure long-term security for CO2 stored deep underground. Long-term integrity of all the wells drilled in these gas fields must be ensured in order to successfully keep the CO2 stored for decades/centuries into the future. Well integrity is often defined as the ability to contain fluids without significant leakage through the project lifecycle. In order to analyze the risk associated with all 38 drilled wells, that includes 11 plugged and abandoned (P&A) wells and 27 active wells, probabilistic risk assessment approach has been developed. This approach uses various leakage scenarios, that includes features, events, and processes (FEP). A P&A well in a depleted reservoir is a very complex system in order to assess the loss of containment as several scenarios and parameters associated to those scenarios are difficult to estimate. Based on the available data of P&A wells, a well has been selected for this study. All the barriers in the example well have been identified and properties associated with those barriers are defined in order to estimate the possible leakage pathways through the identified barriers within that well. Detailed mathematical models are provided for estimating CO2 leakage from reservoir to the surface through all possible leakage pathways. Sensitivity analysis has been carried out for critical parameters such as cement permeability, and length of cement plug, in order to assess the containment ability of that well and understand its impact on overall well integrity. Sensitivity analysis shows that permeability of the cement in the annulus, and length of cement plug in the wellbore along with pressure differential can be used as critical set of parameters to assess the risk associated with all wells in these three fields. Well integrity is defined as the ability of the composite system (cemented casings string) in the well to contain fluids without significant leakage from underground reservoir up to surface. It has been recognized as a key performance factor determining the viability of any CCS project. This is the first attempt in assessing Well Integrity risk related to CO2 storage in Central Luconia Gas Fields in Sarawak. The wells have been looked individually in order to make sure that integrity is maintained, and CO2 is contained underground for years to come.


Great Lakes ◽  
2012 ◽  
pp. 268-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Hall ◽  
Kristin O'Connor

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. N. Bowlby ◽  
V. P. Hiriart-Baer ◽  
E. A. Blukacz-Richards ◽  
R. R. Yerubandi ◽  
S. E. Doka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document