scholarly journals Engaging stakeholders to identify implementation strategies for a faith-based physical activity program

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Haughton ◽  
Michelle L. Takemoto ◽  
Jennifer Schneider ◽  
Steven P. Hooker ◽  
Borsika Rabin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Health Promotion ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Health Behavior Change ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Physical Activity Program ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Faith Based ◽  
Activity Program

Abstract Background Stakeholder engagement is critical to the acceleration of evidence-based interventions into community settings. Harnessing the knowledge and opinions of community stakeholders increases the likelihood of successful implementation, scale up, and sustainment of evidence-based interventions. Faith in Action ( Fe en Acción ) is an evidence-based promotora -led physical activity program designed to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among churchgoing Latina women. Methods We conducted in-depth interviews using a semi-structured interview guide based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) at various Catholic and Protestant churches with large Latino membership in San Diego County, California to explore barriers and facilitators to implementation of a Faith in Action and to identify promising implementation strategies for program scale-up and dissemination. We interviewed 22 pastors and church staff and analyzed transcripts using an iterative-deductive team approach. Results Stakeholders described barriers and facilitators to implementation within three domains of CFIR: characteristics of individuals (lack of self-efficacy for and knowledge of PA; influence on churchgoers’ behaviors), inner setting (church culture and norms, alignment with mission and values, competing priorities, lack of resources), and outer setting (need for buy-in from senior leadership). From the interviews, we identified four promising implementation strategies for the scale-up of faith-based health promotion programs: 1) health behavior change training for pastors and staff; 2) tailored messaging; 3) developing community collaborations; and 4) gaining denominational support. Conclusions While churches can serve as valuable partners in health promotion, specific barriers and facilitators to implementation must be recognized and understood. Addressing these barriers through targeted implementation strategies at the adopter and organizational level can facilitate improved program implementation and lead the way for scale-up and dissemination.

scholarly journals Engaging stakeholders to identify implementation strategies for a faith-based physical activity program

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Haughton ◽  
Michelle L. Takemoto ◽  
Jennifer Schneider ◽  
Steven P. Hooker ◽  
Borsika Rabin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Health Promotion ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Health Behavior Change ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Physical Activity Program ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Faith Based ◽  
Activity Program

Abstract Background: Stakeholder engagement is critical to the acceleration of evidence-based interventions into community settings. Harnessing the knowledge and opinions of community stakeholders increases the likelihood of successful implementation, scale up, and sustainment of evidence-based interventions. Faith in Action ( Fe en Acción ) is an evidence-based promotora -led physical activity program designed to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among churchgoing Latina women.Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews using a semi-structured interview guide based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) at various Catholic and Protestant churches with large Latino membership in San Diego County, California to explore barriers and facilitators to implementation of a Faith in Action and to identify promising implementation strategies for program scale-up and dissemination. We interviewed 22 pastors and church staff and analyzed transcripts using an iterative-deductive team approach.Results: Stakeholders described barriers and facilitators to implementation within three domains of CFIR: characteristics of individuals (lack of self-efficacy for and knowledge of PA; influence on churchgoers’ behaviors), inner setting (church culture and norms, alignment with mission and values, competing priorities, lack of resources), and outer setting (need for buy-in from senior leadership). From the interviews, we identified four promising implementation strategies for the scale-up of faith-based health promotion programs: 1) health behavior change training for pastors and staff; 2) tailored messaging; 3) developing community collaborations; and 4) gaining denominational support.Conclusions: While churches can serve as valuable partners in health promotion, specific barriers and facilitators to implementation must be recognized and understood. Addressing these barriers through targeted implementation strategies at the adopter and organizational level can facilitate improved program implementation and lead the way for scale-up and dissemination.

scholarly journals Identifying barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies for a faith-based physical activity program

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Haughton ◽  
Michelle L. Takemoto ◽  
Jennifer Schneider ◽  
Steven P. Hooker ◽  
Borsika Rabin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Health Promotion ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Physical Activity Program ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Church Staff ◽  
Faith Based ◽  
Activity Program

Abstract Background: Community engagement is critical to the acceleration of evidence-based interventions into community settings. Harnessing the knowledge and opinions of community leaders increases the likelihood of successful implementation, scale up, and sustainment of evidence-based interventions. Faith in Action (Fe en Acción) is an evidence-based promotora-led physical activity program designed to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among churchgoing Latina women.Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews using a semi-structured interview guide based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) at various Catholic and Protestant churches with large Latino membership in San Diego County, California to explore barriers and facilitators to implementation of Faith in Action and identify promising implementation strategies for program scale-up and dissemination. We interviewed 22 pastors and church staff and analyzed transcripts using an iterative-deductive team approach. Results: Pastors and church staff described barriers and facilitators to implementation within three domains of CFIR: characteristics of individuals (lack of self-efficacy for and knowledge of physical activity; influence on churchgoers’ behaviors), inner setting (church culture and norms, alignment with mission and values, competing priorities, lack of resources), and outer setting (need for buy-in from senior leadership). From the interviews, we identified four promising implementation strategies for the scale-up of faith-based health promotion programs: 1) health behavior change training for pastors and staff; 2) tailored messaging; 3) developing community collaborations; and 4) gaining denominational support.Conclusions: While churches can serve as valuable partners in health promotion, specific barriers and facilitators to implementation must be recognized and understood. Addressing these barriers through targeted implementation strategies at the adopter and organizational level can facilitate improved program implementation and lead the way for scale-up and dissemination.

scholarly journals Identifying barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies for a faith-based physical activity program

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Haughton ◽  
Michelle L. Takemoto ◽  
Jennifer Schneider ◽  
Steven P. Hooker ◽  
Borsika Rabin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Physical Activity Program ◽  
Faith Based ◽  
Activity Program

scholarly journals Extent, Type and Reasons for Adaptation and Modification When Scaling-Up an Effective Physical Activity Program: Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Mclaughlin ◽  
Elizabeth Campbell ◽  
Rachel Sutherland ◽  
Tom McKenzie ◽  
Lynda Davies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Program Effectiveness ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Evaluation Methods ◽  
Physical Activity Program ◽  
Implementation Support ◽  
Support Strategies ◽  
Activity Program

Abstract Background Few studies have described the extent, type and reasons for making changes to a program prior to and during its delivery using a consistent taxonomy. Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) is a secondary school physical activity program that was scaled-up for delivery to a greater number of schools. We aimed to describe the extent, type and reasons for changes to the PA4E1 program (the evidence-based physical activity practices, implementation support strategies and evaluation methods) made before its delivery at scale (adaptations) and during its delivery in a scale-up trial (modifications). Methods The Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME) was used to describe adaptations (planned and made prior to the scale-up trial) and modifications (made during the conduct of the trial). A list of adaptations was generated from a comparison of the efficacy and scale-up trials via published PA4E1 protocols, trial registrations and information provided by trial investigators. Monthly trial team meetings tracked and coded modifications in ‘real-time’ during the conduct of the scale-up trial. The extent, type and reasons for both adaptations and modifications were summarized descriptively. Results In total, 20 adaptations and 20 modifications were identified, these were to physical activity practices (n = 8; n = 3), implementation support strategies (n = 6; n = 16) and evaluation methods (n = 6, n = 1), respectively. Few adaptations were ‘fidelity inconsistent’ (n = 2), made ‘unsystematically’ (n = 1) and proposed to have a ‘negative’ impact on the effectiveness of the program (n = 1). Reasons for the adaptations varied. Of the 20 modifications, all were ‘fidelity consistent’ and the majority were made ‘proactively’ (n = 12), though most were ‘unsystematic’ (n = 18). Fifteen of the modifications were thought to have a ‘positive’ impact on program effectiveness. The most common decision-maker in the modification process was the ‘program manager’ (n = 17). The main reason for modification was the ‘available resources’ (n = 14) of the PA4E1 Implementation Team. For both adaptations and modifications respectively, the most common goal was to ‘improve fit with recipients’ (n = 8; n = 7). Conclusions A considerable number of adaptations and modifications were made for scale-up that could have important impacts on intervention effects and are important to the interpretation of trial findings. Trial Registration Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12617000681358

scholarly journals Assessing the effectiveness of training models for national scale-up of an evidence-based nutrition and physical activity intervention: a group randomized trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebekka M. Lee ◽  
Jessica L. Barrett ◽  
James G. Daly ◽  
Rebecca S. Mozaffarian ◽  
Catherine M. Giles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Training Model ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Training Models ◽  
Group Randomized Trial ◽  
Nutrition And Physical Activity

Abstract Background There is a great need to identify implementation strategies to successfully scale-up public health interventions in order to achieve their intended population impact. The Out-of-school Nutrition and Physical Activity group-randomized trial previously demonstrated improvements in children’s vigorous physical activity and the healthfulness of foods and beverages consumed. This implementation study aimed to assess the effects and costs of two training models to scale-up this evidence-based intervention. Methods A 3-arm group-randomized trial was conducted to compare effectiveness of in-person and online training models for scaling up the intervention compared to controls. One-third of sites were randomized to the in-person train-the-trainer model: local YMCA facilitators attended a training session and then conducted three learning collaborative meetings and technical assistance. One-third were assigned to the online model, consisting of self-paced monthly learning modules, videos, quizzes, and facilitated discussion boards. Remaining sites served as controls. Fifty-three afterschool sites from three YMCA Associations in different regions of the country completed baseline and follow-up observations using a validated tool of afterschool nutrition and physical activity practices. We used multivariable regression models, accounting for clustering of observations, to assess intervention effects on an aggregate afterschool practice primary outcome, and conducted secondary analyses of nine intervention goals (e.g. serving water). Cost data were collected to determine the resources to implement each training model. Results Changes in the primary outcome indicate that, on average, sites in the in-person arm achieved 0.44 additional goals compared to controls (95%CI 0.02, 0.86, p = 0.04). Increases in the number of additional goals achieved in sites in the online arm were not significantly greater than control sites (+ 0.28, 95% CI -0.18, 0.73, p = 0.24). Goal-specific improvements were observed for increasing water offered in the in-person arm and fruits and vegetables offered in the online arm. The cost per person trained was $678 for the in-person training model and $336 for the on-line training model. Conclusions This pilot trial presents promising findings on implementation strategies for scale-up. It validated the in-person training model as an effective approach. The less expensive online training may be a useful option for geographically disbursed sites where in-person training is challenging. Trial registration Although this study does not report the results of a health care intervention on human subjects, it is a randomized trial and was therefore retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on July 4, 2019 in accordance with the BMC guidelines to ensure the complete publication of all results (NCT04009304).

scholarly journals Adopting an evidence-based lifestyle physical activity program: dissemination study design and methods

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea L Dunn ◽  
David B Buller ◽  
James W Dearing ◽  
Gary Cutter ◽  
Michele Guerra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Physical Activity Program ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Activity Program ◽  
Lifestyle Physical Activity ◽  
Design And Methods

Motivations and Experiences in a Physical Activity Program for Cancer Survivors: Findings from Key Informant Interviews

2021 ◽  
pp. 089011712110619
Author(s):  
Melissa Dunn ◽  
Lauren Milius ◽  
Amanda Ivarra ◽  
Maria Cooper ◽  
Nimisha Bhakta
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Physical Activity Program ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Activity Program ◽  
Key Informant

Purpose LIVESTRONG at the YMCA is an evidence-based 12-week physical activity (PA) program for cancer survivors. The purpose of our study was to understand the factors that motivated cancer survivors to begin the program, how the program impacted their habits, and how their experience influenced their motivation to continue with the program. Approach or Design Key informant interviews Setting Phone interviews conducted between April 15 and June 1, 2020. Participants 27 cancer survivors in Texas who previously participated in the LS program. Method Participants completed a 30- to 60-minute interview with one of four interviewers. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes. Results Most interviewees were motivated to begin the program because of a desire to feel better after treatment. The most cited motivator to continue in the program was the community of cancer survivors. During the program, interviewees enjoyed learning different exercises, the community of cancer survivors, and the supportive teachers. Nearly all interviewees adopted or changed a healthy habit as a result of the program. Conclusion These results could be used by healthcare professionals to better understand what motivates cancer survivors to participate in a PA program. Results could also be used to plan or modify other PA programs for cancer survivors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document