scholarly journals Costs and Health-Related Quality of Life in Relation to Caries

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Kastenbom ◽  
Alexandra Falsen ◽  
Pernilla Larsson ◽  
Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg ◽  
Thomas Davidson

Abstract Background Dental caries remains a common and expensive disease for both society and affected individuals. Furthermore, caries often affect individuals’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Health economic evaluations are needed to understand how to efficiently distribute dental care resources. This study aims to evaluate treatment costs and QALY weights for caries active and inactive adult individuals, and to test whether the generic instrument EQ-5D-5L can distinguish differences in this population. Methods A total of 1200 randomly selected individuals from dental clinics in Västerbotten County, Sweden, were invited to participate. Of these, 79 caries active and 179 caries inactive patients agreed to participate (response rate of 21.7%). Inclusion criteria were participants between 20-65 years old and same caries risk group categorization in two consecutive check-ups between 2014 and 2017. Results Treatment costs showed to be twice as high in the caries active group compared to the caries inactive group and were three times higher in the caries active age group 20-29 compared to the caries inactive age group 20-29. Differences between the groups was found for number of intact teeth according to age groups. In the EQ-5D-5L instrument, more problems relating to the dimension anxiety/depression was seen in the caries active group. QALY weights showed tendencies (non-significant) to be lower in the caries active group. Conclusions These findings highlight the need for efficient treatments and prevention strategies as well as adequate money allocation within dentistry. However, further research is needed to assess appropriate instruments for health economic evaluations.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Kastenbom ◽  
Alexandra Falsen ◽  
Pernilla Larsson ◽  
Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg ◽  
Thomas Davidson

Abstract Background Dental caries remains a common and expensive disease for both society and affected individuals. Furthermore, caries often affect individuals’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Health economic evaluations are needed to understand how to efficiently distribute dental care resources. This study aims to evaluate treatment costs and QALY weights for caries active and inactive adult individuals, and to test whether the generic instrument EQ-5D-5L can distinguish differences in this population. Methods A total of 1200 randomly selected individuals from dental clinics in Västerbotten County, Sweden, were invited to participate. Of these, 79 caries active and 179 caries inactive patients agreed to participate (response rate of 21.7%). Inclusion criteria were participants between 20-65 years old and same caries risk group categorization in two consecutive check-ups between 2014 and 2017. Results Treatment costs showed to be twice as high in the caries active group compared to the caries inactive group and were three times higher in the caries active age group 20-29 compared to the caries inactive age group 20-29. Differences between the groups was found for number of intact teeth according to age groups. In the EQ-5D-5L instrument, more problems relating to the dimension anxiety/depression was seen in the caries active group. QALY weights showed tendencies (non-significant) to be lower in the caries active group. Conclusions These findings highlight the need for efficient treatments and prevention strategies as well as adequate money allocation within dentistry. However, further research is needed to assess appropriate instruments for health economic evaluations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun-Jung Bae

Abstract Objectives This study was conducted to evaluate the association of dietary diversity score with health-related quality of life and osteosarcopenic obesity in female aged 50 or older using data from the 2008∼2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Methods In this cross-sectional study, a total of 4276 subjects (50∼64y: n = 2279, ≥65y: n = 1997) were classified according to dietary diversity score (DDS) (≥3 DDS, <3 DDS) using 24 h dietary recalls method. Body composition was evaluated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and health-related quality of life was assessed using EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension) index. Analysis was conducted by age-stratified groups: 50∼64 (≥3 DDS = 2070, <3 DDS = 209) and 65 (≥3 DDS = 1534, <3 DDS = 463) yrs or older. Results The ≥3 DDS group had a larger proportion of subjects who were highly educated compared to <3 DDS group (P < 0.001). In the 65 yrs or older age group, age-adjusted means of EQ-5D index of ≥3 DDS group and <3 DDS group were 0.84 and 0.74, respectively and there was significant difference (P < 0.0001). However, in the 50∼64 yrs age group, no difference was observed in EQ-5D index according to the dietary diversity. The ≥3 DDS group had a larger proportion of subjects who had no osteosarcopenic obesity compared to <3 DDS group (P < 0.05). Conclusions These results suggest that the dietary diversity may be associated with a lower health-related quality of life and osteosarcopenic obesity in Korean female aged 50 years or older. Funding Sources This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP; Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) (No. 2017R1C1B5017636).


2017 ◽  
Vol 158 (35) ◽  
pp. 1363-1372
Author(s):  
Zsombor Zrubka

Abstract: Informal care is non-financed care outside the realm of formal healthcare, which represents an increasing challenge for aging societies. Informal care has frequently been neglected in health economic analyses, while in recent years its coverage has increased considerably in the international scientific literature. This review summarizes the methodology of the health-economic assessment of informal care, including the objective and subjective metrics of caregiver burden, its financial and non-financial valuation and practical applications, with special emphasis on the introduction of care-related quality of life instruments (e.g. Care Related Quality of Life – CarerQoL instrument). Care-related quality of life is a different entity from health-related quality of life, the two cannot be combined, so their joint evaluation requires multi-criteria decision analysis methods. Therefore, it is important to determine the societal preferences of care-related quality of life versus health-related quality of life, and map the relationship of care-related quality of life with time. The local validation of tools measuring care-related quality of life, its more widespread practical application and the analysis of its effect on decision making are also important part of the future research agenda. Orv Hetil. 2017; 158(35): 1363–1372.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. Kanters ◽  
C. L. P. van de Ree ◽  
M. A. C. de Jongh ◽  
T. Gosens ◽  
L. Hakkaart-van Roijen

Abstract Summary Patients with hip fractures experience reduced health-related quality of life and have a reduced life expectancy. Patients’ utilization of healthcare leads to costs to society. The results of the study can be used in future economic evaluations of treatments for hip fractures. Purpose Hip fractures are associated with high mortality, reduced quality of life, and increased healthcare utilization, leading to an economic burden to society. The purpose of this study is to determine the burden of illness of hip fractures in elderly Dutch patients for specific time periods after surgery. Methods Patients with a hip fracture above the age of 65 were included in the study. In the 1-year period after surgery, patients were asked to complete a set of questionnaires pre-injury (retrospectively), and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery. The set of questionnaires included the Euroqol 5D (EQ-5D-3L), the iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) and iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ). Health-related quality of life was calculated using Dutch tariffs. Costs were calculated using the methodology described in the Dutch costing manual. Results Approximately 20% of patients with a hip fracture died within 1 year. Health-related quality of life was significantly reduced compared to pre-injury values, and patients did not recover to their pre-injury values within 1 year. Total costs in the first year after injury were €27,573, of which 10% were due to costs of the procedure (€2706). Total follow-up costs (€24,876) were predominantly consisting of healthcare costs. Monthly costs decreased over time. Conclusions Hip fractures lead to a burden to patients, resulting from mortality and health-related quality of life reductions, and to society, due to (healthcare) costs. The results of this study can be used in future economic evaluations.


2020 ◽  
pp. 088307382096292
Author(s):  
Jamie L. Jackson ◽  
Christina X. Korth ◽  
Carine E. Leslie ◽  
Jennifer Cotto ◽  
May Ling Mah ◽  
...  

The health-related quality of life and emotional distress among mothers of sons with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophies (n = 82) were compared to sex- and age group–matched controls (n = 26). Participants self-reported health-related quality of life for themselves and their son(s), emotional distress, and mood/anxiety-related medication. Mothers reported poorer health-related quality of life across all domains of their health-related quality of life, as well as higher levels of emotional distress. Clinically elevated symptoms of anxiety were reported by 39% of mothers. Mothers’ report of poorer health-related quality of life for their son(s) was a significant predictor of worse health-related quality of life and emotional distress for themselves across most domains. Additionally, older age of mothers predicted greater energy/less fatigue and lower levels of anxiety. Results highlight the need for screening emotional distress among mothers, as well as consideration for accessible interventions to improve the psychosocial functioning among these families.


1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherine E. Gabriel ◽  
Terry S. Kneeland ◽  
L. Joseph Melton ◽  
Megan M. Moncur ◽  
Bruce Ettinger ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Judith Dams ◽  
Elisabeth Huynh ◽  
Steffi Riedel-Heller ◽  
Margrit Löbner ◽  
Christian Brettschneider ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Economic evaluations often use preference-based value sets (tariffs) for health-related quality of life to quantify health effects. For wellbeing at the end of life, issues beyond health-related quality of life may be important. Therefore, the ICECAP Supportive Care Measure (ICECAP-SCM), based on the capability approach, was developed. A validated German ICECAP-SCM version was published recently. However, tariffs for the German ICECAP-SCM are not available. Therefore, the aim was to determine tariffs for the ICECAP-SCM based on preferences of the German general population. Methods An online sample of 2996 participants completed a best–worst scaling (BWS) and a discrete choice experiment (DCE). BWSs required participants to choose the best and worst statement within the same capability state, whereas DCEs required participants to trade-off between two capability states. First, BWS and DCE data were analyzed separately. Subsequently, combined data were analyzed using scale-adjusted conditional logit latent class models. Models were selected based on the stability of solutions and the Bayesian information criterion. Results The two latent class model was identified to be optimal for the BWS, DCE, and combined data, and was used to derive tariffs for the ICECAP-SCM capability states. BWS data captured differences in ICECAP-SCM scale levels, whereas DCE data additionally explained interactions between the seven ICECAP-SCM attributes. Discussion The German ICECAP-SCM tariffs can be used in addition to health-related quality of life to quantify effectiveness in economic evaluations. The tariffs based on BWS data were similar for Germany and the UK, whereas the tariffs based on combined data varied. We would recommend to use tariffs based on combined data in German evaluations. However, only results on BWS data are comparable between Germany and the UK, so that tariffs based on BWS data should be used when comparing results between Germany and the UK.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document