scholarly journals A Comparative Study on Efficacies of Posterior Microscopic Mini-open and Open Technique for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Accompanied With Severe Traumatic Spinal Stenosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Zhang ◽  
Yanna Zhou ◽  
Hua Zou ◽  
Zimo Lu ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Spinal Canal ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
Post Operation ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Purpose To compare the efficacies of minimal invasive decompression by posterior microscopic mini-open technique combined with percutaneous pedicle fixation (hereafter MOT) and traditional open surgeries in patients with severe traumatic spinal canal stenosis resulting from AO Type A3 or A4 thoracolumbar burst fractures and provide references for clinical treatment. Methods The clinical materials of 133 patients with severe traumatic spinal canal stenosis caused by AO Type A3 or A4 thoracolumbar burst fractures who underwent MOT (group A) or traditional open surgery (group B) were retrospectively enrolled. The patient demographic and radiological data were analyzed between the two groups. Results A total of 64 patients were finally recruited in this study. There were no significant differences in gender, age, follow-up time, injury mechanism, injured level, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score, Visual analogue scale (VAS) score and hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). After procedures, the prevertebral height ratio (PHR), the Cobb angle, and the mid-sagittal canal diameter compression ratio (MSDCR) in two groups were significantly improved (P<0.05). Meanwhile, group A with little intraoperative bleeding volume, and the VAS score improved better at post-operation and last follow up, but the operative time was longer (P<0.05). The PHR, the Cobb angle in the two groups at the post-operation and last follow up without significantly different (P>0.05), the MSDCR was improved at last follow up when compared with the value at post-operation (P<0.05). However, the Cobb angle in group A was well maintained than in group B at last follow up (P<0.05) and the MSDCR in group B at last follow up improved better than in group A (P<0.05). Conclusions Both the MOT and traditional open surgery can treat AO type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar burst fractures accompanied with severe traumatic spinal stenosis effectively. The MOT has advantages including minimal invasion, extremely fine spinal canal decompression, lower intraoperative bleeding volume and obvious pain relief. We suggest that MOT should be preferentially selected for AO type A3 or A4 thoracolumbar burst fractures accompanied with severe traumatic spinal stenosis.

Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1598-1604
Author(s):  
Chen Qi ◽  
Xia Chen ◽  
Mao Guangfeng ◽  
Chen Chuyong ◽  
Jin Yongming ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Spinal Canal ◽  
Spinal Canal Stenosis ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Background Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the common causes of low back and leg pain. Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration leads to the decrease of intervertebral height, the limitation of vertebral activity, and the biomechanical changes of the lumbar spine, which in turn makes the lumbar anterior convex angle and sacral inclination angle smaller, and the pelvic inclination angle larger, affecting the stress distribution of the lumbar spine aggravating the intervertebral disc degeneration. If the spinal canal stenosis is not corrected for a long time, can cause the cauda equina nerve, nerve root compression, resulting in neurogenic intermittent claudication. If the spinal canal stenosis is not corrected for a long time, can cause the cauda equina nerve, nerve root compression, resulting in neurogenic intermittent claudication. Surgery can correct lumbar stenosis and reconstruct lumbar stability. But the traditional lumbar fusion trauma is huge, even can aggravate pain, spinal canal stenosis. Therefore, more and more patients are more inclined to MIS-TLIF treatment with less surgical trauma. For single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis, MIS-TLIF has the same effect as open surgery in restoring lumbar interbody height and improving lumbar-pelvis balance. Objective Discussion on the effect difference of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by Quadrant and MED methods. Methods A total of 96patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who were scheduled to undergo MIS-TLIF surgery in Our Hospital from January 2017 to October 2020 were selected and divided into group A and group B according to the surgical channel selection scheme, with 48 cases in each group. The patients in group A were treater with MED channel, and the patients in group B were treated with Quadrant channel. The degree of surgical trauma, VAS score before and postoperative, JOA score, lumbar-pelvic imaging parameters and surgical complications were compared between the two methods. Results The operation time of the A group was shorter than that of the group B(P < 0.05). The blood loss, exposure time under X line, drainage flow and down-ground time in A group were lower than those in B group, which had statistical significance (P<0.05) ; A and B groups of patients were compared, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05) ; Preoperative, Comparison of VAS scores between A and B groups, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05) . On the first day of postoperative, the VAS score of group A was lower than that of groupB, which had statistical significance (P < 0.05). Preoperative, Comparison of JOA scores between A and B groups, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05) ; Comparison of JOA scores between 1 month ,3 months and 6 months in Postoperative, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The JOA scores of the two groups at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperative were significantly lower than those Preoperative (P < 0.05). Six months postoperative, the lumbar anterior convex angle, segmental anterior convex angle and intervertebral height of the two groups were significantly higher than those Preoperative (P<0.05), and the pelvic inclination angle of the two groups was lower than that Preoperative (P<0.05).Conclusion MIS-TLIF in the treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis using MED channel or Quadrant channel operation has curative effect, and there is little difference in the recovery of lumbar-pelvis imaging parameters, but the former has the advantages of less surgical trauma and lower postoperative pain.

scholarly journals Techniques of Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A comparative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-261
Author(s):  
Gabriel Iacob ◽  
Abdul Salam ◽  
Abdul Rahman Hawis
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Common Type ◽  
Lumbar Canal Stenosis ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Lateral Recess Stenosis ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Abstract Aim: To compare between classic open surgeries and minimally invasive surgeries in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Methods: A comparative descriptive study, involved 117 patients suffering from lumbar canal stenosis, aged between 40-70 years; admitted to department of Neurosurgery from March 2011 till august 2016 in King Fahad Hospital in Saudi Arabia. Study groups are consisted of group A as patients managed with classical laminectomy, group B as patients managed with Endoscopic spinal procedures and group C as patients managed with Microscopic decompression facilitated by the Metrex Tubular System. SPSS was used in data entry and analysis, and ethical considerations taken into consideration and participants filled the required inform consents. Results: Age of particaoncet ranged from 45 - 63 Year, Mean +/- 50. The degenerative canal stenosis with acute disc single level (cauda equina syndrome) was the most common type of lumbar canal stenosis encountered in group A, the unilateral foraminal and lateral recess stenosis without disc prolapse was the most common type of lumbar canal stenosis encountered in group B, while The unilateral foraminal and lateral recess stenosis without disc prolapse was the most common type of lumbar canal stenosis encountered in group C. Classic laminectomy and disectomy used mostly in group A, endoscopic unilateral decompression lamino-foraminotomy without discectomy used mostly in group B and bilateral microscopic laminectomy without discectomy followed by unilateral microscopic lamino-foraminotomy without discectomy used mostly in group C. Mean of operation duration was the highest in both gender of group A, followed by group B, then group C. Unintended durotomy was the most common intra operative complications occurred in the whole study especially in group A. Mean of blood lost was the highest in both gender of group A, followed by group B, then group C. Postop complications in the patients of study Groups was the highest in group A (33.3 %) ,followed by group B (8.5 %) and then group C (2 %). Conclusion: Microscopic decompression facilitated by the Metrex Tubular System is the most effective techniques of Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and the least intraoperative and post-operative complications.

scholarly journals Effect of microscopically assisted decompression with micro-hook scalpel in the surgical treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 5120-5129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng Yang ◽  
Jianmin Lu ◽  
Dapeng Fu ◽  
Depeng Shang ◽  
Fei Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Recovery Rate ◽  
Spinal Canal ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Posterior Surgery ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective This study was performed to investigate the effect of microscopically assisted decompression using a micro-hook scalpel on ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Methods Sixty-one patients with OPLL were divided into Group A (posterior surgery with laminectomy of the responsible segment and lateral mass screw fixation) and Group B (anterior cervical corpectomy with intervertebral titanium cage fusion). Neurological function was assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and recovery rate. The fixation status and the result of spinal canal decompression were radiographically assessed. Results In Groups A and B, the JOA score was significantly higher and the VAS score was significantly lower at 1 week postoperatively and at the final follow-up than during the preoperative period. The mean recovery rate in Group A and B was 59.92% ± 13.46% and 62.28% ± 14.00%, respectively. Postoperative radiographs showed good positioning and no damage to the internal fixation materials. The spinal canal was also fully decompressed. Conclusions Microscopically assisted decompression with a micro-hook scalpel in both anterior and posterior surgeries achieved good clinical effects in patients with OPLL.

Lumbar Canal Stenosis: A Prospective Clinicoradiologic Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (05) ◽  
pp. 387-391
Author(s):  
Nikhil Jain ◽  
Shankar Acharya ◽  
Nitin Maruti Adsul ◽  
Mukesh Kumar Haritwal ◽  
Manoj Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Spinal Canal ◽  
Neurogenic Claudication ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Background Although spinal canal narrowing is thought to be the defining feature for the clinical diagnosis of lumbar canal stenosis, the degree of spinal canal stenosis necessary to elicit neurologic symptoms is not clear. Several studies have been performed to detect an association between a narrow spinal canal and clinical symptoms. Through our prospective study, we compared the radiologic criteria with the clinical criteria using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and assessed how they correlate. Materials and Methods We used the qualitative grading (morphological classification system on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) system, dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA), and sedimentation sign on MRI images and compared them with the Self-Paced Walking Ability (Self-Paced Walking Test) and ODI of the patients in the study. The systems were applied to 85 patients divided into three groups: group A: 43 patients with neurogenic claudication and able to walk < 30 minutes; group B: 11 patients with neurogenic claudication and able to walk > 30 minutes; and group C: 31 patients with simple back pain and no signs of neurologic claudication. Results The mean ODI was 21.19 in group C, 46.50 in group B, and 61.95 in group A. The difference was statistically significant. The mean DSCA was 164.42 mm2 in group C, 49.94 mm2 in group B, and 35.07 mm2 in group A. The difference was statistically significant. The sedimentation sign was negative in 96.8% patients in group C, 54.5% patients in group B, and 32.6% patients in group A. The difference was statistically significant. Group C had 9.3% patients in morphology grade A3, 51.6% in grade A2, and 38.7% patients in grade A1. Group B had 63.6% patients in grade C, 18.2% patients in grade B, 9.1% in grade A4, and 9.1% in grade A3. Group A had 18.6% patients in grade D, 39.5% in grade C, 27.9% in grade B, 11.6% in grade A4, and 2.3% in grade A3. The mean DSCA of group C was significantly different from group A and group B, but the difference of the mean DSCA between group A and group B was not statistically significant. The relationship of ODI to DSCA, ODI to sedimentation sign, and ODI to morphological grading for group C and group A was not statistically significant. The relationship of morphological grading to DSCA was statistically significant for all three groups. Conclusion DSCA, morphological grading, and sedimentation sign are good to excellent radiologic indicators differentiating patients with simple back pain from those with lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinically, ODI is an excellent indicator of the severity of stenosis. But ODI statistically has no significant correlation to any of these radiologic parameters.

scholarly journals The Effect of Bone Cement Distribution on the Outcome of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: A Case Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Tan ◽  
Bingtao Wen ◽  
Zhaoqing Guo ◽  
Zhongqiang Chen
Keyword(s):  
Bone Cement ◽  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty ◽  
Vertebral Height ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cement Distribution ◽  
Post Operation ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background: To analyze the effect of different types of bone cement distribution after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). Methods: 137 patients withsinglelevelOVCF who underwent PVP were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to bone cementdistribution. Group A:bone cement contacted both upper and lower endplates; Group B: bone cement missed at least one endplate. Group Bwas divided into 3 subgroups. Group B1: bone cement only contacted the upper endplates; Group B2: bone cement only contacted the lower endplates; Group B3: bone cement only located in the middle of vertebral body. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scoreat 24 hours post operation and last follow-up, anterior vertebral height restoration ratio (AVHRR), anterior vertebral height loss ratio (AVHLR) and vertebral body recompression ratewere compared. Results: 24 hours post operation, the pain of all groups were significantly improved. At the last follow-up, the VAS score of group A was lower than that of group B. There were 9 cases (6.6%) of cement leakage, 4 cases (6.9%) in group A and 5 cases (6.3%) in group B. At the last follow-up, there were 16 cases (11.7%) of vertebral body recompression, including 3 cases (5.2%) in group A and 13 cases (16.5%) in group B. There was no significant difference in AVHRR between two groups. At the last follow-up, AVHLR in group B was higher than that in group A. In subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in VAS score,vertebral recompression rate, AVHRR or AVHLR.Conclusions: If the bone cement fully contacted both the upper and lower endplates, it can better restore the strength of the vertebral bodyand maintain the height of the vertebral body, reduce the risk of the vertebral body recompression and long term pain.

Relationship between Traumatic Spinal Canal Stenosis and Neurologic Deficits in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

1996 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 1124
Author(s):  
Yong-Goo Lee ◽  
Jang-Seok Choi ◽  
Young-Chang Kim ◽  
Hyun-Duck Yoo ◽  
Sung-Seok Seo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Canal ◽  
Spinal Canal Stenosis ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Neurologic Deficits ◽  
Burst Fractures

Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures with Polymethyl Methacrylate Vertebroplasty and Short-segment Pedicle Screw Fixation

Neurosurgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1354-1361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Der-Yang Cho ◽  
Wuen-Yen Lee ◽  
Pon-Chun Sheu
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Vertebral Height ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Kyphosis Correction ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of reinforcing short-segment pedicle screw fixation with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) vertebroplasty in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures. METHODS We enrolled 70 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures for treatment with short-segment pedicle screw fixation. Fractures in Group A (n = 20) were reinforced with PMMA vertebroplasty during surgery. Group B patients (n = 50) were not treated with PMMA vertebroplasty. Kyphotic deformity, anterior vertebral height, instrument failure rates, and neurological function outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Kyphosis correction was achieved in Group A (PMMA vertebroplasty) and Group B (Group A, 6.4 degrees; Group B, 5.4 degrees). At the end of the follow-up period, kyphosis correction was maintained in Group A but lost in Group B (Group A, 0.33-degree loss; Group B, 6.20-degree loss) (P = 0.0001). After surgery, greater anterior vertebral height was achieved in Group A than in Group B (Group A, 12.9%; Group B, 2.3%) (P &lt; 0.001). During follow-up, anterior vertebral height was maintained only in Group A (Group A, 0.13 ± 4.06%; Group B, −6.17 ± 1.21%) (P &lt; 0.001). Patients in both Groups A and B demonstrated good postoperative Denis Pain Scale grades (P1 and P2), but Group A had better results than Group B in terms of the control of severe and constant pain (P4 and P5) (P &lt; 0.001). The Frankel Performance Scale scores increased by nearly 1 in both Groups A and B. Group B was subdivided into Group B1 and B2. Group B1 consisted of patients who experienced instrument failure, including screw pullout, breakage, disconnection, and dislodgement (n = 11). Group B2 comprised patients from Group B who did not experience instrument failure (n = 39). There were no instrument failures among patients in Group A. Preoperative kyphotic deformity was greater in Group B1 (23.5 ± 7.9 degrees) than in Group B2 (16.8 ± 8.40 degrees), P &lt; 0.05. Severe and constant pain (P4 and P5) was noted in 36% of Group B1 patients (P &lt; 0.001), and three of these patients required removal of their implants. CONCLUSION Reinforcement of short-segment pedicle fixation with PMMA vertebroplasty for the treatment of patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture may achieve and maintain kyphosis correction, and it may also increase and maintain anterior vertebral height. Good Denis Pain Scale grades and improvement in Frankel Performance Scale scores were found in patients without instrument failure (Groups A and B2). Patients with greater preoperative kyphotic deformity had a higher risk of instrument failure if they did not undergo reinforcement with vertebroplasty. PMMA vertebroplasty offers immediate spinal stability in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures, decreases the instrument failure rate, and provides better postoperative pain control than without vertebroplasty.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document