scholarly journals Nonstructural versus structural bone grafting in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zenghui Zhao ◽  
Jianxiao Li ◽  
Qiqi Peng ◽  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Anterior Column ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Bone Fusion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Column Support ◽  
Posterior Debridement

Abstract [Background] Various bone grafting have been reported to achieve anterior column support and bone fusion after one stage posterior debridement in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis. However, nonstructural bone grafting has been rarely studied. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of nonstructural bone grafting versus structural bone grafting in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis.[Patients and methods] We retrospectively reviewed patients with nonstructural (n=27) and structural (n=22) bone grafting after single-stage posterior debridement and instrumentation for lumbar tuberculosis with at least 24 months of follow-up. Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scans, and health-related outcomes (e.g. Visual Analog Scale for back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index) were collected before surgery and at follow-up. [Results] Both nonstructural and structural bone grafting were associated with significant improvements in the quality of life parameters, the laboratory tests and the Cobb angle of local kyphosis. A slight loss of Cobb angle correction was observed in two groups. Nonstructural bone grafting resulted in the significantly less operation duration, blood loss and lower bone fusion rate than structural bone grafting group. There were three complications in the nonstructural bone grafting and four complications in the structural bone grafting group, with no significant difference between two groups.[Conclusions] Nonstructural bone grafting can achieve anterior column support with less surgical trauma and simpler surgical procedure than structural bone grafting, but the lower rate of grafted bone fusion should be taken into consideration when choosing nonstructural bone grafting.

scholarly journals Nonstructural versus structural bone grafting in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zenghui Zhao ◽  
Jianxiao Li ◽  
Qiqi Peng ◽  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Anterior Column ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Bone Fusion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Column Support ◽  
Posterior Debridement

Abstract Background Various bone grafting have been reported to achieve anterior column support and bone fusion after one stage posterior debridement in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis. However, nonstructural bone grafting has been rarely studied. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of nonstructural bone grafting versus structural bone grafting in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis.Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with nonstructural (n=27) and structural (n=22) bone grafting after single-stage posterior debridement and instrumentation for lumbar tuberculosis with at least 24 months of follow-up. Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scans, and health-related outcomes (e.g. Visual Analog Scale for back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index) were collected before surgery and at follow-up.Results Both nonstructural and structural bone grafting were associated with significant improvements in the quality of life parameters, the laboratory tests and the Cobb angle of local kyphosis. A slight loss of Cobb angle correction was observed in two groups. Nonstructural bone grafting resulted in the significantly less operation duration, blood loss and lower bone fusion rate than structural bone grafting group. There were three complications in the nonstructural bone grafting and four complications in the structural bone grafting group, with no significant difference between two groups. Conclusions Nonstructural bone grafting can achieve anterior column support with less surgical trauma and simpler surgical procedure than structural bone grafting, but the lower rate of grafted bone fusion should be taken into consideration when choosing nonstructural bone grafting. Key words Lumbar tuberculous; Single-stage posterior debridement; Anterior column support; Bone fusion; Nonstructural bone grafting; Structural bone grafting

Nonstructural versus structural bone grafting in the treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis combined with single-stage posterior debridement and instrumentation: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zenghui Zhao ◽  
Jianxiao Li ◽  
Qiqi Peng ◽  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Anterior Column ◽  
Bone Fusion ◽  
Anterior Column Support ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Posterior Debridement

Abstract Background Many types of bone grafting have been reported for successful use in achieving anterior column support and bone fusion after one stage posterior debridement in the treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis. However, none-structural bone grafting has rarely been studied. This study was aimed to identify the feasibility of none-structural bone grafting from comparing the advantages and disadvantages with structural bone grafting in the treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with lumbar spinal tuberculosis who had undergone none-structural (n=27) and structural (n=22) bone grafting after single-stage posterior debridement and instrumentation with at least 24 months of follow-up. Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography scans, as well as health-related outcomes, including Visual Analog Scale for back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index were collated before surgery and at follow-up. Results Both none-structural and structural bone grafting were associated with significant improvements in quality of life parameters, the laboratory tests and the Cobb angle of local kyphosis. A slight loss of Cobb angle correction was in both two groups, without any associated complications. The operation duration and blood loss in none-structural bone grafting group was significantly less. The bone fusion rate was higher in structural bone grafting group. There were three complications in the none-structural bone grafting and four complications in the structural bone grafting group; the incidence of complications between the two groups was not significantly different. Conclusions Based on single-stage posterior debridement and pedicle screws fixation, none-structural bone grafting can achieve anterior column support with reducing surgical trauma, simplifying surgical procedure and decreasing intraoperative hemorrhage, but the lower rate of grafted bone fusion should be taken into consideration when choosing the aforementioned method. Key words Lumbar spinal tuberculous; Single-stage posterior debridement; Anterior column support; Bone fusion; None-structural bone grafting; Structural bone grafting

scholarly journals Nonstructural Versus Structural Bone Grafting for Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Tuberculosis by a Single Posterior Approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zenghui Zhao ◽  
Jianxiao Li ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Xing Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Single Segment ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Posterior Debridement

Abstract Background Many types of bone grafting have been reported for successful use in the treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis. However, none-structural bone grafting has rarely been studied. This study was aimed to identify the clinical efficacy of nonstructural with structural bone graft for interbody fusion in the surgical treatment of single segment lumbar tuberculosis after one stage posterior debridement.Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with nonstructural (n=27) and structural (n=22) bone grafting after single-stage posterior debridement and instrumentation for lumbar tuberculosis with at least 24 months of follow-up. Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scans, and health-related outcomes (e.g., Visual Analog Scale for back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index) were collected and analyzed before and after surgery. Results Both nonstructural and structural bone grafting were associated with significant improvements in the life quality parameters, the laboratory tests, and the Cobb angle of local kyphosis. A slight loss of Cobb angle correction was observed in two groups. Nonstructural bone grafting exhibited the advantages of less operation duration, blood loss and lower bone fusion rate compared with structural bone grafting. There were three complications in the nonstructural bone grafting and four complications in the structural bone grafting group, with no significant difference between two groups.Conclusions In conclusion, nonstructural bone grafting can achieve comparable interbody fusion to structural bone grafting but has less surgical trauma and simpler surgical procedure than structural bone grafting in the treatment of single segment lumbar tuberculosis after one stage posterior debridement and pedicle screws fixation.

scholarly journals Long-term outcome of polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis in elderly patients with severe osteoporosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-Song Yang ◽  
Bao-Rong He ◽  
Jian-Min Wei ◽  
Xiang-Fu Wang ◽  
Dongmei Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Implant Failure ◽  
Severe Osteoporosis ◽  
Posterior Debridement ◽  
Thoracolumbar Spinal Tuberculosis

Abstract Background: to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation (PASF) in the treatment of elderly patients with thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis accompanied with severe osteoporosis.Methods: 34 elderly patients with thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis accompanied with severe osteoporosis underwent PASF after anterior or posterior debridement and bone grafting in our hospital from January 2010 to January 2012. The follow-ups were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and then annually thereafter. The segmental cobb angle was measured to evaluate kyphosis improvement. The laboratory examination including ESR and CRP was also monitored. The pre- and postoperative VAS score, ODI score, and neurological function of ASIA scale were also recorded.Results: The included 21 patients completed the operation successfully. In all patients with neurological dysfunction, the ASIA grade improved by at least 1 grade. One month postoperatively, the VAS score, ODI, segmental Cobb angle, ESR, and CRP were significantly improved compared with those preoperatively (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the values at 1 month postoperatively and last follow-up (P＞0.05). There were no complications such as implant failure, proximal junctional kyphosis, or recurrence of tuberculosis at the minimum 5-year follow-up. Conclusion: For elderly patients with thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis complicated with severe osteoporosis, after anterior or posterior debridement and bone grafting, together with postoperative systematic anti-tuberculosis and anti-osteoporosis treatments, PASF is safe and effective without catastrophic complications such as intraspinal cement leakage. During the 5-year follow-up, there was no tuberculosis recurrence or implant failure.

scholarly journals The radiological outcome in lumbar interbody fusion among rheumatoid arthritis patients: a 20-year retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuan-Kai Tung ◽  
Yun-Che Wu ◽  
Kun-Hui Chen ◽  
Chien-Chou Pan ◽  
Wen-Xian Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Substantial Improvement ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Subsidence Rate ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cage Subsidence

Abstract Background Clinical outcomes amongst Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients have shown satisfactory results being reported after lumbar surgery. The increased adoption of the interbody fusion technique has been due to a high fusion rate and less invasive procedures. However, the radiographic outcome for RA patients after receiving interbody fusion has scarcely been addressed in the available literature. Methods Patients receiving interbody fusion including ALIF, OLIF, and TLIF were examined for implant cage motion and fusion status at two-year follow-up. Parameters for the index correction level including ADH, PDH, WI, SL, FW, and FH were measured and compared at pre-OP, post-OP, and two-year follow-up. Results We enrolled 64 RA patients at 104 levels (mean 64.0 years old, 85.9% female) received lumbar interbody fusion. There were substantial improvement in ADH, PDH, WI, SL, FW, and FH after surgery, with both ADH and PDH having significantly dropped at two-year follow up. The OLIF group suffered from a higher subsidence rate with no significant difference in fusion rate when compared to TLIF. The fusion rate and subsidence rate for all RA patients was 90.4 and 28.8%, respectively. Conclusions We revealed the radiographic outcomes of lumbar interbody fusions towards symptomatic lumbar disease in RA patients with good fusion outcome despite the relative high subsidence rate amongst the OLIF group. Those responsible for intra-operative endplate management should be more cautious to avoid post-OP cage subsidence.

scholarly journals Treatment of thoracolumbar trauma by short-segment percutaneous transpedicular screw instrumentation: prospective comparative study with a minimum 2-year follow-up

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petr Vanek ◽  
Ondrej Bradac ◽  
Renata Konopkova ◽  
Patricia de Lacy ◽  
Jiri Lacman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Working Ability ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Transpedicular Screw ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Screw Group

Object The main aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes after stabilization by a percutaneous transpedicular system and stabilization from the standard open approach for thoracolumbar spine injury. Methods Thirty-seven consecutive patients were enrolled in the study over a period of 16 months. Patients were included in the study if they experienced 1 thoracolumbar fracture (A3.1–A3.3, according to the AO/Magerl classification), had an absence of neurological deficits, had no other significant injuries, and were willing to participate. Eighteen patients were treated by short-segment, minimally invasive, percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation. The control group was composed of 19 patients who were stabilized using a short-segment transpedicular construct, which was performed through a standard midline incision. The pain profile was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS), and overall satisfaction by a simple 4-stage scale relating to performance of daily activities. Working ability and return to original occupation were also monitored. Radiographic follow-up was defined by the vertebral body index (VBI), vertebral body angle (VBA), and bisegmental Cobb angle. The accuracy of screw placement was examined using CT. Results The mean surgical duration in the percutaneous screw group was 53 ± 10 minutes, compared with 60 ± 9 minutes in the control group (p = 0.032). The percutaneous screw group had a significantly lower perioperative blood loss of 56 ± 17 ml, compared with 331 ± 149 ml in the control group (p < 0.001). Scores on the VAS in patients in the percutaneous screw group during the first 7 postoperative days were significantly lower than those in the control group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in VBI, VBA, and Cobb angle values during follow-up. There was no significant difference in screw placement accuracy between the groups and no patients required surgical revision. There was no significant difference between groups in overall satisfaction at the 2-year follow-up (p = 0.402). Working ability was insignificantly better in the percutaneous screw group; previous working position was achieved in 17 patients in this group and in 12 cases in the control group (p = 0.088). Conclusions This study confirms that the percutaneous transpedicular screw technique represents a viable option in the treatment of preselected thoracolumbar fractures. A significant reduction in blood loss, postoperative pain, and surgical time were the main advantages associated with this minimally invasive technique. Clinical, functional, and radiological results were at least the same as those achieved using the open technique after a 2-year follow-up. The short-term benefits of the percutaneous transpedicular screw technique are apparent, and long-term results have to be studied in other well-designed studies evaluating the theoretical benefit of the percutaneous technique and assessing whether the results of the latter are as durable as the ones achieved by open surgery.

scholarly journals Radiographic evaluation of the use of transverse traction device in vertebral arthrodesis for degenerative diseases

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-30
Author(s):  
Edgar Takao Utino ◽  
João Paulo Machado Bergamaschi ◽  
Luciano Antonio Nassar Pellegrino ◽  
Ricardo Shigueaki Galhego Umeta ◽  
Maria Fernanda Silber Caffaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Studies ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Pedicle Fixation ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Diseases ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Traction Device ◽  
Consolidation Rate ◽  
The Stability

OBJECTIVE: Perform radiographic analysis of the use of Transverse Traction Device (DTT) with respect to fusion rate in patients submitted to vertebral arthrodesis for degenerative lumbar diseases. METHODS: We selected x-ray images on anteroposterior, lateral and oblique views and with maximum flexion and extension dynamics of 23 patients submitted to posterolateral arthrodesis of the lumbar spine with a minimum follow-up period of six months. The images were evaluated and classified by the Linovitz's system by two spine surgeons. RESULTS: We evaluated the radiographs of 23 patients after the minimum postoperative period of 6 months and of these, 11 have used DTT. With regard to the consolidation rate, seven patients (63.6%) in the group of DTT were classified as fusion as well as six patients (50%) who were not submitted to the treatment. There was no statistical difference between the groups regarding the consolidation rate. CONCLUSION: The use of transverse traction device in this study showed no significant difference in the rate of consolidation in radiographic evaluation. Studies on the effective participation of this device in the stability of pedicle fixation systems are still lacking in the literature.

scholarly journals Efficacy Analysis of One-stage Posterior-only Surgical Treatment for Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis in the T4-6 Segments with Minimum 5-year Follow-up

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Zhan ◽  
Xin Kang ◽  
Wenjie Gao ◽  
Xinliang Zhang ◽  
Lingbo Kong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Posterior Surgery ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Thoracic Spinal ◽  
Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis

Abstract In recent years, with the in-depth research on spinal tuberculosis, posterior surgery alone has been praised highly by more and more surgeons due to the better correction of kyphosis, better maintenance of spinal physiological curvature, smaller surgical trauma and fewer surgical complications. However, there is currently lack of relevant reports about the efficacy of posterior surgery alone in the treatment of tuberculosis in the T4-6 segments. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical study efficacy and feasibility of one-stage posterior-only surgical treatment for thoracic spinal tuberculosis in the T4-6 segments. 67 patients with tuberculosis in T4-6 segments who underwent one-stage posterior-only surgery were included in this study. The clinical efficacy was evaluated using statistical analysis based on the data about erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Oswestry Dability Index (ODI) score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and Cobb angle before surgery, after surgery and at the last follow-up. All patients completed fusion during the follow-up period of 6–9 months. ESR and CRP were returned to normal for all patients at 6 months follow-up. In the meanwhile, among the 27 patients combined with neurological impairment, neurological functions of 22 cases (81.48%) recovered completely at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). Cobb angle of the kyphosis was improved from preoperative 34.8 ± 10.9° to postoperative 9.6 ± 2.8°, maintaining at 11.3 ± 3.2° at the last follow-up, The ODI and VAS scores were improved by 77.10% and 81.70%, respectively. This 5-year follow-up study shows that better clinical efficacy can be achieved for tuberculosis in T4-6 segments using one-stage posterior-only approach by costotransverse debridement in combination with bone graft and internal fixation. The posterior surgical method cannot only effectively accomplish debridement, obtain satisfactory clinical results, but also well correct kyphotic deformity and maintain it.

scholarly journals Surgical Treatments for Lumbar Spine Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanthika Wasinpongwanich ◽  
Tanawin Nopsopon ◽  
Krit Pongpirul
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Spine Diseases

Purpose Surgical treatment is mandatory in some patients with lumbar spine diseases. To obtain spine fusion, many operative techniques were developed with different fusion rates and clinical results. This study aimed to collect randomized controlled trial (RCT) data to compare fusion rate, clinical outcomes, complications among Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF), and other techniques for lumbar spine diseases. Methods A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases was searched for studies up to 13 February 2020. The meta-analysis was done using a random-effects model. Pooled risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval of fusion rate, clinical outcomes, and complication in TLIF and other techniques for lumbar diseases. Results The literature search identified 3,682 potential studies, 15 RCTs (915 patients) were met our inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to other techniques, TLIF had slightly lower fusion rate (RR=0.84 [95% CI 0.72, 0.97], p=0.02, I2=0.0%) at 1-year follow-up while there was no difference on fusion rate at 2-year follow up (RR=1.06 [95% CI 0.96, 1.18], p=0.27, I2=69.0%). The estimated risk ratio of total adverse events (RR=0.90 [95% CI 0.59, 1.38], p=0.63, I2=0.0%) and revision rate (RR=0.78 [95%CI 0.34, 1.79], p=0.56, I2=39.0%) showed no difference. TLIF had approximately half an hour more operative time than other techniques (MD=31.88 [95% CI 5.33, 58.44], p=0.02, I2=92.0%). There was no significant difference between TLIF and other techniques in terms of the blood loss, and clinical outcomes. Conclusions Besides fusion rate at 1-year follow-up and operative time, our study demonstrated similar outcomes of TLIF with other techniques for lumbar diseases in regard to fusion rate, clinical outcomes, and complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document