Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach With and Without the Use of a Traction Table; a Matched-control, Retrospective, Single Surgeon Study
Abstract BackgroundHip surgeons performing total hip arthroplasty (THA) through the direct anterior approach (DAA) commonly use a traction table to facilitate exposure. Even though performing THA through DAA without traction table could be technically more demanding, this technique offers the advantage of intraoperative leg length comparison. Therefore, this study aimed to compare clinical outcomes, complication rates, component positioning and leg length discrepancy (LLD) after THA through the DAA performed with or without a traction table.MethodsA single-surgeon continuous series of 75 patients who underwent DAA THA performed with a traction table were matched for gender, age and BMI with 75 patients who underwent DAA THA performed without a traction table (male:62, female:88, with an average age of 68 y.o). Clinical and radiological outcomes, intra- and post-operative complications and LLD were retrospectively assessed.ResultsNo statistically significant difference was detected in surgical time, hospital stay, Harris Hip Score (HHS), complication rates, and implant positioning between the two groups. Leg length restoration was significantly more accurate in the group performed without a traction table (2.4 ± 2 mm vs. 3.7 ± 3.1 mm, respectively; p value ≤ 0.05). No LLD > 10 mm was reported in the group performed without traction table, whereas two cases (2.7 %) were reported in those performed with traction table.ConclusionPerforming THA through DAA without a traction table was associated with a significantly more accurate leg length restoration without significantly increase in the rates of intra- and post-operative complications.