scholarly journals Rituximab/Bendamustine or Rituximab/Ifosfamide/Carboplatin/Etoposide as Second-Line Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Real-World Analysis

Author(s):  
Yu-Hung Wang ◽  
Ching-Yen Su ◽  
Li-Chin Chen ◽  
Ming Yao ◽  
Bor-Sheng Ko

Abstract Rituximab/bendamustine (RB) and rituximab/ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide (R-ICE) are commonly used to treat relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), although their effectiveness has not been compared in real-world practice. This study evaluated data from DLBCL patients who relapsed after or were refractory to first-line therapy in an electronic health record (EHR)-derived database between 2011 and 2018. One hundred thirty-seven patients using RB and 270 patients using R-ICE were included for analysis. Transplantation after second-line therapy was considered a censored event in the time-to-event analyses. Patients in the RB group were older and had poorer performance status while there were no significant differences in stage, cell of origin, and double-/triple-hit subtypes. Relative to the R-ICE group, the RB group had significantly longer time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses revealed that patients who were <70 years or had better performance status consistently had better TTNT and OS if they had received RB. Patients who had disease progression within 12 months after induction chemotherapy had a significantly inferior prognosis, regardless of the salvage treatments. Multivariable analysis revealed that RB treatment independently predicted better TTNT and OS. These data indicate that RB may be an alternative to R-ICE as second-line therapy for selected DLBCL patients.

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 2133-2138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santosha Vardhana ◽  
Paul A. Hamlin ◽  
Joanna Yang ◽  
Andrew Zelenetz ◽  
Craig S. Sauter ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Frederick L. Locke ◽  
David B. Miklos ◽  
Caron A. Jacobson ◽  
Miguel-Angel Perales ◽  
Marie-José Kersten ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 29-30
Author(s):  
Ahmed Sawas ◽  
Constance Lau ◽  
Michael Thomson ◽  
Kathleen Maignan

Background: In the rituximab era, outcome data from patients (pts) receiving second-line therapy (2L) for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are derived mostly from randomized controlled trials or selected cohorts from specialized care centers. As new salvage strategies emerge, there is a need to reevaluate the landscape of 2L DLBCL (treatments and outcomes) in real-world (rw) patient cohorts. We investigated the timing of 2L in a cohort of US pts with DLBCL, the utilization of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as consolidation, and the overall survival (OS) in these pts. Methods We included patients from the Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR) derived, de-identified database, with a first incident DLBCL diagnosed after January 2011, and with documented 2L therapy receipt (n=524). All pts received ≥4 doses of an anthracycline-based immune-chemotherapy in the frontline therapy (1L) setting and initiated 2L active immune-chemotherapy (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody monotherapy was excluded) prior to December 2019 to allow for at least 6 m of potential follow-up through May 31 2020. Patients with central nervous system disease at diagnosis were excluded. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) probabilities, indexed to the start of 2L, were estimated in the entire cohort using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HR) comparing rwOS were estimated using Cox regression models. Baseline covariates included demographic information, DLBCL histologic subtypes, cell of origin (COO) classified by the Hans' algorithm, cytogenetics, and the time interval in months (m) from end of 1L therapy to initiation of 2L therapy. Analyses were also re-indexed to 1 and 3 years post-2L, comparing unadjusted rwOS in pts who had received ASCT on or prior to these timepoints versus those who did not. Results In the study sample of 524 pts (57% men), median age at 2L initiation was 68 years (range 59 to 76) and 63% had stage III or IV disease at diagnosis. Initiation of 2L happened within 6 m of 1L completion for a majority of pts, 276/524 (53%), and within 2 months for one quarter, 137/524 (26%); for the rest, 92 pts (18%) initiated between 6-&lt;12 m after 1L completion, 72 pts (14%) between ⩾12-24 m and 84 pts (16%) after 24 m. Consolidation with ASCT was documented for 115 pts (22%) and 17 pts (3%) received chimeric antigen receptor T-cells therapy. Unadjusted median rwOS in the entire cohort was 22 m [95% CI: 17, 38] (Figure 1A). This varied by interval between 1L completion and 2L initiation; for pts with shorter interval (&lt;12 m) from 1L, median rwOS was 17 m [95% CI: 12, 30], while it was 43 m [95% CI: 22, 54] for those with a ⩾12 m interval (Figure 1B). The presence of MYC translocation alone or in combination with other cytogenetic abnormalities was associated with a shorter unadjusted median rwOS vs. absence of MYC: 9.3 m [95% CI: 8.2, 32, n=33] vs. 26 m [95% CI: 18, 43, n=491] (Figure 1C). In the adjusted model controlling for baseline covariates, older age (⩾ 70) appears to be associated with increased hazard of death (HR: 1.48 [95% CI: 1.14, 1.91]). Unadjusted rwOS analyses at 1 year following start of 2L showed better survival for patients receiving ASCT versus those who did not (HR: 0.40 [0.21, 0.76]). This association was sustained at 3 years (HR: 0.17 [0.04, 0.75]. Conclusion In a contemporary cohort of rw pts with DLBCL receiving 2L immune-chemotherapy, the majority did not receive ASCT. In this setting, age ⩾70, shorter intervals between 1L completion and 2L initiation, presence of MYC translocations, and no ASCT were factors associated with shorter survival. It may be important to address the implications of these clinical features in the investigation of 2L therapy options for pts with DLBCL. Disclosures Sawas: Daiichi Sankyo: Speakers Bureau; Affimed: Research Funding; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Flatiron Health: Current Employment; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Lau:Flatiron Health, Inc: Current Employment; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Thomson:Flatiron Health, Inc: Current Employment; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Maignan:Flatiron Health, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4940-4940
Author(s):  
Rebecca Elstrom ◽  
Peter Martin ◽  
Katya Ostrow ◽  
Jacqueline Barrientos ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who relapse after or are refractory to initial therapy can in some cases experience long term disease free survival after second-line chemotherapy alone or followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. The major predictor of outcome for patients undergoing autologous transplant is response to prior (second-line) chemotherapy. Patients not responding to second-line regimens may receive third-line or subsequent chemotherapy regimens in hopes of achieving response and proceeding to transplant, but available outcome data from this group have been limited. Methods: We used pathology and treatment records to identify patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL (excluding transformed lymphoma) at the Weill Cornell Medical Center for whom data on response to second-line chemotherapy could be determined. An online social security database verified survival. Median overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: One hundred eight patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who underwent second line chemotherapy were identified, and adequate treatment records were available for 74 of these patients. Chemotherapy consisted of ifosfamide-containing regimens in 60 patients (81%), platinum-containing regimens in 61 (82%) and included rituximab in 29 (39%). Forty-seven patients (64%) achieved at least a partial response (R), while 27 patients (36%) did not respond (NR). Median OS from second therapy was 4 months (range 1–61) in the NR group, and was projected at 66 months (range 2–106) in the R group. Only one patient in the NR group (4%) survived for greater than one year. Twenty-four NR patients underwent third-line therapy, of whom 5 of 19 with available response data achieved a clinical response (5 died prior to response assessment) and 3 underwent autologous transplantation. Two patients progressed within 3 months of transplantation, with OS from transplantation of 4 months, while the third patient is alive in remission at 59 months after transplant. Neither longer duration of first remission (HR 1.00, p=0.85) nor choice of subsequent aggressive chemotherapy over less intensive approaches (HR 0.81, p=0.65) conferred a survival benefit in patients who had not responded to second-line therapy. Conclusion: Patients with recurrent DLBCL who do not respond to second-line chemotherapy have poor outcomes, with only rare patients achieving extended survival following subsequent chemotherapy. Clinical trials of novel therapeutic regimens should be prioritized as management strategies for these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document