Overcoming Downhole Fluid Sampling Challenge Using Dual-Port Straddle Packer in Shallow Viscous Reservoir

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Gregorio Garcia ◽  
Ramil Mirhasanov ◽  
Shahad Waleed AlKandari ◽  
Abdullah Al-Rabah ◽  
Ahmad Al-Naqi ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives/Scope: Downhole fluid sampling of high quality, low contaminated oil samples with a pumpout wireline formation tester (PWFT) in a shallow unconsolidated reservoir with high H2S, high water salinity and filled with viscous oil is a quite challenging operation. Key properties, related to fluid flow in low pressure reservoirs: formation mechanical weakness, drilling invasion and the high contrast on fluid mobility, have resulted in the failure or impracticality of conventional methods for efficient sampling, resulting in a long sampling time causing high rig cost overhead and often highly contaminated oil samples. Most common problems faced during sampling are: Sand production- causing caving and lost seals and no pressure or samples. Sand plugging of the tool flowline. Operation limitation of pressure drawdown- dictated by extremely low formation pressure and mainly due to having saturated pressure around 20 to 30 psia below formation initial pressure (based on 118 bubble point samples measured in the laboratory). To maintain rock stability and low pressure draw down, fluids were pumped at a low rate, resulting in a long operation time, where a single sample take up to 15 – 20 hours of a pump out. Even with the long pumpout time the collected sample is often highly contaminated based on laboratory PVT analysis report. Methods, Procedures, Process Understanding of the formation properties and its rock mechanics helps to design proper operating techniques to overcome the challenge of viscous oil sampling in unconsolidated sand reservoir. A pre-job geomeechanical study of unconfined sand with very low compressive strength, restricted the flow rate to a maximum drawdown per square inch to maintain rock stability while pumping out. Dual-Port Straddle Packer (figure 1) sampling was introduced to overcome the mentioned challenges. Its large flow area (>1000 in² in 8 ½″ OH section) allowed a high total pumping rate while maintaining very low flow rate per square inch at the sand face, which resulted in an ultra-low draw-down flowing pressure to prevent sand collapse and producing below bubble point pressure that could invalidate further PVT studies. Packer inflation pressure has also been limited to a maximum of 150 to 200 psia above hydrostatic pressure to achieve isolation without overcoming the sand weak compressive strength. During the clean-out operation crude oil tend to separate from water based mud (WBM) filtrate in the packed-off interval due to fluid density difference and immiscibility of the two liquids due to the lower shear rate applied (among others). So a water/oil interface forms within the packed-off interval. As pumping continues, this oil/water fluid contact moves toward the bottom inlet port allowing more clean oil to accumulate at the top. Results, Observations, Conclusions: With the advantage of the dual inlet port straddle packer and the independent opening/closing operating design of each port, a clean segregated oil sample was collected from the top port at an early stage of job operation, saving rig time and cost without compromising collected fluids quality that is valid for PVT studies. Novel/Additive Information: Dual-port Straddle Packer with large flow area (plus filters) with ultra-low drawdown pressure to stay above bubble point pressure in shallow heavy oil reservoirs resulted to be another provided a cost effective technology that can be utilized for collecting downhole samples (DHS) that will undergo PVT studies.

Author(s):  
Amir Tabzar ◽  
Mohammad Fathinasab ◽  
Afshin Salehi ◽  
Babak Bahrami ◽  
Amir H. Mohammadi

Asphaltene precipitation in reservoirs during production and Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) can cause serious problems that lead to reduction of reservoir fluid production. In order to study asphaltene tendency to precipitate and change in flow rate as a function of distance from wellbore, an equation of state (Peng-Robinson) based model namely Nghiem et al.’s model has been employed in this study. The heaviest components of crude oil are separated into two parts: The first portion is considered as non-precipitating component (C31A+) and the second one is considered as precipitating component (C31B+) and the precipitated asphaltene is considered as pure solid. For determination of the acentric factor and critical properties, Lee-Kesler and Twu correlations are employed, respectively. In this study, a multiphase flow (oil, gas and asphaltene) model for an asphaltenic crude oil for which asphaltene is considered as solid particles (precipitated, flocculated and deposited particles), has been developed. Furthermore, effect of asphaltene precipitation on porosity and permeability reduction has been studied. Results of this study indicate that asphaltene tendency to precipitate increases and permeability of porous medium decreases by increasing oil flow rate in under-saturated oil reservoirs and dropping reservoir pressure under bubble point pressure. On the other hand, asphaltene tendency to precipitate decreases with pressure reduction to a level lower than bubble point pressure where asphaltene starts to dissolve back into oil phase. Moreover, it is observed that precipitation zone around the wellbore develops with time as pressure declines to bubble point pressure (production rate increases up). Also, there is an equilibrium area near wellbore region at which reservoir fluid properties such as UAOP (Upper Asphaltene Onset Pressure) and LAOP (Lower Asphaltene Onset Pressure) are constant and independent of the distance from wellbore.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Boeije ◽  
Pacelli Zitha ◽  
Anne Pluymakers

<p>Geothermal energy, the extraction of hot water from the subsurface (500 m to 5 km deep), is generally considered one of the key technologies to achieve the demands of the energy transition.  One of the main problems during production of geothermal waters is degassing. Many subsurface waters contain substantial amounts of dissolved gasses. As the hot water travels up the production well, the pressure and/or temperature drop will cause dissolved gas to come out of the solution. This causes several problems, such as corrosion of the facilities (due to pH changes and/or degassing-related precipitation) and in some cases even to blocking of the reservoir as the free gas limits the water flow.  To better understand under which conditions free gas nucleates, we need confirmation of theoretical bubble point pressure and temperature, and understand what controls the evolution of the bubble front:  i.e. what are the conditions under which free gas emerges from the solution and at what rate are bubbles created?</p><p>An experimental setup was designed in which the degassing process can be observed visually. The setup consists of a high-pressure visual cell which contains water saturated with dissolved gas at high-pressure. The pressure within the cell can be reduced in a reproducible manner using a back-pressure regulator at the outlet of the system. A high-speed camera paired with a uniform LED light source is used to record the degassing process. The pressure in the cell is monitored using a pressure transducer which is synchronized with the camera. The resulting images are then analysed using a MATLAB routine, which allows for determination of the bubble point pressure and rate of bubble formation.</p><p>The first two sets of experiments at ambient temperatures (~20 <sup>o</sup>C) were carried out using two different gases, N<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>. Initial pressure was 70 and 30 bar for the N<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> experiments respectively. In these first experiments we determined the influence of the initial fluid used to pressurize the system. Using gas as the initial fluid causes a large amount of bubbles, whereas only a single bubble was observed for a system where degassed water is used as the initial fluid. An intermediate system where degassed water is pumped into a system full of air at ambient conditions and is subsequently pressurized yields a number of bubbles in between the two systems described previously. All three methods give reproducible bubble point pressures within 2 bar (i.e. pressure where the first free bubble is formed). There are clear differences in bubble point between N<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p>A series of follow-up experiments is planned that will investigate specific properties at more extreme conditions: at higher pressures (up to 500 bar) and temperatures (500 <sup>o</sup>C) and using high-salinity brines (2.5 M).</p>


2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 1197-1203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon-Hyuk Yim ◽  
Ha Na Song ◽  
Ki-Pung Yoo ◽  
Jong Sung Lim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document