scholarly journals Intravenous fibrinolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy versus direct endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke: clinical and infarct volume results.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Gamba ◽  
Nicola Gilberti ◽  
Enrico Premi ◽  
Angelo Costa ◽  
Michele Frigerio ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Purpose endovascular therapy (ET) is the standard of care for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). The role of adjunctive intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in these patients is still unclear. The present study aims to test whether IVT plus ET (CoT, combined therapy) provides additional benefits over direct ET for anterior circulation AIS by LVO. Methods we performed a single center retrospective observational study of patients with AIS caused by anterior circulation LVO, referred to our center between January 2014 and January 2017 and treated with ET. The patients were divided in 2 groups based on the treatment they received: CoT and, if IVT contraindicated, direct ET. We compared functional recovery (modified Rankin at 3-months follow-up), recanalization rate (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [TICI] score) and time, early follow-up infarct volume (EFIV) (for recanalized patients only) as well as safety profile, defined as symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month mortality, between groups. Results 145 subjects were included in the study, 70 in direct ET group and 75 in CoT group. Patients who received CoT presented more frequently a functional independence at 3-months follow-up compared to patients who received direct ET (mRS score 0-1: 48.5% vs 18.6%; P<0.001. mRS score 0-2: 67.1% vs 37.3%; P<0.001), higher first-pass success rate (62.7% vs 38.6%, P<0.05), higher recanalization rate (84.3% vs 65.3%; P=0.009) and, in recanalized subjects, smaller EFIV (16.4ml vs 62.3ml; P=0.003). The safety profile was similar for the 2 groups. In multivariable regression analysis, low baseline NIHSS score (P<0.05), vessel recanalization (P=0.05) and CoT (P=0.03) were indipendent predictors of 3-month favorable outcome. Conclusions CoT appears more effective than ET alone for anterior circulation AIS with LVO, with similar safety profile.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Gamba ◽  
Nicola Gilberti ◽  
Enrico Premi ◽  
Angelo Costa ◽  
Michele Frigerio ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Purpose endovascular therapy (ET) is the standard of care for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). The role of adjunctive intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in these patients is still unclear. The present study aims to test whether IVT plus ET (CoT, combined therapy) provides additional benefits over direct ET for anterior circulation AIS by LVO. Methods we performed a single center retrospective observational study of patients with AIS caused by anterior circulation LVO, referred to our center between January 2014 and January 2017 and treated with ET. The patients were divided in 2 groups based on the treatment they received: CoT and, if IVT contraindicated, direct ET. We compared functional recovery (modified Rankin at 3-months follow-up), recanalization rate (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [TICI] score) and time, early follow-up infarct volume (EFIV) (for recanalized patients only) as well as safety profile, defined as symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month mortality, between groups. Results 145 subjects were included in the study, 70 in direct ET group and 75 in CoT group. Patients who received CoT presented more frequently a functional independence at 3-months follow-up compared to patients who received direct ET (mRS score 0-1: 48.5% vs 18.6%; P<0.001. mRS score 0-2: 67.1% vs 37.3%; P<0.001), higher first-pass success rate (62.7% vs 38.6%, P<0.05), higher recanalization rate (84.3% vs 65.3%; P=0.009) and, in recanalized subjects, smaller EFIV (16.4ml vs 62.3ml; P=0.003). The safety profile was similar for the 2 groups. In multivariable regression analysis, low baseline NIHSS score (P<0.05), vessel recanalization (P=0.05) and CoT (P=0.03) were indipendent predictors of 3-month favorable outcome. Conclusions CoT appears more effective than ET alone for anterior circulation AIS with LVO, with similar safety profile.


2021 ◽  
pp. 174749302110473
Author(s):  
Jin Pyeong Jeon ◽  
Chih-Hao Chen ◽  
Fon-Yih Tsuang ◽  
Jianming Liu ◽  
Michael D Hill ◽  
...  

Background. The impact of renal impairment (RI) on the outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) was relatively limited and contradictory. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate this. Aims. We registered a protocol on September 2020 and searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar accordingly. RI was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Predefined outcomes included functional independence (defined as a modified Rankin Scale of 0, 1, or 2) at 3 months, successful reperfusion, mortality, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Summary of review. Eleven studies involving 3453 patients were included. For the unadjusted outcomes, RI was associated with fewer functional independence (odds ratio (OR), 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39–0.62) and higher mortality (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 2.03–3.21). RI was not associated with successful reperfusion (OR, 0.80; 95% CI 0.63–1.00) and sICH (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.95–2.10). For the adjusted outcomes, results derived from a multivariate meta-analysis were consistent with the respective unadjusted outcomes: functional independence (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45–0.77), mortality (OR, 2.23, 95% CI, 1.45–3.43), and sICH (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.85–2.10). Conclusions. We presented the first systematic review to demonstrate that RI is associated with fewer functional independence and higher mortality. Future EVT studies should publish complete renal eGFR data to facilitate prognostic studies and permit eGFR to be analyzed in a continuous variable. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020191309


Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shumei Man ◽  
M. Shazam Hussain ◽  
Dolora Wisco ◽  
Esteban Cheng-ching ◽  
Toshiya Osanai ◽  
...  

Background: The factors impacting infarct evolution after intra-arterial(IA) intervention for acute ischemic stroke remain uncertain. We studied the infarct evolution on MRI DWI among acute stroke patients who underwent IA therapy. Methods: We reviewed the early ischemic stroke imaging database at Cleveland Clinic Cerebrovascular Center for those undergoing IA therapy in anterior circulation from 2009 to 2012. Patients with both pre-treatment and follow-up MRI were included. Infarct volume was measured on initial and follow-up DWI by region of interest demarcation. Patients were grouped into quartiles by infarct growth from initial to follow-up. Outcome were defined as modified Rankin Score 0-2 at 30 days. Results: Among the 76 patients, the median (range) infarct growth of four quartiles were 0.5 cc (-19.1-4.2), 13.8 cc (4.8-25.8), 38.8 cc (28.0-77.6), and 166.3 cc (78.0-314.5). Baseline characteristics of age, gender, race, diabetes, and hypertension were similar among groups except more smokers (p=0.017) and fewer patients on anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents in large-growth group (p=0.049). Compared to No-growth group (Quartile 1), large-growth group (Quartile 4) had more Hyperdense M1 MCA sign ( 26.3% vs 73.7%, p=0.004), larger initial ischemic lesion measured by CT ASPECT (p=0.002) and DWI volume (p=0.012), and absence of full collaterals on CTA ( 36.8% vs 0, p=0.004). There was a trend of lower recanalization rate in large-growth group (73.7% vs 47.4%, p=0.097). With the increment of infarct growth, there is a decrement in favorable outcomes (mRS 0-2) at 30 days: 42%, 37%, 26% and 10.5% (p=0.027). Conclusion: Infarct growth after IA therapy determines outcome. Initial ischemic lesion size, collaterals, and hyperdense vessel sign are associated with infarct growth.


2021 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2021-017667
Author(s):  
Chun-Hsien Lin ◽  
Jeffrey L Saver ◽  
Bruce Ovbiagele ◽  
Wen-Yi Huang ◽  
Meng Lee

ObjectiveTo conduct a meta-analysis of randomized trials to comprehensively compare the effect of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) versus intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus EVT on functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2) after acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO).MethodsWe searched Pubmed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov from January 2000 to February 2021 and abstracts presented at the International Stroke Conference in March 2021 to identify trials comparing EVT alone versus IVT plus EVT in AIS-LVO. Five non-inferiority margins established in the literature were assessed: −15%, −10%, −6.5%, −5%, and −1.3% for the risk difference for functional independence at 90 days.ResultsFour trials met the selection criteria, enrolling 1633 individuals, with 817 participants randomly assigned to EVT alone and 816 to IVT plus EVT. Crude cumulative rates of 90-day functional independence were 46.0% with EVT alone versus 45.5% with IVT plus EVT. Pooled results showed the risk difference of functional independence was 1% (95% CI −4% to 5%) between EVT alone versus IVT plus EVT. The lower 95% CI bound of −4% fell within the non-inferiority margins of −15%, −10%, −6.5%, and −5%, but not −1.3%. Pooled results also showed the risk difference between EVT alone versus IVT plus EVT was 1% (95% CI −3% to 5%) for mRS 0–1, and 1% (95% CI −1% to 3%) for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that EVT alone is non-inferior to IVT plus EVT for several, but not the most stringent, non-inferiority margins.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1137-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M M Boers ◽  
Ivo G H Jansen ◽  
Ludo F M Beenen ◽  
Thomas G Devlin ◽  
Luis San Roman ◽  
...  

BackgroundFollow-up infarct volume (FIV) has been recommended as an early indicator of treatment efficacy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Questions remain about the optimal imaging approach for FIV measurement.ObjectiveTo examine the association of FIV with 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score and investigate its dependency on acquisition time and modality.MethodsData of seven trials were pooled. FIV was assessed on follow-up (12 hours to 2 weeks) CT or MRI. Infarct location was defined as laterality and involvement of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score regions. Relative quality and strength of multivariable regression models of the association between FIV and functional outcome were assessed. Dependency of imaging modality and acquisition time (≤48 hours vs >48 hours) was evaluated.ResultsOf 1665 included patients, 83% were imaged with CT. Median FIV was 41 mL (IQR 14–120). A large FIV was associated with worse functional outcome (OR=0.88(95% CI 0.87 to 0.89) per 10 mL) in adjusted analysis. A model including FIV, location, and hemorrhage type best predicted mRS score. FIV of ≥133 mL was highly specific for unfavorable outcome. FIV was equally strongly associated with mRS score for assessment on CT and MRI, even though large differences in volume were present (48 mL (IQR 15–131) vs 22 mL (IQR 8–71), respectively). Associations of both early and late FIV assessments with outcome were similar in strength (ρ=0.60(95% CI 0.56 to 0.64) and ρ=0.55(95% CI 0.50 to 0.60), respectively).ConclusionsIn patients with an acute ischemic stroke due to a proximal intracranial occlusion of the anterior circulation, FIV is a strong independent predictor of functional outcome and can be assessed before 48 hours, oneither CT or MRI.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hongmin Gong ◽  
Libo Zhao ◽  
Ge Tang ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
Deyu Yang ◽  
...  

Objective. Currently, the standard treatment modality for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) presenting with isolated M2 occlusions is not specific. We therefore assessed the difference in treatment outcomes for patients with isolated M2 occlusions. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with AIS presenting with isolated M2 occlusions from October 1, 2018, to June 30, 2020. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the treatments they received: no reperfusion therapy (NRT), intravenous thrombolysis treatment (IVT), and endovascular intervention (EVT), which comprised IVT in conjunction with EVT or EVT alone. The primary outcomes were improvements in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at 24 hours after treatment compared with the baseline. The secondary efficacy outcome comprised a good outcome rate defined as a 90 − day   mRS   score ≤ 2 , final infarct volume (FIV), 90-day mortality rate, and successful recanalization rate, which was defined as a modified thrombolysis in cerebral   infarction   score ≥ 2 b . Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and procedure-related complications. Results. Seventy patients were enrolled and divided into 3 groups: the NRT group ( n = 25 ), IVT group ( n = 27 ), and EVT group ( n = 18 ). Twenty-four-hour posttreatment NIHSS scores were substantially decreased by EVT compared with NRT (adjusted β -4.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.60 to -1.43; P = 0.003 ) or IVT (adjusted β , -3.61 [95% CI, -6.45 to -0.77]; P = 0.013 ). Compared with the outcomes observed after NRT, patients who received EVT were more likely to achieve lower 90-day mRS scores (adjusted β , -1.42 [95% CI, -2.66 to -0.63]; P = 0.007 ), higher good outcome rates (adjusted odds ratio, 8.73 [95% CI, 1.43-53.24]; P = 0.019 ), and smaller FIVs (adjusted β , -29.66 [95% CI, -59.73 to 0.42]; P = 0.048 ). The recanalization rate of EVT was high (88.89%), and procedure-related complications were rare (5.56%). Conclusions. For acute, isolated M2 occlusions, EVT could dramatically and rapidly improve neurological deficits with high safety and effectiveness. These changes were observed at 24 hours after treatment and were maintained over the long term.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Chen ◽  
Teng-Fei Wan ◽  
Tian-Ce Xu ◽  
Guo-Can Chang ◽  
Hui-Sheng Chen ◽  
...  

Background and purpose: It is unclear whether endovascular thrombectomy alone compared with intravenous thrombolysis combination with endovascular thrombectomy can achieve similar neurological outcomes in patients with acute large vessel occlusion stroke. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare endovascular thrombectomy alone or intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy in this population.Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We restricted our search to randomized clinical trials that examined the clinical outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy alone vs. intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess study quality. Random-effects meta-analyses were used for evaluating all outcomes.Results: Total three randomized controlled trials with 1,092 individuals enrolled were included in the meta-analysis, including 543 (49.7%) who received endovascular thrombectomy alone and 549 (50.3%) who received intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy. The primary outcome of 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin scale (mRS) score ≤ 2) was 44.6% (242/543) in the endovascular thrombectomy alone group vs. 42.8% (235/549) in the alteplase with endovascular thrombectomy group (odds ratio (OR), 1.08 [95% CI, 0.85–1.38]; P = 0.0539). Among pre-specified secondary outcomes, no significant between-group differences were found in excellent outcome (mRS score ≤ 1) (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.85–1.47]; P = 0.418), mortality at 90 days (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.68–1.29]; P = 0.673), successful reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b-3) (OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.54–1.05]; P = 0.099), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.45–1.15]; P = 0.171).Conclusions: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation within 4.5 h from the onset, endovascular thrombectomy alone was non-inferior to combined intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy.


Author(s):  
A. Elisabeth Abramowicz

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke is a new and powerful treatment modality that restores functional independence to many victims. Although it has been proved of value in large-vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation, it is also used in basilar artery embolism. Time to successful reperfusion is a major determinant of recovery. A subset of patients has robust collaterals and will benefit from treatment up to 24 hours after stroke onset; the presence of salvageable brain tissue (penumbra) must be ascertained by specialized imaging. The number of patients who can benefit from EVT is estimated at 100,000/year in the United States alone in more than 300 designated Thrombectomy-Capable Stroke Centers. EVT is a new anesthetic emergency. Anesthesiologists must be actively involved in creating protocol-driven care for acute ischemic stroke patients.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Chen ◽  
Benjamin Tan ◽  
Aloysius Tan ◽  
Lukas Meyer ◽  
Jens Fiehler ◽  
...  

Introduction: Endovascular thrombectomy(EVT) is considered standard of care for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke(AIS) with large vessel occlusion(LVO). Young AIS-LVO patients have distinctly different underlying stroke mechanisms and etiologies. Methods: In this multicenter cohort study conducted from August 2014 to January 2020, we investigated the safety and effectiveness of EVT in young AIS-LVO patients aged≤50 years and evaluated associations between demographics, stroke etiology, neuroimaging factors and clinical outcomes, including functional outcomes, in-hospital mortality and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage(sICH) in univariable and multivariable regression models. Results: 275 AIS-LVO patients from 10 tertiary centers in Germany, Sweden, Singapore and Taiwan were included. The more common TOAST subtypes included cardioembolism (82/275, 29.8%) and stroke of undetermined etiology (85/275, 30.9%). Arterial dissection was the most prevalent stroke etiology (42/195, 21.5%) and had the highest rate of good functional outcomes (29/42, 69.0%). Successful reperfusion was achieved in 85.1% (234/275). Excellent and good functional outcomes were achieved in 48.0% (132/275) and 66.0% (182/275) respectively. sICH occurred in 6.5% (18/275). National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at presentation was inversely related with good functional outcomes (aOR0.92, 95% CI 0.88- 0.96 per point increase, p<0.001). Successful reperfusion (aOR3.22, 95% CI 1.44-7.21, p=0.005), higher ASPECTS (aOR1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.44, p=0.036) and bridging intravenous thrombolysis (aOR2.37, 95% CI 1.29-4.34, p=0.005) independently predicted good functional outcomes. Higher initial NIHSS (aOR1.08, 95% 1.02-1.14, p=0.007) and lower ASPECTS (aOR0.73, 95% 0.58-0.93, p=0.012) were associated with sICH. Successful reperfusion was inversely associated with in-hospital mortality (aOR0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.57, p=0.006). Hypertension strongly predicted in-hospital mortality (aOR4.59, 95% CI 1.10-19.13, p=0.036). Conclusion: While differences in functional outcomes exist across varying stroke aetiologies, high rates of successful reperfusion and good outcomes are generally achieved in young AIS-LVO patients undergoing EVT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document